|
#17
| |||
| |||
| On Feb 11, 7:56*pm, "Billy" <billnospamever1234...[at]aol.com> wrote: - quote - > "Phil Marti" <prm20...[at]verizon.net> wrote in message
care, education, energy, foreign tax, child tax, retirement and> news 05sj.10376$0B2.8205[at]trnddc03...> > "Billy" wrote: > > > > If they file a joint return it will be based on the joint return > > > > information. *There's no need that both spouses have taxable income in > > > > order to receive the full amount. > > > > Not clear on ans. *Will the disbled Vet get both pmts? Thus making 3 pmts > > > > to the couple? > > No. *Assuming no children under 17, the couple will get a maximum of $1200 > > and a minimum of $600. *That minimum requires $3000 of one spouse's earned > > income and $3000 of the disability pension. > > Nothing has been announced yet about how people who don't have to file tax > > returns will be identified. *In the meantime, if you file a joint return > > and the Income Tax after Credits is at least $1,200 on your 2007 return, > > you'll get $1,200. > > -- > > Phil Marti > > Clarksburg, MD > A whole lotta poeple dont pay much in tax after the credits, based on your > response, they won't see a dime even though they work. *Child Tax Credit and > EIC wipe out a lot of liability. > bill > -- Bill - EIC doesn't wipe out liability- only line items 47-55 (day various other credits from rarely used forms decrease diability. You need to read the 2/13/08 US Treasury Press Release which has 5 pages of examples. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#16
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > > The bill as passed does contain an appropriation for both SSA and VA in
You guys need to keep the faith!> > > order to "administer" their part of the program. > > > So that tells me that those records will be consulted in the absence of > > > actual tax returns for 2007. > > > My oh my. How many government agencies does it take to send a rebate > > check to a disabled vet? > > "Hi. We're with the IRS, SSA and VA, and we're here to give you money" > > We're in some serious trouble now. > You got that right, Paul. All will go well, nearly $300 million is planned to facilitate the implementation of this act, the policy analyst, lawyer, program analyst & computers programmer (s) are up to the task. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#15
| |||
| |||
| Paul Thomas, CPA wrote: - quote - > "Harlan Lunsford" <hnslunsford[at]bellsouth.net> wrote > > The bill as passed does contain an appropriation for both SSA and VA in > > order to "administer" their part of the program. > > So that tells me that those records will be consulted in the absence of > > actual tax returns for 2007. > My oh my. > How many government agencies does it take to send a rebate check to a > disabled vet? > "Hi. We're with the IRS, SSA and VA, and we're here to give you money" > We're in some serious trouble now. You got that right, Paul. ChEAr$, Harlan -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#14
| |||
| |||
| "Harlan Lunsford" <hnslunsford[at]bellsouth.net> wrote - quote - > The bill as passed does contain an appropriation for both SSA and VA in > order to "administer" their part of the program. > So that tells me that those records will be consulted in the absence of > actual tax returns for 2007. My oh my. How many government agencies does it take to send a rebate check to a disabled vet? "Hi. We're with the IRS, SSA and VA, and we're here to give you money" We're in some serious trouble now. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#13
| |||
| |||
| Phil Marti wrote: - quote - > I'm still waiting to hear something official about how people who qualify
(balance snipped..)> for a check but are not required to file a 2007 return will be identified. > My thought is that FMS should do it since they know who's getting SS and > Veterans' benefits. The bill as passed does contain an appropriation for both SSA and VA in order to "administer" their part of the program. So that tells me that those records will be consulted in the absence of actual tax returns for 2007. ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| Phil Marti wrote: - quote - > "Condor" wrote:
If you start to think this through you quickly come to a> > See CNNMoney.com Rebates: What you need to know > And one significant piece of misinformation. CNN says that to get a rebate > check you MUST file a 2007 tax return. I've seen nothing official that > confirms that. > I'm still waiting to hear something official about how people who qualify > for a check but are not required to file a 2007 return will be identified. > My thought is that FMS should do it since they know who's getting SS and > Veterans' benefits. > I've seen something in the press about SSA and VA sending out a form for > people to file with IRS, which makes no sense, which may be why that's the > way they'll go. A double benefit of this approach is that it would open the > door for phishers to send "official" notices requesting information, > including the bank account information that our super-efficient current > administration wants since it's pushing the idea of direct deposit of the > checks, again according to press reports. > I've been in Washington too long to believe anyone will really think this > through, especially with Congress pounding at the gates to get the cash to > the people in time for the election. > In any case, people who are not required to file a 2007 return should hold > tight and await further developments. And they should be extra careful who > they send any kind of information to, stopping to think, "Wait a minute. > Don't they already have this information?" conclusion that it is a mess that requires careful thought and the ability for various computer systems to communicate with each other. For example, many people who receive SSA & VA benefits have other income and file tax returns. The rebate based on a filed tax return could be larger than the $300 rebate under the qualified income rule. Some of these people are dependents on another taxpayer's return. Dependents are not eligible for a rebate. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| Phil Marti wrote: - quote - > "Andrew" wrote:
Ah, thanks Phil. Appreciate it.> > I've seen $300 per person minimum and $600 also throw about. What > > determines whether or not you get more than the $300 (for a minimum > > of $3,000 income from last year, or something to that effect?) > You start with income tax after credits except the child tax credit. If > that amount is $600 or more ($1200 on a joint return), you get > $600/$1200. If it's less, you get only the amount of tax after > credits, but no less than $300 if you have $3,000 of qualifying > income. > -- > Phil Marti > Clarksburg, MD -- ----------------------------- Regards - - Andrew -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| "Condor" wrote: - quote - > See CNNMoney.com Rebates: What you need to know
And one significant piece of misinformation. CNN says that to get a rebatecheck you MUST file a 2007 tax return. I've seen nothing official that confirms that. I'm still waiting to hear something official about how people who qualify for a check but are not required to file a 2007 return will be identified. My thought is that FMS should do it since they know who's getting SS and Veterans' benefits. I've seen something in the press about SSA and VA sending out a form for people to file with IRS, which makes no sense, which may be why that's the way they'll go. A double benefit of this approach is that it would open the door for phishers to send "official" notices requesting information, including the bank account information that our super-efficient current administration wants since it's pushing the idea of direct deposit of the checks, again according to press reports. I've been in Washington too long to believe anyone will really think this through, especially with Congress pounding at the gates to get the cash to the people in time for the election. In any case, people who are not required to file a 2007 return should hold tight and await further developments. And they should be extra careful who they send any kind of information to, stopping to think, "Wait a minute. Don't they already have this information?" -- Phil Marti Clarksburg, MD -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > Time will tell.
See CNNMoney.com Rebates: What you need to know> bill http://money.cnn.com/2008/02/08/pf/t...ion=2008020817 Condor -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| "Andrew" wrote: - quote - > I've seen $300 per person minimum and $600 also throw about. What
You start with income tax after credits except the child tax credit. If> determines whether or not you get more than the $300 (for a minimum of > $3,000 income from last year, or something to that effect?) that amount is $600 or more ($1200 on a joint return), you get $600/$1200. If it's less, you get only the amount of tax after credits, but no less than $300 if you have $3,000 of qualifying income. -- Phil Marti Clarksburg, MD -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| "Billy" wrote: - quote - > A whole lotta poeple dont pay much in tax after the credits, based on your
My response was to you, not to people whose liability is wiped out by the> response, they won't see a dime even though they work. Child Tax Credit > and EIC wipe out a lot of liability. Child Tax Credit and EIC. People with zero income tax after credits EXCEPT CTC and all refundable credits, including EIC, will get the $300 minimum if they have the $3,000 of qualifying income. -- Phil Marti Clarksburg, MD -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Phil Marti wrote: Phil (or others) - I've seen $300 per person minimum and $600 also throw about. What determines whether or not you get more than the $300 (for a minimum of $3,000 income from last year, or something to that effect?) Wondering about my child who started her working life in t/y 2007 and is no longer my dependent. How can we tell how much SHE will get as a single individual (Does make considerably more than $3,000 if 2007). I've looked at online resources, and can't see where this is stated. Thanks! -- ----------------------------- Regards - - Andrew -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| "Phil Marti" <prm20871[at]verizon.net> wrote in message news 05sj.10376$0B2.8205[at]trnddc03...- quote - > "Billy" wrote:
A whole lotta poeple dont pay much in tax after the credits, based on your> > > If they file a joint return it will be based on the joint return > > > information. There's no need that both spouses have taxable income in > > > order to receive the full amount. > > > Not clear on ans. Will the disbled Vet get both pmts? Thus making 3 pmts > > > to the couple? > No. Assuming no children under 17, the couple will get a maximum of $1200 > and a minimum of $600. That minimum requires $3000 of one spouse's earned > income and $3000 of the disability pension. > Nothing has been announced yet about how people who don't have to file tax > returns will be identified. In the meantime, if you file a joint return > and the Income Tax after Credits is at least $1,200 on your 2007 return, > you'll get $1,200. > -- > Phil Marti > Clarksburg, MD response, they won't see a dime even though they work. Child Tax Credit and EIC wipe out a lot of liability. bill -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| "Harlan Lunsford" <hnslunsford[at]bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:YH4sj.95874$K27.59885[at]bignews6.bellsouth.net... - quote - > Phil Marti wrote:
Time will tell.> > "Billy" wrote: > > > > If one person is a disabled Veteran and spouse is working, can they > > > collect the 2 rebates plus the disabled Vet rebate also under new plan? > > > If they file a joint return it will be based on the joint return > > information. There's no need that both spouses have taxable income in > > order to receive the full amount. > > But it IS necessary that they have "qualified income." And that is the > usual income items on a tax return, plus untaxed social security and VA > benefits which don't even appear on the tax return. > Just how IRS is going to administer this is tricky though. > Presumably in a case like this they will issue the rebate based on return > data and then (after October 15th -youknowwhatthatis) will adjust > with reference to the VA database. > That's the way the law is written, that qualified income includes VA > benefits. > But.... we'll see. > ChEAr$, > Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA > That was my point, VA disability income isn't reportable, so the IRS will > send recipients checks based on VA status and want to know if that makes a > 3rd check for the married couple without children? bill -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| "Billy" wrote: - quote - > > If they file a joint return it will be based on the joint return
No. Assuming no children under 17, the couple will get a maximum of $1200> > information. There's no need that both spouses have taxable income in > > order to receive the full amount. > > Not clear on ans. Will the disbled Vet get both pmts? Thus making 3 pmts > > to the couple? and a minimum of $600. That minimum requires $3000 of one spouse's earned income and $3000 of the disability pension. Nothing has been announced yet about how people who don't have to file tax returns will be identified. In the meantime, if you file a joint return and the Income Tax after Credits is at least $1,200 on your 2007 return, you'll get $1,200. -- Phil Marti Clarksburg, MD -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Phil Marti wrote: - quote - > "Billy" wrote:
usual income items on a tax return, plus untaxed social security and VA> > If one person is a disabled Veteran and spouse is working, can they > > collect the 2 rebates plus the disabled Vet rebate also under new plan? > If they file a joint return it will be based on the joint return > information. There's no need that both spouses have taxable income in order > to receive the full amount. But it IS necessary that they have "qualified income." And that is the benefits which don't even appear on the tax return. Just how IRS is going to administer this is tricky though. Presumably in a case like this they will issue the rebate based on return data and then (after October 15th -youknowwhatthatis) will adjust with reference to the VA database. That's the way the law is written, that qualified income includes VA benefits. But.... we'll see. ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| "Phil Marti" <prm20871[at]verizon.net> wrote in message news:JZ2sj.5650$qw4.44[at]trnddc02... - quote - > "Billy" wrote:
tks> > If one person is a disabled Veteran and spouse is working, can they > > collect the 2 rebates plus the disabled Vet rebate also under new plan? > If they file a joint return it will be based on the joint return > information. There's no need that both spouses have taxable income in > order to receive the full amount. > -- > Phil Marti > Clarksburg, MD > Not clear on ans. Will the disbled Vet get both pmts? Thus making 3 pmts > to the couple? bw -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| | |||
| |||
| "Billy" wrote: - quote - > If one person is a disabled Veteran and spouse is working, can they
If they file a joint return it will be based on the joint return> collect the 2 rebates plus the disabled Vet rebate also under new plan? information. There's no need that both spouses have taxable income in order to receive the full amount. -- Phil Marti Clarksburg, MD -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| If one person is a disabled Veteran and spouse is working, can they collect the 2 rebates plus the disabled Vet rebate also under new plan? tks bw -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| Tags |
| rebate |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Rebate schliss: I noticed that my order acknowledgement of deluxe quotes a price of $39.99. No mention of rebate although the page I ordered from advertises a... | Microsoft Money | 3 | 08-26-2008 11:46 PM | |
| Money Plus Rebate Claus DuBois: What specifically does the online Money Plus Rebate form say? What are the specific requirements? This question is either a Microsoft rep or for... | Microsoft Money | 7 | 10-13-2007 06:10 PM | |
| Rebate for Premium Matthew: I purchased Money 2006 Premium through the Money 2005 offer. It took me awhile to find the address to actually download the product. Now I need to... | Microsoft Money | 4 | 08-29-2005 02:47 AM | |
| NJ Homestead Rebate Dannie: I know this rebate is not NJ State taxable BUT is it Federal taxable? << -------------------------------------------------><< The Charter and the... | Taxes | 1 | 02-17-2005 12:52 AM | |
| NJ Homestead Rebate Dannie: I know that NJ does not send out 1099's to the people who get this rebate, and I know the IRS considers it a recovery but the issue remains where... | Taxes | 13 | 02-19-2004 01:56 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |