|
#1
| |||
| |||
| "Cliff Powell" <cliffp[at]cox.net> wrote in message news:MPG.225c46c3f932c6a4989681[at]news.cox.net... - quote - > My clent, an independent contractor, worked for a employer away from > home city. She received 1099-MISC for $80K and then a corrected 1099- > MISC for $100K. There is NO documented reason for increase but she > presumed it to cover reimbursement. She did have auto expense which was > deducted. Lodging for her was provided directly to hotel by her client. > She did not spend anything herself. I am following: > "Code section 162a - An individual who has a temporary work assignment > =3Faway from home=3F can deduct the travel expenses (mileage 48.5 cents), > meals and lodging while away from home on business." > She believes that she can deduct the lodging expense even though it was > not paid by her, but rather for her. The increase on the 1099-MISC, if > it is reimbursement, is far more than auto expenses. Why would her > client pay the lodging fee and then provide their client with an > identical amount on the 1099-MISC. She has a CPA realative who agrees > with her. Your commnents most appreciated. Why guess? Get the facts from her client first then proceed. - quote - > Cliffp
<< ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- >
> -- > << ------------------------------------------------------- > > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > > << > > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > > << are at www.asktax.org. > > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > > << ------------------------------------------------------- > -- |
| | |||
| |||
| "Cliff Powell" <cliffp[at]cox.net> wrote - quote - > My clent, an independent contractor, worked for a employer away from > home city. She received 1099-MISC for $80K and then a corrected 1099- > MISC for $100K. There is NO documented reason for increase but she > presumed it to cover reimbursement. She did have auto expense which was > deducted. Lodging for her was provided directly to hotel by her client. > She did not spend anything herself. I am following: > "Code section 162a - An individual who has a temporary work assignment > =3Faway from home=3F can deduct the travel expenses (mileage 48.5 cents), > meals and lodging while away from home on business." > She believes that she can deduct the lodging expense even though it was > not paid by her, but rather for her. The increase on the 1099-MISC, if > it is reimbursement, is far more than auto expenses. Why would her > client pay the lodging fee and then provide their client with an > identical amount on the 1099-MISC. She has a CPA realative who agrees > with her. Your commnents most appreciated. Conversely, she could report the amount directly received by her, and deduct the expenses she directly paid. She's guessing on the lodging expenses unless she can get an accounting of the 1099 from the employer. Since there's probably no rhyme or reason for the 1099 amount, then follow her provable numbers and deal with IRS when they send a notice. -- Paul A. Thomas, CPA Athens, Georgia -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| My clent, an independent contractor, worked for a employer away from home city. She received 1099-MISC for $80K and then a corrected 1099- MISC for $100K. There is NO documented reason for increase but she presumed it to cover reimbursement. She did have auto expense which was deducted. Lodging for her was provided directly to hotel by her client. She did not spend anything herself. I am following: "Code section 162a* - An individual who has a temporary work assignment =3Faway from home=3F *can deduct the travel expenses (mileage 48.5 cents), meals and lodging while away from home on business." She believes that she can deduct the lodging expense even though it was not paid by her, but rather for her. The increase on the 1099-MISC, if it is reimbursement, is far more than auto expenses. Why would her client pay the lodging fee and then provide their client with an identical amount on the 1099-MISC. She has a CPA realative who agrees with her. Your commnents most appreciated. Cliffp -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| Tags |
| deductions, schedule |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Where do I report dividends paid on Form 5471 Schedule C or Schedule F A Wieser: Thanks Alan for answering my 5471 questions so far. It's been a great help. I think I've now figured almost everything out. The only thing I'm... | Taxes | 8 | 03-14-2008 02:21 AM | |
| Schedule A deductions in TX david: I plan on using the optional tax tables to figure my local sales tax deduction. However i had some huge purchases last year such as a new car and... | Taxes | 2 | 06-02-2006 06:53 AM | |
| Non Ad Valorem Property Taxes and Tax Deductions on Schedule A Drakem42: Case: (question at the end) :-) I will file a 1040 and itemize deductions on the Schedule A. The property is my home (have only one), and it's not... | Taxes | 2 | 02-03-2005 05:46 PM | |
| Chapter 179 Deductions -large SUV/Truck deductions for business owners MAX: Does any one have any information on this? Is it an Audit alert? Thanks. << -------------------------------------------------><< The Charter... | Taxes | 17 | 06-17-2004 03:53 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |