|
#7
| |||
| |||
| Bill Brown wrote: - quote - > On Jul 7, 6:59 pm, "Gil Faver" <rowdy'sb...[at]xxyz.com> wrote:
exchange", there is no further need of an intermediary, therefore his> > "Bill Brown" <brow...[at]longwood.edu> wrote in message> > > Now that I've read a tiny bit more closely I'm only concerned about > > > disqualification if the intermediary is also the "insurance" provider. > > What about disqualification concerns you? I don't know this reg. > Qualified intermediaries cannot provide other services to the taxpayer > trying to do a 1031 exchange. AHmmm.. interesting. But you reckon that in case of a "failed office is vacated and just another potential investor? But for it to work, there canna be anything in the contract about the unspoken arrangement. A bit risky, I think. ChEAr$, Harlan -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| On Jul 7, 6:59*pm, "Gil Faver" <rowdy'sb...[at]xxyz.com> wrote: - quote - > "Bill Brown" <brow...[at]longwood.edu> wrote in message> > Now that I've read a tiny bit more closely I'm only concerned about
Qualified intermediaries cannot provide other services to the taxpayer> > disqualification if the intermediary is also the "insurance" provider. > What about disqualification concerns you? *I don't know this reg. trying to do a 1031 exchange. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| "Bill Brown" <brownwp[at]longwood.edu> wrote in message news:edcfad7d-52f5-4ecc-9a0f-4e1933f88af8[at]c58g2000hsc.googlegroups.com... - quote - > On Jul 7, 1:22 pm, Bill Brown <brow...[at]longwood.edu> wrote:
from the proceeds of the sale of the property, which is then invested to> > On Jul 7, 12:58 pm, "Gil Faver" <rowdy'sb...[at]xxyz.com> wrote: > > > > > > no, it sounds like once you sell your property, and the replacement > > > fails, > > > they qualified intermediary makes your sale an installment sale. The > > > paperwork has to be done ahead of your sale to allow this possibility. > > > I believe removeps's point may be illuminated by this question. Where > > does the intermediary get the money to make the payments on the > > installment sale contract? > That is, where does the "insurance" provider get the money? provide the stream of income for the installment sale. Or so it would seem. - quote - > > > I have another question. Does this existence of this guarantee by the
What about disqualification concerns you? I don't know this reg.> > intermediary disqualify the intermediary under Reg Sec 1.1031(k)-1(g) > > (4)? > Now that I've read a tiny bit more closely I'm only concerned about > disqualification if the intermediary is also the "insurance" provider. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| On Jul 7, 1:22*pm, Bill Brown <brow...[at]longwood.edu> wrote: - quote - > On Jul 7, 12:58*pm, "Gil Faver" <rowdy'sb...[at]xxyz.com> wrote:
That is, where does the "insurance" provider get the money?> > no, it sounds like once you sell your property, and the replacement fails, > > they qualified intermediary makes your sale an installment sale. *The > > paperwork has to be done ahead of your sale to allow this possibility. > I believe removeps's point may be illuminated by this question. Where > does the intermediary get the money to make the payments on the > installment sale contract? - quote - > I have another question. Does this existence of this guarantee by the
Now that I've read a tiny bit more closely I'm only concerned about> intermediary disqualify the intermediary under Reg Sec 1.1031(k)-1(g) > (4)? disqualification if the intermediary is also the "insurance" provider. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| On Jul 7, 12:58*pm, "Gil Faver" <rowdy'sb...[at]xxyz.com> wrote: - quote - > no, it sounds like once you sell your property, and the replacement fails,
I believe removeps's point may be illuminated by this question. Where> they qualified intermediary makes your sale an installment sale. *The > paperwork has to be done ahead of your sale to allow this possibility. does the intermediary get the money to make the payments on the installment sale contract? I have another question. Does this existence of this guarantee by the intermediary disqualify the intermediary under Reg Sec 1.1031(k)-1(g) (4)? -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| <removeps-groups[at]yahoo.com> wrote in message news:9304da62-2b88-4302-975f-1594ccf03e04[at]x35g2000hsb.googlegroups.com... - quote - > On Jul 6, 5:53 pm, "Gil Faver" <rowdy'sb...[at]xxyz.com> wrote:
no, it sounds like once you sell your property, and the replacement fails,> > ok, here is one such link: > > > http://www.nafep.com/1031%20Rescue/1031_rescue.htm > It sounds as if the qualified intermediary is promising to buy the > property if no one else does. It looks like an insurance program. > Maybe you pay a premium to take advantage of their service, and all > the premiums people pay will be used to buy properties for the 15% of > failures. If the premiums of future customers is used to pay your > installment capital gain, then a court could rule this to be a Ponzi > scheme, and you'd have to pay your capital gains back (though maybe > you would have a claim of right to get back the taxes you paid on it). they qualified intermediary makes your sale an installment sale. The paperwork has to be done ahead of your sale to allow this possibility. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| On Jul 6, 5:53 pm, "Gil Faver" <rowdy'sb...[at]xxyz.com> wrote: - quote - It sounds as if the qualified intermediary is promising to buy the property if no one else does. It looks like an insurance program. Maybe you pay a premium to take advantage of their service, and all the premiums people pay will be used to buy properties for the 15% of failures. If the premiums of future customers is used to pay your installment capital gain, then a court could rule this to be a Ponzi scheme, and you'd have to pay your capital gains back (though maybe you would have a claim of right to get back the taxes you paid on it). -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| | |||
| |||
| "Gil Faver" <rowdy'sboss[at]xxyz.com> wrote in message news:aS7ck.99628$102.61903[at]bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net... - quote - > I just ran across something touted as a "1031 rescue plan", that causes a
ok, here is one such link:> failed 1031 exchange to become an installment sale for the seller, > deferring taxes out into the future. Some of the numbers used in their > example are a bit odd, but the concept seems ok. > Anyone heard of this? I can post a link, but don't know the etiquette for > doing so on this group. I am not trying to spam, here, just pass on some > info and seek some comment. > ========================================= MODERATOR'S COMMENT: > - links that are on-topic and either add to an open thread or > introduce a relevant tax related topic, are usually approved. http://www.nafep.com/1031%20Rescue/1031_rescue.htm -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I just ran across something touted as a "1031 rescue plan", that causes a failed 1031 exchange to become an installment sale for the seller, deferring taxes out into the future. Some of the numbers used in their example are a bit odd, but the concept seems ok. Anyone heard of this? I can post a link, but don't know the etiquette for doing so on this group. I am not trying to spam, here, just pass on some info and seek some comment. ========================================= MODERATOR'S COMMENT: - links that are on-topic and either add to an open thread or introduce a relevant tax related topic, are usually approved. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| Tags |
| 1031, rescue |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| MSN De Lux Portfolio showing wrong data In the "% Gain" and "Averege Cost" columns Fulvio Bizzaro: Hi, have a problem with the DeLux Portfolio: Since some days, from September 2008 the calculation in the Gain/Loss is not accurate: It is... | Microsoft Money | 8 | 10-05-2008 10:41 PM | |
| The legality of the Bear Stearns "rescue" PeterL: An interesting article on the Bear Stearns "rescue": http://www.hussmanfunds.com/wmc/wmc080324.htm "Bear Stearns is trading at $6 instead of $2... | Financial Planning | 4 | 03-25-2008 08:31 AM | |
| "news" and "fyi" links on the "Track My Portfolio" page tom: no longer work in my Money 2000. When I click them, I get "MSN Money-Page Not Found" and "The page you requested could not be found." But there is a... | Microsoft Money | 7 | 10-25-2007 11:34 PM | |
| Problem with keeping track of shared expenses, "His", "Hers", "Ours" and How much do I owe you? P.Constantineau: Hi all, My girlfriend and I are having trouble figuring how to use money 2005 to indicate us how much we owe each other. I have setup Money 2005... | Microsoft Money | 4 | 04-03-2006 02:01 PM | |
| Money 2002 transaction status flags ("E", "C", "R") have all disappeared Nick Tonkin: Hi, After many months of using Money 2002, yesterday I suddenly noticed that the column in my resgister that shows the cleared status of each... | Microsoft Money | 4 | 02-28-2004 04:39 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |