|
#6
| |||
| |||
| In article <5944d49c-4751-4bb6-bdc5-b04f69abbb24[at]n14g2000pri.googlegroups.com> , "Alexei A. Frounze" <alexfrunews[at]gmail.com> wrote: - quote - > On Apr 9, 4:51 pm, Barry Margolin <bar...[at]alum.mit.edu> wrote:
Yes. Once you make the adjustment, you use the adjusted basis and> > In article > > <284ca102-8061-46d6-9c19-6700fcee8...[at]1g2000prg.googlegroups.com> , > > "Alexei A. Frounze" <alexfrun...[at]gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Q2: If I adjust (reduce) the basis of some stock due to a wash sale, > > > You never reduce the basis. The disallowed loss is added to the basis > > of the replacement shares, so you increase the basis. > > > > then it may happen that for that stock the adjusted basis is less than > > > the proceeds and so, the loss has just moved to a different place. And > > > If the basis is less than the proceeds, you have a GAIN, not a loss. > > What I think you means to say is that it may happen that the increased > > basis is greater than the proceeds. > Sorry, you're right, I increase the basis, of course. > > > this is asking to apply the wash sale rules again and again and again, > > > until the loss is fully absorbed by the gains or there's no way to > > > absorb it entirely (all wash sale rules exhausted) and it stays as a > > > loss at which point some other rules may come in play (i.e. if it's a > > > net loss there're limits on how much can be claimed). Did I get it > > > right that after I've moved a loss to a different place (having > > > applied the wash sale rules) I need to look again if that newly > > > created loss may cause further wash sale adjustments? > > > I'm not really sure what you're getting at. You have to make another > > sale to have another wash sale. > So, if the shares whose basis was adjusted due to the wash sale rules > were sold, then what? If selling them with this adjusted basis results > in a loss (but wouldn't if I had not made the adjustment), then I need > to check whether or not that results in another wash sale? Right? purchase date when figuring out whether any future sales are wash sales. You might want to take a look at http://www.fairmark.com/capgain/wash. It has lots of information on the wash sale rule, including links to software that can help if you have lots of trades that need to be reconciled. -- Barry Margolin, barmar[at]alum.mit.edu Arlington, MA *** PLEASE don't copy me on replies, I'll read them in the group *** -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| "Seth" wrote: - quote - > > The history of how your basis was established is irrelevant. Any time you
You're so intent on making this harder than it is that you're not paying> > sell for a loss you have to consider the wash sale rule if: > > > 1. You still have a holding in the security after the sale; or > Huh? Selling half a position has the same rule as selling all of it. attention. If after a sale you hold no shares of the stock just sold, the wash sale rule cannot apply unless... - quote - > > 2. You purchase the same security within 30 days after the sale.
No, since I already dealt with the before part in number 1. If you buy> Shouldn't that be "within 30 days before or after" and remove rule 1? something and within 30 days sell it for a loss but hold no remaining shares of the stock (my # 1), the wash sale rule doesn't apply, unless #2 applies. -- Phil Marti Clarksburg, MD -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| In article <QwmLj.8892$_I1.3824[at]trnddc02> , Phil Marti <prm20871[at]verizon.net> wrote: - quote - > The history of how your basis was established is irrelevant. Any time you
Huh? Selling half a position has the same rule as selling all of it.> sell for a loss you have to consider the wash sale rule if: > 1. You still have a holding in the security after the sale; or - quote - > 2. You purchase the same security within 30 days after the sale.
Shouldn't that be "within 30 days before or after" and remove rule 1?- quote - > Note that "consider" doesn't mean that the rule automatically applies to #1.
Seth-- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| On Apr 9, 6:08 am, "Alexei A. Frounze" <alexfrun...[at]gmail.com> wrote: - quote - > Case 1:
In addition to the other posts, were Xb and Xs and Yb the same number> Xb ... [ ... Yb ... Xs ... ] > Case 2: > Xb ... [... Xs ... Yb ... ] > Case 3: > [... Ya ... Xb ... Xs ... ] > Case 4: > [... Xb ... Yb ... Xs ... ] > Case 5: > [... Xb ... Xs ... Yb ... ] of shares? If Xb and Xs were 10 shares, and Yb was 1 share, then the disallowed loss in Xs is only for 1 share. If Yb was 10 or more, then the disallowed loss is for all 10 shares (that is, none of the loss is allowed). - quote - > So, if I need to adjust Y's basis due to thewashsale, I also need to
========================================= MODERATOR'S COMMENT:> adjust Y's purchase date (cite from pub550:"If your loss was > disallowed because of thewashsalerules, add the disallowed loss to > the cost of the new stock or securities. The result is your basis in > the new stock or securities. This adjustment postpones the loss > deduction until the disposition of the new stock or securities. Your > holding period for the new stock or securities begins on the same day > as the holding period of the stock or securities sold.") I basically > want to confirm that Yb may adjust into the past (cases 1,2,4,5) and > into the future (case 3). If it's not how this is done, then how is > it? > Q2: If I adjust (reduce) the basis of some stock due to awashsale, > then it may happen that for that stock the adjusted basis is less than > the proceeds and so, the loss has just moved to a different place. And > this is asking to apply thewashsalerules again and again and again, > until the loss is fully absorbed by the gains or there's no way to > absorb it entirely (allwashsalerules exhausted) and it stays as a > loss at which point some other rules may come in play (i.e. if it's a > net loss there're limits on how much can be claimed). Did I get it > right that after I've moved a loss to a different place (having > applied thewashsalerules) I need to look again if that newly > created loss may cause furtherwashsaleadjustments? > I've read pub 550 and the following, but it's still unclear what the > new holding period (the date of acquire) should be and if thewashsalerules apply recursively:http://fairmark.com/capgain/wash/ws1...e-example.html > Thanks, > Alex Please delete unnecessary text from the prior message when posting. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| "Alexei A. Frounze" wrote: - quote - > So, if the shares whose basis was adjusted due to the wash sale rules
The history of how your basis was established is irrelevant. Any time you> were sold, then what? If selling them with this adjusted basis results > in a loss (but wouldn't if I had not made the adjustment), then I need > to check whether or not that results in another wash sale? Right? sell for a loss you have to consider the wash sale rule if: 1. You still have a holding in the security after the sale; or 2. You purchase the same security within 30 days after the sale. Note that "consider" doesn't mean that the rule automatically applies to #1. -- Phil Marti Clarksburg, MD -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| On Apr 9, 4:51 pm, Barry Margolin <bar...[at]alum.mit.edu> wrote: - quote - > In article
Sorry, you're right, I increase the basis, of course.> <284ca102-8061-46d6-9c19-6700fcee8...[at]1g2000prg.googlegroups.com> , > "Alexei A. Frounze" <alexfrun...[at]gmail.com> wrote: > > Q2: If I adjust (reduce) the basis of some stock due to a wash sale, > You never reduce the basis. The disallowed loss is added to the basis > of the replacement shares, so you increase the basis. > > then it may happen that for that stock the adjusted basis is less than > > the proceeds and so, the loss has just moved to a different place. And > If the basis is less than the proceeds, you have a GAIN, not a loss. > What I think you means to say is that it may happen that the increased > basis is greater than the proceeds. - quote - > > this is asking to apply the wash sale rules again and again and again,
So, if the shares whose basis was adjusted due to the wash sale rules> > until the loss is fully absorbed by the gains or there's no way to > > absorb it entirely (all wash sale rules exhausted) and it stays as a > > loss at which point some other rules may come in play (i.e. if it's a > > net loss there're limits on how much can be claimed). Did I get it > > right that after I've moved a loss to a different place (having > > applied the wash sale rules) I need to look again if that newly > > created loss may cause further wash sale adjustments? > I'm not really sure what you're getting at. You have to make another > sale to have another wash sale. were sold, then what? If selling them with this adjusted basis results in a loss (but wouldn't if I had not made the adjustment), then I need to check whether or not that results in another wash sale? Right? Alex -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| | |||
| |||
| In article <284ca102-8061-46d6-9c19-6700fcee889c[at]1g2000prg.googlegroups.com> , "Alexei A. Frounze" <alexfrunews[at]gmail.com> wrote: - quote - > Q2: If I adjust (reduce) the basis of some stock due to a wash sale,
You never reduce the basis. The disallowed loss is added to the basisof the replacement shares, so you increase the basis. - quote - > then it may happen that for that stock the adjusted basis is less than
If the basis is less than the proceeds, you have a GAIN, not a loss.> the proceeds and so, the loss has just moved to a different place. And What I think you means to say is that it may happen that the increased basis is greater than the proceeds. - quote - > this is asking to apply the wash sale rules again and again and again,
I'm not really sure what you're getting at. You have to make another> until the loss is fully absorbed by the gains or there's no way to > absorb it entirely (all wash sale rules exhausted) and it stays as a > loss at which point some other rules may come in play (i.e. if it's a > net loss there're limits on how much can be claimed). Did I get it > right that after I've moved a loss to a different place (having > applied the wash sale rules) I need to look again if that newly > created loss may cause further wash sale adjustments? sale to have another wash sale. - quote - > I've read pub 550 and the following, but it's still unclear what the
--> new holding period (the date of acquire) should be and if the wash > sale rules apply recursively: > http://fairmark.com/capgain/wash/ws101.htm > http://www.smartmoney.com/tax/capita...tory=washrules > http://www.armencomp.com/wash-sales.html > http://www.armencomp.com/wash-sale-example.html > Thanks, > Alex Barry Margolin, barmar[at]alum.mit.edu Arlington, MA *** PLEASE don't copy me on replies, I'll read them in the group *** -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Q1: It's about the holding period of the replacement security. There're several situations possible. Let's denote the purchase of shares (that will later be sold at a loss) as Xb. Let's denote the sale at loss as Xs and the other shares that were purchased within the wash sale period as Yb. Let's denote the wash sale period beginning and ending by [ and ]. Let's depict this on a timeline (left to right: past to future): Case 1: Xb ... [ ... Yb ... Xs ... ] Case 2: Xb ... [... Xs ... Yb ... ] Case 3: [... Ya ... Xb ... Xs ... ] Case 4: [... Xb ... Yb ... Xs ... ] Case 5: [... Xb ... Xs ... Yb ... ] So, if I need to adjust Y's basis due to the wash sale, I also need to adjust Y's purchase date (cite from pub550:"If your loss was disallowed because of the wash sale rules, add the disallowed loss to the cost of the new stock or securities. The result is your basis in the new stock or securities. This adjustment postpones the loss deduction until the disposition of the new stock or securities. Your holding period for the new stock or securities begins on the same day as the holding period of the stock or securities sold.") I basically want to confirm that Yb may adjust into the past (cases 1,2,4,5) and into the future (case 3). If it's not how this is done, then how is it? Q2: If I adjust (reduce) the basis of some stock due to a wash sale, then it may happen that for that stock the adjusted basis is less than the proceeds and so, the loss has just moved to a different place. And this is asking to apply the wash sale rules again and again and again, until the loss is fully absorbed by the gains or there's no way to absorb it entirely (all wash sale rules exhausted) and it stays as a loss at which point some other rules may come in play (i.e. if it's a net loss there're limits on how much can be claimed). Did I get it right that after I've moved a loss to a different place (having applied the wash sale rules) I need to look again if that newly created loss may cause further wash sale adjustments? I've read pub 550 and the following, but it's still unclear what the new holding period (the date of acquire) should be and if the wash sale rules apply recursively: http://fairmark.com/capgain/wash/ws101.htm http://www.smartmoney.com/tax/capita...tory=washrules http://www.armencomp.com/wash-sales.html http://www.armencomp.com/wash-sale-example.html Thanks, Alex -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| Tags |
| sale, wash |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Is this a wash sale? garagecapital: I'm trying to find out of I screwed myself here: I bought 100 shares of AAPL at 160 and sell it, three months later, at 130 -- a 3,000 loss. But... | Taxes | 2 | 03-17-2008 04:30 PM | |
| Wash sale? Jim L.: JimLouis@webtv.net (Jim L.) I intend to sell MGSEX at a loss and buy NAESX to replace it. (MGSEX is a small-cap managed fund and NAESX is a... | Financial Planning | 5 | 01-14-2008 07:46 PM | |
| Wash Sale valentino: I have losses in etrade. I plan to sell the stock and take the loss. Can i buy call option in the same, etrade, right the way, or the call option... | Taxes | 1 | 12-09-2007 06:51 AM | |
| Re: Wash Sale / Sale to Related Party: replacement shares Herb Smith: "Vernon V Chatman III" <vvc@besttaxplace.com> wrote: > Consider the following: > {a} Stock sale (ticker XXX) is in a taxable account, > {b}... | Taxes | 3 | 04-07-2004 08:11 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |