|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Phil Marti wrote: .... - quote - > It is likely that 20% withholding was required. I have no idea what you're > talking about in your reference to "other firms," but if you're talking > about IRAs the rules are different. > See the discussion beginning on page 8 of IRS Publication 575. It would certainly be nice(r) if the Plan Administrators would train their representatives to at least have the references to what requirements are. They couldn't answer a single question wrt to the issue. I see the 20% was, indeed, applicable, but Vanguard insisted they were going to withhold 25%. At that point since we pay estimates anyway and compute them on the basis of planned withdrawals it was simply intolerable so as noted in the other response just changed horses in midstream and initiated the rollover. Thanks for the correct Publication reference... -- -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| JoeTaxpayer wrote: .... - quote - > > It is likely that 20% withholding was required. I have no idea what
Actually, that's precisely what I was referring to...I didn't realize> > you're talking about in your reference to "other firms," but if you're > > talking about IRAs the rules are different. .... there was a difference between the two in that respect and since the robot couldn't give me any reference, I assumed it was bs... - quote - > You might consider transferring this small 401(k) to an IRA, to avoid
Actually, that is what I did for exactly that reason as the last straw;> this annoyance. I was still curious, however... ![]() -- -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Phil Marti wrote: - quote - > "dpb" wrote:
You might consider transferring this small 401(k) to an IRA, to avoid> > Requested a withdrawal (over 59.5 so no issues of penalty) from a small > > 401(k) from a (relatively) short employer. > > > Was informed it was "the law" that would have to withhold 25%. > > > When informed other firms didn't require that, of course, the telephone > > robot couldn't do other than read the supplied script and claim > > infallibility. > > > This is internal procedure and subterfuge of using a convenient whipping > > boy of the IRS as an excuse rather than reality, correct? > It is likely that 20% withholding was required. I have no idea what you're > talking about in your reference to "other firms," but if you're talking > about IRAs the rules are different. > See the discussion beginning on page 8 of IRS Publication 575. this annoyance. Joe -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| | |||
| |||
| "dpb" wrote: - quote - > Requested a withdrawal (over 59.5 so no issues of penalty) from a small
It is likely that 20% withholding was required. I have no idea what you're> 401(k) from a (relatively) short employer. > Was informed it was "the law" that would have to withhold 25%. > When informed other firms didn't require that, of course, the telephone > robot couldn't do other than read the supplied script and claim > infallibility. > This is internal procedure and subterfuge of using a convenient whipping > boy of the IRS as an excuse rather than reality, correct? talking about in your reference to "other firms," but if you're talking about IRAs the rules are different. See the discussion beginning on page 8 of IRS Publication 575. -- Phil Marti Clarksburg, MD -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Requested a withdrawal (over 59.5 so no issues of penalty) from a small 401(k) from a (relatively) short employer. Was informed it was "the law" that would have to withhold 25%. When informed other firms didn't require that, of course, the telephone robot couldn't do other than read the supplied script and claim infallibility. This is internal procedure and subterfuge of using a convenient whipping boy of the IRS as an excuse rather than reality, correct? -- -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| Tags |
| 401k, required, withholding |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Looking for advice on W-4 withholding bbcrock@gmail.com: I paid a large tax issue this year and am planning to file quarterly taxes in June. We are a two-earner family with similar salaries. Kids,... | Taxes | 1 | 05-26-2007 02:51 AM | |
| Calculating GA withholding Jason.Alden.Benoit@gmail.com: I am trying to calculate in excel the Georgia state withholding tax. I am single and have no allowances. I used this publication: ... | Taxes | 3 | 07-11-2006 07:29 PM | |
| One Lump Tax Withholding Dennis Marks: This is probably the reverse of some tax withholding questions that I have seen. I receive social security, a small pension, and income from a very... | Taxes | 8 | 07-09-2006 01:40 AM | |
| Tax Withholding Estimator Lawrence: I just have a quick question. Assuming that I have entered all the tax information in Money 2004 correctly, is the the Tax estimator generally... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 10-06-2004 06:04 PM | |
| IRA withholding Aimee43: I hope someone can help me, I'm having trouble getting a consistent answer about this question. On 12/19/03 I rolled over two complete funds from a... | Taxes | 1 | 02-17-2004 01:54 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |