|
#8
| |||
| |||
| On May 15, 5:57*pm, Harlan Lunsford <hnslunsf...[at]bellsouth.net> wrote: - quote - > 1joetaxpayer wrote:
use a paid preparer; therefore> > Ted wrote: > > > If it seemed like they might be necessary, would you bring up the > > > issue of estimated quarterly payments for the coming year with a > > > client, or would it be his responsibility to ask about them as they > > > are not part of preparing a tax return? > > ? Not part of the return? The estimated payment vouchers print along > > with the return, I considered this part of the process. Now, for many > > (not all) retirees, their total tax bill is less than their RMD, so they > > can forget the quarterlies, and just withhold the entire tax liability > > from the RMD close to year end. > Well my software Taxwise, doesn't automatically prepare 1040es vouchers! > Not unless I instruct it to do so of course. *We should remember of > course that it is always up to a paying client whether or not he elects > to make estimated payments. > However! * * As a matter of course, I believe it our duty to discuss the > issue and heavily recommend that he make the payments and offer to > prepare the estimates and vouchers should he so choose. > Actually, for many of my clients, esp those who's bookkeeping I do, I > will provide the vouchers each quarter, refigured each quarter, to keep > him on track. *Thus the payments might be : *I - 2000, *II - 3700, *III > - (after business downturn) *800. *But for the IV quarter, the last > payment will be very much on target, and well within the 1,000 leeway. > ChEAr$, > Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA Keep in mind that the IRS no longer sends vouchers to taxpayers who it should be standard practice to discuss and, at the least, prepare blank vouchers for those who might encounter an underpayment situation. It would have been nice if the IRS had informed us of this change at the beginning of the year (I heard circa April 1st). -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| "Harlan Lunsford" <hnslunsford[at]bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:BW6Xj.4597$Kk3.2204[at]bignews9.bellsouth.net... - quote - > John Levine wrote:
There are many instances where that 30 minutes can turn into hours.> > > If it seemed like they might be necessary, would you bring up the issue > > > of estimated quarterly payments for the coming year with a client, or > > > would it be his responsibility to ask about them as they are not part of > > > preparing a tax return? > > > Every tax preparer I've used in the past 35 years has done the next > > year's estimated taxes as part of the process. I'd never use a > > preparer who didn't, or who charged extra for them. > > If the next year's estimate is a matter of basing it on previous year's > figures, no extra work is involved, hence no added charge. > But for those of us who take the time and effort to accurately estimate > and project figures based on reasonable assumptions, it's worth at least a > fee for the extra 30 minutes. - quote - > ChEAr$,
--> Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| John Levine wrote: - quote - > > If it seemed like they might be necessary, would you bring up the issue of
figures, no extra work is involved, hence no added charge.> > estimated quarterly payments for the coming year with a client, or would it > > be his responsibility to ask about them as they are not part of preparing a > > tax return? > Every tax preparer I've used in the past 35 years has done the next > year's estimated taxes as part of the process. I'd never use a > preparer who didn't, or who charged extra for them. If the next year's estimate is a matter of basing it on previous year's But for those of us who take the time and effort to accurately estimate and project figures based on reasonable assumptions, it's worth at least a fee for the extra 30 minutes. ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > If it seemed like they might be necessary, would you bring up the issue of
Every tax preparer I've used in the past 35 years has done the next> estimated quarterly payments for the coming year with a client, or would it > be his responsibility to ask about them as they are not part of preparing a > tax return? year's estimated taxes as part of the process. I'd never use a preparer who didn't, or who charged extra for them. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Phil Marti wrote: - quote - > "Harlan Lunsford" wrote:
payments are predicated on actual results, there's always page 3 of the> > Actually, for many of my clients, esp those who's bookkeeping I do, I will > > provide the vouchers each quarter, refigured each quarter, to keep him on > > track. Thus the payments might be : I - 2000, II - 3700, III - (after > > business downturn) 800. But for the IV quarter, the last payment will be > > very much on target, and well within the 1,000 leeway. > That $1,000 leeway applies only to the balance due after withholding > credits, not ES payments. The reason I know this is that I got corrected > for the same error, and it stuck with me. When ES payments are invovled you > have to meet the 100/110% of last year or 90% of this year safe harbor. True of course, but in the example I just mentioned, since quarterly 2210 to use. Besides, notice that for 2nd quarter above, the 3700 is enough to carry over to third quarter at least. ChEAr$, Harlan -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| "Harlan Lunsford" wrote: - quote - > Actually, for many of my clients, esp those who's bookkeeping I do, I will
That $1,000 leeway applies only to the balance due after withholding> provide the vouchers each quarter, refigured each quarter, to keep him on > track. Thus the payments might be : I - 2000, II - 3700, III - (after > business downturn) 800. But for the IV quarter, the last payment will be > very much on target, and well within the 1,000 leeway. credits, not ES payments. The reason I know this is that I got corrected for the same error, and it stuck with me. When ES payments are invovled you have to meet the 100/110% of last year or 90% of this year safe harbor. -- Phil Marti Clarksburg, MD -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| 1joetaxpayer wrote: - quote - > Ted wrote:
Well my software Taxwise, doesn't automatically prepare 1040es vouchers!> > If it seemed like they might be necessary, would you bring up the > > issue of estimated quarterly payments for the coming year with a > > client, or would it be his responsibility to ask about them as they > > are not part of preparing a tax return? > ? Not part of the return? The estimated payment vouchers print along > with the return, I considered this part of the process. Now, for many > (not all) retirees, their total tax bill is less than their RMD, so they > can forget the quarterlies, and just withhold the entire tax liability > from the RMD close to year end. Not unless I instruct it to do so of course. We should remember of course that it is always up to a paying client whether or not he elects to make estimated payments. However! As a matter of course, I believe it our duty to discuss the issue and heavily recommend that he make the payments and offer to prepare the estimates and vouchers should he so choose. Actually, for many of my clients, esp those who's bookkeeping I do, I will provide the vouchers each quarter, refigured each quarter, to keep him on track. Thus the payments might be : I - 2000, II - 3700, III - (after business downturn) 800. But for the IV quarter, the last payment will be very much on target, and well within the 1,000 leeway. ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Ted wrote: - quote - > If it seemed like they might be necessary, would you bring up the issue of
? Not part of the return? The estimated payment vouchers print along> estimated quarterly payments for the coming year with a client, or would it > be his responsibility to ask about them as they are not part of preparing a > tax return? with the return, I considered this part of the process. Now, for many (not all) retirees, their total tax bill is less than their RMD, so they can forget the quarterlies, and just withhold the entire tax liability from the RMD close to year end. Joe www.blog.joetaxpayer.com -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| | |||
| |||
| "Ted" wrote: - quote - > If it seemed like they might be necessary, would you bring up the issue of
I do only unpaid prep for the poor and befuddled and, I'm sure, carry some> estimated quarterly payments for the coming year with a client, or would > it be his responsibility to ask about them as they are not part of > preparing a tax return? prejudice from my prior life as a tax collector, but IMO it's bordering on malpractice to fail to address the issue with a client. After all, that's one of the reasons I strongly assert that anyone who goes into business without a good consultation with an accountant is an idiot. Yes, I understand that you're asking in the context of return prep, not a consultation. It makes no difference to me. -- Phil Marti Clarksburg, MD -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| If it seemed like they might be necessary, would you bring up the issue of estimated quarterly payments for the coming year with a client, or would it be his responsibility to ask about them as they are not part of preparing a tax return? -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| Tags |
| client, included, preparing a tax return |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Does anyone follow the "Million Dollar Client" model? Jessica: Hi There, I am looking into becoming a Financial Planner. I have been doing alot of research, and I have been hearing alot latley about a paticular... | Financial Planning | 27 | 12-18-2006 01:46 PM | |
| What is "section 743(b) adjustment to income included on line 1"? Ted: I have a K1 from a limited partnership. The whole thing is a nightmare, but I have worked everything out but this. The K1 instructions do not... | Taxes | 1 | 04-03-2006 03:53 AM | |
| Money 2002 transaction status flags ("E", "C", "R") have all disappeared Nick Tonkin: Hi, After many months of using Money 2002, yesterday I suddenly noticed that the column in my resgister that shows the cleared status of each... | Microsoft Money | 4 | 02-28-2004 04:39 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |