Go Back   CDN Business Directory > Main Category > Taxes

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-22-2008, 07:13 PM
jmail7@andrewmitchel.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Passive Foreign Investment Company (PFIC)

- quote -

> My first question is why does the U.S. not treat such companies as ordinary
> corporations distributing qualified dividends? *Is it simply because they
> invest in assets like airplanes that are held for a long term? * It seems
> awfully discriminatory against such companies to treat their earnings as
> ordinary income. * * And why create such hellish complexity for ordinary
> shareholders?


The PFIC rules were targeted at foreign mutual funds. If they didn't
exist, U.S. persons could invest in foreign mutual funds that don't
pay current dividends (instead the mutual funds would reinvest all of
their earnings). This would allow the U.S. investors unlimited
deferral on what is essentially investment income. Without the PFIC
rules, there would be a strong incentive to invest in foreign mutual
funds rather than U.S. mutual funds (which are required to annually
distribute their income).

- quote -

> Second, if I take the QEF election as I read it I pay tax based on actual
> earnings rather than distributions. * If the company distributes nothing, I
> pay tax based on the earnings anyway, and I get to increase my tax basis.
> What is less clear is what happens if the company pays out *more* dividend
> than it reports as earnings? * *In this case do I pay tax based on the
> earnings, but not get taxed on the difference and simply decrease tax cost
> basis in the stock for the difference? * In such case what would happen in a
> future year when the tax cost basis in the stock goes to zero?


In the QEF context, distributions in excess of earnings will be
treated as return of basis and when basis is gone they will be treated
as gain on sale or exchange of an asset.

- quote -

> Third, does any of this hideousness get less complex if I buy the stock in
> an IRA account, or are there still requirements to pay out tax for IRAs
> (with or without the QEF election)?


I don't know.

- quote -

> And a fourth question: if I take the QEF election, and the company
> reports both ordinary income and capital gains, am I at least allowed to
> take the capital gains and declare it on my return as capital gains? Or am
> I forced to take the PFIC's capital gains and declare that as ordinary
> income as well?


Yes, if you make the QEF election you can get long term capital gain
treatment to the extent it exists. Note that you need to annually get
a detailed statement from the PFIC if you want to election QEF status.

Andrew Mitchel
Essex, Connecticut
http://www.andrewmitchel.com

--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- >
 
Old 09-22-2008, 02:54 PM
Will
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Passive Foreign Investment Company (PFIC)

And a fourth question: if I take the QEF election, and the company
reports both ordinary income and capital gains, am I at least allowed to
take the capital gains and declare it on my return as capital gains? Or am
I forced to take the PFIC's capital gains and declare that as ordinary
income as well?

--
Will


"Will" <westes-usc[at]noemail.nospam> wrote in message
news:kvmdnYSpcqkET0vVnZ2dnUVZ_o_inZ2d[at]giganews.com...
- quote -

> I am looking at an investment in a passive foreign invesment company
(PFIC),
> and the implications of this are explained on the company's web page here:
> http://www.genesislease.com/document...ocumentID=1891
> Wow, that gets complicated, and it looks complicated with or without the

QEF
> election.
> My first question is why does the U.S. not treat such companies as

ordinary
> corporations distributing qualified dividends? Is it simply because they
> invest in assets like airplanes that are held for a long term? It seems
> awfully discriminatory against such companies to treat their earnings as
> ordinary income. And why create such hellish complexity for ordinary
> shareholders?
> Second, if I take the QEF election as I read it I pay tax based on actual
> earnings rather than distributions. If the company distributes nothing,

I
> pay tax based on the earnings anyway, and I get to increase my tax basis.
> What is less clear is what happens if the company pays out *more* dividend
> than it reports as earnings? In this case do I pay tax based on the
> earnings, but not get taxed on the difference and simply decrease tax cost
> basis in the stock for the difference? In such case what would happen in

a
> future year when the tax cost basis in the stock goes to zero?
> Third, does any of this hideousness get less complex if I buy the stock in
> an IRA account, or are there still requirements to pay out tax for IRAs
> (with or without the QEF election)?
> --
> Will


--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- >
  #-1  
Old 09-22-2008, 04:52 AM
Will
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Passive Foreign Investment Company (PFIC)

I am looking at an investment in a passive foreign invesment company (PFIC),
and the implications of this are explained on the company's web page here:

http://www.genesislease.com/document...ocumentID=1891

Wow, that gets complicated, and it looks complicated with or without the QEF
election.

My first question is why does the U.S. not treat such companies as ordinary
corporations distributing qualified dividends? Is it simply because they
invest in assets like airplanes that are held for a long term? It seems
awfully discriminatory against such companies to treat their earnings as
ordinary income. And why create such hellish complexity for ordinary
shareholders?

Second, if I take the QEF election as I read it I pay tax based on actual
earnings rather than distributions. If the company distributes nothing, I
pay tax based on the earnings anyway, and I get to increase my tax basis.
What is less clear is what happens if the company pays out *more* dividend
than it reports as earnings? In this case do I pay tax based on the
earnings, but not get taxed on the difference and simply decrease tax cost
basis in the stock for the difference? In such case what would happen in a
future year when the tax cost basis in the stock goes to zero?

Third, does any of this hideousness get less complex if I buy the stock in
an IRA account, or are there still requirements to pay out tax for IRAs
(with or without the QEF election)?

--
Will

--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- >
 

Tags
company, foreign, investment, passive, pfic
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
Disposition of Passive Investment
miainvest: I have an opportunity to investment in a company which I will not be actively nor materially participating. Assuming this is my only passive...
Taxes 2 01-05-2006 04:13 AM
Movie Investment and Passive Losses
mel: Taxpayers invested in a movie. After the 2004 return was filed they received a K-1 indicating a $12,000 ordinary business loss. I assume this is...
Taxes 1 04-23-2005 12:30 AM
U.S. Citizen paid by foreign company
Michelle Kapp: U.S. Citizen working for US company in Taiwan for three months in 2003. He was paid by US company but also received a direct payment of $4,500...
Taxes 1 03-02-2004 05:07 AM
working for a foreign company
bill: I am doing work for a foreign company; they do not have a subsidiary or other legal entity in the U.S. They classify me as an "independent...
Taxes 4 02-01-2004 06:23 AM



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:47 PM.