|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Alan <sfcnm-mtm[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > Steve Pope wrote:
There are GSE's (Government Sponsored Entities) besides> > Alan <sfcnm-mtm[at]yahoo.com> wrote: > > > Freddie Mac & Fannie Mae bonds are not direct obligations of the > > > USA or a USA agency. As such, the states are free to tax the > > > interest income paid on the bonds. > > The answer is right, but the reasoning is not exact; > > some GSE debt is state-tax-free, some isn't, and some > > it depends on the state. > I've never seen a Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac bond that was treated > as a federal obligation and therefore not taxable by the states > if they so desired. Would you please elaborate. Fannie and Freddie, and some of these issue obligations that are not direct obligations of the US (similar to Fannie/Freddie) but are nonetheless state tax free. A pretty good discussion is here: http://www.smithbarney.com/products_.../agncysec.html Steve -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Steve Pope wrote: - quote - > Alan <sfcnm-mtm[at]yahoo.com> wrote:
as a federal obligation and therefore not taxable by the states> > Kevin wrote: > > > I know it is subject to federal tax, but how about state tax? > > Freddie Mac & Fannie Mae bonds are not direct obligations of the > > USA or a USA agency. As such, the states are free to tax the > > interest income paid on the bonds. > The answer is right, but the reasoning is not exact; > some GSE debt is state-tax-free, some isn't, and some > it depends on the state. > Steve I've never seen a Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac bond that was treated if they so desired. Would you please elaborate. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| In article <Rehsl.12213$i9.329[at]bignews8.bellsouth.net> , Harlan Lunsford <lunstax[at]bellsouth.net> wrote: - quote - > Kevin wrote:
It is now.> > I know it is subject to federal tax, but how about state tax? > > I know of no reason that it would not be subject to state income tax. > Remember, the underlying debit is not that of the U S of A. R's, John -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Alan <sfcnm-mtm[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > Kevin wrote:
The answer is right, but the reasoning is not exact;> > I know it is subject to federal tax, but how about state tax? > Freddie Mac & Fannie Mae bonds are not direct obligations of the > USA or a USA agency. As such, the states are free to tax the > interest income paid on the bonds. some GSE debt is state-tax-free, some isn't, and some it depends on the state. Steve -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Kevin wrote: - quote - > I know it is subject to federal tax, but how about state tax? I know of no reason that it would not be subject to state income tax. Remember, the underlying debit is not that of the U S of A. ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| | |||
| |||
| Kevin wrote: - quote - > I know it is subject to federal tax, but how about state tax?
USA or a USA agency. As such, the states are free to tax theFreddie Mac & Fannie Mae bonds are not direct obligations of the interest income paid on the bonds. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I know it is subject to federal tax, but how about state tax? -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| ESPP Taxed Twice? MichiganMan: MichiganMan wrote: > Thank you so much for the response. > Another question...I filed for an extention till March 6th so I could > get the... | Taxes | 4 | 02-17-2009 03:13 PM | |
| Am I taxed on the Interest from Tax Exempt Bonds in my Rollover IRA Gary: Being that I would like to maintain a stable (in this market) value of my Rollover IRA, I have 20% of my money in Tax Exempt Bonds. Will I be taxed... | Taxes | 4 | 11-08-2008 11:40 PM | |
| Tax Free Interest and Dividends Taxed Due to Calculation of Taxable Amount of SS Benefits askalot: Why are Tax Free Interest and Dividends included in the income used to determine the Taxable Amount of Social Security Benefits? Doesn't this,... | Taxes | 8 | 01-15-2007 06:07 AM | |
| Earning interest on MMA and checking acct/ taxed differently? mikepier@optonline.net: Are you taxed differently on the interest you earn from the MMA as opposed to the checking acct, or are you taxed on regular interest earned,... | Financial Planning | 3 | 11-28-2006 04:28 PM | |
| Taxed Twice? Mark: Last year my AGI was high enough that $1800 of deductions were disallowed on my Federal return. This year, I received a $450 state tax refund... | Taxes | 4 | 02-17-2004 01:15 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |