Go Back   CDN Business Directory > Main Category > Taxes

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #6  
Old 11-17-2008, 02:00 AM
Rich Carreiro
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Do I understand AMT?

Mark Bole <makbo[at]pacbell.net> writes:

- quote -

> > Due to the phaseout, there's a large range where the actual marginal
> > rate is quite a bit higher.

> Do you mean, higher than the regular tax marginal rate? I recall in
> recent years graphing results where the two lines (regular vs. AMT)


If you are the AMT exemption phaseout zone, your ordinary AMT income
will be subject to the 26% rate or the 28% rate (the phaseout zone
straddles the AMT brackets). The phaseout is losing $25 of AMT exemption
for every $100 you're over the threshold. Therefore, if your ordinary
AMT income is in the 26% bracket, the phaseout increases your marginal
rate by $25/$100 * 2600bp = 650bp. If you're in the 28% bracket, your
marginal rate is increased by $25/$100 * 2800bp = 700bp.

In other words, if you're in the 26% AMT bracket and in the phaseout
zone, then the actual marginal rates you will experience are:
Ordinary income = 26% + 6.50% = 32.50%
LTCG = 15% + 6.50% = 21.50%

And if you're in the 28% AMT bracket and in the phaseout zone,
the actual marginal rates you'll experience are:
Ordinary income = 28% + 7% = 35%
LTCG = 15% + 7% = 22%

A few years ago David Cay Johnston at the NYT did a tax piece
about this very thing. Dunno if it's available in the free
archives or not.

--
Rich Carreiro rlc-news[at]rlcarr.com

--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- >
  #5  
Old 11-15-2008, 02:33 PM
Bill
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Do I understand AMT?


removeps-groups[at]yahoo.com posted:

(Note: major redaction.)

- quote -

> For this matter, these items also reduce the
> normal exemption and itemized deduction by
> increasing the phaseout _(but in 2010
> itemized deductions will not be phased out)._
> (emphasis added)


I keep noticing these references to 2010 -- as if it were the "promised
land."

What congresscritters have given, they may take away. Shouldn't we
always add a qualifier, such as "under current law"?

Seems very likely the 2010 rules will be revised once the new
administration gets around to revising tax law -- which will probably be
sooner, rather than later.

Bill

--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- >
  #4  
Old 11-15-2008, 04:25 AM
Mark Bole
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Do I understand AMT?

Seth wrote:
- quote -

> In article <gfieov$icl$1[at]feeder.motzarella.org> , jack <jack[at]yahoo.org> wrote:
> > AMT has two basic provisions:
> > > 1) Most deductions are lost.(specifially state income tax and real estate

> > tax)
> > 2) The tax rate becomes 26/28% So W2 income is taxed less, but long term
> > capital gains goes up.

> Due to the phaseout, there's a large range where the actual marginal
> rate is quite a bit higher.


Do you mean, higher than the regular tax marginal rate? I recall in
recent years graphing results where the two lines (regular vs. AMT)
dance with each other over a large range...

-Mark Bole

--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- >
  #3  
Old 11-15-2008, 03:37 AM
Seth
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Do I understand AMT?

In article <gfieov$icl$1[at]feeder.motzarella.org> , jack <jack[at]yahoo.org> wrote:
- quote -

> AMT has two basic provisions:
> 1) Most deductions are lost.(specifially state income tax and real estate
> tax)
> 2) The tax rate becomes 26/28% So W2 income is taxed less, but long term
> capital gains goes up.


Due to the phaseout, there's a large range where the actual marginal
rate is quite a bit higher.

Seth

--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- >
  #2  
Old 11-14-2008, 02:33 PM
removeps-groups@yahoo.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Do I understand AMT?

On Nov 13, 4:21 pm, "jack" <j...[at]yahoo.org> wrote:

- quote -

> 1) Most deductions are lost.(specifially state income tax and real estate
> tax)


For many people, the mortgage interest deduction is the biggest
deduction, and it is allowed. The home equity deduction may be
limited (I think it is allowed if you used it to purchase or improve
your main or second home). For some people, charitable contributions
are the largest, and they are allowed under AMT. For some odd reason,
part of the medical deduction is subject to AMT.

- quote -

> 2) The tax rate becomes 26/28% So W2 income is taxed less, but long term
> capital gains goes up.


Long term gains and qualified dividends are still taxed at 15%.
However, these items increase AGI, and therefore reduce the AMT
exemption (or rather they increase the phaseout of the exemption).
Thus, you may end up paying 28% on your entire AMT taxable income
without any exemption. For this matter, these items also reduce the
normal exemption and itemized deduction by increasing the phaseout
(but in 2010 itemized deductions will not be phased out).

--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- >
  #1  
Old 11-14-2008, 12:29 AM
JoeTaxpayer
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Do I understand AMT?



Mark Bole wrote:

- quote -

> No. AMT still allows regular capital gains rates, although basis may be
> different. W-2 income receives no special treatment, it is lumped with
> your other ordinary income.


I know your statement above is correct, but since the cap gain is added
to income and AMT rises, there comes the feel of the LT cap gain rate
being treated as though it were 22.5%. i.e. when in the AMT zone, add
$10,000 of LT cap gain, and however the calculations ripple, I see a
rise in tax due of $2250. Thus my inclination to remark "20% cap gain
rate? so what? I pay 22.5% now".

This is in a similar category to my 'phantom tax rate' created by the
incremental taxing of social security.

Joe

--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- >
 
Old 11-14-2008, 12:19 AM
Mark Bole
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Do I understand AMT?

jack wrote:
- quote -

> AMT has two basic provisions:
> 1) Most deductions are lost.(specifially state income tax and real estate
> tax)


Taxes-paid deductions are lost (and state tax refunds are generally not
taxable if they resulted from a year when AMT was paid). Miscellaneous
2%-of-AGI deductions are lost. Medical deductions and mortgage interest
deductions are more limited. Most other itemized deductions are allowed.


- quote -

> 2) The tax rate becomes 26/28% So W2 income is taxed less, but long term
> capital gains goes up.



No. AMT still allows regular capital gains rates, although basis may be
different. W-2 income receives no special treatment, it is lumped with
your other ordinary income. AMT is essentially a flat tax with a
relatively high exemption amount (based solely on filing status, not the
number of persons claimed under regular tax) and no standard deduction.

- quote -

> Is that fundamentally it, or am I misunderstanding it still. I know there
> is a AMT deduction, but other than that...



Fundamentally, as corrected above. There are lots of other details,
involving depreciation, foreign taxes, incentive stock options, etc.

Also, some regular tax credits are not allowed under AMT, exactly which
ones are frequently subject to tinkering by Congress (for example, up
until the last minute, the Hope/Lifetime Learning education credits were
not going to be allowed to reduce regular tax below AMT for 2007).

-Mark Bole

--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- >
  #-1  
Old 11-13-2008, 11:21 PM
jack
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Do I understand AMT?

AMT has two basic provisions:

1) Most deductions are lost.(specifially state income tax and real estate
tax)
2) The tax rate becomes 26/28% So W2 income is taxed less, but long term
capital gains goes up.

Is that fundamentally it, or am I misunderstanding it still. I know there
is a AMT deduction, but other than that...

--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- >
 

Tags
amt, understand
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
Anyone understand what's going on with GMAC?
zxcvbob: I bought GMAC bonds about 5 or 6 (?) years ago for about 85ยข on the dollar when they were still rated investment grade by Moody's and S&P. I was...
Financial Planning 4 11-07-2008 02:14 AM
Something I do not understand about 401(k)'s
gbongi1@gmail.com: OK I am trying to understand something. I have a 401k account through my company that utilizes Fidelity borkerage link. What happens is that my...
Financial Planning 8 07-20-2006 06:35 PM
Transactions I don't understand
Laurel: I recently installed a trial version of Money 2006. When I look at the transactions for one of my investment accounts, I can't figure out what some...
Microsoft Money 3 11-19-2005 09:13 PM
Trying to understand Preferred Names
Mark Johnson: I have a gazillion of transactions in the format of the following: HEB #428 10/17 #000784200 PU HEB #428 10/13 #000150600 PU HEB #428 10/08...
Microsoft Money 1 10-29-2004 02:26 PM
I don't understand this case...
MTW: Just when I thought I understood how divorces and alimony were supposed to work, along came the case of Dato-Nodurft vs. Commish, TC Memo 2004-119....
Taxes 5 05-24-2004 05:16 AM



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:56 PM.