Go Back   CDN Business Directory > Main Category > Taxes

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #3  
Old 11-18-2008, 09:29 PM
Don Priebe
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Rental depreciation clarification


- quote -

> > > The property was purchased in 1976 or so in Calif for about 50k ( -
> > > now the land value only - is about one million).
> > > 80% of the property purch value (50k) or about 40k was depreciated
> > > straight line because it was regarded as the rental portion.
> > > > > Question - assuming no complications - and nothing fancy - will be
> > > the tax rate be 25% on the 40 k recapture - if sold today?
> > > > > What could cause it to be less than 25%?
> > > The ordinary tax rate being less than 25%.

> Can that happen with $1 million in capital gains?


Sure. The amount subject to tax at ordinary rates is the total taxable
income less the capital gains (not including the amount subject to the 1250
recapture). If the sale of the property was the only thing that happened
this year, the $40K recapture less MFJ with no kids would result in about
$2,513 in tax (6%). And since they would be still below the top of the 15%
bracket, they would even get some of the real LTCG taxed at 0%.

[Neglecting AMT and all that stuff].
--
Don EA in Upstate NY

--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- >
  #2  
Old 11-18-2008, 03:09 PM
Seth
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Rental depreciation clarification

In article <IEqUk.11847$Ws1.2764[at]nlpi064.nbdc.sbc.com> ,
Mark Bole <makbo[at]pacbell.net> wrote:
- quote -

> mike[at]nosamm.org wrote:
> > The property was purchased in 1976 or so in Calif for about 50k ( -
> > now the land value only - is about one million).
> > 80% of the property purch value (50k) or about 40k was depreciated
> > straight line because it was regarded as the rental portion.
> > > Question - assuming no complications - and nothing fancy - will be

> > the tax rate be 25% on the 40 k recapture - if sold today?
> > > What could cause it to be less than 25%?

> The ordinary tax rate being less than 25%.


Can that happen with $1 million in capital gains?

Seth

--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- >
  #1  
Old 11-18-2008, 03:09 AM
mike@nosamm.org
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Rental depreciation clarification

On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 22:29:41 EST, Mark Bole <makbo[at]pacbell.net> wrote:

- quote -

> mike[at]nosamm.org wrote:
> > The property was purchased in 1976 or so in Calif for about 50k ( -
> > now the land value only - is about one million).
> > 80% of the property purch value (50k) or about 40k was depreciated
> > straight line because it was regarded as the rental portion.
> > > Question - assuming no complications - and nothing fancy - will be

> > the tax rate be 25% on the 40 k recapture - if sold today?
> > > What could cause it to be less than 25%?

> The ordinary tax rate being less than 25%.
> -Mark Bole


Could it also be more then - if my ordinary tax rate is higher than
25%?

--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- >
 
Old 11-18-2008, 02:29 AM
Mark Bole
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Rental depreciation clarification

mike[at]nosamm.org wrote:
- quote -

> The property was purchased in 1976 or so in Calif for about 50k ( -
> now the land value only - is about one million).
> 80% of the property purch value (50k) or about 40k was depreciated
> straight line because it was regarded as the rental portion.
> Question - assuming no complications - and nothing fancy - will be
> the tax rate be 25% on the 40 k recapture - if sold today?
> What could cause it to be less than 25%?


The ordinary tax rate being less than 25%.

-Mark Bole

--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- >
  #-1  
Old 11-18-2008, 01:40 AM
mike@nosamm.org
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Rental depreciation clarification

The property was purchased in 1976 or so in Calif for about 50k ( -
now the land value only - is about one million).
80% of the property purch value (50k) or about 40k was depreciated
straight line because it was regarded as the rental portion.

Question - assuming no complications - and nothing fancy - will be
the tax rate be 25% on the 40 k recapture - if sold today?

What could cause it to be less than 25%?

m

--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- >
 

Tags
clarification, depreciation, rental
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
Another Rental Depreciation
Pilgrim: I own a rental that I through out the last few years have not had rented all twelve months of the year. The first question is can or should I claim...
Taxes 1 03-30-2006 09:40 AM
Rental depreciation
L K Williams: I'm curious if anybody has had a similar situation: My clients have a situation I have never had to deal with before. The husband is a US citizen...
Taxes 1 03-23-2006 05:58 AM
Residental Rental Depreciation
dfhea: I have a client who bought a brand new house and is renting it out. Some appliances came with the house and others he had to purchase himself. ...
Taxes 4 03-17-2006 08:57 PM
Rental depreciation
LB: preparing for 04 tax return with home sale and Rental depreciation I have owned and lived in a house for 4 years, then rented it out January 1...
Taxes 2 11-06-2004 11:00 PM
depreciation - rental
Jim: After you have fully depreciated your rental proporty(5 year), is there any way to continue depreciating. Thank you in advance for any information...
Taxes 6 07-23-2004 02:38 PM



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:57 PM.