|
#6
| |||
| |||
| On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 19:07:23 EST, "removeps-groups[at]yahoo.com" <removeps-groups[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > On Dec 27, 6:44 pm, honda.lion...[at]gmail.com wrote:
But I'm still happy to have honda raise them for me.> > Is there interest charged on themedicalexpenses if they are not paid > > by a certain date? Can youpayoff themedicalexpenses in > > installments such that you do not have to borrow? If you have to > > borrow, what is the interest rate on what you borrow? > These are not tax questions. It's up to the hospital to determine how - quote - > much interest to charge.
Your words make it seem like you objected to honda answering non-taxquestions. But maybe not, since you do too. I appreciate your answers as well. - quote - > However, there may be a law that there
LOL. Thank you. Actually, the doctor who did my required colonoscopy> hospitals cannot charge interest for 6 months (or maybe forever), as > I've never seen it on my bills. The interest that the hospitals > charge should be deductible -- if they charge $150 interest, you end > up paying saying 50150, and that 50150 is deductible subject to the > usual limits. > You can call the hospital and tell them you'll pay X dollars now, Y > dollars early next year, Z dollars the following year. I'm not sure > if they will be OK with the Z dollars as it is very far into the > future, and they may send your account to collections. But if you > negotiate, they very well might accept your offer. They will almost > certainly accept the X and Y dollar payments. Also, try to negotiate > the price, as the insurance companies do this -- so find out from a > friend what insurance companies actually pay for that procedure. > Though these are not tax matters. told me to do this too -- He told me that he rarely got from an insurance oompany what he billed, and there was no reason I should pay more than the insurance company would pay -- and I actually tried some of this yesterday and today. I have a lot of bills, the radiology, anesthesiolgy, surgery, rehab, etc. and the biggest, the hospital. One of the medium sized bills had an quick payment amount that was 30% less than the full amount. That was good, especially psychologically, and it was the price the woman on the phone quoted me. Another one lowered the price 30% just because I asked. I didn't have to beg or anything. The othere were different departments of the hospital, and share a policy, and said they would send me a form to fill out. So while I did spend several thousand dollars in tne last two days, even if I'm wrong about what t I made this past year, even if it is less, what I spent was probably not enough to get past the threshhold that Alan explained to me. OTOH< my spending this year depleted the amount I will spend next year, so I may not even get the maximum dedution that I could have even next year. Oh, well, I tried, so be it. This will just come out of the money I might have left the government when I died, asssuming I still had some money then. (One of the candidates last year said that paying more taxes was patriotic, and a Republican or two made fun of him. I think it is indeed patriotic, just as giving the government money is.) But really while I'm not unhappy about this is that I finally opened all my bills on Monday, and it's only about half of what I thought it would be. I called the billing office on my third day in the hospital to learn my charges so far, and I thought they gave me a number twice what the actual hospital bill is, and I though that by the time I was discharged it would be 50% more even than that. The amount stunned me and I asked again, and thought I heard the same number. So I'm glad the bill even before any negotiation is about 40% lower than I thought it was. Thank you all. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| "removeps-gro...[at]yahoo.com" - quote - > These are not tax questions.
Answering these questions is essential to assisting the OP in tryingto decide whether to take a tax deduction this year, next, or never, for the full amount of the medical expenses or part of them each year. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| On Dec 30, 4:07*pm, "removeps-gro...[at]yahoo.com" <removeps- gro...[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > On Dec 27, 6:44 pm, honda.lion...[at]gmail.com wrote: > > Is there interest charged on themedicalexpenses if they are not paid > > by a certain date? Can youpayoff themedicalexpenses in > > installments such that you do not have to borrow? If you have to > > borrow, what is the interest rate on what you borrow? > These are not tax questions. *It's up to the hospital to determine how > much interest to charge. *However, there may be a law that there > hospitals cannot charge interest for 6 months (or maybe forever), as > I've never seen it on my bills. *The interest that the hospitals > charge should be deductible -- if they charge $150 interest, you end > up paying saying 50150, and that 50150 is deductible subject to the > usual limits. A small correction: if the provider charges interest on late payments, the interest is not a deductible medical expense. It's nondeductible personal interest. The same is true if the OP borrows money to pay the medical bills; the interest expense is not deductible. Interest and late payment penalties are not included in the definition of "medical care" expenses in IRC Sec. 213(d). Katie in San Diego -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| On Dec 27, 6:44 pm, honda.lion...[at]gmail.com wrote: - quote - > Is there interest charged on themedicalexpenses if they are not paid
These are not tax questions. It's up to the hospital to determine how> by a certain date? Can youpayoff themedicalexpenses in > installments such that you do not have to borrow? If you have to > borrow, what is the interest rate on what you borrow? much interest to charge. However, there may be a law that there hospitals cannot charge interest for 6 months (or maybe forever), as I've never seen it on my bills. The interest that the hospitals charge should be deductible -- if they charge $150 interest, you end up paying saying 50150, and that 50150 is deductible subject to the usual limits. You can call the hospital and tell them you'll pay X dollars now, Y dollars early next year, Z dollars the following year. I'm not sure if they will be OK with the Z dollars as it is very far into the future, and they may send your account to collections. But if you negotiate, they very well might accept your offer. They will almost certainly accept the X and Y dollar payments. Also, try to negotiate the price, as the insurance companies do this -- so find out from a friend what insurance companies actually pay for that procedure. Though these are not tax matters. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 17:47:50 EST, Alan <sfcnm-mtm[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > Assuming your taxable income in 2009 is not going to go up
Thanks a lot for your very detailed answer. You also explained all> significantly and kick you into a higher tax bracket, you should > pay only the amount needed to wipe out your 2008 tax liability. > A quick calculation on my computer provides an example for > someone who is single, under age 65 and has paid $600 in state > income tax and made $400 of substantiated charitable > contributions. The standard deduction (5450) and personal > exemption (3500) equals $8950. That makes your taxable income > $15050. To wipe out that income you would first have to pay $6250 > of medical bills to arrive at itemized deductions equivalent to > the standard deduction ($1800 of the medical would be disallowed > under the 7,5% AGI rule). You would then pay another $15050 to > wipe out your taxable income. That's a total payment of $21300 in > 2008. > The above assumes your taxable gross income was $24000. the factors I needed to knwow about. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| On Dec 27, 3:05 pm, Bobby <bob234REMOVET...[at]bigfoot.com> wrote: - quote - > Would there be a tax advantage to me for paying a good chunck of my
Is there interest charged on the medical expenses if they are not paid> medical bills, half?, in 2008, versus paying all of it in 2009. > I'm only earning about 24,000 a year, and I recently got sick and have > about 50,000 dollars of uninsured medical expenses. > I can pay this from savings (including, in part, the money I saved > from not paying insurance premiums) and by borrowing the rest. by a certain date? Can you pay off the medical expenses in installments such that you do not have to borrow? If you have to borrow, what is the interest rate on what you borrow? As Alan pointed out, sure you can save around $1900 (with Alan's assumptions re filing status etc.) in taxes. But if you have to borrow $20,000 or so to do so and at an interest rate of 10%, then it may be more financially advantageous to pay in installments. More information is needed. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| | |||
| |||
| Bobby wrote: - quote - > Would there be a tax advantage to me for paying a good chunck of my
significantly and kick you into a higher tax bracket, you should> medical bills, half?, in 2008, versus paying all of it in 2009. > I'm only earning about 24,000 a year, and I recently got sick and have > about 50,000 dollars of uninsured medical expenses. > I can pay this from savings (including, in part, the money I saved > from not paying insurance premiums) and by borrowing the rest. The > question is just, Should I rush to pay half before the end of the year > and the other half in the first 2 to 6 months of 2009? Assuming your taxable income in 2009 is not going to go up pay only the amount needed to wipe out your 2008 tax liability. A quick calculation on my computer provides an example for someone who is single, under age 65 and has paid $600 in state income tax and made $400 of substantiated charitable contributions. The standard deduction (5450) and personal exemption (3500) equals $8950. That makes your taxable income $15050. To wipe out that income you would first have to pay $6250 of medical bills to arrive at itemized deductions equivalent to the standard deduction ($1800 of the medical would be disallowed under the 7,5% AGI rule). You would then pay another $15050 to wipe out your taxable income. That's a total payment of $21300 in 2008. The above assumes your taxable gross income was $24000. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Would there be a tax advantage to me for paying a good chunck of my medical bills, half?, in 2008, versus paying all of it in 2009. I'm only earning about 24,000 a year, and I recently got sick and have about 50,000 dollars of uninsured medical expenses. I can pay this from savings (including, in part, the money I saved from not paying insurance premiums) and by borrowing the rest. The question is just, Should I rush to pay half before the end of the year and the other half in the first 2 to 6 months of 2009? -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| Tags |
| bills, medical, pay |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Consulting assistance on medical bills as a medical deduction? AES: I recently attended an Emeriti Council meeting at my university at which numerous emeritus faculty members (most of them still totally savvy... | Taxes | 8 | 10-23-2007 10:14 PM | |
| Bills Summary: Unable to select multiple bills Michael T.: I installed Money Plus Deluxe yesterday and converted my ongoing Money 2005 Deluxe file. In Money 2005 I was able to select multiple items in the... | Microsoft Money | 6 | 09-06-2007 04:00 PM | |
| Selecting multiple bills within Bills window Matt: I had an older version of Money prior to upgrading to 2006. I used to be able to highlight multiple bills that would be paid by the same account... | Microsoft Money | 6 | 10-12-2005 05:08 PM | |
| Scheduled Bills & Deposits, MSN Bill Pay, e-Bills Retired Coal Miner: I can't figure out how to get M03 to recognize a scheduled bill (setup in Scheduled Bills & Deposits), as being paid when I have the bill setup as... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 07-21-2003 01:17 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |