|
#6
| |||
| |||
| In misc.taxes.moderated, Steve Pope wrote: - quote - > > Were the capital gains also re-invested? If so, the re-invested
In open end funds (your typical mutual fund), net positive capital> > amount should also be added to the cost basis. > Yes. I should have pointed out this is an open-end fund, and > so (as is typical for open-end funds) the cap gains stayed > within the fund. In a closed end fund, they get paid out > as a distribution (which may or may not be reinvested). gains are paid out, and may be reinvested. This year CG distributions will be a rare occurrence. http://www.fairmark.com/mutual/cgdist.htm -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| removeps-groups[at]yahoo.com <removeps-groups[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > On Dec 26, 8:04 pm, spop...[at]speedymail.org (Steve Pope) wrote:
Yes. I should have pointed out this is an open-end fund, and> > > > > > (1) TP bought a tax-free municipalbondmutual fund in 1993, selling > > > > > > it in 2008. During this interval all dividends paid by the > > > > > > fund were re-invested (and were reported as tax-free interest > > > > > > on Page 1 of form 1040), and capital gains internal to the fund > > > > > > were reported as income on the appropriate form. > Were the capital gains also re-invested? If so, the re-invested > amount should also be added to the cost basis. so (as is typical for open-end funds) the cap gains stayed within the fund. In a closed end fund, they get paid out as a distribution (which may or may not be reinvested). - quote - > > > You are correct. If 1% of your shares were short term, then
In this case the TP sold the entire holding.> > > allocate 1% of the sales amount to short term, and 99% to long > > > term. > Does one really need to allocate? Say shares were purchased on the > 3rd of each month from Jan/03 to Jul/08, and the entire holdings sold > on Jul/15/08. Then the re-invested dividends from Jul/15/07 to Jul/ > 15/08 are short term. The rest is long term. If you didn't sell all > the holdings, then can you choose between LIFO and FIFO? - quote - > Also, in the example above the fund might pay a reduced dividend for
Steve> the 3rd to 15th on Aug/3/2008. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| On Dec 26, 8:04 pm, spop...[at]speedymail.org (Steve Pope) wrote: - quote - > > > > > (1) TP bought a tax-free municipalbondmutual fund in 1993, selling
Were the capital gains also re-invested? If so, the re-invested> > > > > it in 2008. During this interval all dividends paid by the > > > > > fund were re-invested (and were reported as tax-free interest > > > > > on Page 1 of form 1040), and capital gains internal to the fund > > > > > were reported as income on the appropriate form. amount should also be added to the cost basis. - quote - > > You are correct. If 1% of your shares were short term, then
Does one really need to allocate? Say shares were purchased on the> > allocate 1% of the sales amount to short term, and 99% to long > > term. 3rd of each month from Jan/03 to Jul/08, and the entire holdings sold on Jul/15/08. Then the re-invested dividends from Jul/15/07 to Jul/ 15/08 are short term. The rest is long term. If you didn't sell all the holdings, then can you choose between LIFO and FIFO? Also, in the example above the fund might pay a reduced dividend for the 3rd to 15th on Aug/3/2008. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Arthur Kamlet <-To[at]panix.com> wrote: - quote - > Steve Pope <spope33[at]speedymail.org> wrote:
Correct. As I said they're reported on "Page 1". I'm sure> > > > (1) TP bought a tax-free municipal bond mutual fund in 1993, selling > > > > it in 2008. During this interval all dividends paid by the > > > > fund were re-invested (and were reported as tax-free interest > > > > on Page 1 of form 1040), and capital gains internal to the fund > > > > were reported as income on the appropriate form. > Those tax exempt dividends should have ben reported on Form 1040 > Line 8b where they can have effects on other items. it's been Line 8b for at least the last ten years, but beyond that my memory is foggy. - quote - > > There is one other subtlety that I was wondering about: the
Thanks, this is not too difficult to do, although some> > above describes the correct basis, but reporting the entire > > gain as long term capital gain seems not entirely correct, > > because some small fraction of the reinvested interest and > > capital gain distributions occured less than a year before > > the position was sold. > > It's not a large fraction, but I'm wondering if this fraction > > needs to be calculated and separated out as a short-term gain. > You are correct. If 1% of your shares were short term, then > allocate 1% of the sales amount to short term, and 99% to long > term. straight-line-type estimation will necessarily be involved, since the sale occured mid-year. Steve -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| In article <gj46ui$oem$1[at]blue.rahul.net> , Steve Pope <spope33[at]speedymail.org> wrote: - quote - > Herb Smith <smithff33[at]aol.com> wrote: > > On Dec 26, 6:25�pm, spop...[at]speedymail.org (Steve Pope) wrote: > > > (1) TP bought a tax-free municipal bond mutual fund in 1993, selling > > > it in 2008. �During this interval all dividends paid by the > > > fund were re-invested (and were reported as tax-free interest > > > on Page 1 of form 1040), and capital gains internal to the fund > > > were reported as income on the appropriate form. > > > Is the basis of the fund be the sum of the original purchase > > > price, plus the tax-free interest, plus the capital gains? > > > Are there any subtleties involved beyond this? > > You are correct. Your basis is comprised of original purchase price, > > reinvested capital gain distributions, and reinvested tax exempt > > interest dividends. Don't forget to include the shares purchased with > > these reinvested funds in your share total. > > In other words, exactly the same as for a taxable mutual fund. > > The only subtlety I can discern is that you pay no tax on the > > dividends, Those tax exempt dividends should have ben reported on Form 1040 Line 8b where they can have effects on other items. They might increase social security taxability, they might affect any earned income credit, they could afect AMT, they could increase the Medicare B Surcharge, and other factors. - quote - > > AND you reduce your capital gains when you sell the > > reinvested tax free shares. > Thanks. > There is one other subtlety that I was wondering about: the > above describes the correct basis, but reporting the entire > gain as long term capital gain seems not entirely correct, > because some small fraction of the reinvested interest and > capital gain distributions occured less than a year before > the position was sold. > It's not a large fraction, but I'm wondering if this fraction > needs to be calculated and separated out as a short-term gain. You are correct. If 1% of your shares were short term, then allocate 1% of the sales amount to short term, and 99% to long term. -- ArtKamlet at a o l dot c o m Columbus OH K2PZH -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Herb Smith <smithff33[at]aol.com> wrote: - quote - > On Dec 26, 6:25�pm, spop...[at]speedymail.org (Steve Pope) wrote:
Thanks.> > (1) TP bought a tax-free municipal bond mutual fund in 1993, selling > > it in 2008. �During this interval all dividends paid by the > > fund were re-invested (and were reported as tax-free interest > > on Page 1 of form 1040), and capital gains internal to the fund > > were reported as income on the appropriate form. > > Is the basis of the fund be the sum of the original purchase > > price, plus the tax-free interest, plus the capital gains? > > Are there any subtleties involved beyond this? > You are correct. Your basis is comprised of original purchase price, > reinvested capital gain distributions, and reinvested tax exempt > interest dividends. Don't forget to include the shares purchased with > these reinvested funds in your share total. > In other words, exactly the same as for a taxable mutual fund. > The only subtlety I can discern is that you pay no tax on the > dividends, AND you reduce your capital gains when you sell the > reinvested tax free shares. There is one other subtlety that I was wondering about: the above describes the correct basis, but reporting the entire gain as long term capital gain seems not entirely correct, because some small fraction of the reinvested interest and capital gain distributions occured less than a year before the position was sold. It's not a large fraction, but I'm wondering if this fraction needs to be calculated and separated out as a short-term gain. Opinions? Steve -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| | |||
| |||
| On Dec 26, 6:25�pm, spop...[at]speedymail.org (Steve Pope) wrote: - quote - > (1) TP bought a tax-free municipal bond mutual fund in 1993, selling
You are correct. Your basis is comprised of original purchase price,> it in 2008. �During this interval all dividends paid by the > fund were re-invested (and were reported as tax-free interest > on Page 1 of form 1040), and capital gains internal to the fund > were reported as income on the appropriate form. > Is the basis of the fund be the sum of the original purchase > price, plus the tax-free interest, plus the capital gains? > Are there any subtleties involved beyond this? reinvested capital gain distributions, and reinvested tax exempt interest dividends. Don't forget to include the shares purchased with these reinvested funds in your share total. In other words, exactly the same as for a taxable mutual fund. The only subtlety I can discern is that you pay no tax on the dividends, AND you reduce your capital gains when you sell the reinvested tax free shares. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| (1) TP bought a tax-free municipal bond mutual fund in 1993, selling it in 2008. During this interval all dividends paid by the fund were re-invested (and were reported as tax-free interest on Page 1 of form 1040), and capital gains internal to the fund were reported as income on the appropriate form. Is the basis of the fund be the sum of the original purchase price, plus the tax-free interest, plus the capital gains? Are there any subtleties involved beyond this? (2) TP bought in the secondary market a tax-free, zero coupon municipal bond, then sold it a couple years later before it matured. The broker has not reported any OID associated with this bond. Research determines this zero was a stripped component of a bond issued at 4% coupon on a certain date. Is it acceptable to calculate that the basis of this bond is the purchase price, plus an OID amount calculated as follows: OID = (face amount) * (1/(1.04 ^ T1)) - 1/(1.04 ^ T2)) where T1 = number of years (including fractions) from sale date to maturity data T2 = number of years (including fractions) from purchase date to maturity data ^ is the power operator. The above formula makes sense to me (from a bond investor perspective), but is a method like this good to use for tax purposes, or is some other method preferred/required? Steve -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| Tags |
| bond, fund, municipal, questions |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Municipal Bond Questions BRH: Having recently retired, I'm now interested in converting some of my non-IRA investments (ie - mutual funds) into something that will a) provide... | Financial Planning | 13 | 06-07-2008 09:24 PM | |
| accrued interest on municipal bond Donald S. Goldman: I buy a $100,000 bond for 101,000 plus $225 accrued interest. Total purchase price is $101,225. What is the best way to record this? As a... | Microsoft Money | 3 | 02-04-2007 12:28 AM | |
| living on municipal bond dividends Xavier Sledge: My brother (age 50) inherited some money last year and invested it, mostly in municipal bond mutual funds, but a little bit in taxable bond and... | Taxes | 5 | 01-18-2005 02:24 AM | |
| Accrued Municipal Bond Interest Raymond K. Locke: I purchased a municipal bond in 2001 and it was called in 2003. I paid $120.31 in accrued interest. I did not realize that this could be... | Taxes | 7 | 02-10-2004 08:05 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |