Go Back   CDN Business Directory > Main Category > Taxes

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #4  
Old 06-21-2008, 09:00 PM
Phil Marti
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Roth query: Over 70, Conversion OK? Cap gains losses offset OK?

"Bill" wrote:

- quote -

> TP is over 70, taking RMDs -- but has substantial assets in Traditional
> IRA. At the same time, 2007-2008 nosedive in Bank stocks has created
> significant decline in IRA value.
> Three questions:
> First, is conversion from Trad to Roth still OK when over 70 and taking
> RMD?


Yes. The RMD cannot be converted, but any to all of the remaining balance
can be converted as long as the taxpayer meets the income and filing status
restrictions. Note that neither income from the conversion nor the RMD
counts against the income limit. See Chapter 2 of Publication 590.

- quote -

> Second, does the "conversion" count as part of RMD?

No

- quote -

> Third, is it possible to transfer stock directly from Traditional IRA to
> Roth IRA


Yes.

--
Phil Marti
Clarksburg, MD

--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- >
  #3  
Old 06-20-2008, 03:32 AM
joetaxpayer
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Roth query: Over 70, Conversion OK? Cap gains losses offset OK?



removeps-groups[at]yahoo.com wrote:

- quote -

> On Jun 19, 5:16 pm, joetaxpayer <joetaxpa...[at]nospam.com> wrote:
> > than $100K. So for a really large IRA, the RMD plus other income may put
> > MAGI over $100K. In 2010 this rule is eliminated.

> If Obama is elected, there's a good chance the 2010 rule will be the
> same as 2009.


Staying away from any show of political bias, I still find this
statement odd. The ability to deposit to a Roth is the ability to avoid
taxes on the funds deposited indefinitely. But a conversion is revenue
to the government now. And especially since a single with $100 MAGI is
in the 28% bracket (Joint is 25%), the 2010 rule is not a handout but a
revenue raiser. A voluntary one at that.

But to your point, any answers here are based on the current tax code
and those laws that are in place for future years, which of course, are
subject to change.
Joe

--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- >
  #2  
Old 06-20-2008, 02:21 AM
removeps-groups@yahoo.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Roth query: Over 70, Conversion OK? Cap gains losses offset OK?

On Jun 19, 5:16 pm, joetaxpayer <joetaxpa...[at]nospam.com> wrote:

- quote -

> than $100K. So for a really large IRA, the RMD plus other income may put
> MAGI over $100K. In 2010 this rule is eliminated.


If Obama is elected, there's a good chance the 2010 rule will be the
same as 2009.

--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- >
  #1  
Old 06-20-2008, 12:16 AM
joetaxpayer
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Roth query: Over 70, Conversion OK? Cap gains losses offsetOK?



joetaxpayer wrote:

- quote -

> Ok? It's fantastic!!

Forgive me, all, in my enthusiasm, I failed to mention that for
conversion in 2008 or 2009 Modified Adjusted Gross income must be less
than $100K. So for a really large IRA, the RMD plus other income may put
MAGI over $100K. In 2010 this rule is eliminated.
Joe

--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- >
 
Old 06-19-2008, 11:12 PM
joetaxpayer
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Roth query: Over 70, Conversion OK? Cap gains losses offsetOK?

Bill wrote:

- quote -

> TP is over 70, taking RMDs -- but has substantial assets in Traditional
> IRA. At the same time, 2007-2008 nosedive in Bank stocks has created
> significant decline in IRA value.
> Three questions:
> First, is conversion from Trad to Roth still OK when over 70 and taking
> RMD?
> Second, does the "conversion" count as part of RMD?
> Third, is it possible to transfer stock directly from Traditional IRA to
> Roth IRA -- using current valuation on day of transfer (NYSE Avg Trade
> presumed) as the basis for amount of conversion? The alternative would
> be to sell stock, converting to cash, and then buy same stock in Roth --
> but that would presumably raise possible "Wash Sale" issues.


Ok? It's fantastic!! Yes, I need to get out more, but I will first tell
you that I believe that Roth's value while working is slightly
exaggerated. Your scenario above is ideal. I have an 80+ yr old woman
who is in the 15% bracket. Each year we convert just enough to 'top off'
that bracket so the next hundred dollars would have been taxed at 25%.

No, the conversion must take place after you calculate the RMD. Our RMD
is based on 12/31/07 year end balance. We can do the Roth conversion any
time during the year, but that RMD is fixed.

Yes - you can convert stock, the broker will report that value based on
the day of conversion. There is no wash sale selling in one IRA and
buying in another, anyway.

This strategy helps reduce the ever increasing RMDs as the converted
amount is not in the account at year end. Reduces taxes by letting you
use my 'top off' strategy. And saves the kids/beneficiaries a bucketload
of money. Please, please confirm that TP has beneficiaries listed on the
IRA account(s). IRAs should have their beneficiaries listed for proper
transfer, a will is not enough. This is one of the top planning mistakes
I see out there. See http://www.fairmark.com/refrence/index.htm to
understand the bracket TP is in and how you can strategize for him/her.
Joe

--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- >
  #-1  
Old 06-19-2008, 10:40 PM
Bill
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Roth query: Over 70, Conversion OK? Cap gains losses offset OK?


TP is over 70, taking RMDs -- but has substantial assets in Traditional
IRA. At the same time, 2007-2008 nosedive in Bank stocks has created
significant decline in IRA value.

Three questions:

First, is conversion from Trad to Roth still OK when over 70 and taking
RMD?

Second, does the "conversion" count as part of RMD?

Third, is it possible to transfer stock directly from Traditional IRA to
Roth IRA -- using current valuation on day of transfer (NYSE Avg Trade
presumed) as the basis for amount of conversion? The alternative would
be to sell stock, converting to cash, and then buy same stock in Roth --
but that would presumably raise possible "Wash Sale" issues.

Bill

--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- >
 

Tags
cap, conversion, gains, losses, offset, query, roth
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
offset capital gains with loss
DC: I've often read articles that suggest to offset your capital gains with losses. That never made sense to me because for a typical investor, the...
Financial Planning 1 12-15-2004 12:56 PM
Offset Cap Gains from House with Stock Losses?
ML: I sold a house this year and will have some capital gains from the sale. I own some stocks and mutual funds that are at big losses from their cost...
Taxes 3 10-23-2004 08:33 PM
gains strategy query
MB: I am not sure about the strategy here. I currently have net short term gains. I also have long term gains, includes gains taken recently so they...
Taxes 2 12-01-2003 04:44 PM
Can California Real Property Gain be Offset By Intangible Capital Losses?
Jose Guerra: My wife and I sold our house in California and our profit is about $600K. We have legitimately moved to Nevada. Question: Can we offset the...
Taxes 10 10-20-2003 12:33 AM
Gifts to charity/buying a house- to offset capital gains tax
X: I sold my Michigan (USA) LLC business this year. I lost money three out of five years for a net loss of around $12,000.00. I sold my share of the...
Taxes 2 08-29-2003 05:03 AM



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:35 PM.