|
#4
| |||
| |||
| <removeps-groups[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > Seems the rebate amount will be determined by the 2008 taxable year,
You understand, although I'd use different words. The "rebate" is a> but they will use the 2007 tax return to determine how much of a > rebate check to send to you this year in May -- well, this is my > reading of section g1, but the language is too cryptic for me to > understand fully. refundable credit on your 2008 taxes. "Refundable" means you get it even if it reduces your tax below zero. The checks to be sent out in 2008 are an estimation, based on your 2007 return, of what your 2008 credit will be. - quote - > So if your 2007 income is too high you might get
Change "might" to "will," and you got it.> nothing in May, but if your 2008 income is low you could get a credit > on the 2008 return which you file in 2009. Is that right? - quote - > If your
That is correct. When you file your 2008 return in 2009 the credit applies> 2007 income is low enough you might get something, but if your 2008 > income is too high then what? The URL referenced above says you get > to keep the rebate. to your return. It is reduced by the amount of the advance check you got, BUT NOT BELOW ZERO. That means you keep the change. -- Phil Marti Clarksburg, MD -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| On Feb 9, 9:34*pm, cpabake...[at]yahoo.com wrote: - quote - The bill has finally passed both branches of congress, and signed by the president. See http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.5140: Click Text of Legislation Click [H.R.5140.ENR] Seems the rebate amount will be determined by the 2008 taxable year, but they will use the 2007 tax return to determine how much of a rebate check to send to you this year in May -- well, this is my reading of section g1, but the language is too cryptic for me to understand fully. So if your 2007 income is too high you might get nothing in May, but if your 2008 income is low you could get a credit on the 2008 return which you file in 2009. Is that right? If your 2007 income is low enough you might get something, but if your 2008 income is too high then what? The URL referenced above says you get to keep the rebate. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| On Feb 8, 12:50*pm, frenchy <mf101...[at]msn.com> wrote: - quote - > I've read conflicting stories on the rebates, one said I will have to > pay the entire rebate of $600 back in reduced tax refund or an actual > increase in my taxes by the whole amount, on my 09 return (MSN money > article) - another said I will only have to pay TAX on the $600 as it > would increase my income by that amount. *What's the correct answer? > Thanks! > -- > << ------------------------------------------------------- > > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, * > > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties *> > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. * * * * * * * * *> > << * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * > > << * The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts * > > << *to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy *> > << * * * * * * * * *are atwww.asktax.org. * * * * * * * * > > << * * * * Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. * * * * > > << ------------------------------------------------------- > http://tinyurl.com/yq3643 Milt Baker CPA Michigan -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| "frenchy" wrote: - quote - > I've read conflicting stories on the rebates, one said I will have to
Door number 3.> pay the entire rebate of $600 back in reduced tax refund or an actual > increase in my taxes by the whole amount, on my 09 return (MSN money > article) - another said I will only have to pay TAX on the $600 as it > would increase my income by that amount. What's the correct answer? It's a refundable credit toward 2008 taxes. In effect it reduces your 2008 tax liability by the rebate amount, and if the rebate winds up being more than your 2008 tax, you get to keep the change. You ignore the rebate through the year. Don't adjust your withholding or estimated tax payments, and you'll wind up with about the same refund/balance due when you file your 2008 return as you would have without the rebate. Of course, you will have had the rebate check previously. If you wind up not getting a rebate check you'll get the credit when you file your 2008 return. -- Phil Marti Clarksburg, MD -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| | |||
| |||
| "frenchy" <mf101723[at]msn.com> wrote - quote - > I've read conflicting stories on the rebates, one said I will have to > pay the entire rebate of $600 back in reduced tax refund or an actual > increase in my taxes by the whole amount, on my 09 return (MSN money > article) - another said I will only have to pay TAX on the $600 as it > would increase my income by that amount. What's the correct answer? Federal tax refunds are not taxable income on federal returns. Although Congress could change it for this rebate. Other than that, remember that this gimmick ~has~ to be paid for by someone at some time. They aren't overflowing with money in DC, so this'll just add to the deficit (ie: money collected being less than money spent). If not paid for directly on the 2008 tax returns in some manner, expect increasing taxes (increase in tax rates, decrease in deductions/exemptions, or both) in the future years. Ya can't have it all and have others pay for it all. So that old commercial saying "You can pay me now, or you can pay me later" applies here - you're going to pay later for what you get today. -- Paul A. Thomas, CPA Athens, Georgia -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I've read conflicting stories on the rebates, one said I will have to pay the entire rebate of $600 back in reduced tax refund or an actual increase in my taxes by the whole amount, on my 09 return (MSN money article) - another said I will only have to pay TAX on the $600 as it would increase my income by that amount. What's the correct answer? Thanks! -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| Tags |
| 2009, cost, rebate, tax |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| IRA distributions not required in 2009 (pending) Tad Borek: This idea of temporarily waiving RMDs to allow the accounts to recover seems to have just passed. The bill is HR 7327 and it just needs W's... | Financial Planning | 1 | 12-12-2008 11:43 PM | |
| Money 2009 robmp: Any word on microsoft money 2009 and if so when ? | Microsoft Money | 1 | 11-12-2008 12:43 PM | |
| WILL THERE BE A MONEY 2009? Steve: I haven't been on this board for awhile so I haven't searched back to see if any of you are aware of what Microsoft Money's plans are for an... | Microsoft Money | 31 | 10-12-2008 05:17 AM | |
| There will be NO Money 2009 google@bpellerin.com: Looks like Microsoft has killed this product, but they deny this. See these articles: http://money.mvps.org/faq/article/562.aspx... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 09-08-2008 04:07 AM | |
| new version for 2008-2009 Don: I have Money 2006 and am perfectly happy with it but the stock updates will stop in September of 2008. I guess I have to upgrade. will there be a... | Microsoft Money | 6 | 05-12-2008 02:00 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |