|
#9
| |||
| |||
| Mark Bole wrote: [snip] - quote - > > > When a child goes off to college and is not commuting, the child's
a child goes off to college. In this instance, I believe domicile> > absence is temporary as long as the child does not change domicile.. > > the place where an individual has his permanent home, to where > > whenever absent, he intends to return. Every person has at all times > > only one domicile. A child's domicile will remain his parent's > > domicile unless the child forsakes that domicile and intends to remain > > permanently at a new place where they are physically and lawfully > > present. > This is the first time I've heard domicile used in relation to the tests > for dependency, usually it's in the context of being a resident of one > state or another. Thanx for giving me a new way to look at it, one of > the benefits of this discussion group. > A further analysis would probably have to take into account age as well. > For example, in the case of a younger child splitting time between the > households of custodial and non-custodial parent, where would the > domicile be, and can it change from year to year depending on where the > majority of nights are spent? What about the college student whose > parents split up, or move to a smaller "empty nest"? Determining his or > her domicile might be more challenging. Nowadays, with college students > typically taking more than four years to finish, could you say that the > 18-year old freshman "intends to return to the vicinity of campus > whenever absent" for the next 5-plus years, and then to wherever the > first post-graduation job is? > As a practical matter, I'm guessing it rarely gets audited as long as > only one tax return claims the exemption. If a student is ready to cut > the financial ties and provide more than half of his (her) own support, > where he lives becomes irrelevant for determining dependency, as no one > who supports themselves can be (claimed as) a dependent. > -Mark Bole My comments were meant to specifically address what happens when is important because we need to define temporary absences for education. You do raise an interesting issue relating to when a child departs a residence that is home for both parents and while attending school, the parents split up. Assuming that the child has no intention to make his residence at school his new domicile, then he keeps his old domicile. If one of the parents still maintains that domicile, we have our answer unless the child decides to change domiciles. If the parents sell that home and each parent moves into a new home, with whom is the child living? I think you now look to intent. Where does the child intend to live for more than six months in the year? Basically, it means the child is going to determine who gets the dependency exemption assuming the child is not self-supporting, is still under age 24, a full time student and the parent of choice agrees to provide a home for the child. I agree that as a practical matter, the parents will probably decide who gets the exemption and in those cases where they can't agree, the child is going to make the decision for them based on the child's intent. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| Alan wrote: - quote - > Mark Bole wrote:
This is the first time I've heard domicile used in relation to the tests> [snip] > > > > He lived in an apartment near his college for most of the year, > > > Was his permanent residence still with you, or had he established a > > new residence at his apartment? If so, when? To determine residence, > > you should consider, where did he have the strongest ties? (in no > > particular order, including but not limited to: mailing address, bank > > account branch office, doctors, voter registration, driver license and > > vehicle registration address, location of employment, family, social > > connections, property, etc). > Mark raises a very good point here, as I have seen parents lose the > dependency exemption because of a change in domicile (note that I used > the term domicile and not residence). > When a child goes off to college and is not commuting, the child's > absence is temporary as long as the child does not change domicile.. the > place where an individual has his permanent home, to where whenever > absent, he intends to return. Every person has at all times only one > domicile. A child's domicile will remain his parent's domicile unless > the child forsakes that domicile and intends to remain permanently at a > new place where they are physically and lawfully present. for dependency, usually it's in the context of being a resident of one state or another. Thanx for giving me a new way to look at it, one of the benefits of this discussion group. A further analysis would probably have to take into account age as well. For example, in the case of a younger child splitting time between the households of custodial and non-custodial parent, where would the domicile be, and can it change from year to year depending on where the majority of nights are spent? What about the college student whose parents split up, or move to a smaller "empty nest"? Determining his or her domicile might be more challenging. Nowadays, with college students typically taking more than four years to finish, could you say that the 18-year old freshman "intends to return to the vicinity of campus whenever absent" for the next 5-plus years, and then to wherever the first post-graduation job is? As a practical matter, I'm guessing it rarely gets audited as long as only one tax return claims the exemption. If a student is ready to cut the financial ties and provide more than half of his (her) own support, where he lives becomes irrelevant for determining dependency, as no one who supports themselves can be (claimed as) a dependent. -Mark Bole -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| In article <UPTKk.4211$c45.2634[at]nlpi065.nbdc.sbc.com> , Rick <Rick[at]nospam.com> wrote: - quote - > I don't believe he can claim education credits because his actual tuition > expenses were covered by scholarships. If I claim him as an exemption > (rather than him claiming himself), I can claim all of his medical and > health insurance expenses on my medical deductions. If he claims himself, > I'm not sure I can still do that. If the only reason he is not your dependent as a qualifying relative is because of the gross income test, then you are allowed to deduct all medical costs you paid for him. -- ArtKamlet at a o l dot c o m Columbus OH K2PZH -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > Was his permanent residence still with you, or had he established a new
That's a good question. He lived full-time in an apartment near school all> residence at his apartment? If so, when? To determine residence, you > should consider, where did he have the strongest ties? (in no particular > order, including but not limited to: mailing address, bank account branch > office, doctors, voter registration, driver license and vehicle > registration address, location of employment, family, social connections, > property, etc). year, but he continued to use our house as his mailing address for his bank accounts, driver license, voter registration, etc. He never received any mail at his apartment, but that's where he actually lived all year. - quote - > All that matters for Qual. Child (QC) is whether or not *he* provided more
Well, we paid for his rent, his car expenses (including insurance), his> than half of his *own* support. Remember, support and income for tax > purposes are determined independently of one another, be sure you > understand what counts as support. phone and his health insurance. He paid for his meals and entertainment. His tuition and books were paid through scholarships. His total income was probably around $10,000. - quote - > > Can I claim as an exemption on my 2008 return?
I don't believe he can claim education credits because his actual tuition> Possibly, but if you cannot claim the dependent exemption deduction, then > he probably can claim the personal exemption deduction, and vice versa, > but in no case can you both claim the exemption deduction. > There are some less common situations, involving education-related > credits, where you are better off not claiming him even though you > could -- he still can't claim himself but might be able to claim certain > credits, if he meets all the other requirements. Assuming, of course, you > are willing to let him get a tax benefit potentially at your expense. expenses were covered by scholarships. If I claim him as an exemption (rather than him claiming himself), I can claim all of his medical and health insurance expenses on my medical deductions. If he claims himself, I'm not sure I can still do that. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Mark Bole wrote: [snip] - quote - > > He lived in an apartment near his college for most of the year,
Mark raises a very good point here, as I have seen parents lose> Was his permanent residence still with you, or had he established a new > residence at his apartment? If so, when? To determine residence, you > should consider, where did he have the strongest ties? (in no particular > order, including but not limited to: mailing address, bank account > branch office, doctors, voter registration, driver license and vehicle > registration address, location of employment, family, social > connections, property, etc). the dependency exemption because of a change in domicile (note that I used the term domicile and not residence). When a child goes off to college and is not commuting, the child's absence is temporary as long as the child does not change domicile.. the place where an individual has his permanent home, to where whenever absent, he intends to return. Every person has at all times only one domicile. A child's domicile will remain his parent's domicile unless the child forsakes that domicile and intends to remain permanently at a new place where they are physically and lawfully present. Many states require a visiting student to obtain a driver's license and to register any vehicle brought into the state. Many students open a local bank account to facilitate check cashing and making deposits. Many students obtain employment where they go to school to generate extra money or pay for school. Most students establish new relationships and social connections where they go to school. Most students will obtain medical services where they go to school. Many students will change their mailing address. So... many of the factors that usually go into determining one's domicile, will work against a student. These changes can be refuted as representing a change in domicile. What really matters are the hard core reasons that go into determining domicile. E.g., Did the child register to vote where he attends college? Did the child apply for in-state tuition if attending college out-of-state? Did the child file state and federal income tax returns using an address other than his parent's address? (Tax Tip: never file a tax return that doesn't use your parent's address.) Do the parent's still maintain a place at their home for the child to live? -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| "Mark Bole" wrote: - quote - > > The issue has been raised as to whether or not he "lived with" you for
Damn! That'll teach me not to look things up. My mind drifted back into> > more than half the year, not counting temporary absenses. While that's > > required for a qualifying child, it's not required for a "qualifying > > relative" to be a dependent. If he isn't a qualifying child, based on > > the information you provided he's a qualifying relative for 2008 as long > > as he passes the citizenship/US residency and joint return tests. See > > IRS Publication 501. > You're forgetting the biggie: to be a qualifying relative (QR), he also > has to pass the "gross income" test, that is, not more gross income than > the personal exemption amount. pre-uniform nonuniform definitions, when the gross income test was always made irrelevant by the full-time student + age factor. To OP: nevermind. -- Phil Marti Clarksburg, MD -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Phil Marti wrote: - quote - > The issue has been raised as to whether or not he "lived with" you for more
You're forgetting the biggie: to be a qualifying relative (QR), he also> than half the year, not counting temporary absenses. While that's required > for a qualifying child, it's not required for a "qualifying relative" to be > a dependent. If he isn't a qualifying child, based on the information you > provided he's a qualifying relative for 2008 as long as he passes the > citizenship/US residency and joint return tests. See IRS Publication 501. has to pass the "gross income" test, that is, not more gross income than the personal exemption amount. That is what keeps most from being a QR who might otherwise qualify. It's not hard for a college student with any part time employment or income from savings/investments to exceed the gross income maximum amount for QR. -Mark Bole -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| "Rick" wrote: - quote - > My son was born in 1985 and will still be 23 as of 12/31/08. He was a
As has already been mentioned, it's a full-time student in any five calendar> full-time student through August 2008. Does he qualify as a "Qualifying > Child" for tax purposes? The IRS instructions state that he must be > "under 24 at the end of the year and a student", but I don't know if that > means he must be a student at the end of the year. months of the year. - quote - > He lived in an apartment near his college for most of the year, but I
Probably.> provided more than 50% of his support. He began supporting himself > completely in September 2008. Can I claim as an exemption on my 2008 > return? The issue has been raised as to whether or not he "lived with" you for more than half the year, not counting temporary absenses. While that's required for a qualifying child, it's not required for a "qualifying relative" to be a dependent. If he isn't a qualifying child, based on the information you provided he's a qualifying relative for 2008 as long as he passes the citizenship/US residency and joint return tests. See IRS Publication 501. As has been mentioned, if he qualifies as your dependent he cannot claim his own personal exemption even if you don't. Be sure you coordinate this with him. First, it will avoid the problems that arise if you both claim his personal exemption. Furthermore, as mentioned, it may be to the family's benefit for no one to claim his exemption in order to allow him to claim education tax benefits that may not help you. -- Phil Marti Clarksburg, MD -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Mark Bole wrote: - quote - > Rick wrote:
Just for completeness, please add to my previous reply:> > My son was born in 1985 and will still be 23 as of 12/31/08. He was a > > full-time student through August 2008. Does he qualify as a > > "Qualifying Child" for tax purposes? [...] You cannot claim his dependency exemption if you yourself are a dependent, if he is not a citizen or North American resident, or if he is married and filing a joint return with his spouse and does not meet the exception for that situation. -Mark Bole -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| | |||
| |||
| Rick wrote: - quote - > My son was born in 1985 and will still be 23 as of 12/31/08. He was a
No, only all or part of any five months during the year, they don't have> full-time student through August 2008. Does he qualify as a "Qualifying > Child" for tax purposes? The IRS instructions state that he must be > "under 24 at the end of the year and a student", but I don't know if > that means he must be a student at the end of the year. to be consecutive. "Full time student" means whatever the qualifying education institution defines it to be for their students. - quote - > He lived in an apartment near his college for most of the year,
Was his permanent residence still with you, or had he established a newresidence at his apartment? If so, when? To determine residence, you should consider, where did he have the strongest ties? (in no particular order, including but not limited to: mailing address, bank account branch office, doctors, voter registration, driver license and vehicle registration address, location of employment, family, social connections, property, etc). - quote - > but I
All that matters for Qual. Child (QC) is whether or not *he* provided> provided more than 50% of his support. He began supporting himself > completely in September 2008. more than half of his *own* support. Remember, support and income for tax purposes are determined independently of one another, be sure you understand what counts as support. - quote - > Can I claim as an exemption on my 2008
Possibly, but if you cannot claim the dependent exemption deduction,> return? then he probably can claim the personal exemption deduction, and vice versa, but in no case can you both claim the exemption deduction. There are some less common situations, involving education-related credits, where you are better off not claiming him even though you could -- he still can't claim himself but might be able to claim certain credits, if he meets all the other requirements. Assuming, of course, you are willing to let him get a tax benefit potentially at your expense. -Mark Bole -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| My son was born in 1985 and will still be 23 as of 12/31/08. He was a full-time student through August 2008. Does he qualify as a "Qualifying Child" for tax purposes? The IRS instructions state that he must be "under 24 at the end of the year and a student", but I don't know if that means he must be a student at the end of the year. He lived in an apartment near his college for most of the year, but I provided more than 50% of his support. He began supporting himself completely in September 2008. Can I claim as an exemption on my 2008 return? -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| Tags |
| child, qualifying, question |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Qualifying Child: What's A Temporary Absence? A.G. Kalman: This must be my season for this. I have had 3 situations where I have determined that a child attending school away from home was no longer a... | Taxes | 4 | 03-05-2007 01:09 AM | |
| Qualifying Child & EITC A.G. Kalman: I'm struggling with another aspect of the qualifying child rules as they relate to the EITC. (Warning to those who continue to read... this is a... | Taxes | 2 | 02-20-2006 07:59 AM | |
| Additional Thoughts on Qualifying Child Phil Marti: What has bothered me from the beginning has been the concept that the status of being a qualifying child exists in a vacuum. The more I look at... | Taxes | 18 | 02-09-2006 03:12 AM | |
| Qualifying Child Phil Marti: We're having a sane disagreement on the unmoderated board that we haven't been able to resolve yet. Here's the situation: We have a household... | Taxes | 11 | 01-31-2006 08:06 PM | |
| Qualifying Child & tie breakers Arthur Kamlet: Grandmother, mother and child all live together and child meets the qualifying child definition for both mother and grandmother. (Mother is not... | Taxes | 1 | 01-12-2006 03:48 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |