|
#3
| |||
| |||
| In article <0941b228-445a-436f-993e-40a806d10fa5[at]b38g2000prf.googlegroups.com> , removeps-groups[at]yahoo.com <removeps-groups[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > On Oct 13, 9:01 pm, kam...[at]panix.com (Arthur Kamlet) wrote: > > And for property that you anticipate wearing out before the end of > > its class life, consider using straight line, so you don't get > > bitten later on. > Why would straight line help? There are situations where your business use drops below 50% or where you dispose of the property and would have to recapture the difference between the accelerated expense taken, and S-L. And there are situations where, like ideal good businesses, your income rises each year. That means you could benefit from not front loading your depreciation expense. -- ArtKamlet at a o l dot c o m Columbus OH K2PZH -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| On Oct 13, 9:01 pm, kam...[at]panix.com (Arthur Kamlet) wrote: - quote - > And for property that you anticipate wearing out before the end of
Why would straight line help?> its class life, consider using straight line, so you don't get > bitten later on. - quote - > By the way if you are anywhere close to AMT, you might want to select
It might make state taxes earlier too, as I'm not sure if accelerated> S-L for both regular and AMT, which somewhat simplifies your paperwork. depreciation is allowed in California. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| "nish" <nisha[at]nunya.org> wrote - quote - > Is there any option to depreciate computers on a > MACRS 200DB 3 Year method instead of the 5 Year? 3 years? No. Section 179, yes. - quote - > Computers typically become obsolete within two years of purchase. Shhhhhhh........ Don't tell the 8+ year old computer in the back room that we use every once in a while to prepare a return for 1999 or so. In fact, don't tell my 4 year old computer that I use on a daily basis either. - quote - > It would be very desirable to just let them depreciate > out after three years It'd be even more desireable to expense them like you do the water bill, but Congress doesn't see it our way. - quote - > and not have to hassle with doing asset sales in the > middle of that five year period. Who do you sell your obsolete computer to? If you do sell it, then it does have value, which supports the theory of depreciation over it's useful life. If you can, take Section 179 on that equipment, if not, then play by the rules set out by Congress. -- Paul A. Thomas, CPA Watkinsville, Georgia -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| | |||
| |||
| In article <05ydneIuxZsUZG7VnZ2dnUVZ_hudnZ2d[at]giganews.com> , nish <nisha[at]nunya.org> wrote: - quote - > Is there any option to depreciate computers on a MACRS 200DB 3 Year method > instead of the 5 Year? Computers are not only 5-year CL, which as you know means six tax & calendar years, they are also Listed Property. Listed Property is the IRS's cutesy way of having you say, "Look Look Look, we just bought computers." Or cars, and, I think cell phones. You do have both 50% Bonus Depreciation as automatically applicable unless you take action to elect out of that Sec 168k benefit for all property of that class, and Section 179 first year expensing for all property that qualifies for these extras. That means, among other things, that business use remains above 50% for the entire five years. And for property that you anticipate wearing out before the end of its class life, consider using straight line, so you don't get bitten later on. - quote - > Computers typically become obsolete within two years of purchase. It would > be very desirable to just let them depreciate out after three years and not > have to hassle with doing asset sales in the middle of that five year > period. Please do not confuse statutory class life with the actual useful life of that property. Will you just toss out the computers? If so, there should be no trouble with your expenses if you did not take bonus depreciation or first year expensing, and you used straight-line instead of 200DB. By the way if you are anywhere close to AMT, you might want to select S-L for both regular and AMT, which somewhat simplifies your paperwork. -- ArtKamlet at a o l dot c o m Columbus OH K2PZH -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Is there any option to depreciate computers on a MACRS 200DB 3 Year method instead of the 5 Year? Computers typically become obsolete within two years of purchase. It would be very desirable to just let them depreciate out after three years and not have to hassle with doing asset sales in the middle of that five year period. nish -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| Tags |
| computer, depreciation, option, year |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Rental Property Depreciation for Current/Previous Year olivia: I am a first time landlord and rented our previous home in September-2005. When I filed my taxes last year, I did not depreciate. My perception (or... | Taxes | 4 | 03-19-2007 05:42 AM | |
| Computer Depreciation Kathrin: I bought a computer in December 2006 for 95% business use (sole proprietor). The cost for it was around $900 dollar and I'm using the 5-year... | Taxes | 3 | 03-08-2007 03:45 AM | |
| Rental properties depreciation with only last year return tedqn@yahoo.com: I'm doing a tax for a friend .. he has a couple of rental properties which have been rented out for approx 5 years. Previous year returns were... | Taxes | 2 | 03-08-2006 02:25 AM | |
| what happens to assets of 179 depreciation after the first year? blue73thing: What happens to assets, like a big truck and commercial lawn mower after one depreciates the at 100% in the first year, and maybe the bonus... | Taxes | 9 | 12-20-2004 11:48 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |