|
#12
| |||
| |||
| In article <9p4fs3l2r23q5n6l2lv3fc7ps7nb8uffun[at]4ax.com> , - Poster Joe - <posterjoeNOSPAM[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:07:43 EST, sethb[at]panix.com (Seth) wrote:
I think the big difference is whether the time you spent doing the work> > Who owns the copyright? If it's a Work for Hire where the buyer owns > > the copyright, I'd say it's a service. If it's the sale of some bits > > with a license, and the creator owns the copyright and is allowed to > > re-use parts of it in his next "custom" website, it's a product. > > > Seth > All right boys, thanks for all the insight. > I did a lot of additional digging. It seems that "off the shelf" or > licensed software is definitely a product[note below]. However, the > only inferences I could find on custom software was that it wasn't > included in any of the references to off-the-shelf, although it was > not specifically excluded either - just not specifically included. > The state seemed to specifically include it as a tangible asset, but > then had a specific section in the statute to exclude anything that > was not off-the-shelf from sales tax and noted that they considered it > a personal service for sales tax purposes. > [note] It's interesting that "licensed" software is considered a > product and a sales taxable tangible item, when in fact you don't even > own a physical product - just a permit to use it. Perhaps that's just > a tacit acknowledgement that the "license" of today is merely a scam > by software manufacturers to duck warranty and product liability > issues. was devoted specifically to the one customer. If you develop software and then license it to numerous customers, it's a product because you aren't billing any particular customer for the hours you worked. That's probably another way to look at it. Even if you don't actually bill by the hour, if the nature of the relationship is such that you *could*, it's a service. -- Barry Margolin, barmar[at]alum.mit.edu Arlington, MA *** PLEASE don't copy me on replies, I'll read them in the group *** -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| On Feb 29, 1:05*am, - Poster Joe - <posterjoeNOS...[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:07:43 EST, se...[at]panix.com (Seth) wrote: > > Who owns the copyright? *If it's a Work for Hire where the buyer owns > > the copyright, I'd say it's a service. *If it's the sale of some bits > > with a license, and the creator owns the copyright and is allowed to > > re-use parts of it in his next "custom" website, it's a product. > > Seth > All right boys, thanks for all the insight. > I did a lot of additional digging. It seems that "off the shelf" or > licensed software is definitely a product[note below]. However, the > only inferences I could find on custom software was that it wasn't > included in any of the references to off-the-shelf, although it was > not specifically excluded either - just not specifically included. > The state seemed to specifically include it as a tangible asset, but > then had a specific section in the statute to exclude anything that > was not off-the-shelf from sales tax and noted that they considered it > a personal service for sales tax purposes. > [note] It's interesting that "licensed" software is considered a > product and a sales taxable tangible item, when in fact you don't even > own a physical product - just a permit to use it. Perhaps that's just > a tacit acknowledgement that the "license" of today is merely a scam > by software manufacturers to duck warranty and product liability > issues. > Thanks again, > -- > << ------------------------------------------------------- > > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, * > > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties *> > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. * * * * * * * * *> > << * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * > > << * The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts * > > << *to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy *> > << * * * * * * * * *are atwww.asktax.org. * * * * * * * * > > << * * * * Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. * * * * > > << ------------------------------------------------------- > For a definition of services, see Treas. Reg. § 1.861-18(d). ========================================= MODERATOR'S COMMENT: When responding please delete all unnecessary parts of the prior post. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:07:43 EST, sethb[at]panix.com (Seth) wrote: - quote - > Who owns the copyright? If it's a Work for Hire where the buyer owns
All right boys, thanks for all the insight.> the copyright, I'd say it's a service. If it's the sale of some bits > with a license, and the creator owns the copyright and is allowed to > re-use parts of it in his next "custom" website, it's a product. > Seth I did a lot of additional digging. It seems that "off the shelf" or licensed software is definitely a product[note below]. However, the only inferences I could find on custom software was that it wasn't included in any of the references to off-the-shelf, although it was not specifically excluded either - just not specifically included. The state seemed to specifically include it as a tangible asset, but then had a specific section in the statute to exclude anything that was not off-the-shelf from sales tax and noted that they considered it a personal service for sales tax purposes. [note] It's interesting that "licensed" software is considered a product and a sales taxable tangible item, when in fact you don't even own a physical product - just a permit to use it. Perhaps that's just a tacit acknowledgement that the "license" of today is merely a scam by software manufacturers to duck warranty and product liability issues. Thanks again, -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| In article <1qbds3he838b0nmhjnodedmhb1pk7bdofm[at]4ax.com> , - Poster Joe - <posterjoeNOSPAM[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > Still, there must be some place where the IRS has made a specific
Who owns the copyright? If it's a Work for Hire where the buyer owns> ruling on whether a selling (building) a "web site" is a product or > service. At the least, there must be a ruling on whether delivering > custom developed software is a product or service. the copyright, I'd say it's a service. If it's the sale of some bits with a license, and the creator owns the copyright and is allowed to re-use parts of it in his next "custom" website, it's a product. Seth -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| In article <Xns9A524ED62F98Davocatstuyahoofr[at]130.133.1.4> , Stuart Bronstein <spamtrap[at]lexregia.com> wrote: - quote - > - Poster Joe - <posterjoeNOSPAM[at]yahoo.com> wrote:
That is, it varies by state. I suspect the IRS will accept whatever> > Still, there must be some place where the IRS has made a specific > > ruling on whether a selling (building) a "web site" is a product > > or service. At the least, there must be a ruling on whether > > delivering custom developed software is a product or service. > I've only seen this issue come up in the context of sales tax. And in > those cases it's be dependent on the specific statute. rules your state has. It's always safer just to issue the 1099; there's no penalty if it wasn't required. (For the recipient, assuming he reports all his income, there's no harm in failing to receive a 1099.) Seth -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| "- Poster Joe -" <posterjoeNOSPAM[at]yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1qbds3he838b0nmhjnodedmhb1pk7bdofm[at]4ax.com... - quote - > On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:30:18 EST, "Allan Martin" <Allan[at]Badboy.com> wrote:
Your dilemma is like trying to define pornography, may be impossible but you> > > I hear what you guys are saying and I always play it conservative. > > > But, I know the web guy (close friend) has a bigger issue - none of > > > his clients send him 1099's. He'd like to nail this properly and not > > > create an inconsistency. For me, I have a similar issue with another > > > vendor type of that I need to pin down after this one. > > > The fact that the clients do not send a 1099 is their problem, it is > > certainly not your friends problem. This is a non-issue. It is up to the > > taxpayer to report his taxable service income. The non-receipt of a > > 1099(s) > > should not factor into the amount reported. > All understood. > Still, there must be some place where the IRS has made a specific > ruling on whether a selling (building) a "web site" is a product or > service. At the least, there must be a ruling on whether delivering > custom developed software is a product or service. > I'd just like to see something more specific and definitive. I tried > searching at the IRS site but it's difficult to come up with search > terms that define the search narrowly enough to weed out what I need. know it when you see it. In your case having someone custom design a Web Site looks like a service. - quote - > --
When responding to a post, please include only the essential parts and> << ------------------------------------------------------- > > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > > << > > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > > << are at www.asktax.org. > > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > > << ------------------------------------------------------- > ========================================= MODERATOR'S COMMENT: delete the non-essential parts of the prior post. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| - Poster Joe - <posterjoeNOSPAM[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > "Allan Martin" <Allan[at]Badboy.com> wrote:
I've only seen this issue come up in the context of sales tax. And in> > > I hear what you guys are saying and I always play it > > > conservative. But, I know the web guy (close friend) has a > > > bigger issue - none of his clients send him 1099's. He'd like to > > > nail this properly and not create an inconsistency. > > > The fact that the clients do not send a 1099 is their problem, it > > is certainly not your friends problem. > Still, there must be some place where the IRS has made a specific > ruling on whether a selling (building) a "web site" is a product > or service. At the least, there must be a ruling on whether > delivering custom developed software is a product or service. those cases it's be dependent on the specific statute. I did a brief check of tax court and other federal cases, as well as IRS regulations, and was unable to find anything at all on this point. Stu -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| "- Poster Joe -" <posterjoeNOSPAM[at]yahoo.com> wrote - quote - > Still, there must be some place where the IRS has made > a specific ruling on whether a selling (building) a "web > site" is a product or service. You can search the Private Letter Rulings (PLR). Otherwise head to the court cases to see what you can find. Otherwise you can pay for a PLR, spell out your facts, and see where the chips fall. It really doesn't matter though, as whatever income is generated is still taxable. So there's no savings to gain, so why bother spanding for a PLR. - quote - > At the least, there must be a ruling on whether delivering > custom developed software is a product or service. Read what you're saying.......custom built isn't a manufacturing job. It's a very personal/professional service. Microsoft manufactures software - it's clearly a product. You buy what they sell - or you do without. Your guy builds what you want - or he does without. -- Paul A. Thomas, CPA Athens, Georgia -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:30:18 EST, "Allan Martin" <Allan[at]Badboy.comwrote: - quote - > > I hear what you guys are saying and I always play it conservative.
All understood.> > But, I know the web guy (close friend) has a bigger issue - none of > > his clients send him 1099's. He'd like to nail this properly and not > > create an inconsistency. For me, I have a similar issue with another > > vendor type of that I need to pin down after this one. > The fact that the clients do not send a 1099 is their problem, it is > certainly not your friends problem. This is a non-issue. It is up to the > taxpayer to report his taxable service income. The non-receipt of a 1099(s) > should not factor into the amount reported. Still, there must be some place where the IRS has made a specific ruling on whether a selling (building) a "web site" is a product or service. At the least, there must be a ruling on whether delivering custom developed software is a product or service. I'd just like to see something more specific and definitive. I tried searching at the IRS site but it's difficult to come up with search terms that define the search narrowly enough to weed out what I need. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| "- Poster Joe -" <posterjoeNOSPAM[at]yahoo.com> wrote in message news:jj3bs3he90q26e68iduri2r5d5tedel17s[at]4ax.com... - quote - > On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 07:55:21 EST, Benjamin Yazersky CPA
The fact that the clients do not send a 1099 is their problem, it is> <byaz55[at]lycos.com> wrote: > > > More specifically, if someone wants to comment on the specific service > > > I am trying to pin down: web site development. My question involves > > > purchasing a custom web site from another party - is this a purchase > > > of a product or a service? In this case, the web site developer does > > > all of the work as a strictly defined independent contractor who meets > > > with the client, learns about the business, then works independently > > > to create a custom web site for the client, finally delivering the > > > completed product (HTML files, graphics, etc) to the client. > > > > If in doubt, issue the 1099. > > > > From your description, I'd say the 1099 should be issued. > > And check your state rules, they may want a copy of the 1099. > Benjamin: > I hear what you guys are saying and I always play it conservative. > But, I know the web guy (close friend) has a bigger issue - none of > his clients send him 1099's. He'd like to nail this properly and not > create an inconsistency. For me, I have a similar issue with another > vendor type of that I need to pin down after this one. certainly not your friends problem. This is a non-issue. It is up to the taxpayer to report his taxable service income. The non-receipt of a 1099(s) should not factor into the amount reported. - quote - > Is there a publication that describes what a "service" is in detail? I
<< ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- >
> remember reading grimy details of something on-line similar back when > I had a Corp and there was a question of whether I was a PSC or not. I > found an on-line IRS resource - forget where - that had the details > right down to recent letter rulings on the issue. (Turned out "not a > PSC" based on a very fine point I found that was acceptable to my > CPA). But, somewhere out there there was a pub or IRS data store that > had very detailed information on the rules and rulings. > Is there something like that out there for 1099's? > -- > << ------------------------------------------------------- > > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > > << > > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > > << are at www.asktax.org. > > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > > << ------------------------------------------------------- > -- |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 07:55:21 EST, Benjamin Yazersky CPA <byaz55[at]lycos.com> wrote: - quote - > > More specifically, if someone wants to comment on the specific service
Benjamin:> > I am trying to pin down: web site development. My question involves > > purchasing a custom web site from another party - is this a purchase > > of a product or a service? In this case, the web site developer does > > all of the work as a strictly defined independent contractor who meets > > with the client, learns about the business, then works independently > > to create a custom web site for the client, finally delivering the > > completed product (HTML files, graphics, etc) to the client. > > If in doubt, issue the 1099. > > From your description, I'd say the 1099 should be issued. > And check your state rules, they may want a copy of the 1099. I hear what you guys are saying and I always play it conservative. But, I know the web guy (close friend) has a bigger issue - none of his clients send him 1099's. He'd like to nail this properly and not create an inconsistency. For me, I have a similar issue with another vendor type of that I need to pin down after this one. Is there a publication that describes what a "service" is in detail? I remember reading grimy details of something on-line similar back when I had a Corp and there was a question of whether I was a PSC or not. I found an on-line IRS resource - forget where - that had the details right down to recent letter rulings on the issue. (Turned out "not a PSC" based on a very fine point I found that was acceptable to my CPA). But, somewhere out there there was a pub or IRS data store that had very detailed information on the rules and rulings. Is there something like that out there for 1099's? -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| On Feb 26, 3:28 pm, - Poster Joe - <posterjoeNOS...[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > I'm looking for a pointer to a publication that discusses what > qualifies as "services" that need to be reported on a 1099. I seem to > recall reading some detailed descriptions somewhere in the past but I > can't find them in a random search at the IRS site. > More specifically, if someone wants to comment on the specific service > I am trying to pin down: web site development. My question involves > purchasing a custom web site from another party - is this a purchase > of a product or a service? In this case, the web site developer does > all of the work as a strictly defined independent contractor who meets > with the client, learns about the business, then works independently > to create a custom web site for the client, finally delivering the > completed product (HTML files, graphics, etc) to the client. > -- If in doubt, issue the 1099. - quote - > From your description, I'd say the 1099 should be issued. And check your state rules, they may want a copy of the 1099. <<< Benjamin Yazersky, CPA [NJ & NY] > > -----> real address on hobokeni or hobokenx <----- "This written advice was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer, for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer." (The foregoing legend has been affixed pursuant to U.S. Treasury Regulations governing tax practice.) The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| | |||
| |||
| "- Poster Joe -" <posterjoeNOSPAM[at]yahoo.com> wrote - quote - > I'm looking for a pointer to a publication that discusses what > qualifies as "services" that need to be reported on a 1099. I seem to > recall reading some detailed descriptions somewhere in the past but I > can't find them in a random search at the IRS site. > More specifically, if someone wants to comment on the specific service > I am trying to pin down: web site development. My question involves > purchasing a custom web site from another party - is this a purchase > of a product or a service? In this case, the web site developer does > all of the work as a strictly defined independent contractor who meets > with the client, learns about the business, then works independently > to create a custom web site for the client, finally delivering the > completed product (HTML files, graphics, etc) to the client. You would issue a 1099 to them for that work. It's not like you bought a manufactured web site that's been sitting on someone's shelf since November. It's also highly likely that you're going to be paying this guy to maintain it for some time. -- Paul A. Thomas, CPA Athens, Georgia -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I'm looking for a pointer to a publication that discusses what qualifies as "services" that need to be reported on a 1099. I seem to recall reading some detailed descriptions somewhere in the past but I can't find them in a random search at the IRS site. More specifically, if someone wants to comment on the specific service I am trying to pin down: web site development. My question involves purchasing a custom web site from another party - is this a purchase of a product or a service? In this case, the web site developer does all of the work as a strictly defined independent contractor who meets with the client, learns about the business, then works independently to create a custom web site for the client, finally delivering the completed product (HTML files, graphics, etc) to the client. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| Tags |
| 1099, product, service |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| MSN De Lux Portfolio showing wrong data In the "% Gain" and "Averege Cost" columns Fulvio Bizzaro: Hi, have a problem with the DeLux Portfolio: Since some days, from September 2008 the calculation in the Gain/Loss is not accurate: It is... | Microsoft Money | 8 | 10-05-2008 10:41 PM | |
| "news" and "fyi" links on the "Track My Portfolio" page tom: no longer work in my Money 2000. When I click them, I get "MSN Money-Page Not Found" and "The page you requested could not be found." But there is a... | Microsoft Money | 7 | 10-25-2007 11:34 PM | |
| Problem with keeping track of shared expenses, "His", "Hers", "Ours" and How much do I owe you? P.Constantineau: Hi all, My girlfriend and I are having trouble figuring how to use money 2005 to indicate us how much we owe each other. I have setup Money 2005... | Microsoft Money | 4 | 04-03-2006 02:01 PM | |
| Money 2002 transaction status flags ("E", "C", "R") have all disappeared Nick Tonkin: Hi, After many months of using Money 2002, yesterday I suddenly noticed that the column in my resgister that shows the cleared status of each... | Microsoft Money | 4 | 02-28-2004 04:39 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |