|
#9
| |||
| |||
| Arthur Kamlet wrote: - quote - > In article <sl0kk.9227$L_.3405[at]flpi150.ffdc.sbc.com> ,
The first time homebuyer credit is available for a principal> Alan <sfcnm-mtm[at]yahoo.com> wrote: > > Alan wrote: > > > Alan wrote: > > > > HR 3221 has passed both houses and Pres. Bush says he will sign it. > > > > > > > Text is at: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/...H.R.3221.EAS2: > > > > > > > JCT explanation of Division C tax provisions is at: > > > > http://www.house.gov/jct/x-63-08.pdf > > > > > > > Senate Summary of other provisions is at: > > > > > http://banking.senate.gov/public/_fi...ctSummary3.pdf > > > > > > The JCT explanation describes a version of the bill that differs > > > slightly from the final relating to the First-Time Homebuyer Credit. > > > > > > > The amount of the credit identified by the JCT is the lesser of 10% of > > > purchase price or $7500 ($3750 if MFS). The final bill changed $7500 to > > > $8000 and $3750 to $4000. > > > > > JCT refers to a provision to allow 1Q09 purchases to be treated as if > > > purchased in 2008 to allow a 2008 tax credit. This provision was removed > > > from the final version. > Did you mean 1H09? residence purchased on or after April 9, 2008, and before July 1, 2009. Any home purchased in 2009, but no later then June 30, 2009 that meets the definition of a first time home, can be treated at the election of the taxpayer as if it was bought on 12/31/08 ONLY for purposes of calculating and applying the credit in 2008. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| Arthur Kamlet wrote: - quote - > In article <sl0kk.9227$L_.3405[at]flpi150.ffdc.sbc.com> ,
principal residence during the 3-year period ending on the date> Alan <sfcnm-mtm[at]yahoo.com> wrote: > > When all was said and done, the final version conforms to the JCT > > explanation. $3750/$7500 and the election to treat 2009 purchases > > as a 2008 purchase for purposes of the credit. > Except a 2009 purchase must still be treated as a 2009 purchase > for the purpose of calculaing if this is a first home purchase. > A "first home" for this credit (more like a loan, since it has > to be paid back) generaly follows the first home exception for a > section 72 exclusion from IRA early distribution tax, except > three years is used for this new credit instead of two years. A first home requires no present ownership interest in a of the purchase of the new principal residence. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| In article <sl0kk.9227$L_.3405[at]flpi150.ffdc.sbc.com> , Alan <sfcnm-mtm[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > Alan wrote: > > Alan wrote: > > > HR 3221 has passed both houses and Pres. Bush says he will sign it. > > > > > Text is at: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/...H.R.3221.EAS2: > > > > > JCT explanation of Division C tax provisions is at: > > > http://www.house.gov/jct/x-63-08.pdf > > > > > Senate Summary of other provisions is at: > > > http://banking.senate.gov/public/_fi...ctSummary3.pdf > > > > > > The JCT explanation describes a version of the bill that differs > > slightly from the final relating to the First-Time Homebuyer Credit. > > > > The amount of the credit identified by the JCT is the lesser of 10% of > > purchase price or $7500 ($3750 if MFS). The final bill changed $7500 to > > $8000 and $3750 to $4000. > > > JCT refers to a provision to allow 1Q09 purchases to be treated as if > > purchased in 2008 to allow a 2008 tax credit. This provision was removed > > from the final version. Did you mean 1H09? - quote - > I lost track of the concurrences to the amendments to the > amendments of the amendments (Resolving differences -- Senate > actions: Senate agreed to the motion to concur in House amendment > to Senate amendment to House amendments to Senate amendment to > the bill by Yea-Nay Vote. 72 - 13.). > When all was said and done, the final version conforms to the JCT > explanation. $3750/$7500 and the election to treat 2009 purchases > as a 2008 purchase for purposes of the credit. -- ArtKamlet at a o l dot c o m Columbus OH K2PZH -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| In article <sl0kk.9227$L_.3405[at]flpi150.ffdc.sbc.com> , Alan <sfcnm-mtm[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > When all was said and done, the final version conforms to the JCT
Except a 2009 purchase must still be treated as a 2009 purchase> explanation. $3750/$7500 and the election to treat 2009 purchases > as a 2008 purchase for purposes of the credit. for the purpose of calculaing if this is a first home purchase. A "first home" for this credit (more like a loan, since it has to be paid back) generaly follows the first home exception for a section 72 exclusion from IRA early distribution tax, except three years is used for this new credit instead of two years. -- ArtKamlet at a o l dot c o m Columbus OH K2PZH -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Alan wrote: - quote - > Alan wrote:
amendments of the amendments (Resolving differences -- Senate> > HR 3221 has passed both houses and Pres. Bush says he will sign it. > > > Text is at: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/...H.R.3221.EAS2: > > > JCT explanation of Division C tax provisions is at: > > http://www.house.gov/jct/x-63-08.pdf > > > Senate Summary of other provisions is at: > > http://banking.senate.gov/public/_fi...ctSummary3.pdf > > > The JCT explanation describes a version of the bill that differs > slightly from the final relating to the First-Time Homebuyer Credit. > The amount of the credit identified by the JCT is the lesser of 10% of > purchase price or $7500 ($3750 if MFS). The final bill changed $7500 to > $8000 and $3750 to $4000. > JCT refers to a provision to allow 1Q09 purchases to be treated as if > purchased in 2008 to allow a 2008 tax credit. This provision was removed > from the final version. I lost track of the concurrences to the amendments to the actions: Senate agreed to the motion to concur in House amendment to Senate amendment to House amendments to Senate amendment to the bill by Yea-Nay Vote. 72 - 13.). When all was said and done, the final version conforms to the JCT explanation. $3750/$7500 and the election to treat 2009 purchases as a 2008 purchase for purposes of the credit. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Harlan Lunsford wrote: - quote - > Alan wrote: > > Paul Thomas wrote: > > > "Alan" <sfcnm-mtm[at]yahoo.com> wrote > > > > The amount of the credit identified by the JCT is the lesser of 10% > > > > of purchase price or $7500 ($3750 if MFS). The final bill changed > > > > $7500 to $8000 and $3750 to $4000. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Did the 15 year payback survive? If so, does anyone believe that in > > > 2012 a new client will tell you that they owe an extra $500 because > > > in 08 or 09 they bought a house and took the credit? > > > > > I suspect this is another "economic stimulus" for the guy who sells > > > paper and envelopes to the IRS. > > > > > > > > > > You add 6.667% of the credit to your tax bill in each year for 15 > > years starting in the second taxable year after the credit is taken. > > There is also recapture if the home is disposed of or ceases to be > > your principal residence. There are also rules for divorces, > > involuntary conversions and situations where recapture exceeds gain on > > sale. And naturally, the credit phases out when your income gets too > > high. > > > As for IRS tracking recapture... I see no reason why their computers > > can't look for the 6.667% add back in future years for each taxpayer > > that claims the credit in 2008 and 2009. > > Likewise they can, upon divorce of a joint return filer, track each ex > spouse for 3.3335%? > ChEAr$, > Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA Ask me again in 2011. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Alan wrote: - quote - > Paul Thomas wrote:
spouse for 3.3335%?> > "Alan" <sfcnm-mtm[at]yahoo.com> wrote > > > The amount of the credit identified by the JCT is the lesser of 10% > > > of purchase price or $7500 ($3750 if MFS). The final bill changed > > > $7500 to $8000 and $3750 to $4000. > > > > > > > > Did the 15 year payback survive? If so, does anyone believe that in > > 2012 a new client will tell you that they owe an extra $500 because in > > 08 or 09 they bought a house and took the credit? > > > I suspect this is another "economic stimulus" for the guy who sells > > paper and envelopes to the IRS. > > > > > You add 6.667% of the credit to your tax bill in each year for 15 years > starting in the second taxable year after the credit is taken. There is > also recapture if the home is disposed of or ceases to be your principal > residence. There are also rules for divorces, involuntary conversions > and situations where recapture exceeds gain on sale. And naturally, the > credit phases out when your income gets too high. > As for IRS tracking recapture... I see no reason why their computers > can't look for the 6.667% add back in future years for each taxpayer > that claims the credit in 2008 and 2009. Likewise they can, upon divorce of a joint return filer, track each ex ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Paul Thomas wrote: - quote - > "Alan" <sfcnm-mtm[at]yahoo.com> wrote
years starting in the second taxable year after the credit is> > The amount of the credit identified by the JCT is the lesser of 10% of > > purchase price or $7500 ($3750 if MFS). The final bill changed $7500 to > > $8000 and $3750 to $4000. > Did the 15 year payback survive? If so, does anyone believe that in 2012 a > new client will tell you that they owe an extra $500 because in 08 or 09 > they bought a house and took the credit? > I suspect this is another "economic stimulus" for the guy who sells paper > and envelopes to the IRS. You add 6.667% of the credit to your tax bill in each year for 15 taken. There is also recapture if the home is disposed of or ceases to be your principal residence. There are also rules for divorces, involuntary conversions and situations where recapture exceeds gain on sale. And naturally, the credit phases out when your income gets too high. As for IRS tracking recapture... I see no reason why their computers can't look for the 6.667% add back in future years for each taxpayer that claims the credit in 2008 and 2009. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| "Alan" <sfcnm-mtm[at]yahoo.com> wrote - quote - > The amount of the credit identified by the JCT is the lesser of 10% of > purchase price or $7500 ($3750 if MFS). The final bill changed $7500 to > $8000 and $3750 to $4000. Did the 15 year payback survive? If so, does anyone believe that in 2012 a new client will tell you that they owe an extra $500 because in 08 or 09 they bought a house and took the credit? I suspect this is another "economic stimulus" for the guy who sells paper and envelopes to the IRS. -- Paul A. Thomas, CPA Athens, Georgia -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| | |||
| |||
| Alan wrote: - quote - > HR 3221 has passed both houses and Pres. Bush says he will sign it.
slightly from the final relating to the First-Time Homebuyer Credit.> Text is at: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/...H.R.3221.EAS2: > JCT explanation of Division C tax provisions is at: > http://www.house.gov/jct/x-63-08.pdf > Senate Summary of other provisions is at: > http://banking.senate.gov/public/_fi...ctSummary3.pdf The JCT explanation describes a version of the bill that differs The amount of the credit identified by the JCT is the lesser of 10% of purchase price or $7500 ($3750 if MFS). The final bill changed $7500 to $8000 and $3750 to $4000. JCT refers to a provision to allow 1Q09 purchases to be treated as if purchased in 2008 to allow a 2008 tax credit. This provision was removed from the final version. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| HR 3221 has passed both houses and Pres. Bush says he will sign it. Text is at: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/...H.R.3221.EAS2: JCT explanation of Division C tax provisions is at: http://www.house.gov/jct/x-63-08.pdf Senate Summary of other provisions is at: http://banking.senate.gov/public/_fi...ctSummary3.pdf -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| Tags |
| act, congress, economic, housing, passes, recovery |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 Gil Faver: Alan over in Misc.Taxes.Moderated indicates he has posted the final version of this bill as signed by Pres. Bush, on his website at: ... | Financial Planning | 3 | 10-07-2008 07:45 PM | |
| new FDIC limits if bailout passes beliavsky@aol.com: The current FDIC insurance limit for a joint (husband and wife) non- retirement account is $200K. For a single owner it would be $100K. If the... | Financial Planning | 2 | 10-03-2008 04:05 PM | |
| Congress Speaks: 401(k) Fee Information Elle: >From a New York Times editorial today, plugging a bill under consideration in the House on the lack of transparency with 401(k) fees: "Under... | Financial Planning | 1 | 12-04-2007 09:01 PM | |
| What actually happens when expiration date passes - Bobb -: I've got a few versions of Money and like M04 best. It states that it expies/ won't auto-update after ~ Sept 07. So in Oct 07, is it just the... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 09-10-2006 08:30 PM | |
| Deduct Bus Passes or Not? jbk@piasystems.com: Some sites indicate that bus passes for commuting can be deducted pretax from the employee's salaries but the IRS in Publication 463 seems to... | Taxes | 2 | 03-08-2005 08:58 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |