| | |||
| |||
| In article <827a13ee-db33-45fe-a2c9-41b35a78a2bb[at]z72g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> , John H. Fisher <TaxService[at]aol.com> wrote: - quote - > IRS Provides Circumstances Under Which a Child of Divorced or > Separated Parents Will Be Treated As a Dependent of Both (Rev. Proc. > 2008-48) > I expect this will make for an abundance of amended returns. I'd have > to review thousands of returns to properly serve the interest of those > affected. Athough I like the ruling, I'm not happy about the work it > will entail- ![]() Jack As I understand this - and it is long and filled with pointers to other code sections -- what this does is adds qualifying children to the allowed list of Dependents for Medical purposes. It has long been the rule that a parent could claim a medical deduction for a child even if he could not claim the dependency exemption. Even if the other parent claimed the dependency exemption. Moreover, and for this RevProc, an employer medical plan hat covers the employee's dependent child can now officially cover that child even if the other spouse claims the dependency exemption. As I see it, this cleans up the language, and brings it into line with the Sec 152 stuff that was modified by the qualifying child rules. Importantly, this RevProc does not allow the Dependency Exemption to go to both parents. I think the Pub that might get modified, and then only slightly, is Pub 502 [medical] and not Pub 501 [filing status and dependency]. -- ArtKamlet at a o l dot c o m Columbus OH K2PZH -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| IRS Provides Circumstances Under Which a Child of Divorced or Separated Parents Will Be Treated As a Dependent of Both (Rev. Proc. 2008-48) I expect this will make for an abundance of amended returns. I'd have to review thousands of returns to properly serve the interest of those affected. Athough I like the ruling, I'm not happy about the work it will entail- ![]() -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| Tags |
| children, dependent, parents, treated |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| When A Child Is Treated As A Dependent of Both Parents: Divorced- Separated or Living Apart Alan: The IRS has released RP 2008-48 that describes the circumstances under which the Internal Revenue Service will treat a child of parents who are... | Taxes | 2 | 08-18-2008 11:35 PM | |
| withholding on a 1099-R treated same as W-2 ? JohnEyles: When I was a W-2 employee, there was a nice rule that said that ALL money withheld from my wages were considered to be evenly withheld throughout... | Taxes | 8 | 08-02-2007 09:46 PM | |
| Loan pmt treated as credit card pmt, cannot categorize PeterPla: Two problems. 1) When I set up my car loan, Money somehow decided to treat it like a Credit Card, no idea why. Is there a way to "fix" this? ... | Microsoft Money | 5 | 09-10-2006 12:07 AM | |
| pre-tax dependent care limit for 2 children bbcrock@gmail.com: My HR person at work said that with 2 children, the dependent care pre-tax program increases from a $5000 max to a $10k max if there are two... | Taxes | 3 | 06-14-2006 02:48 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |