|
#8
| |||
| |||
| Taxmanhog wrote: - quote - > I fear we will be hearing quite a few stories like this! > It's ironic that those with good credit & the gumption to take a chance,go > out on a limb by purchasing a BRAND NEW auto, get a short shafting. > I wrote to all my congrées critères & the Président about this iniquité, my > key point was the confusion & désappointement the 2/17/09 effective date has > & will créâtes in the coming year & subséquent élection cycle. > One reply so far, from Sen. Kennedy, in short, ~they intend to seek > additional législation to enhance the economic stimulus~ if they do then it > might be possible to fix this issue, at least make it 1/1/09. Ah.. I didn't know you spoke french! (grin "additional legislation" you say? Maybe that will include forgiveness for those who bought their residence since april of 2008 who took advantage of the $7500 "loan", i.e. "tax credit". However.....! ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| "Taxmanhog" <taxmanhog[at]comcast.net> wrote - quote - > > > Taxmanhog <taxmanhog[at]comcast.net> wrote: > > > It's ironic that those with good credit & the gumption to take a > > > chance,go > > > out on a limb by purchasing a BRAND NEW auto, get a short shafting. > > "Seth" wrote ... > > If the purpose of the incentive is to influence behavior, it's pretty > > hard to influence past behavior. > > based on that reasoning.) > > If they want to give away money to various people, I don't see why > > "those who bought cars between two specific past dates" is a worthy > > group. > It's Social Engineering, but I believe a UNIFORM effective date would be a > reasonable expectation. > The original Senate bill had an effective date that was Late Fall 08, Then > considered 1/1/09, then yielded to the conférence on date of enactment. > Along this premise, then all the provisions (including the home buyer > credit) should have been effective on date of enactment. People do things based on pending legislation. It's unclear how many folks bought cars ~because~ they thought Congress would give them a tax break. But it shouldn't matter. -- Paul Thomas, CPA Watkinsville, Georgia -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > Taxmanhog <taxmanhog[at]comcast.net> wrote:
It's Social Engineering, but I believe a UNIFORM effective date would be a> > It's ironic that those with good credit & the gumption to take a chance,go > > out on a limb by purchasing a BRAND NEW auto, get a short shafting. > "Seth" wrote ... > If the purpose of the incentive is to influence behavior, it's pretty > hard to influence past behavior. > based on that reasoning.) > If they want to give away money to various people, I don't see why > "those who bought cars between two specific past dates" is a worthy > group. reasonable expectation. The original Senate bill had an effective date that was Late Fall 08, Then considered 1/1/09, then yielded to the conférence on date of enactment. Along this premise, then all the provisions (including the home buyer credit) should have been effective on date of enactment. Just Saying my peace. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| In article <gns75j$t96$1[at]news.motzarella.org> , Taxmanhog <taxmanhog[at]comcast.net> wrote: - quote - > It's ironic that those with good credit & the gumption to take a chance,go
If the purpose of the incentive is to influence behavior, it's pretty> out on a limb by purchasing a BRAND NEW auto, get a short shafting. hard to influence past behavior. (Insert rant about the unconstitutionality of the copyright extension based on that reasoning.) If they want to give away money to various people, I don't see why "those who bought cars between two specific past dates" is a worthy group. Seth -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > "Harlan Lunsford" wrote.....
Harlan,................ > So I was briefing a client yesterday as to what the new bill means to them > (usual 400$ credit for each wage earner, etc) and I came to the bit about > sales tax deductibiliy for 2009 for new car. They lit up like a candle > and beamed until I came to the part about the effective date which was > last week and not back in january when they bought that new expensive car. I fear we will be hearing quite a few stories like this! It's ironic that those with good credit & the gumption to take a chance,go out on a limb by purchasing a BRAND NEW auto, get a short shafting. I wrote to all my congrées critères & the Président about this iniquité, my key point was the confusion & désappointement the 2/17/09 effective date has & will créâtes in the coming year & subséquent élection cycle. One reply so far, from Sen. Kennedy, in short, ~they intend to seek additional législation to enhance the economic stimulus~ if they do then it might be possible to fix this issue, at least make it 1/1/09. -- TaxmanHog -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Bill wrote: - quote - > lunstax[at]bellsouth.net(HarlanLunsford) posted:
It's still wrong, since real estate tax is not "deducted from income> > [material elided for brevity] > > > Q: I need to buy a car. Does the stimulus > > > plan help me? > > > A: It doesn't provide the steep tax credits > > > some prominent economists had advocated > > > but will allow you to deduct from your federal > > > taxes the state sales tax that are associated > > > with buying a car, truck, motorcycle or > > > recreational vehicle. This benefit phases out > > > for single tax filers who have adjusted gross > > > incomes above $125,000 or joint filers > > > above $250,000. > * > > As usual, they got it wrong. "Deduct .... from > > your ...taxes...."!!! > I also had my doubts about that item. FWIW, I ran across a > clarification in another article, which I suspect may be what will > really happen (much like the real estate tax addition to standard > deduction for 2008): tax" but rather a deduction from income before reckoning the tax. - quote - > > Temporary deduction for car buyers:
So I was briefing a client yesterday as to what the new bill means to> > The bill would let those who buy a new car, > > light vehicle, recreational vehicle or > > motorcycle in 2009 deduct state and local > > sales taxes as well as any excise tax charged > > in the purchase. The deduction would be > > available to those earning less than $125,000 > > ($250,000 for joint filers). _It will be an > > above-the-line deduction, meaning even > > taxpayers who don't itemize may take it in > > addition to the standard deduction_. them (usual 400$ credit for each wage earner, etc) and I came to the bit about sales tax deductibiliy for 2009 for new car. They lit up like a candle and beamed until I came to the part about the effective date which was last week and not back in january when they bought that new expensive car. ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| On Feb 18, 9:56*am, an_ordinary_guy_...[at]hotmail.com (Bill) wrote: - quote - > *
Not entirely accurate. The credit is still $7,500 for first-time> Q: There'd been talk of a $15,000 tax credit for home purchases. Is this > in the stimulus? > A: No. The stimulus plan expanded an existing program for first-time > homebuyers, but didn't expand it to everyone. It raised by $500, to > $8,000, the tax credit for first-time buyers who purchase a home. > Before, this credit had to be repaid if a home was sold within three > years of purchase. That repayment no longer is required. homebuyers after 4/8/08 through 12/31/08. That credit still has to be repaid. The credit increases to $8,000 after 12/31/08 for purchases up to 12/1/09 and does not have to be repaid. And the part about having to be repaid if sold within three years isn't entirely accurate either. With some exceptions, it has to be repaid over 15 years beginning with the second year after the credit is taken. - quote - > From research I received at work:
"Note that qualifying taxpayers who purchased their homes during 2008can get a maximum credit of $7,500 and will have to pay it back, whereas taxpayers who buy a home on or after January 1, 2009 and before December 1, 2009 could get a maximum credit of $8,000 and will not have to pay it back." -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| lunstax[at]bellsouth.net(HarlanLunsford) posted: - quote - > [material elided for brevity]
I also had my doubts about that item. FWIW, I ran across a> > Q: I need to buy a car. Does the stimulus > > plan help me? > > A: It doesn't provide the steep tax credits > > some prominent economists had advocated > > but will allow you to deduct from your federal > > taxes the state sales tax that are associated > > with buying a car, truck, motorcycle or > > recreational vehicle. This benefit phases out > > for single tax filers who have adjusted gross > > incomes above $125,000 or joint filers > > above $250,000. * > As usual, they got it wrong. * "Deduct .... from > your ...taxes...."!!! clarification in another article, which I suspect may be what will really happen (much like the real estate tax addition to standard deduction for 2008): - quote - > Temporary deduction for car buyers:
Bill> The bill would let those who buy a new car, > light vehicle, recreational vehicle or > motorcycle in 2009 deduct state and local > sales taxes as well as any excise tax charged > in the purchase. The deduction would be > available to those earning less than $125,000 > ($250,000 for joint filers). _It will be an > above-the-line deduction, meaning even > taxpayers who don't itemize may take it in > addition to the standard deduction_. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| | |||
| |||
| Bill wrote: - quote - > Feeling some responsibility to acquire better information, I googled and
Naturally my concern was that even though I get a regular paycheck> found a pretty good summary at the Kansas City Star site. Since I was > printing it out for myself, I thought other preparers might find it > useful: > ************************************************** **** > Q: Will I get a tax rebate like last year? > A: No. Taxpayers won't receive checks this year. This plan involves a > payroll tax cut, where employers will withhold less in taxes, meaning > there will be a modest bump up in take-home pay until an income > threshold is met. The cap is $400 for single filers and $800 for joint > filers whose adjusted gross income falls below $75,000 and $150,000, > respectively. during tax season, I get hardly any pay last half of the year! But I think there will be accounting for the 400 at year's end and that will end up as a credit on my 1040. Except for the fact that my 250$ SSA "stimulus" payment will be subtracted from the 400. How about THAT, sports friends? - quote - > *
I thought about this on way home an hour ago. I just hope SSA doesn't> Q: What about people who are disabled or living on their Social Security > checks? > A: The Social Security Administration will be sending a one-time $250 > "economic recovery payment" within 120 days for people in this category. > Check the agency's Web site, or AARP's Web site, in the coming days for > more detail. add it to existing benefits and include it in box 5 next year. If so, some would end up paying tax on 85% of it. - quote - > *
As usual, they got it wrong. "Deduct .... from your ...taxes...."!!!> Q: I need to buy a car. Does the stimulus plan help me? > A: It doesn't provide the steep tax credits some prominent economists > had advocated but will allow you to deduct from your federal taxes the > state sales tax that are associated with buying a car, truck, motorcycle > or recreational vehicle. This benefit phases out for single tax filers > who have adjusted gross incomes above $125,000 or joint filers above > $250,000. > * ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Amid the blizzard of news regarding President Obama's signature on the new bill, which spends $789 Billion to "stimulate the economy" ... there*has been very little detailed information released. Yesterday, at my TaxAide site, virtually every TP whom we served was asking for details about _how and when_ they might receive their "stimulus payment." We could only suggest they watch for details in the media. Feeling some responsibility to acquire better information, I googled and found a pretty good summary at the Kansas City Star site. Since I was printing it out for myself, I thought other preparers might find it useful: ************************************************** **** Q: Will I get a tax rebate like last year? A: No. Taxpayers won't receive checks this year. This plan involves a payroll tax cut, where employers will withhold less in taxes, meaning there will be a modest bump up in take-home pay until an income threshold is met. The cap is $400 for single filers and $800 for joint filers whose adjusted gross income falls below $75,000 and $150,000, respectively. * Q: What if I'm self-employed? A: You must adjust your quarterly tax filings to capture this credit. * Q: I don't earn a lot. How else does the stimulus plan help me? A: The stimulus plan includes a temporary expansion of the earned-income tax credit for families with three or more children, and it allows more low-income families to receive a refundable child tax credit this year and next. For recipients of food stamps, the dollar amount of this assistance will increase by 14 percent. * Q: What about people who are disabled or living on their Social Security checks? A: The Social Security Administration will be sending a one-time $250 "economic recovery payment" within 120 days for people in this category. Check the agency's Web site, or AARP's Web site, in the coming days for more detail. * Q: I've lost my job. How does this help? A: If you're eligible for unemployment benefits this year, you no longer will have to pay federal taxes on the first $2,400 of these benefits. The bill also extends unemployment benefits that would've phased out in March through December, and it raises the average weekly benefit by $25 a week, to $325. * Q: I've lost my health insurance. Where do I get coverage for my family? A: If you lose your job this year and choose to take Cobra coverage to keep your family covered on health care, the government will now subsidize up to 65 percent of the costs of your premium for nine months. If you lost your job any time after Sept. 1 and elected not to receive Cobra coverage but now want it, you can contact your former employer and it should be available. Help on Cobra premiums will be available to any worker laid off from Sept. 1, 2008, to Dec. 31, 2009. * Q: I need to buy a car. Does the stimulus plan help me? A: It doesn't provide the steep tax credits some prominent economists had advocated but will allow you to deduct from your federal taxes the state sales tax that are associated with buying a car, truck, motorcycle or recreational vehicle. This benefit phases out for single tax filers who have adjusted gross incomes above $125,000 or joint filers above $250,000. * Q: There'd been talk of a $15,000 tax credit for home purchases. Is this in the stimulus? A: No. The stimulus plan expanded an existing program for first-time homebuyers, but didn't expand it to everyone. It raised by $500, to $8,000, the tax credit for first-time buyers who purchase a home. Before, this credit had to be repaid if a home was sold within three years of purchase. That repayment no longer is required. * ON THE WEB - Social Security's economic recovery one-time payments information page: http://www.ssa.gov/payment/ ______________________________________ Bill -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Economic Stimulus Eligibility for individuals claimed as dependent Jahan: I am looking for an answer to the follwoing question. Can an individual, who is claimed as a dependent on his/her parents’ tax returns, eligible... | Taxes | 3 | 06-09-2008 10:24 PM | |
| TaxACT and Yellow Alert on Form 6251 AMT-Individuals, Line 17 CT: Good Afternoon, (I posted this to biz.comp.accounting and realized immediately afterwards that it may not be the proper forum for my question, so... | Taxes | 1 | 03-25-2008 06:48 PM | |
| Stimulus plan income phase-out HW \Skip\ Weldon: I have been under the impression that for married-filing-joint the phase out (for the stimulus plan checks) begins at $150,000 of adjusted gross... | Financial Planning | 2 | 03-22-2008 06:56 PM | |
| Change the FICA Tax for Individuals Paul Berg: Change the FICA Tax for Individuals For individuals, "taxable income" (2003 Form 1040, Line 40) would become the starting basis for the FICA tax,... | Taxes | 2 | 07-31-2004 06:49 AM | |
| Unmarried Couple - Both Individuals Took Same Mortgage Interest Deduction Seth Tomblyn: My girlfriend and I are not married and we own a house together. Her filing address is different than mine (she reports a Mail Boxes etc. address... | Taxes | 10 | 02-23-2004 04:41 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |