|
#2
| |||
| |||
| "Phil Marti" <prm20871[at]verizon.net> wrote: - quote - > "Harlan Lunsford" wrote:
Adulterated butter these days is not illegal between consenting butters> > Definitions are always in order, because there are probably many > > people in this US of A who don't know what snuff really is. > I started working for IRS in 1971, before Congress had gotten rid > of a lot of excise taxes. We never did get an explanation from > our instructors as to exactly what "adulterated butter and filled > cheese" were. Maybe it's just as well. of appropriate age. As for filled cheese, it's filled with hot air, and the bureaucrats felt too close an affinity to want to cause them trouble. Stu -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| "Harlan Lunsford" wrote: - quote - > Definitions are always in order, because there are probably many people in
I started working for IRS in 1971, before Congress had gotten rid of a lot> this US of A who don't know what snuff really is. of excise taxes. We never did get an explanation from our instructors as to exactly what "adulterated butter and filled cheese" were. Maybe it's just as well. -- Phil Marti Clarksburg, MD -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| | |||
| |||
| Don Priebe wrote: - quote - > John Fisher is usually pretty good on keeping us up to date on the latest
Definitions are always in order, because there are probably many people> tax news, but he missed one this week from New York State: > TSB-M-08(2)M, Change in the Method of Calculating the Tobacco Products Tax > on Snuff > http://www.tax.state.ny.us/pdf/memos...tte/m08_2m.pdf > This one ranks right up there with the decision that all marshmallows are > food (not subject to sales tax) rather than candy (subject to sales tax) > regardless of size. in this US of A who don't know what snuff really is. Have you ever seen it on the shelf for sale? It comes in one ounce cans. Anyway, I used to sell snuff back when my father was in the wholesale bidness. We sold Tops, Strawberry, CC, Garrett's Sweet, just to name a few. Ah, what pleasant memories of the aroma of a tobacco room! ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| John Fisher is usually pretty good on keeping us up to date on the latest tax news, but he missed one this week from New York State: TSB-M-08(2)M, Change in the Method of Calculating the Tobacco Products Tax on Snuff http://www.tax.state.ny.us/pdf/memos...tte/m08_2m.pdf This one ranks right up there with the decision that all marshmallows are food (not subject to sales tax) rather than candy (subject to sales tax) regardless of size. -- Don EA in Upstate NY -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| Tags |
| government, work |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| the government plan - details anyone? Gil Faver: I haven't seen much in the way of details reported. I guess the fundamental question I have is what price will the US be paying for these mortgages... | Financial Planning | 1 | 09-20-2008 04:34 PM | |
| TaxCut & U.S. Treasury vs. U.S. Government Paul: TaxCut for the 2004 tax year tells me to enter the percentage of my dividends that are from "U.S. Treasury Obligations" for exclusion from... | Taxes | 4 | 01-26-2005 07:04 PM | |
| tax loss by the government??? sunny: Could anybody tell me how much money is lost by the federal government by allowing most of the online shopping free of tax. If this is a huge... | Taxes | 7 | 01-22-2005 05:30 PM | |
| Getting Money to work with Government Thrift Savings Plan (high interest) TB Booher: I noticed several posts on this, but none of them were answered. I can not figure out how to track/manage the Government Thrift Savings Plan in... | Microsoft Money | 8 | 01-30-2004 05:08 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |