|
#5
| |||
| |||
| On Sep 30, 12:40*pm, Bernie Cosell <ber...[at]fantasyfarm.com> wrote: - quote - > ....and how is it accounted for:
Thanks all --- it is very clear. I guess since the estate is taxed on> If an estate has illiquid assets that need to be liquidated (at the least > to pay the estate taxes and estate expenses, perhaps also to be able to > make the distributions to the heirs), how are the capital gains (or losses) > handled? ... the actual value of the assets at the DoD, the capital gains or losses those assets might represent are irrelevant (and the tax basis for the heirs (or the estate, itself, if some assets have to be liquidated) will simply be *that*value*, as of the DoD).. Appts with account and lawyer are next week, so at least I understand what's going on here.... THANKS! /Bernie\ -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| On Sep 30, 3:48�pm, ed <edcos...[at]sbcglobal.net> wrote: - quote - > On Sep 30, 4:37�pm, Alan <sfcnm-...[at]yahoo.com> wrote:
The Alternate Valuation Date is a factor ONLY if the gross estate> > Bernie Cosell wrote: > > > ....and how is it accounted for: > > > If an estate has illiquid assets that need to be liquidated (at the least > > > to pay the estate taxes and estate expenses, perhaps also to be able to > > > make the distributions to the heirs), how are the capital gains (or losses) > > > handled? I can't imagine that the IRS would just let that opportunity to > > > tax "slip by" but I can't quite figure out which party(ies?) get stuck with > > > them. > > > Also, since the estate is evaluated at the time of death, I assume that the > > > liquidation would only reflect capital gains (or losses) relative to the > > > assessed value of the assets at the time of death? �And how does the > > > six-month re-valuation affect this (would the capital gains/losses be > > > against the *final* assessed value of the assets, either time-of-death or > > > six months later, whichever is used?) �[and yes, this is a real situation > > > and I'm talking to both my accountant and my lawyer about it -- I'm just > > > looking for other opinions and/or background on how these kinds of things > > > work )] �Oh, and I guess there'd be parallel questions about the state> > > estate taxes, New York State in this case. �THANKS. > > > � /Bernie\ > > An estate can have capital gains and losses. They get reflected > > on the 1041 Schedule D (income tax return for estates and trusts) > > and are included in computing the estate's total income on the > > 1041. If losses exceed gains, the excess losses remain with the > > estate until the final income tax return is filed. I.e., they do > > not get passed through to the beneficiaries until the final > > income tax return is filed. �As to how much of any net capital > > gains (long & short) get passed through to the beneficiaries, > > that will depend upon whether there is a requirement to > > distribute the gains or they are actually paid to the beneficiaries. > Alan is correct. � The basis is DOD value or, if a sale is more than 6 > months later then DOD, the 6 month alternative date if elected for ALL > assets. �Use 1041 Schedule D even if there is no gain/loss. �The gains > must be taxed in the Estate and cnnnot be pased through to > beneficiaries if the Estate sells the asset. �The the asset is > distributed the beneficiary takes it at the DOD value and is > responsible for the tax when sold. > ed value is greater than 2 Million (2008). Such an evaluation would generally only be made if the gross asset total has decreased over that period of time. The "election" is made by the executor of the estate. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| On Sep 30, 4:37*pm, Alan <sfcnm-...[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > Bernie Cosell wrote:
Alan is correct. The basis is DOD value or, if a sale is more than 6> > ....and how is it accounted for: > > If an estate has illiquid assets that need to be liquidated (at the least > > to pay the estate taxes and estate expenses, perhaps also to be able to > > make the distributions to the heirs), how are the capital gains (or losses) > > handled? I can't imagine that the IRS would just let that opportunity to > > tax "slip by" but I can't quite figure out which party(ies?) get stuck with > > them. > > Also, since the estate is evaluated at the time of death, I assume that the > > liquidation would only reflect capital gains (or losses) relative to the > > assessed value of the assets at the time of death? *And how does the > > six-month re-valuation affect this (would the capital gains/losses be > > against the *final* assessed value of the assets, either time-of-death or > > six months later, whichever is used?) *[and yes, this is a real situation > > and I'm talking to both my accountant and my lawyer about it -- I'm just > > looking for other opinions and/or background on how these kinds of things > > work )] *Oh, and I guess there'd be parallel questions about the state> > estate taxes, New York State in this case. *THANKS. > > * /Bernie\ > An estate can have capital gains and losses. They get reflected > on the 1041 Schedule D (income tax return for estates and trusts) > and are included in computing the estate's total income on the > 1041. If losses exceed gains, the excess losses remain with the > estate until the final income tax return is filed. I.e., they do > not get passed through to the beneficiaries until the final > income tax return is filed. *As to how much of any net capital > gains (long & short) get passed through to the beneficiaries, > that will depend upon whether there is a requirement to > distribute the gains or they are actually paid to the beneficiaries. > -- > << ------------------------------------------------------- > > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, * > > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties *> > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. * * * * * * * * *> > << * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * > > << * The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts * > > << *to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy *> > << * * * * * * * * *are atwww.asktax.org. * * * * * * * * > > << * * * * Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. * * * * > > << ------------------------------------------------------- > > - Hide quoted text - > - Show quoted text - months later then DOD, the 6 month alternative date if elected for ALL assets. Use 1041 Schedule D even if there is no gain/loss. The gains must be taxed in the Estate and cnnnot be pased through to beneficiaries if the Estate sells the asset. The the asset is distributed the beneficiary takes it at the DOD value and is responsible for the tax when sold. ed -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Bernie Cosell wrote: - quote - > ....and how is it accounted for:
on the 1041 Schedule D (income tax return for estates and trusts)> If an estate has illiquid assets that need to be liquidated (at the least > to pay the estate taxes and estate expenses, perhaps also to be able to > make the distributions to the heirs), how are the capital gains (or losses) > handled? I can't imagine that the IRS would just let that opportunity to > tax "slip by" but I can't quite figure out which party(ies?) get stuck with > them. > Also, since the estate is evaluated at the time of death, I assume that the > liquidation would only reflect capital gains (or losses) relative to the > assessed value of the assets at the time of death? And how does the > six-month re-valuation affect this (would the capital gains/losses be > against the *final* assessed value of the assets, either time-of-death or > six months later, whichever is used?) [and yes, this is a real situation > and I'm talking to both my accountant and my lawyer about it -- I'm just > looking for other opinions and/or background on how these kinds of things > work )] Oh, and I guess there'd be parallel questions about the state> estate taxes, New York State in this case. THANKS. > /Bernie\ An estate can have capital gains and losses. They get reflected and are included in computing the estate's total income on the 1041. If losses exceed gains, the excess losses remain with the estate until the final income tax return is filed. I.e., they do not get passed through to the beneficiaries until the final income tax return is filed. As to how much of any net capital gains (long & short) get passed through to the beneficiaries, that will depend upon whether there is a requirement to distribute the gains or they are actually paid to the beneficiaries. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| In misc.taxes.moderated, Bernie Cosell wrote: - quote - > ....and how is it accounted for:
On a big estate, you are subject to estate taxes. You are not> If an estate has illiquid assets that need to be liquidated (at the least > to pay the estate taxes and estate expenses, perhaps also to be able to > make the distributions to the heirs), how are the capital gains (or losses) > handled? I can't imagine that the IRS would just let that opportunity to > tax "slip by" but I can't quite figure out which party(ies?) get stuck with > them. subject to capital gains taxes based on the pre-death basis, big or small. This may seem like surprising loophole. It means that the original basis info is not needed. - quote - > Also, since the estate is evaluated at the time of death, I assume that the
As to whether the 6-month alternate valuation applies and is> liquidation would only reflect capital gains (or losses) relative to the > assessed value of the assets at the time of death? And how does the > six-month re-valuation affect this (would the capital gains/losses be > against the *final* assessed value of the assets, either time-of-death or > six months later, whichever is used?) [and yes, this is a real situation > and I'm talking to both my accountant and my lawyer about it -- I'm just > looking for other opinions and/or background on how these kinds of things > work )] Oh, and I guess there'd be parallel questions about the state> estate taxes, New York State in this case. THANKS. something you want to elect, I would take that up with your accountant. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| | |||
| |||
| On Sep 30, 10:40 am, Bernie Cosell <ber...[at]fantasyfarm.com> wrote: - quote - > If an estate has illiquid assets that need to be liquidated (at the least
I'm not an accountant, but did go through this process in NY State> to pay the estate taxes and estate expenses, perhaps also to be able to > make the distributions to the heirs), how are the capital gains (or losses) > handled? I can't imagine that the IRS would just let that opportunity to > tax "slip by" but I can't quite figure out which party(ies?) get stuck with > them. > Also, since the estate is evaluated at the time of death, I assume that the > liquidation would only reflect capital gains (or losses) relative to the > assessed value of the assets at the time of death? And how does the > six-month re-valuation affect this (would the capital gains/losses be > against the *final* assessed value of the assets, either time-of-death or > six months later, whichever is used?) [and yes, this is a real situation > and I'm talking to both my accountant and my lawyer about it -- I'm just > looking for other opinions and/or background on how these kinds of things > work )] Oh, and I guess there'd be parallel questions about the state> estate taxes, New York State in this case. THANKS. with my father's estate 4 years ago. There may be errors here, and you really should be getting this info from your accountant and lawyer. Capital gains/losses are basically irrelevant. An estate is taxed on its total value at the time of death. You don't need to know the original purchase price/cost basis/etc of anything, just its current value. The IRS doesn't let the taxes on cap gains slip by, Congress does. Everything under $2 million (for a 2008 death) gets passed along without tax. Estates with a value > $2M get taxed on the portion over $2M at a graduated rate, I believe. There is no automatic 6 month valuation. You can choose to use the value of the estate at 6 mos rather than the time of death, but you must do so for all assets (no cherry picking). So instead of the date of death, you'd be using 6 mos later. In addition to the estate return, that covers the time of death (or 6 mo later), you must also produce an annual return for all income and losses while the estate is being settled. That return would include gains and losses from the time of death to the end of the calendar year and so on. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| .....and how is it accounted for: If an estate has illiquid assets that need to be liquidated (at the least to pay the estate taxes and estate expenses, perhaps also to be able to make the distributions to the heirs), how are the capital gains (or losses) handled? I can't imagine that the IRS would just let that opportunity to tax "slip by" but I can't quite figure out which party(ies?) get stuck with them. Also, since the estate is evaluated at the time of death, I assume that the liquidation would only reflect capital gains (or losses) relative to the assessed value of the assets at the time of death? And how does the six-month re-valuation affect this (would the capital gains/losses be against the *final* assessed value of the assets, either time-of-death or six months later, whichever is used?) [and yes, this is a real situation and I'm talking to both my accountant and my lawyer about it -- I'm just looking for other opinions and/or background on how these kinds of things work )] Oh, and I guess there'd be parallel questions about the stateestate taxes, New York State in this case. THANKS. /Bernie\ -- Bernie Cosell Fantasy Farm Fibers bernie[at]fantasyfarm.com Pearisburg, VA --> Too many people, too few sheep <-- -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| Tags |
| capital, gains, pays |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Can a short term capital loss balance long term capital gains? Judy: My boss sold his house (lucky guy) at a price well above basis and over his $250,000 exclusion. He has a lot of stock losses this year. Can he use... | Financial Planning | 1 | 10-19-2008 01:17 PM | |
| How best to enter paper Capital gains and return of capital PTH: I hold mutual funds that report both capital gains and return of capital at the end of year for tax purposes. Neither of these are actually paid... | Microsoft Money | 5 | 03-19-2008 10:08 PM | |
| Short Term Capital Gains and Long Term Capital Losses PeterOut: (Under US tax law) can you offset short term capital gains with long term capital losses. Thanks, Peter. <<... | Taxes | 4 | 01-15-2007 06:07 AM | |
| Capital gains Mike: Husband and wife have separate brokerage accounts. Husband bought stock at $100, now worth $150. He transfers this stock to his wife's account. Is... | Taxes | 10 | 09-16-2005 11:40 PM | |
| Capital gains vs short term gains malibu.ron@verizon.net: Can stock losses from short term gains be used to offset long term gains. << -------------------------------------------------><< The Charter and... | Taxes | 1 | 06-11-2005 09:54 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |