|
#3
| |||
| |||
| "D. Stussy" <spam[at]bde-arc.ampr.org> wrote in message news:g9g2p8$3j8$1[at]snarked.org... - quote - > "Gil Faver" <rowdy'sboss[at]xxyz.com> wrote in message
Thanks folks.> news:1KFuk.192430$102.175921[at]bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net... > > "D. Stussy" <spam[at]bde-arc.ampr.org> wrote in message > > news:g9f8am$de5$1[at]snarked.org... > > > "Dick Peavey" <me[at]privacy.net> wrote in message > > > news:xnbuk.20204$Rs1.14903[at]newsfe08.iad... > > > > I was the executor of a Calif. estate for the years 1990 and 1991. The > > > > estate was probated in Calif and closed in 1991. I've retained all > > > > paperwork, bills, cancelled checks, Calif and Federal Estate income > > > > taxes, > > > > and so on. > > > > > > > How long should I retain these records? > > > > > > > I would like to shred the pile because by now these papers will have > > > little > > > > meaning to anybody, but I want to know if there are legal or tax > > > > requirements, or if there are records I should retain indefinitely. > > > > > > > Dick Peavey > > > > > As the records may form the "cost basis" of the inherited assets by the > > > beneficiaries, you should not dispose of them but instead divest them > > > to > > > the > > > beneficiaries (if they don't already have them). The only thing you > might > > > want to keep is the IRS Closing Letter. > > > good point, but aren't the assets and their values listed in the estate > tax > > return? shouldn't that suffice? > Of course they're listed. However, disposing of the tax return itself was > a > consideration of the OP's question. I suggested keeping the closing > letter > because that's proof of having filed the 706 (and thus the statute of > limitations). > > If not, how will you distribute to a plurality of beneficiaries > > (shouldn't > > that be legatees?) all this paperwork? Actually, it should be whittled > down > > to only that which is important to keep, but who is to do that task? > Either > > the ex-executor, or his delegate (perhaps a trusted one of the legatees?) > To each as necessary, and where a document applies to more than one, pick > one. It really doesn't matter - as the question was whether the executor > should continue to retain, etc.... I'll keep the court papers and filings, and the tax returns for a while longer. I shredded everything else. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| "Gil Faver" <rowdy'sboss[at]xxyz.com> wrote in message news:1KFuk.192430$102.175921[at]bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net... - quote - > "D. Stussy" <spam[at]bde-arc.ampr.org> wrote in message
Of course they're listed. However, disposing of the tax return itself was a> news:g9f8am$de5$1[at]snarked.org... > > "Dick Peavey" <me[at]privacy.net> wrote in message > > news:xnbuk.20204$Rs1.14903[at]newsfe08.iad... > > > I was the executor of a Calif. estate for the years 1990 and 1991. The > > > estate was probated in Calif and closed in 1991. I've retained all > > > paperwork, bills, cancelled checks, Calif and Federal Estate income > > > taxes, > > > and so on. > > > > > How long should I retain these records? > > > > > I would like to shred the pile because by now these papers will have > > little > > > meaning to anybody, but I want to know if there are legal or tax > > > requirements, or if there are records I should retain indefinitely. > > > > > Dick Peavey > > > As the records may form the "cost basis" of the inherited assets by the > > beneficiaries, you should not dispose of them but instead divest them to > > the > > beneficiaries (if they don't already have them). The only thing you might > > want to keep is the IRS Closing Letter. > good point, but aren't the assets and their values listed in the estate tax > return? shouldn't that suffice? consideration of the OP's question. I suggested keeping the closing letter because that's proof of having filed the 706 (and thus the statute of limitations). - quote - > If not, how will you distribute to a plurality of beneficiaries (shouldn't
To each as necessary, and where a document applies to more than one, pick> that be legatees?) all this paperwork? Actually, it should be whittled down > to only that which is important to keep, but who is to do that task? Either > the ex-executor, or his delegate (perhaps a trusted one of the legatees?) one. It really doesn't matter - as the question was whether the executor should continue to retain, etc.... -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| "D. Stussy" <spam[at]bde-arc.ampr.org> wrote in message news:g9f8am$de5$1[at]snarked.org... - quote - > "Dick Peavey" <me[at]privacy.net> wrote in message
good point, but aren't the assets and their values listed in the estate tax> news:xnbuk.20204$Rs1.14903[at]newsfe08.iad... > > I was the executor of a Calif. estate for the years 1990 and 1991. The > > estate was probated in Calif and closed in 1991. I've retained all > > paperwork, bills, cancelled checks, Calif and Federal Estate income > > taxes, > > and so on. > > > How long should I retain these records? > > > I would like to shred the pile because by now these papers will have > little > > meaning to anybody, but I want to know if there are legal or tax > > requirements, or if there are records I should retain indefinitely. > > > Dick Peavey > As the records may form the "cost basis" of the inherited assets by the > beneficiaries, you should not dispose of them but instead divest them to > the > beneficiaries (if they don't already have them). The only thing you might > want to keep is the IRS Closing Letter. return? shouldn't that suffice? If not, how will you distribute to a plurality of beneficiaries (shouldn't that be legatees?) all this paperwork? Actually, it should be whittled down to only that which is important to keep, but who is to do that task? Either the ex-executor, or his delegate (perhaps a trusted one of the legatees?) -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| | |||
| |||
| "Dick Peavey" <me[at]privacy.net> wrote in message news:xnbuk.20204$Rs1.14903[at]newsfe08.iad... - quote - > I was the executor of a Calif. estate for the years 1990 and 1991. The
As the records may form the "cost basis" of the inherited assets by the> estate was probated in Calif and closed in 1991. I've retained all > paperwork, bills, cancelled checks, Calif and Federal Estate income taxes, > and so on. > How long should I retain these records? > I would like to shred the pile because by now these papers will have little > meaning to anybody, but I want to know if there are legal or tax > requirements, or if there are records I should retain indefinitely. > Dick Peavey beneficiaries, you should not dispose of them but instead divest them to the beneficiaries (if they don't already have them). The only thing you might want to keep is the IRS Closing Letter. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I was the executor of a Calif. estate for the years 1990 and 1991. The estate was probated in Calif and closed in 1991. I've retained all paperwork, bills, cancelled checks, Calif and Federal Estate income taxes, and so on. How long should I retain these records? I would like to shred the pile because by now these papers will have little meaning to anybody, but I want to know if there are legal or tax requirements, or if there are records I should retain indefinitely. Dick Peavey -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| Tags |
| closed, estate, record, retention |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| closed estate tobe: In February 2006, I responded by phone to a letter from the IRS asking about a "missing" Form 1041 Estate tax return for 2004 for my dad's estate. ... | Taxes | 1 | 02-07-2008 10:22 PM | |
| What to do with "new" asset of closed estate Ira Smilovitz: Unusual situation here. Decedent died in 1993. Estate Tax return filed and relevant taxes paid (taxable estate was over $600K) and estate closed in... | Taxes | 5 | 07-28-2007 04:24 AM | |
| Personal Representative Signing tax return after estate closed bm30003700@aol.com: I have been told by one source that a personal rep can sign a tax return I am preparing on behalf of an estate for year 2002. The reason he cited... | Taxes | 2 | 03-06-2006 02:50 AM | |
| California record retention rules ??? Michael T Wing CPA: A colleague has asked whether there are any rules in California that impose different or additional record retention requirements on paid... | Taxes | 3 | 12-22-2003 07:46 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |