|
#5
| |||
| |||
| <removeps-groups[at]yahoo.com> wrote in message news:5ca5bd84-8435-4576-9276-e8f7db4ea26b[at]b7g2000pre.googlegroups.com... - quote - > On Mar 20, 9:27 pm, "Kevin" <ke...[at]rocketmail.com> wrote:
Your explanation makes more sense, but obviously that isn't a contraint.> > > No. See > > > http://www.irs.gov/publications/p525...blink100098400 > > I appreciate your help; you may have saved me some serious money! > The other thread says that the full reimbursement is taxable > regardless of how much was deducted in the previous year. So maybe > your accountant was right and my information was not. I'm looking for > a court case on the internet for my learning. But I've already spent the money! Thanks. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| On Mar 20, 9:27 pm, "Kevin" <ke...[at]rocketmail.com> wrote: - quote - > > No. See
The other thread says that the full reimbursement is taxable> > http://www.irs.gov/publications/p525...blink100098400 > I appreciate your help; you may have saved me some serious money! regardless of how much was deducted in the previous year. So maybe your accountant was right and my information was not. I'm looking for a court case on the internet for my learning. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| <removeps-groups[at]yahoo.com> wrote in message news:84914ff3-7d73-4d19-bd0b-2f72033a3826[at]n33g2000pri.googlegroups.com... - quote - > On Mar 20, 5:12 pm, "Kevin" <Ke...[at]rocketmail.com> wrote: > > I am pretty sure it is taxable if the legal fees were deducted; at least > > that is what my attorney told me at the settlement. > > > My question is if I couldn't deduct them because they didn't exceed 2% of > > my > > AGI; are they still taxable. > No. See > http://www.irs.gov/publications/p525...blink100098400 > Tax benefit rule. You must include a recovery in your income in the > year you receive it up to the amount by which the deduction or credit > you took for the recovered amount reduced your tax in the earlier > year. For this purpose, any increase to an amount carried over to the > current year that resulted from the deduction or credit is considered > to have reduced your tax in the earlier year. > And be aware, even if the legal fees did exceed 2% of AGI, the > deduction is not allowed under AMT, so if you were under AMT you > wouldn't have received a benefit from this deduction. > If only part of the fees was deductible because of the 2% rule, then > the reimbursement is only partly deductible in my opinion. I appreciate your help; you may have saved me some serious money! Lets say I got legal fee reimbursement of $60,000 in 2007 which covered $20,000 paid in 2007 and $40,000 paid in earlier years. I SHOULD have paid tax on $40,000 because that is all I deducted in earlier years. The remaining $20,000 is not income because it simply offsets the $20,000 in 2007 legal fees that I haven't deducted. Is that it? I ran the numbers through Taxcut and it says that I get $8,000 back! (because I paid tax on the entire $60,000 and couldn't deduct the $20,000 in legal fees.) To take this one step further; if I only got to deduct $15,000 of that $40,000 in earlier years because of either AMT or the 2% of AGI rule, than I only have to pay taxes on $15,000 of the reimbursement; right? That will take a few hours of work to straighten out, but if it saves me another $10,000... Although I did my tax return first on Taxcut for 2007 to get organized, I had an accountant actually do it for real because it was complicated and I wanted to make sure I didn't have any errors. He missed this. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| On Mar 20, 5:12 pm, "Kevin" <Ke...[at]rocketmail.com> wrote: - quote - > I am pretty sure it is taxable if the legal fees were deducted; at least
No. See http://www.irs.gov/publications/p525...blink100098400> that is what my attorney told me at the settlement. > My question is if I couldn't deduct them because they didn't exceed 2% of my > AGI; are they still taxable. Tax benefit rule. You must include a recovery in your income in the year you receive it up to the amount by which the deduction or credit you took for the recovered amount reduced your tax in the earlier year. For this purpose, any increase to an amount carried over to the current year that resulted from the deduction or credit is considered to have reduced your tax in the earlier year. And be aware, even if the legal fees did exceed 2% of AGI, the deduction is not allowed under AMT, so if you were under AMT you wouldn't have received a benefit from this deduction. If only part of the fees was deductible because of the 2% rule, then the reimbursement is only partly deductible in my opinion. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| "mrosen" <mrosen[at]gmail.com> wrote in message news:706455f5-82d4-4f50-a8cb-f9931d4753c1[at]g38g2000yqd.googlegroups.com... - quote - > On Mar 19, 5:49 pm, "Kevin" <Ke...[at]rocketmail.com> wrote:
that is what my attorney told me at the settlement.> > I settled a lawsuit and got reimbursement for my legal fees. > > > I didn't deduct the legal fees when I paid them because my miscellaneous > > deductions didn't exceed 2% of my AGI as required. > > > Do I have to PAY taxes on the reimbursement? > > I don't think so. It's a reimbursement of expenses, net zero. I am pretty sure it is taxable if the legal fees were deducted; at least My question is if I couldn't deduct them because they didn't exceed 2% of my AGI; are they still taxable. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| | |||
| |||
| On Mar 19, 5:49*pm, "Kevin" <Ke...[at]rocketmail.com> wrote: - quote - > I settled a lawsuit and got reimbursement for my legal fees.
I don't think so. It's a reimbursement of expenses, net zero.> I didn't deduct the legal fees when I paid them because my miscellaneous > deductions didn't exceed 2% of my AGI as required. > Do I have to PAY taxes on the reimbursement? -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I settled a lawsuit and got reimbursement for my legal fees. I didn't deduct the legal fees when I paid them because my miscellaneous deductions didn't exceed 2% of my AGI as required. Do I have to PAY taxes on the reimbursement? -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| How can my son deduct my real estate taxes? NadCixelsyd: I own a house. My son lives with my wife and me. I derive no income- tax benefit to deducting the real estate taxes. Rather than pay rent, I've... | Taxes | 1 | 08-05-2007 08:16 PM | |
| Didn't get distribution from S-Corp to cover taxes kkallmes@gmail.com: I live in Ohio but held stock in a company in Massachusetts during 2005. I paid $ 2000 in taxes for taxes due that year but have never received a... | Taxes | 4 | 05-31-2007 04:58 AM | |
| Can I deduct property taxes paid in escrow? HarAhd@aol.com: We bought a rental property in Oct. of 2005. Property taxes were paid in escrow from Oct. through Jan. 1, 2006. Can we deduct that amount on our... | Taxes | 2 | 02-05-2006 12:25 AM | |
| Which taxes can I deduct? John D. Goulden: Hi, long time lurker and infrequent poster...we purchased a new home in 2004 and prepaid a lot of the taxes at closing. These include: Ad... | Taxes | 4 | 02-10-2005 06:49 AM | |
| Didn't file 2001 taxes Jason: I filed my 2002 taxes, but didn't file my 2001 taxes. I am using 1040ez and don't owe anything. Should i go ahead and send in my 2001 taxes, or... | Taxes | 6 | 08-31-2003 09:55 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |