|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Mark Bole <makbo[at]pacbell.net> writes: - quote - > > Due to the phaseout, there's a large range where the actual marginal
If you are the AMT exemption phaseout zone, your ordinary AMT income> > rate is quite a bit higher. > Do you mean, higher than the regular tax marginal rate? I recall in > recent years graphing results where the two lines (regular vs. AMT) will be subject to the 26% rate or the 28% rate (the phaseout zone straddles the AMT brackets). The phaseout is losing $25 of AMT exemption for every $100 you're over the threshold. Therefore, if your ordinary AMT income is in the 26% bracket, the phaseout increases your marginal rate by $25/$100 * 2600bp = 650bp. If you're in the 28% bracket, your marginal rate is increased by $25/$100 * 2800bp = 700bp. In other words, if you're in the 26% AMT bracket and in the phaseout zone, then the actual marginal rates you will experience are: Ordinary income = 26% + 6.50% = 32.50% LTCG = 15% + 6.50% = 21.50% And if you're in the 28% AMT bracket and in the phaseout zone, the actual marginal rates you'll experience are: Ordinary income = 28% + 7% = 35% LTCG = 15% + 7% = 22% A few years ago David Cay Johnston at the NYT did a tax piece about this very thing. Dunno if it's available in the free archives or not. -- Rich Carreiro rlc-news[at]rlcarr.com -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| removeps-groups[at]yahoo.com posted: (Note: major redaction.) - quote - > For this matter, these items also reduce the
I keep noticing these references to 2010 -- as if it were the "promised> normal exemption and itemized deduction by > increasing the phaseout _(but in 2010 > itemized deductions will not be phased out)._ > (emphasis added) land." What congresscritters have given, they may take away. Shouldn't we always add a qualifier, such as "under current law"? Seems very likely the 2010 rules will be revised once the new administration gets around to revising tax law -- which will probably be sooner, rather than later. Bill -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Seth wrote: - quote - > In article <gfieov$icl$1[at]feeder.motzarella.org> , jack <jack[at]yahoo.org> wrote:
Do you mean, higher than the regular tax marginal rate? I recall in> > AMT has two basic provisions: > > > 1) Most deductions are lost.(specifially state income tax and real estate > > tax) > > 2) The tax rate becomes 26/28% So W2 income is taxed less, but long term > > capital gains goes up. > Due to the phaseout, there's a large range where the actual marginal > rate is quite a bit higher. recent years graphing results where the two lines (regular vs. AMT) dance with each other over a large range... -Mark Bole -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| In article <gfieov$icl$1[at]feeder.motzarella.org> , jack <jack[at]yahoo.org> wrote: - quote - > AMT has two basic provisions:
Due to the phaseout, there's a large range where the actual marginal> 1) Most deductions are lost.(specifially state income tax and real estate > tax) > 2) The tax rate becomes 26/28% So W2 income is taxed less, but long term > capital gains goes up. rate is quite a bit higher. Seth -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| On Nov 13, 4:21 pm, "jack" <j...[at]yahoo.org> wrote: - quote - > 1) Most deductions are lost.(specifially state income tax and real estate
For many people, the mortgage interest deduction is the biggest> tax) deduction, and it is allowed. The home equity deduction may be limited (I think it is allowed if you used it to purchase or improve your main or second home). For some people, charitable contributions are the largest, and they are allowed under AMT. For some odd reason, part of the medical deduction is subject to AMT. - quote - > 2) The tax rate becomes 26/28% So W2 income is taxed less, but long term
Long term gains and qualified dividends are still taxed at 15%.> capital gains goes up. However, these items increase AGI, and therefore reduce the AMT exemption (or rather they increase the phaseout of the exemption). Thus, you may end up paying 28% on your entire AMT taxable income without any exemption. For this matter, these items also reduce the normal exemption and itemized deduction by increasing the phaseout (but in 2010 itemized deductions will not be phased out). -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Mark Bole wrote: - quote - > No. AMT still allows regular capital gains rates, although basis may be
I know your statement above is correct, but since the cap gain is added> different. W-2 income receives no special treatment, it is lumped with > your other ordinary income. to income and AMT rises, there comes the feel of the LT cap gain rate being treated as though it were 22.5%. i.e. when in the AMT zone, add $10,000 of LT cap gain, and however the calculations ripple, I see a rise in tax due of $2250. Thus my inclination to remark "20% cap gain rate? so what? I pay 22.5% now". This is in a similar category to my 'phantom tax rate' created by the incremental taxing of social security. Joe -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| | |||
| |||
| jack wrote: - quote - > AMT has two basic provisions:
Taxes-paid deductions are lost (and state tax refunds are generally not> 1) Most deductions are lost.(specifially state income tax and real estate > tax) taxable if they resulted from a year when AMT was paid). Miscellaneous 2%-of-AGI deductions are lost. Medical deductions and mortgage interest deductions are more limited. Most other itemized deductions are allowed. - quote - > 2) The tax rate becomes 26/28% So W2 income is taxed less, but long term > capital gains goes up. No. AMT still allows regular capital gains rates, although basis may be different. W-2 income receives no special treatment, it is lumped with your other ordinary income. AMT is essentially a flat tax with a relatively high exemption amount (based solely on filing status, not the number of persons claimed under regular tax) and no standard deduction. - quote - > Is that fundamentally it, or am I misunderstanding it still. I know there > is a AMT deduction, but other than that... Fundamentally, as corrected above. There are lots of other details, involving depreciation, foreign taxes, incentive stock options, etc. Also, some regular tax credits are not allowed under AMT, exactly which ones are frequently subject to tinkering by Congress (for example, up until the last minute, the Hope/Lifetime Learning education credits were not going to be allowed to reduce regular tax below AMT for 2007). -Mark Bole -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| AMT has two basic provisions: 1) Most deductions are lost.(specifially state income tax and real estate tax) 2) The tax rate becomes 26/28% So W2 income is taxed less, but long term capital gains goes up. Is that fundamentally it, or am I misunderstanding it still. I know there is a AMT deduction, but other than that... -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| Tags |
| amt, understand |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Anyone understand what's going on with GMAC? zxcvbob: I bought GMAC bonds about 5 or 6 (?) years ago for about 85ยข on the dollar when they were still rated investment grade by Moody's and S&P. I was... | Financial Planning | 4 | 11-07-2008 02:14 AM | |
| Something I do not understand about 401(k)'s gbongi1@gmail.com: OK I am trying to understand something. I have a 401k account through my company that utilizes Fidelity borkerage link. What happens is that my... | Financial Planning | 8 | 07-20-2006 06:35 PM | |
| Transactions I don't understand Laurel: I recently installed a trial version of Money 2006. When I look at the transactions for one of my investment accounts, I can't figure out what some... | Microsoft Money | 3 | 11-19-2005 09:13 PM | |
| Trying to understand Preferred Names Mark Johnson: I have a gazillion of transactions in the format of the following: HEB #428 10/17 #000784200 PU HEB #428 10/13 #000150600 PU HEB #428 10/08... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 10-29-2004 02:26 PM | |
| I don't understand this case... MTW: Just when I thought I understood how divorces and alimony were supposed to work, along came the case of Dato-Nodurft vs. Commish, TC Memo 2004-119.... | Taxes | 5 | 05-24-2004 05:16 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |