Go Back   CDN Business Directory > Main Category > Taxes

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #3  
Old 02-06-2009, 09:36 PM
Alan
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Internet sales tax - was Re: CCH Tax News Headlines - February5, 2009

D. Stussy wrote:
- quote -

> "Alan" <sfcnm-mtm[at]yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:mH1jl.12570$D32.7606[at]flpi146.ffdc.sbc.com...
> > D. Stussy wrote:
> > > "John H. Fisher" <TaxService[at]aol.com> wrote in message
> > > news:de2f2197-f030-49cf-a098-3d6c95a73609[at]d36g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> > > > CCH Tax News Headlines - February 5, 2009
> > > > Federal Headlines: -
> > > http://tax.cchgroup.com/news/headlin.../nws2209.htm#1
> > > > ...
> > > > State Headlines:
> > > > > > > 2/5/2009 - Connecticut --Sales and Use Tax: Legislation Introduced
> > > > That Would Tax Certain Internet Sales
> > > > 2/5/2009 - Hawaii --Sales and Use Tax: Bill Proposing to Tax Some
> > > > Internet Sales Introduced
> > > Aren't these already federally preempted?
> > > > The State are pushing the envelope in how they define nexus. See

> > the below link on New York's "Amazon Law", that other states are
> > trying to emulate.
> > http://www.kiplinger.com/businessres...aw_080513.html

> The California Board of Equalization tried to do that - by "searching"
> package delivery companies (e.g. United Parcel Service) for out-of-state
> arrivals, and were stopped on the grounds it violated the Interstate
> Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution. Not only do I not see anything
> different here, Congress has passed laws that specifically PREVENT any tax
> from being imposed just because the transaction took place over the
> Internet. Although "NY's Amazon" law also affects phone orders, the two
> items above specifically target the Internet. Under the 10th amendment,
> since Congress has already acted, why wouldn't these be pre-empted?

I am not aware of any federal court decision or federal law that
prevents a state from collecting use tax on purchases over the
internet if they are able to show substantial nexus consistent
with the USSC decision QUILL CORP. v. HEITKAMP, 504 U.S. 298
(1992).
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/script...=504&invol=298

What the states are now trying to do is establish that nexus.

You are going to have come up with that federal law that you say
Congress passed. I'm not aware of it.

--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- >
  #2  
Old 02-06-2009, 08:52 PM
D. Stussy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Internet sales tax - was Re: CCH Tax News Headlines - February 5, 2009

"Alan" <sfcnm-mtm[at]yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:mH1jl.12570$D32.7606[at]flpi146.ffdc.sbc.com...
- quote -

> D. Stussy wrote:
> > "John H. Fisher" <TaxService[at]aol.com> wrote in message

> news:de2f2197-f030-49cf-a098-3d6c95a73609[at]d36g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> > > CCH Tax News Headlines - February 5, 2009
> > > Federal Headlines: -

> > http://tax.cchgroup.com/news/headlin.../nws2209.htm#1
> > > ...
> > > State Headlines:
> > > > > 2/5/2009 - Connecticut --Sales and Use Tax: Legislation Introduced
> > > That Would Tax Certain Internet Sales
> > > 2/5/2009 - Hawaii --Sales and Use Tax: Bill Proposing to Tax Some
> > > Internet Sales Introduced
> > > Aren't these already federally preempted?

> > The State are pushing the envelope in how they define nexus. See

> the below link on New York's "Amazon Law", that other states are
> trying to emulate.

http://www.kiplinger.com/businessres...aw_080513.html

The California Board of Equalization tried to do that - by "searching"
package delivery companies (e.g. United Parcel Service) for out-of-state
arrivals, and were stopped on the grounds it violated the Interstate
Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution. Not only do I not see anything
different here, Congress has passed laws that specifically PREVENT any tax
from being imposed just because the transaction took place over the
Internet. Although "NY's Amazon" law also affects phone orders, the two
items above specifically target the Internet. Under the 10th amendment,
since Congress has already acted, why wouldn't these be pre-empted?

--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- >
  #1  
Old 02-06-2009, 08:16 PM
Alan
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: CCH Tax News Headlines - February 5, 2009

D. Stussy wrote:
- quote -

> "John H. Fisher" <TaxService[at]aol.com> wrote in message
> news:de2f2197-f030-49cf-a098-3d6c95a73609[at]d36g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> > CCH Tax News Headlines - February 5, 2009
> > Federal Headlines: -

> http://tax.cchgroup.com/news/headlin.../nws2209.htm#1
> > ...
> > State Headlines:
> > > 2/5/2009 - Connecticut --Sales and Use Tax: Legislation Introduced

> > That Would Tax Certain Internet Sales
> > 2/5/2009 - Hawaii --Sales and Use Tax: Bill Proposing to Tax Some
> > Internet Sales Introduced

> Aren't these already federally preempted?

The State are pushing the envelope in how they define nexus. See
the below link on New York's "Amazon Law", that other states are
trying to emulate.
http://www.kiplinger.com/businessres...aw_080513.html

--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- >
 
Old 02-06-2009, 07:42 PM
D. Stussy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: CCH Tax News Headlines - February 5, 2009

"John H. Fisher" <TaxService[at]aol.com> wrote in message
news:de2f2197-f030-49cf-a098-3d6c95a73609[at]d36g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
- quote -

> CCH Tax News Headlines - February 5, 2009
> Federal Headlines: -

http://tax.cchgroup.com/news/headlin.../nws2209.htm#1
> ...
> State Headlines:
> 2/5/2009 - Connecticut --Sales and Use Tax: Legislation Introduced
> That Would Tax Certain Internet Sales
> 2/5/2009 - Hawaii --Sales and Use Tax: Bill Proposing to Tax Some
> Internet Sales Introduced


Aren't these already federally preempted?

--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- >
  #-1  
Old 02-06-2009, 01:14 AM
John H. Fisher
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default CCH Tax News Headlines - February 5, 2009

CCH Tax News Headlines - February 5, 2009

Federal Headlines: - http://tax.cchgroup.com/news/headlin.../nws2209.htm#1

2/5/2009 - Senate Approves $15,000 Homebuyers Tax Credit
2/5/2009 - President Signs SCHIP Bill Funded by Increase in Tobacco
Excise Tax
2/5/2009 - Expenses Related to Storage of Manufactured Homes;
Capitalization Required (Load, Inc., CA-9)
2/5/2009 - Noncompetition Agreement Payment Was Ordinary Income, Not
Capital Gain from Sale of Personal Goodwill (Muskat, CA-1)

State Headlines:

2/5/2009 - Connecticut --Sales and Use Tax: Legislation Introduced
That Would Tax Certain Internet Sales
2/5/2009 - Hawaii --Sales and Use Tax: Bill Proposing to Tax Some
Internet Sales Introduced
2/5/2009 - Pennsylvania --Multiple Taxes: Budget Proposal Would Create
New Taxes, Raise Tobacco Tax



Missed a headline? Click here for last week's tax highlights. -
http://tax.cchgroup.com/NewsHeadline...t.asp?PageID=4

--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- >
 
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
CCH Tax News Headlines - January 4, 2009
John H. Fisher: CCH Tax News Headlines - January 4, 2009 Federal Headlines: - http://tax.cchgroup.com/news/headlines/2009/nws2409.htm#1 2/4/2009 - Hollywood...
Taxes 0 02-04-2009 09:58 PM
CCH Tax News Headlines - December 29, 2008
John H. Fisher: CCH Tax News Headlines - December 29, 2008 Federal Headlines: - http://tax.cchgroup.com/news/headlines/2008/nws122908.htm#1 12/29/2008 - IRS...
Taxes 6 12-30-2008 07:42 PM
CCH TAX NEWS for February 2, 2007
John H. Fisher: CCH TAX NEWS for February 2, 2007 FEDERAL NEWS Senate Overwhelmingly Approves Minimum Wage, Tax Measure...
Taxes 1 02-03-2007 06:14 AM
CCH TAX NEWS for February 28, 2006
John H. Fisher: CCH TAX NEWS for February 28, 2006 FEDERAL NEWS IRS Denies California Domestic Partner's Right to Report Only One-Half Combined Earned...
Taxes 1 03-01-2006 07:56 AM
Still can't open news headlines in MS Money
Chuck Leven: The links to the headline news items on the home page of MS Money 2004 Deluxe stopped working late last week and still don't work. Is anyone else...
Microsoft Money 4 11-21-2005 08:34 PM



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:14 PM.