|
#5
| |||
| |||
| dpb wrote: - quote - > > > But isn't the value of the lodging compensation either location?
I should have mentioned, IRS Pub 15-B is a good starting point for the> > It's excludible from gross income if it meets certain requirements, > > all of which would clearly be met if the potential employee was lodged > > at hotel A. The issue is hotel B in place of A (see my other reply). > Learned something... rules regarding fringe benefit exclusion rules. -Mark Bole -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Mark Bole wrote: - quote - > dpb wrote: > > Harlan Lunsford wrote: .... > > But isn't the value of the lodging compensation either location? > It's excludible from gross income if it meets certain requirements, all > of which would clearly be met if the potential employee was lodged at > hotel A. The issue is hotel B in place of A (see my other reply). .... Learned something... -- -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Chris Ruehrwein wrote: - quote - > Is this taxable Income? An employer requires all employees to live at their
Is the parent corporation the employer? This could be a sticking point.> hotel(A) for their convenance. They do not provide a cash allowance and it > is a condition of employment to live at the hotel. The employer provides > lodging to all of their employees. This potential employee has a child with > medical conditions and needs to be close to medical assistance. The employer > offers the potential employee to live at their hotel(B) own by the parent > corporation one block away which has medical facitlites located in the > hotel. The potential employee would be working at hotel(A) and living at > hotel(B). Would her lodging paid for by her employer be added to her taxable > income? Or put another way, does the employer (who provides and requires employee lodging at hotel A) carry on a significant part of its business activities at hotel B? Of course, it is the employer's responsibility to figure this out, not the employee's. If the employer really wants to hire this person and the lodging is taxable, surely they could just gross up the income to cover the extra tax. I'm also curious what kind of hotel (a) includes medical facilities that (b) are not usable if you live one block away from them... -Mark Bole -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| dpb wrote: - quote - > Harlan Lunsford wrote: > .... > > One block away shouldn't matter. Employer requires all employees to > > live on premises, and unless it's a country block, like where i live, > > I see no difference. > But isn't the value of the lodging compensation either location? It's excludible from gross income if it meets certain requirements, all of which would clearly be met if the potential employee was lodged at hotel A. The issue is hotel B in place of A (see my other reply). -Mark Bole -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Harlan Lunsford wrote: .... - quote - > One block away shouldn't matter. Employer requires all employees to
But isn't the value of the lodging compensation either location?> live on premises, and unless it's a country block, like where i live, I > see no difference. -- -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| | |||
| |||
| Chris Ruehrwein wrote: - quote - > Is this taxable Income? An employer requires all employees to live at their
live on premises, and unless it's a country block, like where i live, I> hotel(A) for their convenance. They do not provide a cash allowance and it > is a condition of employment to live at the hotel. The employer provides > lodging to all of their employees. This potential employee has a child with > medical conditions and needs to be close to medical assistance. The employer > offers the potential employee to live at their hotel(B) own by the parent > corporation one block away which has medical facitlites located in the > hotel. The potential employee would be working at hotel(A) and living at > hotel(B). Would her lodging paid for by her employer be added to her taxable > income? One block away shouldn't matter. Employer requires all employees to see no difference. ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Is this taxable Income? An employer requires all employees to live at their hotel(A) for their convenance. They do not provide a cash allowance and it is a condition of employment to live at the hotel. The employer provides lodging to all of their employees. This potential employee has a child with medical conditions and needs to be close to medical assistance. The employer offers the potential employee to live at their hotel(B) own by the parent corporation one block away which has medical facitlites located in the hotel. The potential employee would be working at hotel(A) and living at hotel(B). Would her lodging paid for by her employer be added to her taxable income? -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| Tags |
| allowance, housing |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| home office deduction if clergy spouse receives housing allowance revheck@linuxwaves.com: I posted this a few weeks ago, but got no response. So I am trying again: My wife is an ordained Presbyterian minister. Part of her compensation... | Taxes | 3 | 10-27-2005 07:03 AM | |
| Best way to handle minister's housing allowance? Dick Watson: I'd probably do what you suggest with one modification. At the end of the year, if there is unspent allowance, put in a paycheck with a negative... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 05-31-2004 06:49 PM | |
| Clergy Housing Allowance & spouse income Dennis C: If a member of the clergy owns a home together with his spouse (not a clergy) who works outside of the church, in calculating the yearly housing... | Taxes | 1 | 02-11-2004 01:58 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |