|
#17
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > had thought that Deluxe would allow me to file electronically without
They dropped the rebates a couple of years ago. Now you pay> > an additional fee but that was wrong. Deluxe has the state (PA) > I think Deluxe usually includes a rebate form for the federal electronic > filing fee. for every e-file. - quote - > > software on it, but I was disappointed with the state software.
Many states REQUIRE a different format for computer-printed> > First, the Federal tax form that is outputted looks exactly like the > > printed Federal form (picked up at my local library). But the state > > form which Turbtax printed out looked nothing like the paper form. > That's true for MA, too. My understanding is that some states accept > simpler formatting, so in these cases TT doesn't go to the trouble of > duplicating the printed forms exactly. returns, typically so that they can be electronically scanned. Bob Sandler |
|
#16
| |||
| |||
| In article <3a0a6092-ff9e-47de-825a-b0c832c95c82[at]j20g2000hsi.googlegroups.com> , JGE <jge[at]cs.unc.edu> wrote: - quote - > There is no "Mac version", one installation CD fits all.
Yes, but the CD contains two versions.> What I meant was, when I open the CD, I have a bunch of files and > folders, - quote - > but not the elusive icon that allows me to drag TurboTax 2007 to
I think I see the problem. AFAIK (I used the download from Intuit and> Applications. not the CD), the files on the CD are NOT drag and drop, but are packaged which means that you have to double click on the package (or installer) and let the installer unpack the files and create the application folder and application on your hard drive. -- -Ernie- |
|
#15
| |||
| |||
| In article <0fd5539b-b2a1-4b24-a0fe-36220c81fb57[at]p69g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> , Me-manny <shiflettcc[at]gmail.com> wrote: - quote - > I add my expience with Turbotax, altho it is on a little different
I think Deluxe usually includes a rebate form for the federal electronic> tangent. > I have used Turbotax for 4 years. Usually I use the Basic since it > fits my needs, but last year my son gave me Deluxe for Christmas. I > had thought that Deluxe would allow me to file electronically without > an additional fee but that was wrong. Deluxe has the state (PA) filing fee. - quote - > software on it, but I was disappointed with the state software.
That's true for MA, too. My understanding is that some states accept> First, the Federal tax form that is outputted looks exactly like the > printed Federal form (picked up at my local library). But the state > form which Turbtax printed out looked nothing like the paper form. simpler formatting, so in these cases TT doesn't go to the trouble of duplicating the printed forms exactly. - quote - > However the most serious objection was that the interview process for
My experience is that TT's state interviews are not as thorough as the> the state form was flawed. After I filed one of my friends told me > that we are eligible for tax forgiveness, but the interview did not > pick that up. When I called Turbotax they told me that when the > interview asks if I am eligible for a tax credit I should have said > "Yes"; how am I supposed to know that? The interview process should > go through the "tax credit" process for me to determine if I am > eligible. federal, they're really just a simple front-end to the forms. They've clearly put most of their development resources into the federal section of the program. -- Barry Margolin, barmar[at]alum.mit.edu Arlington, MA *** PLEASE don't copy me on replies, I'll read them in the group *** |
|
#14
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > TurboTax 2007 is installed and is running just fine on my Mac running
I've managed to install (more below) but this isn't QUITE what I have,> Leopard (OS 10.5). > The only folders and files that you should have after the install are > the main folder: > TurboTax Deluxe 2007 -> Extras -> tax.scd > -> TurboTax 2007 (Which is the application) but close. And it works. - quote - > You should not have a "bunch" of files and folders. Are you sure you
There is no "Mac version", one installation CD fits all.> have the Mac version? What I meant was, when I open the CD, I have a bunch of files and folders, but not the elusive icon that allows me to drag TurboTax 2007 to Applications. Oh well, managed to get hold of a login to TurboTax website and just downloaded the silly thing. The download appeared as nothing but the aforementioned icon, and the dragging procedure installed it just fine; of course, the download WAS Mac-specific. Thanks anyhow, John |
|
#13
| |||
| |||
| In article <0fd5539b-b2a1-4b24-a0fe-36220c81fb57[at]p69g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> , Me-manny <shiflettcc[at]gmail.com> wrote: - quote - > Also I have been disappointed with the lack of software on the
I feel for you with a dial-up connection because the TurboTax CD> Turbotax disc, basically it gives me the right to download the > software. That was an aggrivation since I was on dial-up last year. available in stores is NEVER the final version. TurboTax usually goes on sale at retailers in early December which means the CD's have to be pressed and shipped long before that. Tax software, unlike other software, must be rewritten every year to keep abreast of changes in the tax laws. Even at this late date (December 17) some of the laws are still unsettled in congress. All the software vendor (TT) can do is release downloadable updates as changes in the law becomes known. Sometimes the updates are huge and take forever on a dial-up, but you should never file without the latest update. -- -Ernie- |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| On Dec 17, 2:03 am, Ernie Klein <eckl...[at]pacbell.net> wrote: - quote - > In article
I add my expience with Turbotax, altho it is on a little different> <294467ae-71fd-4bbb-ae20-f9f1eff4b...[at]c4g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> , > JGE <j...[at]cs.unc.edu> wrote: > > Thanks, Ernie. Well, I'm back. Two weeks later. Bought a new old > > Mac > > with Tiger. Turns out I STILL can't install TurboTax. I just get a > > bunch > > of files and folders, but no sign of the icon they describe at the > > support > > section of the Turbotax website. > > I'm starting to get pissed. Any advice much appreciated, especially > > from anyone who has successfully installed THIS YEAR's Turbotax > > on a Mac. > TurboTax 2007 is installed and is running just fine on my Mac running > Leopard (OS 10.5). > The only folders and files that you should have after the install are > the main folder: > TurboTax Deluxe 2007 -> Extras -> tax.scd > -> TurboTax 2007 (Which is the application) > You should not have a "bunch" of files and folders. Are you sure you > have the Mac version? > If it won't install and/or run on Tiger, I would suggest that you > contact support at turbotax.com because it should. > -- > -Ernie- tangent. I have used Turbotax for 4 years. Usually I use the Basic since it fits my needs, but last year my son gave me Deluxe for Christmas. I had thought that Deluxe would allow me to file electronically without an additional fee but that was wrong. Deluxe has the state (PA) software on it, but I was disappointed with the state software. First, the Federal tax form that is outputted looks exactly like the printed Federal form (picked up at my local library). But the state form which Turbtax printed out looked nothing like the paper form. However the most serious objection was that the interview process for the state form was flawed. After I filed one of my friends told me that we are eligible for tax forgiveness, but the interview did not pick that up. When I called Turbotax they told me that when the interview asks if I am eligible for a tax credit I should have said "Yes"; how am I supposed to know that? The interview process should go through the "tax credit" process for me to determine if I am eligible. Incidentially, most of my local electronic stores (i.e. Best Buy) do not sell the Basic. Also I have been disappointed with the lack of software on the Turbotax disc, basically it gives me the right to download the software. That was an aggrivation since I was on dial-up last year. |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| In article <294467ae-71fd-4bbb-ae20-f9f1eff4bfe3[at]c4g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> , JGE <jge[at]cs.unc.edu> wrote: - quote - > Thanks, Ernie. Well, I'm back. Two weeks later. Bought a new old
TurboTax 2007 is installed and is running just fine on my Mac running> Mac > with Tiger. Turns out I STILL can't install TurboTax. I just get a > bunch > of files and folders, but no sign of the icon they describe at the > support > section of the Turbotax website. > I'm starting to get pissed. Any advice much appreciated, especially > from anyone who has successfully installed THIS YEAR's Turbotax > on a Mac. Leopard (OS 10.5). The only folders and files that you should have after the install are the main folder: TurboTax Deluxe 2007 -> Extras -> tax.scd -> TurboTax 2007 (Which is the application) You should not have a "bunch" of files and folders. Are you sure you have the Mac version? If it won't install and/or run on Tiger, I would suggest that you contact support at turbotax.com because it should. -- -Ernie- |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| On Dec 5, 5:19 am, Ernie Klein <eckl...[at]pacbell.net> wrote: - quote - > In article
Thanks, Ernie. Well, I'm back. Two weeks later. Bought a new old> <1ed79ee8-2754-4157-9ac8-d01c2dd68...[at]d61g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> , > JGE <j...[at]cs.unc.edu> wrote: > > Got a rude surprise today upon receiving my copy of TurboTax (I opted > > for Home+Business, from an Amazon re-seller) ... turns out the Mac > > version > > only works with OSX 10.4 or higher. Guess I need finally spring for > > the > > upgrade. > If you upgrade to Leopard, remember that it no longer supports OS9 at > all, so if you still have any "Classic" applications that you need, you > are caught between a rock and a hard place - you can't run new > applications (like TurboTax) unless you update, and you can't run > Classic applications if you do. (You can upgrade to 10.4 - Tiger, if you > can still find it - but that's only putting it off). Mac with Tiger. Turns out I STILL can't install TurboTax. I just get a bunch of files and folders, but no sign of the icon they describe at the support section of the Turbotax website. I'm starting to get pissed. Any advice much appreciated, especially from anyone who has successfully installed THIS YEAR's Turbotax on a Mac. Thanks, John |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| In article <1ed79ee8-2754-4157-9ac8-d01c2dd685bc[at]d61g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> , JGE <jge[at]cs.unc.edu> wrote: - quote - > Got a rude surprise today upon receiving my copy of TurboTax (I opted
If you upgrade to Leopard, remember that it no longer supports OS9 at> for Home+Business, from an Amazon re-seller) ... turns out the Mac > version > only works with OSX 10.4 or higher. Guess I need finally spring for > the > upgrade. all, so if you still have any "Classic" applications that you need, you are caught between a rock and a hard place - you can't run new applications (like TurboTax) unless you update, and you can't run Classic applications if you do. (You can upgrade to 10.4 - Tiger, if you can still find it - but that's only putting it off). - quote - > I wonder what compelling reason there was for TurboTax not being able
Maybe they own Apple stock? <g> , but you are correct it will not run in> to > run on 10.3 ?? less than 10.4 - it looks like they made many changes to the user interface which probably only will work with 10.4 or higher. I always use "forms" and I think the new interface for forms is huge step backwards and hard to work with. -- -Ernie- |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| Got a rude surprise today upon receiving my copy of TurboTax (I opted for Home+Business, from an Amazon re-seller) ... turns out the Mac version only works with OSX 10.4 or higher. Guess I need finally spring for the upgrade. I wonder what compelling reason there was for TurboTax not being able to run on 10.3 ?? |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > Your tone suggests you take issue with my mistrust of Intuit. I
I'm tempted, but I assume the competing products have slightly> > believe > > their past behavior - mainly the shenanigans a few years ago - makes > That's when I got disgusted with them and switched to TaxAct.http://www.taxact.com/ different ways of doing things, and I don't want to have to re-learn. And don't get me wrong, I think TurboTax is a DAMN fine piece of software, I just think the company behaves a little sleazily at times ! Like many US high-tech companies (certainly the one I work for), it probably has a bunch of brilliant engineers, and a bunch of lying theiving douche-bags "running" the company ... John |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:54:32 EST, JGE <jge[at]cs.unc.edu> wrote Re Re: which version of TurboxTax ?: - quote - > Ok, I'll try to give an opinion next spring.
That's when I got disgusted with them and switched to TaxAct.> Your tone suggests you take issue with my mistrust of Intuit. I > believe > their past behavior - mainly the shenanigans a few years ago - makes http://www.taxact.com/ I've never regretted the change. -- To email me directly, remove CLUTTER. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| On Nov 27, 8:57 pm, Mark Bole <ma...[at]pacbell.net> wrote: - quote - > JGE wrote:
Ok, I'll try to give an opinion next spring.> > On that last message, I meant to say "thanks guys". I went ahead > > and sprung for the high-end "Home and Business" version, from some > > "amazon seller" who had 'em pretty cheap. No box he said, but he > > (mrjjwiley) claims it's all above board . > > Now, I'll probably find out that those Intuit mofos have it set up > > that > > I HAVE to buy Home&Business from now on out, in order to be able > > to import previous years' data ! > Apparently you did not deal directly with "those Intuit mofos", > therefore I believe your speculation is unfounded, and in fact untrue > according to my limited experience. > Regarding your original post, it would be helpful to know if you found > it to be "worth it to spring for Premier or Home&Business" -- gratuitous > vendor rants notwithstanding. Your tone suggests you take issue with my mistrust of Intuit. I believe their past behavior - mainly the shenanigans a few years ago - makes this justifiable. I also take issue with their gradual erosion of features that used to exist in the lower-end versions, which now one must buy the higher-end versions to see (stock options support, for one). Finally, it's galling that they charge a higher price for auto-renew customers (I call it the "loyal-customer surcharge"), or ones who visit their website, than I can get by going to Staples or by shopping the Amazon marketplace (as I did a few days ago). John |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| JGE wrote: - quote - > On that last message, I meant to say "thanks guys". I went ahead
Apparently you did not deal directly with "those Intuit mofos",> and sprung for the high-end "Home and Business" version, from some > "amazon seller" who had 'em pretty cheap. No box he said, but he > (mrjjwiley) claims it's all above board . > Now, I'll probably find out that those Intuit mofos have it set up > that > I HAVE to buy Home&Business from now on out, in order to be able > to import previous years' data ! therefore I believe your speculation is unfounded, and in fact untrue according to my limited experience. Regarding your original post, it would be helpful to know if you found it to be "worth it to spring for Premier or Home&Business" -- gratuitous vendor rants notwithstanding. -Mark Bole |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| On that last message, I meant to say "thanks guys". I went ahead and sprung for the high-end "Home and Business" version, from some "amazon seller" who had 'em pretty cheap. No box he said, but he (mrjjwiley) claims it's all above board . Now, I'll probably find out that those Intuit mofos have it set up that I HAVE to buy Home&Business from now on out, in order to be able to import previous years' data ! John |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| On Nov 26, 3:10 am, Bob Sandler <bob_use...[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > JGE <j...[at]cs.unc.edu> wrote: > > I've also used Deluxe and been pretty happy. But I do own (and buy > > and sell) various investments, and have some very simple 1099 income (a > > sole proprietorship, with minimal and uncomplicated expenses). > > Is it acutally worth it to spring for Premier or Home&Business ? > > What specifically do they provide that Deluxe doesn't ? > TurboTax Premier has a more detailed interview for sales of > investments, and it allows you to import your investment > transactions directly from a large number of participating > financial institutions. It also includes BasisPro to help > you determine the basis of securities that you sold. > Home & Business includes all of the features of Premier, and > in addition has a more detailed interview for a sole > proprietorship. The other added features of Home & Business > are probably not important to you, based on what you have > said. > Whether the additional features are "worth it" is a > subjective evaluation that you will have to make yourself. > The best place to get answers to questions about TurboTax is > the TurboTax User Forums athttp://forums.turbotax.com. > Bob Sandler |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| JGE <jge[at]cs.unc.edu> wrote: - quote - > I've also used Deluxe and been pretty happy. But I do own (and buy
TurboTax Premier has a more detailed interview for sales of> and sell) various investments, and have some very simple 1099 income (a > sole proprietorship, with minimal and uncomplicated expenses). > Is it acutally worth it to spring for Premier or Home&Business ? > What specifically do they provide that Deluxe doesn't ? investments, and it allows you to import your investment transactions directly from a large number of participating financial institutions. It also includes BasisPro to help you determine the basis of securities that you sold. Home & Business includes all of the features of Premier, and in addition has a more detailed interview for a sole proprietorship. The other added features of Home & Business are probably not important to you, based on what you have said. Whether the additional features are "worth it" is a subjective evaluation that you will have to make yourself. The best place to get answers to questions about TurboTax is the TurboTax User Forums at http://forums.turbotax.com. Bob Sandler |
| | |||
| |||
| JGE wrote: - quote - > Sorry if this has been covered, but a quick search says not (other
In the oligopoly of tax prep software makers, three seem to come up most> than > "check Intuit's website", which of course isn't very informative and > urges > you to buy the most expensive product). > I've also used Deluxe and been pretty happy. But I do own (and buy > and > sell) various investments, and have some very simple 1099 income (a > sole proprietorship, with minimal and uncomplicated expenses). > Is it acutally worth it to spring for Premier or Home&Business ? > What specifically do they provide that Deluxe doesn't ? often in my experience: TaxAct, TaxCut, and TurboTax (in alphabetical order). They each fill a market niche, and have product placement to match. A marketing student's dream case study! ;-) The answer to your question, "is it worth it?", really depends on your own preferences: tolerance for risk, interacting with a human vs. a computer, other uses of your spare time, and so on. How much data you can enter by importing on-line vs. keying in by hand is also a consideration. The good news is, you can almost always start with the low-end offering and upgrade later in the tax season for an incremental fee, as long as you stay with the same vendor. In the higher-end versions of each vendor's product line, I would normally expect more on-line or human help, more tax documentation, more import options, more planning tools, more guidance for the less-common tax forms, and so on. -Mark Bole |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Sorry if this has been covered, but a quick search says not (other than "check Intuit's website", which of course isn't very informative and urges you to buy the most expensive product). I've also used Deluxe and been pretty happy. But I do own (and buy and sell) various investments, and have some very simple 1099 income (a sole proprietorship, with minimal and uncomplicated expenses). Is it acutally worth it to spring for Premier or Home&Business ? What specifically do they provide that Deluxe doesn't ? Thanks, John |
| Tags |
| turboxtax, version |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Trail version after installing 2005 downloadable version Dan W: I recently purchased 2005 Deluxe off of the web site and now my application says it is a trial version. ANyone know the work around? | Microsoft Money | 5 | 11-01-2004 12:04 PM | |
| Transferring Trial version files to full version Cirdan: I bought a copy of Money Delux & Business and started using it. Recently, I purchased a new laptop, which came with a trial version of Money, for... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 06-24-2004 05:45 PM | |
| How to upgrade from Trial version(Money 2004 Delux) to License version Rams: Hi, I am planning to Try Money 2004 Delux Trial version. How do I upgrade from Trial to delux? WHat is the procedure involved? Is it simply... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 05-09-2004 11:51 AM | |
| Transfer 2004 Trial Version Data to Purchased Version : I used the 60-day trial 2004 version. I have now purchased the 2004 Standard Edition, but I don't know how to transfer the data from the trial... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 11-04-2003 03:48 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |