|
#6
| |||
| |||
| "Philip Samuelsson" wrote: - quote - > in all of the above data, is there *anything*, the parents can do to
There will be zero tax benefit for anything the parents pay in 2008 toward> lessen the burden of paying the 25k tuition for 2008? What I mean is that > now especially the entire cost is theirs as they will not even get the > small $2000 credit for said tuition since they can no longer claim the > graduate student as dependant on their joint return. the daughter's education. The value of the intagibles is for them to decide. - quote - > the only comment I made to the parents was that it looks like their child
I'm not so sure this is true. One thing is certain. The daughter cannot> will not have any taxes to pay, provided they make the student pay the 25k > herself, in that the student would likely get back all taxes paid from the > 10k (or 15k with the award) income. deduct every dollar of tuition she pays. (Pub 970). The daughter will receive some tax benefit, which she could certainly give to her parents as a tangible part of her overall effusive thanks. -- Phil Marti Clarksburg, MD -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Phil Marti wrote: - quote - > It's a combination of the daughter's age and her income. Her age makes her
thank you, I've passed on all the information.> income relevant, a change from prior years, and her income makes her > ineligible. > See IRS Publication 501. in all of the above data, is there *anything*, the parents can do to lessen the burden of paying the 25k tuition for 2008? What I mean is that now especially the entire cost is theirs as they will not even get the small $2000 credit for said tuition since they can no longer claim the graduate student as dependant on their joint return. the only comment I made to the parents was that it looks like their child will not have any taxes to pay, provided they make the student pay the 25k herself, in that the student would likely get back all taxes paid from the 10k (or 15k with the award) income. fortunately it's the last year of graduate school so not an issue in 2009 -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| "Philip Samuelsson" wrote: - quote - > ok, just to confirm the nitty gritty, the child lives at home, 12 months
It's a combination of the daughter's age and her income. Her age makes her> of the year, makes 10k income from part-time work at the uni and is paying > (parents are paying 25k) annual cost of tuition and will turn 24 during > 2008. > thus, in all of the above, I understand the fact that disallows the > dependency test is simply the age of turning 24, not the other parts ? income relevant, a change from prior years, and her income makes her ineligible. See IRS Publication 501. -- Phil Marti Clarksburg, MD -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Phil Marti wrote: - quote - > You assume incorrectly. Since she is no longer "under 24" at the end of the
ok, just to confirm the nitty gritty, the child lives at home, 12 months of the year,> tax year, for 2008 she is not a "qualifying child." To be considered a > dependent, she must be a qualifying relative. She will fail the gross > income test for that status (from unquoted OP information), so the parents > will not be able to claim her as a dependent for 2008. Nor will they be > able to take advantage of any of her education expenses paid in 2008. See > IRS Publication 501. makes 10k income from part-time work at the uni and is paying (parents are paying 25k) annual cost of tuition and will turn 24 during 2008. thus, in all of the above, I understand the fact that disallows the dependency test is simply the age of turning 24, not the other parts ? thanks -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| "Philip Samuelsson" wrote: - quote - > yes to both, that is, student is now 23 years old and will turn 24 during
You assume incorrectly. Since she is no longer "under 24" at the end of the> 2008, so I assume the parents will still be able to claim child as > dependent for this last year of university tax year, for 2008 she is not a "qualifying child." To be considered a dependent, she must be a qualifying relative. She will fail the gross income test for that status (from unquoted OP information), so the parents will not be able to claim her as a dependent for 2008. Nor will they be able to take advantage of any of her education expenses paid in 2008. See IRS Publication 501. This may settle the issue for the parents. The child may need to make estimated tax payments. See Publication 505. An explanation of the tax benefits available to the student regarding education expenses is in Publication 970. -- Phil Marti Clarksburg, MD -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Phil Marti wrote: - quote - > First, the critical age is under 24, not 25, at the end of the tax
yes to both, that is, student is now 23 years old and will turn 24 during> year in question. Second, may we assume that the tax year in > question is 2008? If so, how old will the student be 12/31/2008? 2008, so I assume the parents will still be able to claim child as dependent for this last year of university - quote - > This makes no sense. A payee submits a W-9 to a payor when the payor
sorry if that bit was not clear. allow me to restate.> doesn't have the payee's SSN. In any case, the parents wouldn't be > involved. The "extra" payment would also have zero effect on the > parents' taxes. the parents are concerned over the students ability to pay extra taxes next year (in 2009, since this award happens in 2008 and taxes for 2007 are already done). they wanted to make a separate tax payment during 2008 taking into account the award payment (recall my example of 10k income and 5k award, total income 15k) so that there would be no taxes to pay in arrears in April 2009 - quote - > What exactly is it they're trying to accomplish? I'm lost.
they (parents and child) are trying to avoid the student owing extra taxesdue to the award payment in 2008, which, as we've established will be added to the students part-time income. one item I have not calculated out is the 25k annual university fee, which the parents have been paying (it allows them a modest 2k credit due to claiming the student as dependent). But, I can't see the student claiming that 25k fee as she makes only a modest 15k max during the entire year. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| | |||
| |||
| "Philip Samuelsson" wrote: - quote - > mom & pop claim child under 25 as dependent. she is a full-time university
First, the critical age is under 24, not 25, at the end of the tax year in> grad student and has recently won an award due to placing well in an > academic case study write-up contest. monetary award is a few thousand > dollars. question. Second, may we assume that the tax year in question is 2008? If so, how old will the student be 12/31/2008? - quote - > since she works part-time at the uni, is the monetary award added to her
Sounds about right.> income directly, ie. assuming income of 10k and award of 5k, total income > 15k or is there something else to be aware of? - quote - > I've told mom & pop to submit the W-9 as it looks to be simply a way to
This makes no sense. A payee submits a W-9 to a payor when the payor> certify to the award issuing source the tax status of the award recipient > but the parents are worried about future tax implications and my > non-educated guess is that they could simply take part of the award and > make an early tax payment to IRS during the year if they suspect there > would be a tax payment consequence next year doesn't have the payee's SSN. In any case, the parents wouldn't be involved. The "extra" payment would also have zero effect on the parents' taxes. - quote - > if the early tax payment is a plausible solution, is there some best way
What exactly is it they're trying to accomplish? I'm lost.> of accomplishing this or some form to submit explaining why they are > sending the payment now instead of next year -- Phil Marti Clarksburg, MD -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| have a family member with the following scenario mom & pop claim child under 25 as dependent. she is a full-time university grad student and has recently won an award due to placing well in an academic case study write-up contest. monetary award is a few thousand dollars. since she works part-time at the uni, is the monetary award added to her income directly, ie. assuming income of 10k and award of 5k, total income 15k or is there something else to be aware of? I've told mom & pop to submit the W-9 as it looks to be simply a way to certify to the award issuing source the tax status of the award recipient but the parents are worried about future tax implications and my non-educated guess is that they could simply take part of the award and make an early tax payment to IRS during the year if they suspect there would be a tax payment consequence next year if the early tax payment is a plausible solution, is there some best way of accomplishing this or some form to submit explaining why they are sending the payment now instead of next year ? they have already submitted 2007 income tax returns for everyone -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| Tags |
| behalf, student, submitting |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Query on my friend's behalf Manasi: My friend was an H1 employee for a consulting company from Jan to March '05, after which he transferred his H1 and is a full time employee with a... | Taxes | 2 | 03-09-2006 02:41 AM | |
| Re-doing taxes for 2004, can I make corrections after submitting? josh00@comcast.net: I already submitted my 2004 taxes, however, after getting some more clarifications on deductions, I noticed I could submit another $1200 in... | Taxes | 6 | 05-13-2005 05:58 AM | |
| Student Loan Adrian Walters: What is the best way to create a student loan in Money 04? None of the loan types seem to match a student loan. | Microsoft Money | 8 | 11-14-2004 11:20 PM | |
| LLC Accrue Estimated Tax on behalf of partners? Chad Richardson: Our LLC (taxed as a partnership), has 3 equal members. My question is related to calculating and paying estimated taxes. 1. Is it traditional... | Taxes | 1 | 10-30-2003 03:40 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |