|
#9
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > To get the lower valuation the property only needs to be owned on the
sold before the alternate valuation date, then the sales proceeds> alternate date. *It does not need to be sold. If you elect to use the alternate valuation date AND the property was determine the value on the estate tax return. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| On Feb 6, 3:16 pm, dapperdobbs <George...[at]hotmail.com> wrote: - quote - > On Feb 6, 10:51 am, firenze5...[at]gmail.com wrote: > > Yes, as a matter of fact it did. And it must to some accountants as > > well, because on another site and also in this post Stu mentioned that > > it is sometimes > > done and then the loss isapplied on the 1041. Secondly it would not > > be a loss. These securities are AAA stock and I can take them and put > > them > > directly into my personal brokerage account. I had planned to > > purchase some shares with some of the proceeds anyway. > I would ask the attorney to explain *in step-by-step detail* and give > an example. Get the example in writing - or make your own notes, which > you can show to the atty to make sure you got it right. You might ask > for the example as it will actually appear on the 706 or 1041. I'm > guessing that as executor fulfilling your fiduciary duties you can act > to preserve the value of the estate, which may involve some > transactions such as accumulation of interest payments or dividend > payments, and I believe these show up on the 1041. Presumably the cost > basis would be either date of death or alternate, but following that, > if securities are transacted, it may be that the gain or loss shows up > on the 1041, where a loss could be used to offset divs and interest. > I'd be curious to know if my speculations are correct. > -- > << ------------------------------------------------------- > > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > > << > > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > > << are atwww.asktax.org. > > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > > << ------------------------------------------------------- > Good idea This I shall do. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| On Feb 5, 1:58*pm, firenze5...[at]gmail.com wrote: - quote - > Thanks for anyone who answered my question regarding 1099s for a > probate situation. I am working on > the forms now. > Just one more question. *Just want to be sure I am correct. *I am > executor of an estate. > Atty,Acct is out of town. *If the value of an estate should come in > over 2 million, would federal taxes > be due "only" on the amount over the 2 million. *And, does this apply > to NYS as well? > I am thinking that it might be better in this case to sell some > securities low. > Thanks again Karen The NY estate tax is a "pick-up" or "sponge" tax, equal to the credit allowed for state death taxes against the federal estate tax. The federal credit, of course, has gone away, but NY still conforms to the federal estate tax rules as they were in effect in 1998, i.e., before the EGTRRA changes that phased out the credit for state death taxes and replaced it with a deduction. In addition, the unified credit in 1998 was $345,800, representing the tax on the first $1 million of estate value, and NY still follows those rules. So for NY, you have to prepare a "pro forma" 706 on a pre-EGTRRA basis to compute the NY tax, which will equal the maximum credit allowed on the pro forma 706 for state death taxes. Even if no federal estate tax is actually due, there may be a NY estate tax liability. Katie in San Diego -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| On Feb 6, 10:51*am, firenze5...[at]gmail.com wrote: - quote - > Yes, as a matter of fact it did. And it must to some accountants as
I would ask the attorney to explain *in step-by-step detail* and give> well, because on another site and also in this post Stu mentioned that > it is sometimes > done and then the loss isapplied on the 1041. * Secondly it would not > be a loss. *These securities are AAA stock and I can take them and put > them > directly into my personal brokerage account. *I had planned to > purchase some shares with some of the proceeds anyway. an example. Get the example in writing - or make your own notes, which you can show to the atty to make sure you got it right. You might ask for the example as it will actually appear on the 706 or 1041. I'm guessing that as executor fulfilling your fiduciary duties you can act to preserve the value of the estate, which may involve some transactions such as accumulation of interest payments or dividend payments, and I believe these show up on the 1041. Presumably the cost basis would be either date of death or alternate, but following that, if securities are transacted, it may be that the gain or loss shows up on the 1041, where a loss could be used to offset divs and interest. I'd be curious to know if my speculations are correct. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| On Feb 5, 9:27 pm, BeanTownSteve <s.cronmil...[at]gmail.com> wrote: - quote - > On Feb 5, 4:58 pm, firenze5...[at]gmail.com wrote:
well, because on another site and also in this post Stu mentioned that> > Thanks for anyone who answered my question regarding 1099s for a > > probate situation. I am working on > > the forms now. > > Just one more question. Just want to be sure I am correct. I am > > executor of an estate. > > Atty,Acct is out of town. If the value of an estate should come in > > over 2 million, would federal taxes > > be due "only" on the amount over the 2 million. And, does this apply > > to NYS as well? > > I am thinking that it might be better in this case to sell some > > securities low. > > Thanks again Karen > > -- > > << ------------------------------------------------------- > > > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > > > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > > > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > > > << > > > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > > > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > > > << are atwww.asktax.org. > > > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > > > << ------------------------------------------------------- > > Gee, depending on HOW low you want to sell I might be interested! If > you're giving it away (my daughter invented the concept of "Selling it > for FREE" with her lemonade stand when she was 7) I would also be > interested. But seriously, when you wrote that > [the attorney mentioned ( twice,) that it would be better if I were to > sell the stocks at the lower price That the (loss) could be used on > the form 706] > did it make sense to you? > -- > << ------------------------------------------------------- > > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > > << > > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > > << are atwww.asktax.org. > > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > > << ------------------------------------------------------- > Yes, as a matter of fact it did. And it must to some accountants as it is sometimes done and then the loss isapplied on the 1041. Secondly it would not be a loss. These securities are AAA stock and I can take them and put them directly into my personal brokerage account. I had planned to purchase some shares with some of the proceeds anyway. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| On Feb 5, 4:58 pm, firenze5...[at]gmail.com wrote: - quote - > Thanks for anyone who answered my question regarding 1099s for a
you're giving it away (my daughter invented the concept of "Selling it> probate situation. I am working on > the forms now. > Just one more question. Just want to be sure I am correct. I am > executor of an estate. > Atty,Acct is out of town. If the value of an estate should come in > over 2 million, would federal taxes > be due "only" on the amount over the 2 million. And, does this apply > to NYS as well? > I am thinking that it might be better in this case to sell some > securities low. > Thanks again Karen > -- > << ------------------------------------------------------- > > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > > << > > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > > << are atwww.asktax.org. > > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > > << ------------------------------------------------------- > Gee, depending on HOW low you want to sell I might be interested! If for FREE" with her lemonade stand when she was 7) I would also be interested. But seriously, when you wrote that [the attorney mentioned ( twice,) that it would be better if I were to sell the stocks at the lower price That the (loss) could be used on the form 706] did it make sense to you? -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| On Feb 5, 7:03 pm, Stuart Bronstein <spamt...[at]lexregia.com> wrote: - quote - > firenze5...[at]gmail.com wrote:
Thanks. I think we had better hire an accountant. Our attorney who is> > Stuart Bronstein <spamt...[at]lexregia.com> wrote: > > > Securities, as all estate assets, are valued at market value on > > > the date of death. If these are publicly traded securities the > > > value will be pegged at the price they were traded at on the date > > > of death. If you sell them low you will not reduce the tax. > > Somehow in my notes the attorney mentioned ( twice,) that it would > > be better if I were to sell the stocks at the lower price That the > > (loss) could be used on the form 706 I am confused and > > guess I had better wait for his return. > I hate to say this, but when it comes to tax strategy listen to your > accountant, not your attorney. > There is a thing called the alternate valuation date. The estate can > elect to have the estate valued either on the date of death or on the > date six months later. It's generally only better to use the alternate > date if the entire economy has taken a dive and all the property is, in > the aggregate, worth less. > To get the lower valuation the property only needs to be owned on the > alternate date. It does not need to be sold. > If there's actually been a loss on the securities, they can be sold and > the loss would probably be taken on the 1041, not the 706. > Others who know better will correct me if I'm wrong (I'm an estate > planning and tax attorney who doesn't do returns), but I think either > you misunderstood or your attorney gave you bad advice. > Stu > -- > << ------------------------------------------------------- > > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > > << > > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > > << are atwww.asktax.org. > > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > > << ------------------------------------------------------- > Stu, also acting as our accountant may not be well versed in this issue. I asked my brother who was also at the meeting w/ the att'y and he also recalls the sell low advice. It may be because the dod of the decedent occurred when the market was at an all time high. K -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| firenze5943[at]gmail.com wrote: - quote - > Stuart Bronstein <spamt...[at]lexregia.com> wrote:
I hate to say this, but when it comes to tax strategy listen to your> > Securities, as all estate assets, are valued at market value on > > the date of death. If these are publicly traded securities the > > value will be pegged at the price they were traded at on the date > > of death. If you sell them low you will not reduce the tax. > Somehow in my notes the attorney mentioned ( twice,) that it would > be better if I were to sell the stocks at the lower price That the > (loss) could be used on the form 706 I am confused and > guess I had better wait for his return. accountant, not your attorney. There is a thing called the alternate valuation date. The estate can elect to have the estate valued either on the date of death or on the date six months later. It's generally only better to use the alternate date if the entire economy has taken a dive and all the property is, in the aggregate, worth less. To get the lower valuation the property only needs to be owned on the alternate date. It does not need to be sold. If there's actually been a loss on the securities, they can be sold and the loss would probably be taken on the 1041, not the 706. Others who know better will correct me if I'm wrong (I'm an estate planning and tax attorney who doesn't do returns), but I think either you misunderstood or your attorney gave you bad advice. Stu -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| On Feb 5, 5:21 pm, Stuart Bronstein <spamt...[at]lexregia.com> wrote: - quote - > firenze5...[at]gmail.com wrote: > > Just one more question. Just want to be sure I am correct. I am > > executor of an estate. > > Atty,Acct is out of town. If the value of an estate should come in > > over 2 million, would federal taxes be due "only" on the amount over > > the 2 million. > Essentially yes. The calculation is more complicated - it includes all > money in the estate, and then subtracts the tax that would have been > imposed on the first two million. > > And, does this apply to NYS as well? > I'm not familiar with NY law on this subject. > > I am thinking that it might be better in this case to sell some > > securities low. > Securities, as all estate assets, are valued at market value on the > date of death. If these are publicly traded securities the value will > be pegged at the price they were traded at on the date of death. If > you sell them low you will not reduce the tax. > Stu > -- > << ------------------------------------------------------- > > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > > << > > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > > << are atwww.asktax.org. > > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > > << ------------------------------------------------------- > Thanks for the reply. I now understand about the tax calculation. Somehow in my notes the attorney mentioned ( twice,) that it would be better if I were to sell the stocks at the lower price That the (loss) could be used on the form 706 I am confused and guess I had better wait for his return. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| | |||
| |||
| firenze5943[at]gmail.com wrote: - quote - > Just one more question. Just want to be sure I am correct. I am
Essentially yes. The calculation is more complicated - it includes all> executor of an estate. > Atty,Acct is out of town. If the value of an estate should come in > over 2 million, would federal taxes be due "only" on the amount over > the 2 million. money in the estate, and then subtracts the tax that would have been imposed on the first two million. - quote - > And, does this apply to NYS as well?
I'm not familiar with NY law on this subject.- quote - > I am thinking that it might be better in this case to sell some
Securities, as all estate assets, are valued at market value on the> securities low. date of death. If these are publicly traded securities the value will be pegged at the price they were traded at on the date of death. If you sell them low you will not reduce the tax. Stu -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Thanks for anyone who answered my question regarding 1099s for a probate situation. I am working on the forms now. Just one more question. Just want to be sure I am correct. I am executor of an estate. Atty,Acct is out of town. If the value of an estate should come in over 2 million, would federal taxes be due "only" on the amount over the 2 million. And, does this apply to NYS as well? I am thinking that it might be better in this case to sell some securities low. Thanks again Karen -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| Tags |
| inheritance, taxes |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Inheritance from outside US valentino: I have an inheritance from outside US, EURO country. It is free of taxes there, below the limit. I am US citizen, the inheritance is from my... | Taxes | 5 | 10-13-2007 03:54 AM | |
| Inheritance Tom: My wife's elderly mother has little assets except her house. She has 4 children in all and plans to will equal shares to them. Two of the... | Taxes | 7 | 11-18-2004 01:16 AM | |
| Inheritance: What to do? Sgt. Sausage: Situation: Me: 34 She: 31 We're both employed full time, and plan on staying such until I reach the ripe old age of <grin> 45. That's a bit... | Financial Planning | 12 | 05-25-2004 09:29 PM | |
| PA Inheritance Tax Helen M. Choate: In an effort to do some estate planning, I am trying to calculate the PA Inheritance Tax that will be due on my estate. So far, the only site I've... | Taxes | 9 | 11-11-2003 03:46 AM | |
| Inheritance Bob G.: Is money collected as the beneficiciary of a life insurance policy taxable? Surviving taxpayer is a spouse. Thanks <<... | Taxes | 5 | 10-30-2003 03:21 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |