|
#4
| |||
| |||
| "Bill" wrote: - quote - > TP is over 70, taking RMDs -- but has substantial assets in Traditional
Yes. The RMD cannot be converted, but any to all of the remaining balance> IRA. At the same time, 2007-2008 nosedive in Bank stocks has created > significant decline in IRA value. > Three questions: > First, is conversion from Trad to Roth still OK when over 70 and taking > RMD? can be converted as long as the taxpayer meets the income and filing status restrictions. Note that neither income from the conversion nor the RMD counts against the income limit. See Chapter 2 of Publication 590. - quote - > Second, does the "conversion" count as part of RMD?
No- quote - > Third, is it possible to transfer stock directly from Traditional IRA to
Yes.> Roth IRA -- Phil Marti Clarksburg, MD -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| removeps-groups[at]yahoo.com wrote: - quote - > On Jun 19, 5:16 pm, joetaxpayer <joetaxpa...[at]nospam.com> wrote:
Staying away from any show of political bias, I still find this> > than $100K. So for a really large IRA, the RMD plus other income may put > > MAGI over $100K. In 2010 this rule is eliminated. > If Obama is elected, there's a good chance the 2010 rule will be the > same as 2009. statement odd. The ability to deposit to a Roth is the ability to avoid taxes on the funds deposited indefinitely. But a conversion is revenue to the government now. And especially since a single with $100 MAGI is in the 28% bracket (Joint is 25%), the 2010 rule is not a handout but a revenue raiser. A voluntary one at that. But to your point, any answers here are based on the current tax code and those laws that are in place for future years, which of course, are subject to change. Joe -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| On Jun 19, 5:16 pm, joetaxpayer <joetaxpa...[at]nospam.com> wrote: - quote - > than $100K. So for a really large IRA, the RMD plus other income may put
If Obama is elected, there's a good chance the 2010 rule will be the> MAGI over $100K. In 2010 this rule is eliminated. same as 2009. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| joetaxpayer wrote: - quote - > Ok? It's fantastic!!
Forgive me, all, in my enthusiasm, I failed to mention that forconversion in 2008 or 2009 Modified Adjusted Gross income must be less than $100K. So for a really large IRA, the RMD plus other income may put MAGI over $100K. In 2010 this rule is eliminated. Joe -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| | |||
| |||
| Bill wrote: - quote - > TP is over 70, taking RMDs -- but has substantial assets in Traditional
Ok? It's fantastic!! Yes, I need to get out more, but I will first tell> IRA. At the same time, 2007-2008 nosedive in Bank stocks has created > significant decline in IRA value. > Three questions: > First, is conversion from Trad to Roth still OK when over 70 and taking > RMD? > Second, does the "conversion" count as part of RMD? > Third, is it possible to transfer stock directly from Traditional IRA to > Roth IRA -- using current valuation on day of transfer (NYSE Avg Trade > presumed) as the basis for amount of conversion? The alternative would > be to sell stock, converting to cash, and then buy same stock in Roth -- > but that would presumably raise possible "Wash Sale" issues. you that I believe that Roth's value while working is slightly exaggerated. Your scenario above is ideal. I have an 80+ yr old woman who is in the 15% bracket. Each year we convert just enough to 'top off' that bracket so the next hundred dollars would have been taxed at 25%. No, the conversion must take place after you calculate the RMD. Our RMD is based on 12/31/07 year end balance. We can do the Roth conversion any time during the year, but that RMD is fixed. Yes - you can convert stock, the broker will report that value based on the day of conversion. There is no wash sale selling in one IRA and buying in another, anyway. This strategy helps reduce the ever increasing RMDs as the converted amount is not in the account at year end. Reduces taxes by letting you use my 'top off' strategy. And saves the kids/beneficiaries a bucketload of money. Please, please confirm that TP has beneficiaries listed on the IRA account(s). IRAs should have their beneficiaries listed for proper transfer, a will is not enough. This is one of the top planning mistakes I see out there. See http://www.fairmark.com/refrence/index.htm to understand the bracket TP is in and how you can strategize for him/her. Joe -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| TP is over 70, taking RMDs -- but has substantial assets in Traditional IRA. At the same time, 2007-2008 nosedive in Bank stocks has created significant decline in IRA value. Three questions: First, is conversion from Trad to Roth still OK when over 70 and taking RMD? Second, does the "conversion" count as part of RMD? Third, is it possible to transfer stock directly from Traditional IRA to Roth IRA -- using current valuation on day of transfer (NYSE Avg Trade presumed) as the basis for amount of conversion? The alternative would be to sell stock, converting to cash, and then buy same stock in Roth -- but that would presumably raise possible "Wash Sale" issues. Bill -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| Tags |
| cap, conversion, gains, losses, offset, query, roth |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| offset capital gains with loss DC: I've often read articles that suggest to offset your capital gains with losses. That never made sense to me because for a typical investor, the... | Financial Planning | 1 | 12-15-2004 12:56 PM | |
| Offset Cap Gains from House with Stock Losses? ML: I sold a house this year and will have some capital gains from the sale. I own some stocks and mutual funds that are at big losses from their cost... | Taxes | 3 | 10-23-2004 08:33 PM | |
| gains strategy query MB: I am not sure about the strategy here. I currently have net short term gains. I also have long term gains, includes gains taken recently so they... | Taxes | 2 | 12-01-2003 04:44 PM | |
| Can California Real Property Gain be Offset By Intangible Capital Losses? Jose Guerra: My wife and I sold our house in California and our profit is about $600K. We have legitimately moved to Nevada. Question: Can we offset the... | Taxes | 10 | 10-20-2003 12:33 AM | |
| Gifts to charity/buying a house- to offset capital gains tax X: I sold my Michigan (USA) LLC business this year. I lost money three out of five years for a net loss of around $12,000.00. I sold my share of the... | Taxes | 2 | 08-29-2003 05:03 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |