|
#18
| |||
| |||
| On Mar 24, 1:54 pm, Mark Bole <ma...[at]pacbell.net> wrote: - quote - > While you're at it, you better check to see if you are actually entitled
Stepdaughter, actually. I paid her rent at various> to claim your adult daughter as your own dependent. rehab centers and halfway houses, certainly more that she received in food stamps. -- Charles Packer http://cpacker.org/whatnews mailboxATcpacker.org -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#17
| |||
| |||
| Mark Bole wrote: .... - quote - > One more time: to determine whether a child can be claimed by anyone as
I had thought the discussion had moved past the determination at that> a dependent, it is COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT whether the parent (or other > potential claimee) paid more than half of support. All that matters is > that the child did not pay more than half of his OWN support. .... point -- I was speaking to the philosophical question at that point... But, if the dependent is <50%, _someone_ (or groups of someones) must be making up the rest, ergo > 50%. ![]() Here from OP's posting the father seemed the likely candidate. That isn't the specific wording/requirement of the IRS code, granted, but that wasn't intent here. -- -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#16
| |||
| |||
| Charles Packer wrote: - quote - > On Mar 22, 9:23 pm, dpb <n...[at]non.net> wrote:
One more time: to determine whether a child can be claimed by anyone as> > One might say he already has by contributing more than 50% of son's > > annual support... a dependent, it is COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT whether the parent (or other potential claimee) paid more than half of support. All that matters is that the child did not pay more than half of his OWN support. Support is independent of income. Funds for support can include savings, loans, gifts, inheritances, wages, investment income, illegal income, and nontaxable government aid. What matters is what did it cost, and who paid it. - quote - > You mean that, in effect, the son is assuming the tax
I expect my kids to mow the grass and take out the garbage, at minimum.> burden for the time his father was supporting him? > But he wasn't working while living with his father, and > we typically don't think of a non-working juvenile as > owing anything to his parents. - quote - > On recomputing his tax without the exemption for self,
I wonder what the VITA appointment schedule looks like these last three> I find that, at his low income level, it doubles his > tax, and this seems to be unfair. In fact, I'm going to > urge him to have the returns looked over by one of > those tax clinic volunteers to make sure I haven't > missed something. weeks before filing deadline...but your step-grandson surely can file an extension request without anyone's assistance. While you're at it, you better check to see if you are actually entitled to claim your adult daughter as your own dependent. -Mark Bole -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#15
| |||
| |||
| Charles Packer wrote: - quote - > You mean that, in effect, the son is assuming the tax
We do typically think of such children as at least owing their parents> burden for the time his father was supporting him? > But he wasn't working while living with his father, and > we typically don't think of a non-working juvenile as > owing anything to his parents. the dependent exemption on the parents' annual taxes, as long as said children live at least six months with a parent and the parent provides over half the child's support blah blah. Where would this boy have lived and how would he have fed himself had his father not supported him for some six months in the tax year in question? No fair interjecting that the father stunk because of this or that. Did the father provide food and shelter to keep the boy alive and without breaking the law? -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#14
| |||
| |||
| Charles Packer wrote: - quote - > On Mar 22, 9:23 pm, dpb <n...[at]non.net> wrote: > > One might say he already has by contributing more than 50% of son's > > annual support... > You mean that, in effect, the son is assuming the tax > burden for the time his father was supporting him? > But he wasn't working while living with his father, and > we typically don't think of a non-working juvenile as > owing anything to his parents. > On recomputing his tax without the exemption for self, > I find that, at his low income level, it doubles his > tax, and this seems to be unfair. In fact, I'm going to > urge him to have the returns looked over by one of > those tax clinic volunteers to make sure I haven't > missed something. .... "Fair" has little to do w/ IRS Code... (or perhaps?)I tend to agree that underage working kids get short shrift on some of the provisions as compared to adults--perhaps that's intentional in the Code to try to convince them they ought to stay in school. -- -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#13
| |||
| |||
| On Mar 22, 9:23*pm, dpb <n...[at]non.net> wrote: - quote - > One might say he already has by contributing more than 50% of son's
You mean that, in effect, the son is assuming the tax> annual support... burden for the time his father was supporting him? But he wasn't working while living with his father, and we typically don't think of a non-working juvenile as owing anything to his parents. On recomputing his tax without the exemption for self, I find that, at his low income level, it doubles his tax, and this seems to be unfair. In fact, I'm going to urge him to have the returns looked over by one of those tax clinic volunteers to make sure I haven't missed something. -- Charles Packer http://cpacker.org/whatnews mailboxATcpacker.org -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| Charles Packer wrote: .... - quote - > an assumption here that the father will make it up to
One might say he already has by contributing more than 50% of son's> his son somehow. .... annual support... -- -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| On Mar 21, 11:40 am, paultry <afn0255...[at]afn.org> wrote: - quote - > Charles Packer wrote:
Interesting. Yes, I re-read the rules on who must file> > ...and he didn't pay for more than half his support, > > I'm sure. His father certainly can claim him. So I'm > > sure I can correctly tell grandson: Ask your dad > > to claim you, then you won't have to pay those taxes > > I calculated that you owe because you foolishly didn't > No, Dad can claim Son, but Son still has to file a return, > report his own income, and pay tax on that income. In fact, > Son's tax amount will be greater because he can't claim an > exemption for himself. and I see that he has to file...and line 6a says "If someone can claim you as a dependent" you can't claim the exemption for self. This is fundamentally unfair to anybody in grandson's position. the father benefits by claiming him as a dependent, and he has to pay "extra" for not being able to exempt himself. There seems to be an assumption here that the father will make it up to his son somehow. -- Charles Packer http://cpacker.org/whatnews mailboxATcpacker.org -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| paultry wrote: - quote - > Charles Packer wrote:
And OP can instead tell grandson "welcome to the real world", huh!!??? > > ...and he didn't pay for more than half his support, > > I'm sure. His father certainly can claim him. So I'm > > sure I can correctly tell grandson: Ask your dad > > to claim you, then you won't have to pay those taxes > > I calculated that you owe because you foolishly didn't > > let your employers withhold enough. But then he's going > > to say: How do I get back what _was_ withheld? And > > all I can say at this point is: I dunno...maybe it's > > up to your Dad. True? .... > No, Dad can claim Son, but Son still has to file a return, report his > own income, and pay tax on that income. In fact, Son's tax amount will > be greater because he can't claim an exemption for himself. ![]() -- -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| Charles Packer wrote: - quote - > ...and he didn't pay for more than half his support,
No, Dad can claim Son, but Son still has to file a return,> I'm sure. His father certainly can claim him. So I'm > sure I can correctly tell grandson: Ask your dad > to claim you, then you won't have to pay those taxes > I calculated that you owe because you foolishly didn't > let your employers withhold enough. But then he's going > to say: How do I get back what _was_ withheld? And > all I can say at this point is: I dunno...maybe it's > up to your Dad. True? > -- > Charles Packer > http://cpacker.org/whatnews > mailboxATcpacker.org report his own income, and pay tax on that income. In fact, Son's tax amount will be greater because he can't claim an exemption for himself. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| On Mar 20, 9:22 am, "Phil Marti" <prm20...[at]verizon.net> wrote: - quote - > "Frank S. Duke, Jr." wrote:
....and he didn't pay for more than half his support,> > In order for his father to claim him as a dependent, the father had to > > provide more than 1/2 of his support and your grandson had to live with > > his > > father more than 1/2 the year. Attending college or boarding school is > > considered a temporary absence and is ignored. > This is incorrect. The support test for a qualifying child is whether the > CHILD provided more than half his own support. I'm sure. His father certainly can claim him. So I'm sure I can correctly tell grandson: Ask your dad to claim you, then you won't have to pay those taxes I calculated that you owe because you foolishly didn't let your employers withhold enough. But then he's going to say: How do I get back what _was_ withheld? And all I can say at this point is: I dunno...maybe it's up to your Dad. True? -- Charles Packer http://cpacker.org/whatnews mailboxATcpacker.org -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| "Phil Marti" <prm20871[at]verizon.net> wrote in message news:gHPwl.1395$SU3.1359[at]nwrddc02.gnilink.net... - quote - > "Charles Packer" wrote:
Since he is under age 19 on December 31, how much he actually earned has no> > > Does he live with you? Maybe you are providing more than half his > > > support. > > No, he lives alone. He lived with his father until > > Sept. of last year, so I presume he could be claimed > > as a dependent by his father. > We're back to his support. The question is whether your grandson provided > more than half his own support for the year. If he did, he's nobody's > dependent and claims his own personal exemption. If he didn't, only his > father (or possibly someone else living in that household more than 6 > months) can claim him. (I'm assuming his parents don't live together.) > > At this point, what I want to know is this: > > what are the mechanics of claiming a dependent when > > said dependant has worked and has a W2? I can't > > recall anywhere seeing instructions on that say > > "attach dependents' W2 here..." > W-2 income is reported on only the return of the person who earned it. That > includes dependents. bearing. What he did with his income (i.e. put towards his support or not) does. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| "Charles Packer" wrote: - quote - > > Does he live with you? Maybe you are providing more than half his
We're back to his support. The question is whether your grandson provided> > support. > No, he lives alone. He lived with his father until > Sept. of last year, so I presume he could be claimed > as a dependent by his father. more than half his own support for the year. If he did, he's nobody's dependent and claims his own personal exemption. If he didn't, only his father (or possibly someone else living in that household more than 6 months) can claim him. (I'm assuming his parents don't live together.) - quote - > At this point, what I want to know is this:
W-2 income is reported on only the return of the person who earned it. That> what are the mechanics of claiming a dependent when > said dependant has worked and has a W2? I can't > recall anywhere seeing instructions on that say > "attach dependents' W2 here..." includes dependents. -- Phil Marti Clarksburg, MD -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| On Mar 19, 5:04 pm, "Paul Thomas, CPA" <paulthomascp...[at]bellsouth.netwrote: - quote - > Does he live with you? Maybe you are providing more than half his support.
No, he lives alone. He lived with his father untilSept. of last year, so I presume he could be claimed as a dependent by his father. Incidentally, I'm claiming his mother as a dependent. Don't tell me I could have claimed him through his mother! It's too late; I've already filed. At this point, what I want to know is this: what are the mechanics of claiming a dependent when said dependant has worked and has a W2? I can't recall anywhere seeing instructions on that say "attach dependents' W2 here..." -- Charles Packer http://cpacker.org/whatnews mailboxATcpacker.org -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| "Frank S. Duke, Jr." wrote: - quote - > In order for his father to claim him as a dependent, the father had to
This is incorrect. The support test for a qualifying child is whether the> provide more than 1/2 of his support and your grandson had to live with > his > father more than 1/2 the year. Attending college or boarding school is > considered a temporary absence and is ignored. CHILD provided more than half his own support. See Publication 501. -- Phil Marti Clarksburg, MD -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| in article 9eacb881-d4ad-4e65-8445-18b26cac07e8...oglegroups.com, Charles Packer at mailbox[at]cpacker.org wrote on 3/19/09 3:01 PM: - quote - > My 18-year-old step-grandson wants me to do his taxes.
provide more than 1/2 of his support and your grandson had to live with his> It seemed straightforward -- just a bunch of W2s > from his several jobs -- until I started to think > too much...like maybe there's this earned income > thing that applies to people who are poor...like > maybe he should be claimed as a dependent by his > father. > He made only about $10K, but he doesn't qualify for > the earned income credit because he's under 25. > This seemed unfair to me until I realized that he > could be claimed as a dependent by his father, > (whose house he fled when he turned 18). > -- > Charles Packer > http://cpacker.org/whatnews > mailboxATcpacker.org In order for his father to claim him as a dependent, the father had to father more than 1/2 the year. Attending college or boarding school is considered a temporary absence and is ignored. Support is everything the young man spent to live, room, board, tuition, spending money, medical insurance, car insurance, utilities, etc. So the first question is where did he live and for how long and the second is who provided his support? Uncompensated advice guaranteed correct or double your money back Frank S. Duke, Jr. CPA Cincinnati, OH USA -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| "Charles Packer" <mailbox[at]cpacker.org> wrote - quote - > My 18-year-old step-grandson wants me to do his taxes. > It seemed straightforward -- just a bunch of W2s > from his several jobs -- until I started to think > too much...like maybe there's this earned income > thing that applies to people who are poor He's not old enough to participate in EITC, - quote - > ..like maybe he should be claimed as a dependent > by his father. Maybe. The facts and circumstances would dictate if he's a dependent of someone else. - quote - > He made only about $10K, but he doesn't qualify for > the earned income credit because he's under 25. > This seemed unfair to me until I realized that he > could be claimed as a dependent by his father, > (whose house he fled when he turned 18). > On the basis of pure logic, then, that must be the most > advantageous thing to do. However, I don't want to > lay it on him that he has to negotiate with his father > unless absolutely necessary. Maybe I should just > send him to one of those free tax clinics that are > available around this time of year. But will their > volunteers know enough to navigate a situation > like this? Maybe they would. If "father" provided more than half his support for the year, then "father" can claim him. If "father" didn't provide more than half his support for the year, then.....maybe he's not a dependent. Does he live with you? Maybe you are providing more than half his support. If not for 2008, then maybe for 2009. Dig around some more about the dependency rules to see where he falls for 2008 and looking forward, for 2009. -- Paul Thomas, CPA Watkinsville, Georgia -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| If your grandson provides over 1/2 his own support then his father is NOT eligible to claim him as a dependent. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| | |||
| |||
| "Charles Packer" wrote: - quote - > My 18-year-old step-grandson wants me to do his taxes.
As one of those volunteers I can assure you they're well trained, and> It seemed straightforward -- just a bunch of W2s > from his several jobs -- until I started to think > too much...like maybe there's this earned income > thing that applies to people who are poor...like > maybe he should be claimed as a dependent by his > father. Never having had children myself, I realized > I was in the woods, maybe in the swamp, > tax-rules-wise. > He made only about $10K, but he doesn't qualify for > the earned income credit because he's under 25. > This seemed unfair to me until I realized that he > could be claimed as a dependent by his father, > (whose house he fled when he turned 18). > On the basis of pure logic, then, that must be the most > advantageous thing to do. However, I don't want to > lay it on him that he has to negotiate with his father > unless absolutely necessary. Maybe I should just > send him to one of those free tax clinics that are > available around this time of year. But will their > volunteers know enough to navigate a situation > like this? they've seen just about every kind of family situation you can imagine if they've been at it for any time. The rules for determining dependency are in IRS Publication 501. It's not dealer's choice. Either he can be claimed by his father or he cannot. If his father can claim him he can't claim his own personal exemption even if his father doesn't claim it. I'm not sure whether you were talking about only him regarding the Earned Income Credit or also his father. As you note, he's not eligible, but if his father is and the son was a qualifying child for EIC, it could be to the father's advantage. Note that he could be a qualifying child for EIC even if his father can't claim him as a dependent. Those rules are in the 1040 instructions. It would be best for all concerned if he and his father discussed this, but you know the family dynamics. If it's best for them not to talk right now, he can go ahead and file according to the rules. The downside is that if he and his father file conflicting returns, the IRS will be in touch with both of them to resolve it. See "family dynamics" above, but I wouldn't get in the middle of it on a bet. Send him to a clinic if he won't talk to his father about it. -- Phil Marti Clarksburg, MD -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| My 18-year-old step-grandson wants me to do his taxes. It seemed straightforward -- just a bunch of W2s from his several jobs -- until I started to think too much...like maybe there's this earned income thing that applies to people who are poor...like maybe he should be claimed as a dependent by his father. Never having had children myself, I realized I was in the woods, maybe in the swamp, tax-rules-wise. He made only about $10K, but he doesn't qualify for the earned income credit because he's under 25. This seemed unfair to me until I realized that he could be claimed as a dependent by his father, (whose house he fled when he turned 18). On the basis of pure logic, then, that must be the most advantageous thing to do. However, I don't want to lay it on him that he has to negotiate with his father unless absolutely necessary. Maybe I should just send him to one of those free tax clinics that are available around this time of year. But will their volunteers know enough to navigate a situation like this? -- Charles Packer http://cpacker.org/whatnews mailboxATcpacker.org -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Grandson tuition leo: I have been reimburseing my grandson for college tuition payments that he has previously paid by credit card. He is not my dependent. The... | Taxes | 3 | 01-05-2008 05:40 PM | |
| COMPLICATED Al Baldwin: My brother-in-law (BIL)has been using Money 2004 but has been posting everything manually. I have been using Money 2006 and have been updating... | Microsoft Money | 7 | 07-20-2007 07:14 PM | |
| Basis Step-up (Step-down) Ron Rosenfeld: I have an interest in a "tax shelter" that at present has a large negative basis. Is there any way (other than dying) to gift or donate this so as... | Taxes | 1 | 11-09-2005 04:57 PM | |
| searching for "Step by Step Interactive" *training* for Money 2004 Truth_Seeker1: I am using Money 2004 and would like to purchase Microsoft Money Step by Step Interactive training. I own Office XP for Students and Teachers... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 11-06-2004 01:31 PM | |
| claim grandson for tax purposes schatzn@netwitz.net: Our 19 year old grandson started college last fall. We paid $10,000 for his tuition. His mother provides health insurance for him thru her job. ... | Taxes | 8 | 01-09-2004 03:35 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |