|
#33
| |||
| |||
| In article <Xns9A832889D3F1avocatstuyahoofr[at]130.133.1.4> , Stuart Bronstein <spamtrap[at]lexregia.com> wrote: - quote - > sethb[at]panix.com (Seth) wrote:
Can the expert in this case actually point to sales of that particular> > Drew Edmundson <drewsbeagles[at]hotmail.com> wrote: > > > Lets be realistic. Because some stranger says the price is > > > one thing and an expert says something else, the stranger > > > somehow trumps the expert? > > > I don't see two people saying. I see one person saying, and one > > actual transaction (unless you consider eBay's reporting of prices > > to be the word of an unreliable stranger). > > > Again, the regs _define_ Fair Market Value as the price a willing > > buyer and seller would agree to. On the one hand, we have a > > willing buyer and seller, and the price they actually agreed to. > > On the other hand, we have an "expert" who claims they should have > > agreed to some other price. > One sale is not sufficient to create evidence establishing value. The > expert presumably has experience with many sales and draws on them to > come up with his value. But a single sale can easily be a fluke, and > is unreliable for this purpose. item? We don't know; apparently, he didn't provide that information to OP. Seth -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#32
| |||
| |||
| In article <fb79b5b0-56c2-4348-9b4b-bb6f457cd38d[at]m71g2000hse.googlegroups.com> , kastnna <kastnna[at]auburnalum.org> wrote: - quote - > On Apr 17, 12:39*pm, se...[at]panix.com (Seth) wrote:
You said that some items routinely sell for less than average on eBay,> > In article <5d285f99-b1f1-43f6-ae74-9a3786daa...[at]c65g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> , > > kastnna *<kast...[at]auburnalum.org> wrote: > > > One can simply look for big ticket items on ebay (BMWs, plasma TVs, > > > etc) and see that these items routinely sell for less than average > > > prices. > > > One can look for similar items (TVs, cameras, computers) at buy.com, > > amazon.com, froogle.google.com, and even woot.com and see that they > > routinely sell for "less than average prices". *Does that mean that > > FMV for a book is "publisher's list" and Amazon is "wrong"? > I never said that FMV should be the "publishers list", nor did I say > Amazon is "wrong". You're making inferences that aren't supported by > my statements. to support your claim that eBay isn't representative. (Other items routinely sell for more than average there; I've seen a book sell for $80 while it was still in print from the publisher for $35.) Half of all sales are at less than the median price for the item, by definition. - quote - > Online retailers constitute a PORTION of the market only. FMV is
The definition of FMV is in terms of "a buyer" and "a seller", not> decided by the market, not a single or small number of transactions. "the totality of the market". Yes, that means that one item will have a lot of different prices, all of which are FMV. - quote - > If online retailers provide the bulk of the product, then FMV may, in
FMV is defined for an item, not a market.> fact, be very near online prices. If online retailers constitute only > a small percentage of a product offering then FMV for that market may > be no where near the online retailers price. As usual, it depends. - quote - > Originally this thread focused on the validity of ebay auctions being
That was in response to your claim that eBay didn't matter because its> representative of FMV. Apparently you have now expanded the debate to > include all online retailers. prices were often lower than "average". I pointed out that there are lots of other places with the same property. Seth -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#31
| |||
| |||
| On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 00:59:46 EDT, sethb[at]panix.com (Seth) wrote: - quote - > In article <ftsc049d81tikrokaogsoodujov43mhv00[at]4ax.com> ,
You have now introduced a fact that is not in existence. The> Drew Edmundson <drewsbeagles[at]hotmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 13:31:55 EDT, sethb[at]panix.com (Seth) > > wrote: > > > What about an eBay _sale_? The eBay sale meets the definition in the > > > regulations, and I don't see anything in the quoted regulations about > > > a qualified appraiser trumping the definition. > > > Lets be realistic. Because some stranger says the price is > > one thing and an expert says something else, the stranger > > somehow trumps the expert? > I don't see two people saying. I see one person saying, and one > actual transaction (unless you consider eBay's reporting of prices to > be the word of an unreliable stranger). > Again, the regs _define_ Fair Market Value as the price a willing > buyer and seller would agree to. On the one hand, we have a willing > buyer and seller, and the price they actually agreed to. On the other > hand, we have an "expert" who claims they should have agreed to some > other price. OP said he saw a listing, which is different than a sale. Others have already explained why even one sale is not the definition of FMV. Just because you want something to be a certain way does not make it so. Nor does repeating the same thing over and over again make it true. A random listing on eBay will never overcome an expert's opinion. Drew Edmundson, CPA Cary, NC -- Drew Edmundson, CPA Cary, NC -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#30
| |||
| |||
| On Apr 17, 12:39*pm, se...[at]panix.com (Seth) wrote: - quote - > In article <5d285f99-b1f1-43f6-ae74-9a3786daa...[at]c65g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> ,
I never said that FMV should be the "publishers list", nor did I say> kastnna *<kast...[at]auburnalum.org> wrote: > > One can simply look for big ticket items on ebay (BMWs, plasma TVs, > > etc) and see that these items routinely sell for less than average > > prices. > One can look for similar items (TVs, cameras, computers) at buy.com, > amazon.com, froogle.google.com, and even woot.com and see that they > routinely sell for "less than average prices". *Does that mean that > FMV for a book is "publisher's list" and Amazon is "wrong"? Amazon is "wrong". You're making inferences that aren't supported by my statements. Online retailers constitute a PORTION of the market only. FMV is decided by the market, not a single or small number of transactions. If online retailers provide the bulk of the product, then FMV may, in fact, be very near online prices. If online retailers constitute only a small percentage of a product offering then FMV for that market may be no where near the online retailers price. As usual, it depends. Originally this thread focused on the validity of ebay auctions being representative of FMV. Apparently you have now expanded the debate to include all online retailers. While ALL online retailers may cumulatively come closer to reaching average FMV (depending on the specifics) it doesn't change the original discussion. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#29
| |||
| |||
| On Apr 16, 11:59*pm, se...[at]panix.com (Seth) wrote: - quote - > Again, the regs _define_ Fair Market Value as the price a willing
You're limiting the definition to mean that a single transaction can> buyer and seller would agree to. *On the one hand, we have a willing > buyer and seller, and the price they actually agreed to. *On the other > hand, we have an "expert" who claims they should have agreed to some > other price. consititute FMV. The IRS describes "unusual market conditions", "comparable sales", and even "expert opinion" all as factors that can render a singular transaction (or even a minority of transactions) to be an anomaly and thus not indicative of FMV. Furthermore, immediately prior to your above definition, the IRS states "FMV is the price that property would sell for on the open market". A "market" is not defined by a single transaction but rather ALL the transactions of that good, service, or idea. Can ebay represent FMV? Possibly. Does ebay represent FMV in this case? That depends on details not provided here. Does ebay generally represent FMV? Not in my un-official experience for reason previously stated. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#28
| |||
| |||
| In article <5d285f99-b1f1-43f6-ae74-9a3786daa9c4[at]c65g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> , kastnna <kastnna[at]auburnalum.org> wrote: - quote - > One can simply look for big ticket items on ebay (BMWs, plasma TVs,
One can look for similar items (TVs, cameras, computers) at buy.com,> etc) and see that these items routinely sell for less than average > prices. amazon.com, froogle.google.com, and even woot.com and see that they routinely sell for "less than average prices". Does that mean that FMV for a book is "publisher's list" and Amazon is "wrong"? Seth -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#27
| |||
| |||
| sethb[at]panix.com (Seth) wrote: - quote - > Drew Edmundson <drewsbeagles[at]hotmail.com> wrote:
One sale is not sufficient to create evidence establishing value. The> > Lets be realistic. Because some stranger says the price is > > one thing and an expert says something else, the stranger > > somehow trumps the expert? > I don't see two people saying. I see one person saying, and one > actual transaction (unless you consider eBay's reporting of prices > to be the word of an unreliable stranger). > Again, the regs _define_ Fair Market Value as the price a willing > buyer and seller would agree to. On the one hand, we have a > willing buyer and seller, and the price they actually agreed to. > On the other hand, we have an "expert" who claims they should have > agreed to some other price. expert presumably has experience with many sales and draws on them to come up with his value. But a single sale can easily be a fluke, and is unreliable for this purpose. Stu -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#26
| |||
| |||
| In article <ftsc049d81tikrokaogsoodujov43mhv00[at]4ax.com> , Drew Edmundson <drewsbeagles[at]hotmail.com> wrote: - quote - > On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 13:31:55 EDT, sethb[at]panix.com (Seth)
I don't see two people saying. I see one person saying, and one> wrote: > > What about an eBay _sale_? The eBay sale meets the definition in the > > regulations, and I don't see anything in the quoted regulations about > > a qualified appraiser trumping the definition. > Lets be realistic. Because some stranger says the price is > one thing and an expert says something else, the stranger > somehow trumps the expert? actual transaction (unless you consider eBay's reporting of prices to be the word of an unreliable stranger). Again, the regs _define_ Fair Market Value as the price a willing buyer and seller would agree to. On the one hand, we have a willing buyer and seller, and the price they actually agreed to. On the other hand, we have an "expert" who claims they should have agreed to some other price. Seth -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#25
| |||
| |||
| On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 13:31:55 EDT, sethb[at]panix.com (Seth) wrote: - quote - > In article <ebpLj.34310$rC6.32266[at]bignews4.bellsouth.net> ,
Lets be realistic. Because some stranger says the price is> Drew <drewsbeagles[at]hotmail.com> wrote: > > From the charitable contribution regulations Reg § > > 1.170A-1(c)(2) "The fair market value is the price at which > > the property would change hands between a willing buyer and > > a willing seller, neither being under any compulsion to buy > > or sell and both having reasonable knowledge of relevant > > facts." Note "no compulsion" in the regulation. So motive > > is a key element. The law is the law and telling me how the > > law should be doesn't help. But you have gone off on a > > tangent. Appraisal from a qualified appraiser trumps an > > eBay listing. > What about an eBay _sale_? The eBay sale meets the definition in the > regulations, and I don't see anything in the quoted regulations about > a qualified appraiser trumping the definition. one thing and an expert says something else, the stranger somehow trumps the expert? Common sense says that the expert wins and the courts support common sense. Find some cases that support your point or some other reference. Drew Edmundson, CPA Cary, NC -- Drew Edmundson, CPA Cary, NC -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#24
| |||
| |||
| On Apr 12, 1:01*am, se...[at]panix.com (Seth) wrote: - quote - > In article <357f9970-f7fc-4ec0-96fe-801874272...[at]s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> ,
I buy a lot of stuff on ebay because it is cheaper than it costs me> kastnna *<kast...[at]auburnalum.org> wrote: > > Perhaps ALL of ebay is an aberation. I think it is a shopping place > > for tech-savvy consumers looking for a deal, not a source for fair > > market value. Suppose one were to find 5 or 10 similar sales on ebay. > > What if 1000s of other sales occurred offline at prices markedly > > higher? > Then buy the stuff on eBay and get rich. locally. I don't resell it and "get rich" because there is an opporunity costs associated. - quote - > The fact that so few people are doing that implies that eBay prices
That statement would only be true if there were absolutely no other> aren't necessarily that low. variables to consider. There are numerous other costs and risks associated with ebay that affect price. Shipping costs, selling fees, the inability to "try" an item before purchasing, the lack of dedicated customer service by individual sellers, and the risk of getting "scammed" all result in ebay items generally selling for less than comparable products in "brick and mortar" stores. To overcome these additional factors, ebay sellers must demand a lower price. One can simply look for big ticket items on ebay (BMWs, plasma TVs, etc) and see that these items routinely sell for less than average prices. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#23
| |||
| |||
| In article <yNCdnUPP6NMzHmPanZ2dnUVZWhednZ2d[at]earthlink.com> , anne watson <anneb3[at]mindspring.com> wrote: - quote - > Just had to jump in. EBAY ss not the place to look for Fair Market Value in
Except there's no evidence of actual sales. All we see are the ask> books. d a Google for ABE books, you might be surprised. Our Friends > of the Library uses it to sell hundreds of books per month. > No auction just buying and selling at what ever the market will bear, side. A dealer has had several of my books listed for a year, without sales. Does that make his asking price FMV? Seth -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#22
| |||
| |||
| In article <357f9970-f7fc-4ec0-96fe-801874272305[at]s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> , kastnna <kastnna[at]auburnalum.org> wrote: - quote - > Perhaps ALL of ebay is an aberation. I think it is a shopping place
Then buy the stuff on eBay and get rich.> for tech-savvy consumers looking for a deal, not a source for fair > market value. Suppose one were to find 5 or 10 similar sales on ebay. > What if 1000s of other sales occurred offline at prices markedly > higher? The fact that so few people are doing that implies that eBay prices aren't necessarily that low. Seth -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#21
| |||
| |||
| On Apr 10, 11:29*pm, Stuart Bronstein <spamt...[at]lexregia.com> wrote: - quote - > se...[at]panix.com (Seth) wrote:
Perhaps ALL of ebay is an aberation. I think it is a shopping place> > What about an eBay _sale_? *The eBay sale meets the definition in the > > regulations, and I don't see anything in the quoted regulations about > > a qualified appraiser trumping the definition. > A single eBay sale is meaningless because it could be an aberration. * > If you find five or ten eBay sales of the same item, that will give you > a better idea of what it is actually worth. for tech-savvy consumers looking for a deal, not a source for fair market value. Suppose one were to find 5 or 10 similar sales on ebay. What if 1000s of other sales occurred offline at prices markedly higher? Ex: Because I am in the market, I recently checked ebay for a 2006 3- series BMW. Total for sale=90. I then checked autotrader for the same criteria. Total for sale=3158. Even if autotrader constituted the ENTIRE market (which I don't believe it does), ebay is offering less than 3% of all potential candidates. The vast majority of the ebay offerings were also cheaper that the autotrader offerings (with some overlap for double listed items). That may not be the case here. Ebay may, in fact, be the primary resale source for the items in question. However, if it is not, it shouldn't be relied upon as indicitive of fair market value. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#20
| |||
| |||
| "anne watson" <anneb3[at]mindspring.com> wrote: - quote - > > > > One sale is not fair market value. How do you know the eBay
The Abe book site is a great one for buying books. But they list many> > > > seller isn't desperate for cash? How do you know > Just had to jump in. EBAY ss not the place to look for Fair > Market Value in books. d a Google for ABE books, you might be > surprised. Our Friends of the Library uses it to sell hundreds of > books per month. copies of the same book, often at a wide range of prices. I'm not aware that you can look at what the actual sales are for those books. On eBay, however, you can apparently see the actual results of past sales. Stu -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#19
| |||
| |||
| sethb[at]panix.com (Seth) wrote: - quote - > Drew <drewsbeagles[at]hotmail.com> wrote:
A single eBay sale is meaningless because it could be an aberration.> > From the charitable contribution regulations Reg § > > 1.170A-1(c)(2) "The fair market value is the price at which > > the property would change hands between a willing buyer and > > a willing seller, neither being under any compulsion to buy > > or sell and both having reasonable knowledge of relevant > > facts." > What about an eBay _sale_? The eBay sale meets the definition in the > regulations, and I don't see anything in the quoted regulations about > a qualified appraiser trumping the definition. If you find five or ten eBay sales of the same item, that will give you a better idea of what it is actually worth. Stu -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#18
| |||
| |||
| "> > > > One sale is not fair market value. How do you know the eBay - quote - > > > seller isn't desperate for cash? How do you know
Just had to jump in. EBAY ss not the place to look for Fair Market Value inbooks. d a Google for ABE books, you might be surprised. Our Friends of the Library uses it to sell hundreds of books per month. No auction just buying and selling at what ever the market will bear, Anne -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#17
| |||
| |||
| Seth wrote: .... - quote - > What about an eBay _sale_? The eBay sale meets the definition in the
Just having sold it doesn't remove the possibility of a compulsory sale> regulations, and I don't see anything in the quoted regulations about > a qualified appraiser trumping the definition. .... by the buyer -- he _could_ be willing to accept anything if in a pinch. The expert appraiser trumps the regulation in the eyes of probate court in some states apparently from earlier posts. I agree it would need a fairly sizable sample population of completed auctions to have any chance of setting a FMV at significant variance to an expert appraiser's estimate if it came to that in the process of probate -- but that doesn't say it isn't possible still the appraiser is over-estimating for a multitude of reasons. Where I see the practical difficulty in stuff like this is that ime appraisers tend to have experience in what I'll term "high end" markets whereas an "every day" estate auction is likely to only bring in small fractions of what some items might bring if there were the time and inclination to market them to precisely the right outlet or in a location (particularly larger population centers) where there could be more demand. imo, $0.02, etc., ... -- -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#16
| |||
| |||
| In article <ebpLj.34310$rC6.32266[at]bignews4.bellsouth.net> , Drew <drewsbeagles[at]hotmail.com> wrote: - quote - > From the charitable contribution regulations Reg §
What about an eBay _sale_? The eBay sale meets the definition in the> 1.170A-1(c)(2) "The fair market value is the price at which > the property would change hands between a willing buyer and > a willing seller, neither being under any compulsion to buy > or sell and both having reasonable knowledge of relevant > facts." Note "no compulsion" in the regulation. So motive > is a key element. The law is the law and telling me how the > law should be doesn't help. But you have gone off on a > tangent. Appraisal from a qualified appraiser trumps an > eBay listing. regulations, and I don't see anything in the quoted regulations about a qualified appraiser trumping the definition. I agree that the listing is irrelevant; I know lots of cases where someone listed an item for a low price in order to attract interest, and expected it to sell for much more (and did get an order of magnitude more than the mininum). Seth -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#15
| |||
| |||
| <removeps-groups[at]yahoo.com> wrote in message news:520277db-1a7c-40e3-9deb-95693c8621cd[at]s37g2000prg.googlegroups.com... - quote - > On Apr 7, 4:01 pm, "Drew" <drewsbeag...[at]hotmail.com> wrote:
No it isn't.> > One sale is not fair market value. How do you know the > > eBay > > seller isn't desperate for cash? How do you know they > > aren't an idiot (no insult intended to the eBay seller). > > You don't. > Maybe the eBay seller was desperate for cash, but that's > part of FMV. - quote - > The market of sellers includes people who want to make a
the property would change hands between a willing buyer and> profit and > put their money into new investments, people who want to > sell stuff to > pay for college, people who want to sell stuff because > they need to > pay for heat, etc. Whatever the underlying motive, that's > irrelevant; > the bottom line is that the price they sell for is FMV. > Simarly, when > I sell stock I own because I need to pay for something > (whether it's > for a wedding, to pay a tax bill, whatever), the only > thing that > matters for tax purposes is the price I sold it at. > From the charitable contribution regulations Reg § 1.170A-1(c)(2) "The fair market value is the price at which a willing seller, neither being under any compulsion to buy or sell and both having reasonable knowledge of relevant facts." Note "no compulsion" in the regulation. So motive is a key element. The law is the law and telling me how the law should be doesn't help. But you have gone off on a tangent. Appraisal from a qualified appraiser trumps an eBay listing. That is just the way it is. If you don't like the appraisal then get another expert to tell you the first appraiser is wrong or gather a whole lot of other evidence than just a random eBay listing (no insult intended to the OP). Drew Edmundson, CPA Cary, NC -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#14
| |||
| |||
| On Apr 7, 4:01 pm, "Drew" <drewsbeag...[at]hotmail.com> wrote: - quote - > One sale is not fair market value. How do you know the eBay
Maybe the eBay seller was desperate for cash, but that's part of FMV.> seller isn't desperate for cash? How do you know they > aren't an idiot (no insult intended to the eBay seller). > You don't. The market of sellers includes people who want to make a profit and put their money into new investments, people who want to sell stuff to pay for college, people who want to sell stuff because they need to pay for heat, etc. Whatever the underlying motive, that's irrelevant; the bottom line is that the price they sell for is FMV. Simarly, when I sell stock I own because I need to pay for something (whether it's for a wedding, to pay a tax bill, whatever), the only thing that matters for tax purposes is the price I sold it at. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| Tags |
| estate, taxes |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| estate taxes robert.moredock@gmail.com: An investment adviser with a national brokerage has proposed that my 87 year old mother "invest" about $750K from my deceased fathers credit... | Taxes | 5 | 07-20-2007 02:32 AM | |
| Estate taxes mcmannors: My mother passed away in April of 2002, and she was the sole owner of the house she and my dad lived in. In her will, she left the house to my dad.... | Taxes | 8 | 05-03-2005 09:01 AM | |
| Estate taxes in NC enost1@netscape.net: I am the administrator/executor of my brother's estate. He died in Nov 2003. He had an IRA worth $30,000; a home worth $85,000, and a few other... | Taxes | 1 | 04-12-2005 09:33 PM | |
| estate taxes msmap: I've just inherited $1.65M brokerage account from my dad who lived in Kansas. I've started looking at the estate tax forms for both fed and state.... | Taxes | 8 | 10-13-2003 05:28 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |