|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Avrum Lapin wrote: - quote - > In article <44OdnTycuZ12OD7anZ2dnUVZ_tWtnZ2d[at]sysmatrix.net> , > PaulTry <afn02552at[at]afn.org> wrote: > > Harlan Lunsford wrote: > > > > One more time I'm going to say this. An employer does not HAVE to mail > > > out W2 forms. He is of course supposed to make them available to > > > employees by Jan 31st. Which means if they are available at place of > > > business for pickup that's just fine. > > > > > ChEAr$, > > > Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA > > > snip > > Handing them out at work would seem to comply, but just > > having them available at the work place may not meet the > > "furnish" requirement. > Especially if the person is no longer an employee Then that is the former employee's problem. Using the mail in order to "furnish" them, is just one way,m but not the only way, nor is it required. ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| In article <44OdnTycuZ12OD7anZ2dnUVZ_tWtnZ2d[at]sysmatrix.net> , PaulTry <afn02552at[at]afn.org> wrote: - quote - > Harlan Lunsford wrote:
Especially if the person is no longer an employee> > > > One more time I'm going to say this. An employer does not HAVE to mail > > out W2 forms. He is of course supposed to make them available to > > employees by Jan 31st. Which means if they are available at place of > > business for pickup that's just fine. > > > ChEAr$, > > Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA > snip > Handing them out at work would seem to comply, but just > having them available at the work place may not meet the > "furnish" requirement. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Harlan Lunsford wrote: - quote - > > One more time I'm going to say this. An employer does not HAVE to mail
We've said this for years, but the W-2 instructions at> out W2 forms. He is of course supposed to make them available to > employees by Jan 31st. Which means if they are available at place of > business for pickup that's just fine. > ChEAr$, > Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA irs.gov say: Furnishing Copies B, C, and 2 to employees. Furnish Copies B, C, and 2 of Form W-2 to your employees, generally, by January 31, 2008. You will meet the “furnish” requirement if the form is properly addressed and mailed on or before the due date. The W-2 penalty provisions use the "furnish" terminology. Handing them out at work would seem to comply, but just having them available at the work place may not meet the "furnish" requirement. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Avrum Lapin wrote: - quote - > Today is 1/31/08, the letter carrier has come and we are still short
out W2 forms. He is of course supposed to make them available to> 2 W2s (2 employers) and 2 1099s (one brokerage firm). I'll call > tomorrow. I'd like to sic the IRS on these people but it appears the > the USPS has until 2/15/08 to deliver. > Any suggestions on encouraging earlier delivery next year. > ========================================= MODERATOR'S COMMENT: > Remember, that January 31 is the day for a company to place the > forms in the mail, and it might take a few more days for the Post Office > to deliver. And, as you said, the IRS is not likely to get excited before > February 15. One more time I'm going to say this. An employer does not HAVE to mail employees by Jan 31st. Which means if they are available at place of business for pickup that's just fine. ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| | |||
| |||
| On Jan 31, 7:51 pm, Avrum Lapin <avrum...[at]verizon.net> wrote: - quote - > Today is 1/31/08, the letter carrier has come and we are still short
While I don't think this will help you, one year that the company I> 2 W2s (2 employers) and 2 1099s (one brokerage firm). I'll call > tomorrow. I'd like to sic the IRS on these people but it appears the > the USPS has until 2/15/08 to deliver. > Any suggestions on encouraging earlier delivery next year. > ========================================= MODERATOR'S COMMENT: > Remember, that January 31 is the day for a company to place the > forms in the mail, and it might take a few more days for the Post Office > to deliver. And, as you said, the IRS is not likely to get excited before > February 15. > -- > << ------------------------------------------------------- > > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > > << > > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > > << are atwww.asktax.org. > > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > > << ------------------------------------------------------- > worked for changed hands late in the year, and the W-2's came out on time, but incorrect. (The form stated that I paid more SS than I earned in wages!). The company was dragging their feet about getting me (us) corrected forms. About the 10th of February, I mentioned that if they were having problems correcting these forms for us, that I was sure that the IRS would be more than willing to "help". Amazingly enough, my corrected form appeared the next day. Christina -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Today is 1/31/08, the letter carrier has come and we are still short 2 W2s (2 employers) and 2 1099s (one brokerage firm). I'll call tomorrow. I'd like to sic the IRS on these people but it appears the the USPS has until 2/15/08 to deliver. Any suggestions on encouraging earlier delivery next year. ========================================= MODERATOR'S COMMENT: Remember, that January 31 is the day for a company to place the forms in the mail, and it might take a few more days for the Post Office to deliver. And, as you said, the IRS is not likely to get excited before February 15. -- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| Tags |
| 1099s, late, w2s |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| purpose of 1099s clj1219@bellsouth.net: I'm back after a long, difficult several months of not being here on this group. Long story short, I've had two non-weight bearing splints, one... | Taxes | 6 | 02-13-2007 06:08 AM | |
| Vanguard online access to 1099s BreadWithSpam@fractious.net: Just curious if anyone else has tried to access it yet. I log into Vanguard's site and it shows availability for the 2005 1099DIV, except that... | Financial Planning | 7 | 01-30-2006 09:52 PM | |
| Do 1099s online? manfred95@lycos.com: Is there anywhere I can fill out 1099-Misc and 1099-Int online and efile them for free?? How about W2s? Thanks..... <<... | Taxes | 8 | 01-10-2006 03:34 AM | |
| How to Attach Form 1099s with Fed Tax WH? Heather: I am filing a paper return for 2003 for refund. I have two Forms 1099 that each show Federal Income Tax Withheld, so I need to attach them to the... | Taxes | 25 | 02-28-2005 07:35 PM | |
| 1099s for Rental Property Bob Oaks: I'm having a minor dispute with the property management company that handles a rental property we have in Hawaii. I am trying to get them to stop... | Taxes | 15 | 08-25-2003 12:10 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |