|
#7
| |||
| |||
| In article <gm03ji$5h7$1[at]blue.rahul.net> , Steve Pope <spope33[at]speedymail.org> wrote: - quote - > Arthur Kamlet <-To[at]panix.com> wrote: > > Steve Pope <spope33[at]speedymail.org> wrote: > > > Arthur Kamlet <-To[at]panix.com> wrote: > > > > If you have a true NOL, you carry back two years (unless electing > > > > not to carry back) and then forward. But if your wages exceed your > > > > Sch C loss there is no NOL. > > > This is interesting. Are you then saying a Sched. C filer > > > could pump up their retirement plan by arranging to report > > > excessive profit in one year and then a loss the next (since > > > the NOL flows to 1040 and not Sched C)? > > > In such a scheme, TP could conceivably defer more than their > > > actual cumulative business profit. > > I'm not following. The SE retirement plan contribution would not > > exceed the net earnings from self employment. In a losing year no > > contribution. > > > Wouldn't be the first loophole in the code, but it seems > > > pretty glaring if it's there. > > Could you be more explicit? > Let's say TP has a Schedule C with 20K in profit one year, > and a Schedule C with 20K in loss the following year. > The TP (if over age 50) can put the entire profit of > 20K from the first year into an individual 401(k) plan -- > but on an accumulated basis the business never made any > profit. > I think under this scenario, it would be a disadvantage > for the TP for carry back the loss, because it would zero > out line 12 of the prior year 1040 and (this is the part I'm unsure > of) require a corrective distribution from the plan. > As I said I'm unsure of the ramifications of this but > it seems like a possible win to not have the profit and > loss fall into the same tax year. Interesting. -- ArtKamlet at a o l dot c o m Columbus OH K2PZH -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Arthur Kamlet <-To[at]panix.com> wrote: - quote - > Steve Pope <spope33[at]speedymail.org> wrote:
Let's say TP has a Schedule C with 20K in profit one year,> > Arthur Kamlet <-To[at]panix.com> wrote: > > > If you have a true NOL, you carry back two years (unless electing > > > not to carry back) and then forward. But if your wages exceed your > > > Sch C loss there is no NOL. > > This is interesting. Are you then saying a Sched. C filer > > could pump up their retirement plan by arranging to report > > excessive profit in one year and then a loss the next (since > > the NOL flows to 1040 and not Sched C)? > > In such a scheme, TP could conceivably defer more than their > > actual cumulative business profit. > I'm not following. The SE retirement plan contribution would not > exceed the net earnings from self employment. In a losing year no > contribution. > > Wouldn't be the first loophole in the code, but it seems > > pretty glaring if it's there. > Could you be more explicit? and a Schedule C with 20K in loss the following year. The TP (if over age 50) can put the entire profit of 20K from the first year into an individual 401(k) plan -- but on an accumulated basis the business never made any profit. I think under this scenario, it would be a disadvantage for the TP for carry back the loss, because it would zero out line 12 of the prior year 1040 and (this is the part I'm unsure of) require a corrective distribution from the plan. As I said I'm unsure of the ramifications of this but it seems like a possible win to not have the profit and loss fall into the same tax year. Steve -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| On Jan 30, 11:06 am, kam...[at]panix.com (Arthur Kamlet) wrote: - quote - > Check out Net Operating Loss.
If you amend a prior year return with the NOL and the profit isreduced for that year, then you have to withdraw some of the 401K money. Does the 10% penalty on earnings then apply? -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| On Jan 30, 10:57 am, aloy.par...[at]gmail.com wrote: - quote - > I have/had consulting business for more than 5 years (along with
Assuming that 15k + 20% was less than 49k or so, be aware that you can> working as an "employee" for another firm). Tax-wise there's always > been a profit (SE income), but much/most of it was actually put into a > SE-401K (my reguarly employer doesn't have a retirement plan). In fact > the maximum contribution was placed in the 401K SE every year. Because > my regular wage income was over the SS limit (no 12.4% ss tax), > except for the medicare (2.9%), a total ~15K +20% profit was > contributed every year (nice deal). set up a SEP-IRA and sock away 49k a year. http://personal.fidelity.com/product...ira.shtml.cvsr If you have a 401K at your other company, I imagine that the combined amount deposited into that 401K and your SEP-IRA cannot exceed 49k, but I could be wrong on this. And if you have employees you have to offer them the same benefits, otherwise your plan is discrimination. There are safe harbor rules for IRA. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| In article <glvlka$1gv$1[at]blue.rahul.net> , Steve Pope <spope33[at]speedymail.org> wrote: - quote - > Arthur Kamlet <-To[at]panix.com> wrote: > > If you have a true NOL, you carry back two years (unless electing > > not to carry back) and then forward. But if your wages exceed your > > Sch C loss there is no NOL. > This is interesting. Are you then saying a Sched. C filer > could pump up their retirement plan by arranging to report > excessive profit in one year and then a loss the next (since > the NOL flows to 1040 and not Sched C)? > In such a scheme, TP could conceivably defer more than their > actual cumulative business profit. I'm not following. The SE retirement plan contribution would not exceed the net earnings from self employment. In a losing year no contribution. - quote - > Wouldn't be the first loophole in the code, but it seems
Could you be more explicit?> pretty glaring if it's there. -- ArtKamlet at a o l dot c o m Columbus OH K2PZH -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Arthur Kamlet <-To[at]panix.com> wrote: - quote - > If you have a true NOL, you carry back two years (unless electing
This is interesting. Are you then saying a Sched. C filer> not to carry back) and then forward. But if your wages exceed your > Sch C loss there is no NOL. could pump up their retirement plan by arranging to report excessive profit in one year and then a loss the next (since the NOL flows to 1040 and not Sched C)? In such a scheme, TP could conceivably defer more than their actual cumulative business profit. Wouldn't be the first loophole in the code, but it seems pretty glaring if it's there. Steve -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| <aloy.parker[at]gmail.com> wrote: - quote - > 2) How does the loss and how it is handled (especially it is applied
My non-professional impression of this is:> to past years), effect past 401K contributions? For example if it > possible to get a credit for the loss based on past year's profits > does this method effect the allowable 401K contribution for that past > year the loss is applied against requiring some adjustment/withdrawal > of/from the 401K ? It seems to me if you carry the loss back you will have to make a corrective distribution from your 401(k). You probably want to avoid this -- note that it isn't going to save you much tax -- and instead should elect to carry the loss forward. You should try to generate some self-employement income in the current year or the near future. You may want to talk to a retirement plan specialist. Steve -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| | |||
| |||
| In article <729bcfbd-f697-45c0-a6b8-31d143580842[at]g1g2000pra.googlegroups.com> , <aloy.parker[at]gmail.com> wrote: - quote - > I have/had consulting business for more than 5 years (along with
Check out Net Operating Loss.> working as an "employee" for another firm). Tax-wise there's always > been a profit (SE income), but much/most of it was actually put into a > SE-401K (my reguarly employer doesn't have a retirement plan). In fact > the maximum contribution was placed in the 401K SE every year. Because > my regular wage income was over the SS limit (no 12.4% ss tax), > except for the medicare (2.9%), a total ~15K +20% profit was > contributed every year (nice deal). > However in 2008 I will have a loss. In fact I will have no new revenue > on a cash-basis this year (no 1099 income). This loss is due to the > fact that I was paid in advance in Dec 2007 for consulting to be > performed in 2008; with the taxes on these funds therefore paid on my > 2007 return. > The estimated amount of the loss is relatively small, but significant > (~ $5K). > Is part of the 2008 business loss deductable against other 2008 > income? > I also understand that you can (or may be required) to carry forward > part/all of the loss to be deducted against future business profits. I > also understand that it may be possible to carry back the loss against > prior years to get a a more immediate benefit. > My two questions are: > 1) What is the quick summary of how a loss is handled (I checked the > relevent IRS pub and it seems very complicated) in terms of what it > can be deducted against. However if your wages from your job are more than your business loss, you will not have an NOL and would deduct the schedule C loss currently. - quote - > 2) How does the loss and how it is handled (especially it is applied > to past years), effect past 401K contributions? For example if it > possible to get a credit for the loss based on past year's profits > does this method effect the allowable 401K contribution for that past > year the loss is applied against requiring some adjustment/withdrawal > of/from the 401K ? If you have a true NOL, you carry back two years (unless electing not to carry back) and then forward. But if your wages exceed your Sch C loss there is no NOL. -- ArtKamlet at a o l dot c o m Columbus OH K2PZH -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I have/had consulting business for more than 5 years (along with working as an "employee" for another firm). Tax-wise there's always been a profit (SE income), but much/most of it was actually put into a SE-401K (my reguarly employer doesn't have a retirement plan). In fact the maximum contribution was placed in the 401K SE every year. Because my regular wage income was over the SS limit (no 12.4% ss tax), except for the medicare (2.9%), a total ~15K +20% profit was contributed every year (nice deal). However in 2008 I will have a loss. In fact I will have no new revenue on a cash-basis this year (no 1099 income). This loss is due to the fact that I was paid in advance in Dec 2007 for consulting to be performed in 2008; with the taxes on these funds therefore paid on my 2007 return. The estimated amount of the loss is relatively small, but significant (~ $5K). Is part of the 2008 business loss deductable against other 2008 income? I also understand that you can (or may be required) to carry forward part/all of the loss to be deducted against future business profits. I also understand that it may be possible to carry back the loss against prior years to get a a more immediate benefit. My two questions are: 1) What is the quick summary of how a loss is handled (I checked the relevent IRS pub and it seems very complicated) in terms of what it can be deducted against. 2) How does the loss and how it is handled (especially it is applied to past years), effect past 401K contributions? For example if it possible to get a credit for the loss based on past year's profits does this method effect the allowable 401K contribution for that past year the loss is applied against requiring some adjustment/withdrawal of/from the 401K ? -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| Tags |
| 401k, business, contributions, effect, loss, past, schedule |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Schedule A - Qualified Contributions Heather: Is there any downside to electing to treat cash contributions paid after August 27, 2005 as *qualified* contributions? <<... | Taxes | 1 | 01-31-2006 07:26 PM | |
| Estate 1041 - Business loss vs. investment loss John Smith: The estate sold my late mother's NYC coop, which was her personal residence, and incurred about a 18K loss. It sold at the appraised FMV, but there... | Taxes | 2 | 02-13-2005 10:53 PM | |
| Loss carry over on Schedule D EBG: If I have a short term loss of $10,000 in 2000, I can deduct a maximum of $3000.00 in the year 2000, 2001 and 2002....plus $1000 in 2003. ... | Taxes | 4 | 04-15-2004 06:55 AM | |
| Schedule C Loss Mike Reed: My wife started a home business this year and ended up with a net loss. From Schedule C, is there a limit to the amount of loss I can claim on line... | Taxes | 3 | 02-29-2004 08:38 PM | |
| Schedule C - Business Loss NoNameAtAll: The only thing about my taxes that is going to be complicated this year is that my wife started a small in-home business. She sells Weekenders... | Taxes | 4 | 01-16-2004 07:37 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |