| |||||||
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| <caj11[at]my-deja.com> wrote in message news:7d03f5b0-beca-4371-b4e2-aa6b0b95cf9a[at]79g2000hsk.googlegroups.com... - quote - > Okay, so I'm fairly new to the practice of representing people that
Didn't pay or didn't FILE also? That may make a difference....> are behind on their federal taxes and have some questions about > dealing with the IRS. I'm not one to jump on the whole "the IRS is > evil" bandwagon - more like the "IRS is inconsistent and can't get its > story straight". I just am at the end of my rope with the robots that > answer the practitioner's hotline (hotline - yeah right!). Yes, I > know I have to get used to this sort of thing otherwise I'll never > make it as a practitioner. > Long story short, I have a client who apparently didn't pay all their > federal taxes in 1993 and 1994. They claim that their employer > withheld more than enough taxes but didn't pay them over to the IRS > like they were supposed (the company went under long ago and closed > down). They claim their employer was having cash flow problems and > not turning over the withholdings to the IRS like they should have. > Whether or not that is true, I don't know. How I'm going to obtain > the old employer's payroll records is another matter. For the later year, 1994, it was due in 1995. It's been 13 years since the due date. If filed, was the return processed? The 10 year period on limitations (current law - previously only 6 years - check for the year of change - sometime in the 90's) for collection may have passed, making the whole issue moot. Note that this only applies if he filed. If your client hasn't filed, then there's been no assessment (including self-assessment) and the 10 year period for collection hasn't even started. Have you asked SSA for the W-2 information? - quote - > My real question is, I've called the IRS three times and I've gotten
It's not a TA problem (yet).> three different answers as to what is going on with the client's > account. ... > Should I contact the IRS Office of Taxpayer Advocate and fill out > their standard form? -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| <caj11[at]my-deja.com> wrote: - quote - > > My guess, given your narrative and the years involved, is that it went
CNC dates are irrelevant. The dates that matter are the assessment dates.> > CNC, > > was subseuqently automatically reactivated because of the income level on > > a > > later return, is now waiting in the queue, but won't come out to a > > revenue > > officer because the statute is about to expire. > That may be possible but I've been told by one person on the phone > that the account went into CNC status in July 2005. If that's the > case, it's still a long way from being out of statute. The collection statute runs for 10 years from the date of assessment. The transcripts should show the assessment dates, so you can work from that. -- Phil Marti Clarksburg, MD -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Sorry, forgot to do this - quote - > ========================================= MODERATOR'S COMMENT:
I am an attorney.> Please tell us which category of Circ 230 preparer you are? - quote - > And tell us where you are getting your Rep procedures?
IRS website, IRS publications and CCH.- quote - > And what did you do
It's signed and I still have a copy of it. I submitted it to the IRS> with your POA? via facsimile and it is in their system. - quote - > And are you signed up for EServices? (If not, it's free and no longer
Just signed up today.> subject to a minimum anything.) *Sorry for all the questions but we do > want to help you and this info would help us help you. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > Get a transcript. *If it went into CNC status it will be on the transcript.
I obtained transcripts for both years...there is nothing on them> Ditto if it was reactivated. indicating it ever went into CNC status for either year. Only that subsequent years' refunds were intercepted and applied against the outstanding tax debt for 1993. - quote - > My guess, given your narrative and the years involved, is that it went CNC,
That may be possible but I've been told by one person on the phone> was subseuqently automatically reactivated because of the income level on a > later return, is now waiting in the queue, but won't come out to a revenue > officer because the statute is about to expire. that the account went into CNC status in July 2005. If that's the case, it's still a long way from being out of statute. - quote - > BTW, the client's story is bull. *Employees get credit for the withholding
It may very well be. On the other hand, what if the employer was> even if the employer didn't pay it over. *You might as well skip that part > in discussion with the client, but it would be helpful to look at what > communication from the IRS prompted the client's contact with you. withholding the money from the client and not paying the money to the IRS? How would the IRS know that to be the case? Paystubs and W-2s from 1993 and 1994 would be rather helpful now, but I doubt those are obtainable now. However, back then people were filing paper returns...if we filed a request for copies of the 1993 and 1994 returns (paying the $39 fee for each one, I know), might the IRS have copies of the W-2s that were filed with them? Does anyone have any ideas on how they would approach this one? Because I'm still a novice here and not afraid to admit it. I want to have some kind of open dialogue with the IRS here but the people on the telephone are just useless. I just registered for E-Services, as the first response suggested (I am a licensed representative). Thanks for any help you can give! -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| "Gil Faver" wrote: - quote - > > BTW, the client's story is bull. Employees get credit for the
Sure, they need the report from the employer. That's what the W-2> > withholding even if the employer didn't pay it over. You might as well > > skip that part in discussion with the client, but it would be helpful to > > look at what communication from the IRS prompted the client's contact > > with you. > Doesn't the IRS need to know that the employer withheld? And, if the > employer was not forking this dough over to the IRS, it likely didn't > submit the paperwork, did it? I don't know how much paperwork the IRS > would expect to see from the employee to get this credit, but hopefully > paystubs and affidavits would do the trick. accomplishes. If the employer doesn't provide a W-2 there are other ways the employee can get credit for the money withheld but not paid over. According to OP, today's problems exist because the client's employer withheld and didn't pay over. That remains bull. The problem may be that the employer withheld and didn't pay over AND the employee/client was totally out to lunch at the time, but it's not as simple as the client is presenting it. -- Phil Marti Clarksburg, MD -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > BTW, the client's story is bull. Employees get credit for the withholding
Doesn't the IRS need to know that the employer withheld? And, if the> even if the employer didn't pay it over. You might as well skip that part > in discussion with the client, but it would be helpful to look at what > communication from the IRS prompted the client's contact with you. employer was not forking this dough over to the IRS, it likely didn't submit the paperwork, did it? I don't know how much paperwork the IRS would expect to see from the employee to get this credit, but hopefully paystubs and affidavits would do the trick. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| <caj11[at]my-deja.com> wrote: - quote - > My real question is, I've called the IRS three times and I've gotten
Get a transcript. If it went into CNC status it will be on the transcript.> three different answers as to what is going on with the client's > account. When I call the practitioner's hotline and sit through the > painful music from the "Nutcrack Suite" they play while on hold, and > finally get to a human voice, I have been told the following: 1)my > client's account is "in queue" and waiting to be assigned to a Revenue > Officer, 2)my client's account has been assigned Currently Not > Collectible (CNC) status since July of 2005 and 3)my client's account > will be CNC'd next month. I'm also told my client's account has been > put in CNC status before and taken out of it, then put back in. > How do I confirm exactly what is true and how do I get this in > writing? Ditto if it was reactivated. My guess, given your narrative and the years involved, is that it went CNC, was subseuqently automatically reactivated because of the income level on a later return, is now waiting in the queue, but won't come out to a revenue officer because the statute is about to expire. BTW, the client's story is bull. Employees get credit for the withholding even if the employer didn't pay it over. You might as well skip that part in discussion with the client, but it would be helpful to look at what communication from the IRS prompted the client's contact with you. -- Phil Marti Clarksburg, MD -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| | |||
| |||
| On Jun 9, 12:44*pm, ca...[at]my-deja.com wrote: - quote - > Hello there,
I'll echo our moderator's comments/inquiries -> Okay, so I'm fairly new to the practice of representing people that > are behind on their federal taxes and have some questions about > dealing with the IRS. *I'm not one to jump on the whole "the IRS is > evil" bandwagon - more like the "IRS is inconsistent and can't get its > story straight". *I just am at the end of my rope with the robots that > answer the practitioner's hotline (hotline - yeah right!). *Yes, I > know I have to get used to this sort of thing otherwise I'll never > make it as a practitioner. > Long story short, I have a client who apparently didn't pay all their > federal taxes in 1993 and 1994. *They claim that their employer > withheld more than enough taxes but didn't pay them over to the IRS > like they were supposed (the company went under long ago and closed > down). *They claim their employer was having cash flow problems and > not turning over the withholdings to the IRS like they should have. > Whether or not that is true, I don't know. *How I'm going to obtain > the old employer's payroll records is another matter. > My real question is, I've called the IRS three times and I've gotten > three different answers as to what is going on with the client's > account. *When I call the practitioner's hotline and sit through the > painful music from the "Nutcrack Suite" they play while on hold, and > finally get to a human voice, I have been told the following: 1)my > client's account is "in queue" and waiting to be assigned to a Revenue > Officer, 2)my client's account has been assigned Currently Not > Collectible (CNC) status since July of 2005 and 3)my client's account > will be CNC'd next month. *I'm also told my client's account has been > put in CNC status before and taken out of it, then put back in. > How do I confirm exactly what is true and how do I get this in > writing? > Would it make any sense to go to a physical IRS office instead of > dealing with the IRS on the phone? > Should I call a different number other than the IRS practitioner's > hotline (calling the 800-TAX-1040 is even more useless)? > Should I contact the IRS Office of Taxpayer Advocate and fill out > their standard form? > ========================================= MODERATOR'S COMMENT: > Please tell us which category of Circ 230 preparer you are? > And tell us where you are getting your Rep procedures? And what did you do > with your POA? > And are you signed up for EServices? (If not, it's free and no longer > subject to a minimum anything.) *Sorry for all the questions but we do > want to help you and this info would help us help you. First, are you a licensed representative? A CPA or EA perhaps? Second, IF you are a licensed rep you should sign up for E-Services. This would allow you to go directly to the IRS computer system and download transcripts and account details with all the information you're looking for. This is an invaluable service and if you're going to be a professional representative you NEED to have access to this system if you're going to be efficient. Beyond that, this is why I NEVER, EVER call the IRS - I WRITE. This forces them to respond in writing and written responses can be relied on. You also need to learn how the Taxpayer Advocate works. If you've been waiting for more than 45 days to get a good answer from the IRS on a subject you can escalate the issue to the Office of the Taxpayer Advocate. You can get their address from the IRS.GOV web site. Write to them, explain the situation, give them sufficient details so they can research the issue and they will respond to you. Good luck, Gene E. Utterback, EA, RFC, ABA -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Hello there, Okay, so I'm fairly new to the practice of representing people that are behind on their federal taxes and have some questions about dealing with the IRS. I'm not one to jump on the whole "the IRS is evil" bandwagon - more like the "IRS is inconsistent and can't get its story straight". I just am at the end of my rope with the robots that answer the practitioner's hotline (hotline - yeah right!). Yes, I know I have to get used to this sort of thing otherwise I'll never make it as a practitioner. Long story short, I have a client who apparently didn't pay all their federal taxes in 1993 and 1994. They claim that their employer withheld more than enough taxes but didn't pay them over to the IRS like they were supposed (the company went under long ago and closed down). They claim their employer was having cash flow problems and not turning over the withholdings to the IRS like they should have. Whether or not that is true, I don't know. How I'm going to obtain the old employer's payroll records is another matter. My real question is, I've called the IRS three times and I've gotten three different answers as to what is going on with the client's account. When I call the practitioner's hotline and sit through the painful music from the "Nutcrack Suite" they play while on hold, and finally get to a human voice, I have been told the following: 1)my client's account is "in queue" and waiting to be assigned to a Revenue Officer, 2)my client's account has been assigned Currently Not Collectible (CNC) status since July of 2005 and 3)my client's account will be CNC'd next month. I'm also told my client's account has been put in CNC status before and taken out of it, then put back in. How do I confirm exactly what is true and how do I get this in writing? Would it make any sense to go to a physical IRS office instead of dealing with the IRS on the phone? Should I call a different number other than the IRS practitioner's hotline (calling the 800-TAX-1040 is even more useless)? Should I contact the IRS Office of Taxpayer Advocate and fill out their standard form? ========================================= MODERATOR'S COMMENT: Please tell us which category of Circ 230 preparer you are? And tell us where you are getting your Rep procedures? And what did you do with your POA? And are you signed up for EServices? (If not, it's free and no longer subject to a minimum anything.) Sorry for all the questions but we do want to help you and this info would help us help you. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| Tags |
| answeras, assessment, assigned, client, cnc, revenueofficer, status, straight, substantial, waiting |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Escape Assessment kdt91711@gmail.com: I live in Los Angeles. I received a Notice of Proposed Escape Assessment. Does anyone know what that is? <<... | Taxes | 3 | 01-30-2007 06:04 PM | |
| canifornia income tax: received notiv eof proposed assessment davoti@gmail.com: I would appreciate information on this. I used TurboTax to file both federal and CA state income tax last year, II just received a letter of... | Taxes | 4 | 09-17-2006 10:00 AM | |
| Waiting on Tax Refund XBRY: Does anyone know what time the IRS's Tax Refund Direct Deposits for the scheduled 01/28/2005 deposit date will be transferred? I thought it... | Taxes | 5 | 02-09-2005 05:12 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |