| |||||||
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| On Dec 25, 5:05*am, rdad...[at]panix.com (Dick Adams) wrote: - quote - > liljacket *<ehol...[at]charter.net> wrote:
Thanks for all the great responses folks. I will answer questions here> > The company that I have managed as an employee for the last 5 years > > wants to make me a 10% owner. The 2 owners are very passive. I have > > had an agreement that includes salary + 10% of net before taxes. I > > would exchange that agreement for the 10% ownership. Our CPA says > > that my "buy in" of equity would be a gain to me of approx 75K. > It's difficult to give an informed opinion here with so many unknowns. > Is your salary plus 10% of IBT greater than 75K? *Will your income as > a 10% owner be greater than your current income? *Is this an LLC, a > Partnership, an S-Corp, or a C-Corp? > > Here is my question: > > Why does the IRS not consider the value of my original agreement > > and tax me on an evaluation on the difference between the two? > Let's start with the fact that you never paid taxes on the value of > your employment agreement. *Therefore, you have has a zero basis in > the contract and the difference is the 75K. > Someone else suggested you pay then $75K for the 10% interest on a > 10 year note with the understanding that 10% will be forgiven each year. * > This is a common practice. > > By the way, one of the major benefits that I am seeking is the > > ability as a self employed person to put more away for my retirement. > How did you become self-employed? * > Unless this is an LLC or a Partnership, you are still an employee. > People who are self-employment pay an additional 7.65% in employment > taxes. *What will happen to your current employee benefits as in out > of whose pocket will they be paid? > You need a CPA, an EA, or a Tax Attorney to run the numbers for you. > Dick for efficiency sake. It is an s corp. My salary will continue to grow provided the business continues it past success. in '08 it was 78K and I was entitled to 48K in bonus...I took 25k and deferred 23K(left in company). I would continue to take my salary as W2 income...I don't think that should or would change?? We currently have a SEP with 3% company match but contribution limits are approx $10,300(I dont have the exact amount info here but it is close)...my problem is that my income is eliminating what retirement programs I am eligible for. As I understand, as an owner I can contribute up to 51K per year tax deferred.(I have some catching up to do in this area... and will be 50 next May.) I do need advise and do not think I am getting any creative advise from our cpa or the cpa firms attorney. In fact they seem more interested in "protecting" the existing owners interest then in helping us solve this buy in tax liability issue. You folks have clearly shown me that i need outside advise on this. Merry Christmas too. Ed -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| liljacket <eholand[at]charter.net> wrote: - quote - > The company that I have managed as an employee for the last 5 years
It's difficult to give an informed opinion here with so many unknowns.> wants to make me a 10% owner. The 2 owners are very passive. I have > had an agreement that includes salary + 10% of net before taxes. I > would exchange that agreement for the 10% ownership. Our CPA says > that my "buy in" of equity would be a gain to me of approx 75K. Is your salary plus 10% of IBT greater than 75K? Will your income as a 10% owner be greater than your current income? Is this an LLC, a Partnership, an S-Corp, or a C-Corp? - quote - > Here is my question:
Let's start with the fact that you never paid taxes on the value of> Why does the IRS not consider the value of my original agreement > and tax me on an evaluation on the difference between the two? your employment agreement. Therefore, you have has a zero basis in the contract and the difference is the 75K. Someone else suggested you pay then $75K for the 10% interest on a 10 year note with the understanding that 10% will be forgiven each year. This is a common practice. - quote - > By the way, one of the major benefits that I am seeking is the
How did you become self-employed?> ability as a self employed person to put more away for my retirement. Unless this is an LLC or a Partnership, you are still an employee. People who are self-employment pay an additional 7.65% in employment taxes. What will happen to your current employee benefits as in out of whose pocket will they be paid? You need a CPA, an EA, or a Tax Attorney to run the numbers for you. Dick -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > Sounds like your CPA doesn't have a creative or proactive bone in his
well said, Stu. (Hmm, my spell checker wanted to change that to Stud).> body. Check with a business/tax lawyer about the best way to resolve > your issues. > Stu As long as we are suggesting investigation of other matters, what is the form of the business? Is it a partnership? A 10% partner is 100% liable, isn't it? If it is an LLC or corporation, is it being run properly, as far as "piercing the corporate veil" is concerned? How is your CPA arriving at the $75k figure? Is the business worth $750k? How did he figure that? Did he consider that a 10% ownership share of a business worth $750k is worth less than 10% of 750K? (minority ownership). Is the business likely to grow over time, so your 75k investment grow? Or will it shrink and go away (I know some people involved in such businesses), so your $75k investment will decline? what is your salary? You are giving that up? No salary, but a 10% owner entitled to 10% of the net, vs. your current situation, i.e. a salary PLUS 10% of the net? How much does the business need to grow for you to break even on this offer? -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| "liljacket" <eholand[at]charter.net> wrote in message news:4da434ce-8aea-45dc-97b4-e65a57f186d5[at]a29g2000pra.googlegroups.com... - quote - > The company that I have managed as an employee for the last 5 years
Before, you just had an employment agreement and your income was the money> wants to make me a 10% owner. The 2 owners are very passive. I have > had an agreement that includes salary + 10% of net before taxes. I > would exchange that agreement for the 10% ownership. > Our CPA says that my "buy in" of equity would be a gain to me of > approx 75K. > Here is my question: > Why does the IRS not consider the value of my original agreement and > tax me on an evaluation on the difference between the two? > By the way, one of the major benefits that I am seeking is the ability > as a self employed person to put more away for my retirement. > Thanks for any help. paid. Now, you would have ownership of part of the company. That has value. Think of it as them paying you $75,000 (income) and then you turning around and buying into the company for $75,000 (investment-not expense). You want to be certain of the $75,000 valuation figure. How was it calculated? There are many approaches to valuing a business. It is to your advantage for this value to be as low as possible. It would reduce your current income tax liability although it would increase any capital gain in the future. Questions- What type of entity is the company (partnership, corporation, S-corporation)? How will this make you self-employed and increase your retirement investments? It could actually reduce the retirement amounts depending on the circumstances. Also, ownership could impact your fringe benefits taxation depending on the entity type, company size, structure, etc. I suggest you consult your own local CPA so you understand the full impact of this especially since you are already getting 10% of the company's profit. -- Charles M. Shanes, CPA Charles M. Shanes CPA, LLC Richmond, VA QuickBooks ProAdvisor Microsoft MPAN Member for SBA www.shanescpa.com cshanes[at]-Delete-This-Nospam-shanescpa.com -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| | |||
| |||
| liljacket <eholand[at]charter.net> wrote: - quote - > The company that I have managed as an employee for the last 5
One approach I've seen to reduce the sting is for you to pay the> years wants to make me a 10% owner. The 2 owners are very passive. > I have had an agreement that includes salary + 10% of net before > taxes. I would exchange that agreement for the 10% ownership. > Our CPA says that my "buy in" of equity would be a gain to me of > approx 75K. $75,000 with a note payable over a period of time. They could then forgive each annual payment as it comes due, spreading out your recognized income over a period of years. They could also give you a bonus each year that would be enough to pay the additional tax. - quote - > Here is my question:
Your current contract has little or no market value. First of all> Why does the IRS not consider the value of my original agreement > and tax me on an evaluation on the difference between the two? they can fire you at any time. Also, you can't sell the job to someone else who wants to work for the company, because they're not required to allow the buyer to work for them. But an equity interest can't normally be taken from you without reasonable compensation. - quote - > By the way, one of the major benefits that I am seeking is the
They could incorporate the company, and then everyone can get better> ability as a self employed person to put more away for my > retirement. retirement accounts. Or you could create your own business and have that business contract with your current employer for your services. Your current employer would pay a simple fee, you would do your own taxes and withholding, and be self-employed without having to buy in to the company. Sounds like your CPA doesn't have a creative or proactive bone in his body. Check with a business/tax lawyer about the best way to resolve your issues. Stu -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| The company that I have managed as an employee for the last 5 years wants to make me a 10% owner. The 2 owners are very passive. I have had an agreement that includes salary + 10% of net before taxes. I would exchange that agreement for the 10% ownership. Our CPA says that my "buy in" of equity would be a gain to me of approx 75K. Here is my question: Why does the IRS not consider the value of my original agreement and tax me on an evaluation on the difference between the two? By the way, one of the major benefits that I am seeking is the ability as a self employed person to put more away for my retirement. Thanks for any help. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| Tags |
| agreement, converts, employment, equity, position, taxliability |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Regarding stimulus payment, help me understand Net Income TaxLiability IMAFriend: I am married, filed jointly, and have two young children. I thought I'd get a stimulus payment of $1800. 600+600+300+300. I actually only got... | Taxes | 2 | 05-10-2008 07:14 AM | |
| short against the box tax position malibu.ron@verizon.net: I have a substantial long term capital gains on a stock and would like to go "short against the box" for an equal number of shares. My broker... | Taxes | 6 | 07-17-2006 01:00 AM | |
| Money 2004 Trial converts Q2003 empty whc@williamcalvin.com: When I am trying first-time use of the Trial download, the Quicken 2003 conversion does not succeed, neither from QDF or the QIF exported from... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 06-05-2004 01:29 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |