|
#3
| |||
| |||
| In misc.taxes.moderated, JoeTaxpayer wrote: - quote - > DF2 wrote:
I would probably have been one of them, were it not for reading MTM.> > I was surprised that there was no supporting form -- schedule A or > > otherwise-- printed out by my tax program supporting the increased > > line 40 "Itemized deductions (from Schedule A) or your standard > > deduction (see left margin)" on form 1040. > I just finished the forms for my 80+ yr old. I used TurboTax and saw the > same thing. I pulled up a schedule A to enter the real estate tax, and > it flowed to the standard deduction worksheet, properly giveing her the > extra $500 deduction, but the Schedule A promptly evaporated. It did > maintain the Sch A Tax and interest (keep for records) worksheet, but > that was it. > I bet this is one that many non-itemizers will miss. I have alerted friends. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| DF2 wrote: - quote - > I was surprised that there was no supporting form -- schedule A or
I just finished the forms for my 80+ yr old. I used TurboTax and saw the> otherwise-- printed out by my tax program supporting the increased > line 40 "Itemized deductions (from Schedule A) or your standard > deduction (see left margin)" on form 1040. same thing. I pulled up a schedule A to enter the real estate tax, and it flowed to the standard deduction worksheet, properly giveing her the extra $500 deduction, but the Schedule A promptly evaporated. It did maintain the Sch A Tax and interest (keep for records) worksheet, but that was it. I bet this is one that many non-itemizers will miss. Joe -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| In misc.taxes.moderated, Arthur Kamlet wrote: - quote - > In article <3Zudnf7-O4YiUFvUnZ2dnUVZ_guWnZ2d[at]earthlink.com> ,
I was surprised that there was no supporting form -- schedule A or> CWLee <cdubyalee[at]post.harvard.edu> wrote: > > > Pages 34 and 35 of the 1040 instructions for 2008 IRS > > returns speak of the standard deduction being increased, > > under certain circumstances, due to real estate taxes. > > > My standard deduction would be $5,450, if I paid no real > > estate taxes. As I work through the worksheet on page 35, > > with no earned income, born before 1.2.1944, filing > > separately, and having paid real estate taxes of $2,000, I > > find that my standard deduction becomes $2,450. > > > It doesn't seem logical to me that my standard deduction > > goes down just because I paid some real estate taxes - so I > > think I'm not doing something correctly here. > The right answer is 5950 unless filing status is MFJ. > So re-read the line-by-line instruictions on that worksheet. otherwise-- printed out by my tax program supporting the increased line 40 "Itemized deductions (from Schedule A) or your standard deduction (see left margin)" on form 1040. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| | |||
| |||
| In article <3Zudnf7-O4YiUFvUnZ2dnUVZ_guWnZ2d[at]earthlink.com> , CWLee <cdubyalee[at]post.harvard.edu> wrote: - quote - > Pages 34 and 35 of the 1040 instructions for 2008 IRS > returns speak of the standard deduction being increased, > under certain circumstances, due to real estate taxes. > My standard deduction would be $5,450, if I paid no real > estate taxes. As I work through the worksheet on page 35, > with no earned income, born before 1.2.1944, filing > separately, and having paid real estate taxes of $2,000, I > find that my standard deduction becomes $2,450. > It doesn't seem logical to me that my standard deduction > goes down just because I paid some real estate taxes - so I > think I'm not doing something correctly here. The right answer is 5950 unless filing status is MFJ. So re-read the line-by-line instruictions on that worksheet. -- ArtKamlet at a o l dot c o m Columbus OH K2PZH -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Pages 34 and 35 of the 1040 instructions for 2008 IRS returns speak of the standard deduction being increased, under certain circumstances, due to real estate taxes. My standard deduction would be $5,450, if I paid no real estate taxes. As I work through the worksheet on page 35, with no earned income, born before 1.2.1944, filing separately, and having paid real estate taxes of $2,000, I find that my standard deduction becomes $2,450. It doesn't seem logical to me that my standard deduction goes down just because I paid some real estate taxes - so I think I'm not doing something correctly here. Any enlightenment appreciated. -- ---------- CWLee Former slayer of dragons; practice now limited to sacred cows. Believing we should hire for quality, not quotas, and promote for performance, not preferences. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| NJ deduction for taxes paid on rental real estate kupchik@hotmail.com: On Feb 17, 6:26 am, kupc...@hotmail.com wrote: > In NJ you can get a deduction or a credit for real estate taxes paid. > Does this include real... | Taxes | 1 | 02-17-2009 08:39 PM | |
| May I capitalize my real estate taxes? NadCixelsyd: removeps-groups@yahoo.com wrote: > On Feb 9, 4:02 pm, Alan <sfcnm-...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> removeps-gro...@yahoo.com wrote: >>> Where does it say... | Taxes | 10 | 02-10-2009 06:10 PM | |
| How can my son deduct my real estate taxes? NadCixelsyd: I own a house. My son lives with my wife and me. I derive no income- tax benefit to deducting the real estate taxes. Rather than pay rent, I've... | Taxes | 1 | 08-05-2007 08:16 PM | |
| New York IT-201-ATT and real estate taxes Bmsdelp: A question on itemized deductions. I can't believe that New York allows a deduction for Florida real estate taxes. But I can't find anything that... | Taxes | 5 | 09-16-2004 04:05 AM | |
| Taxes on real estate David from Boston: I purchased a piece of land with 7 garages in June -2002. In September -2003, I razed the garages and built a six unit building I will be selling... | Taxes | 1 | 05-19-2004 07:25 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |