|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Newsgroups: misc.taxes.moderated On Nov 14, 9:19 am, kevincoste...[at]cox.net wrote: - quote - > I know that Turbo Tax and the like default to "first-in, > first-out", and it is up to me to use a different method. I > just want to be sure I know the correct options as I > consider buying and selling stocks at the end of the year to > minimize my tax burden. For stocks, you really only have two options for determining the basis (and holding period) of stocks sold: First-in, First-out. This is the default and applies unless you do something differently. Designated Shares. This will apply if you specifically identify which shares are sold. This allows you great flexibility, since you can choose the last-in, first-out strategy or any other mix. There are, however, two important things that need to be done in order for you to use this method -- and which may make it too late if you've already sold: 1. You must identify and designate the share to be sold at the time of sale. 2. The identification must be on the broker confirmation of that sale. As far as I know, you can freely switch between these two methods at any time. For mutual funds, there is another option (average cost), but that doesn't apply to direct ownership of company stocks. It is also a method that IIRC, once used, needs to continue being used until all of that particular mutual fund are sold. << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| kevincostello[at]cox.net wrote: - quote - > I have bought and sold a number of shares of two particular
You can save even more by selling the most expensive shares,> companies over the last two years. When I prepared my taxes > last year, I calculated the sales as "last-in, first-out", > maintaining the first shares I had purchased in my account > in case I ended up holding them more than a year. I have now > sold all of the shares of these two companies, and by a > careful tracking of last-in, first-out, I indeed have a > number of shares that I have held for more than a year, and > this will save me about $500 on my tax bill. which may not be the last-in. Also, since shares held more than a year are taxed at a lower rate, you may be able to save more by selling long-term shares than short-term shares. - quote - > 1) There is nothing wrong with this method, is there? I have
The only two options you have for accounting for stock sales> been consistent and careful in my accounting for these > shares over two years, and the numbers work out correctly. I > have also been consistent in using this method for all > shares of individual stocks that I own. are FIFO or specific shares. LIFO is just a particular case of specific shares, where you just happen to specify the youngest shares. In order to use the specific shares method you have to tell your broker which shares to sell, and get a written acknowledgement from the broker that they sold the designated shares. If you don't specify explicitly, you're assumed to be selling FIFO. So unless you've been making these explicit designations, there is definitely something wrong with your method. In the case of mutual funds you also have the option of using average cost basis accounting. - quote - > 2) Am I required to use the same holding time accounting
You can use different methods for different companies, and> method for shares of every company I own? Would I be able to > calculate by "last- in, first-out" for some sets of shares, > and "first-in, first-out" for others? I would of course be > consistent for shares in one particular company. you can change the method for any particular company at any time. However, if you sell a mutual fund and use the average cost basis method you can't go back to specific shares or FIFO for that fund until you close out your entire position. -- Barry Margolin, barmar[at]alum.mit.edu Arlington, MA *** PLEASE don't copy me on replies, I'll read them in the group *** << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > I have bought and sold a number of shares of two particular
No, as long as, when you placed each sell order, you told> companies over the last two years. When I prepared my taxes > last year, I calculated the sales as "last-in, first-out", > maintaining the first shares I had purchased in my account > in case I ended up holding them more than a year. I have now > sold all of the shares of these two companies, and by a > careful tracking of last-in, first-out, I indeed have a > number of shares that I have held for more than a year, and > this will save me about $500 on my tax bill. > 1) There is nothing wrong with this method, is there? your broker which specific shares you were selling, and the broker confirmed the specific identification of the shares in writing within a reasonable time. If that was not done at the time of each sale, then you must use first-in, first-out. If you used the wrong method when you prepared your tax return for 2006, you will have to file an amended return. There are really only two methods allowed for stocks: first-in, first-out, and specific identification. You can accomplish the same thing as last-in, first-out by keeping track of it yourself and using specific identification for each sale, but you can't tell the IRS that you are using last-in, first-out as a general method. You can't decide what method to use when you do your taxes at the end of the year. To use specific identification, the two steps that I mentioned above have to take place at the time of the sale: your notification to the broker and the broker's written confirmation. If you didn't follow the specific identification procedure at the time of the sale, then by default you chose to use first-in, first-out. - quote - > 2) Am I required to use the same holding time accounting
No.> method for shares of every company I own? - quote - > Would I be able to calculate by "last- in, first-out" for
Yes, by using specific identification, as described above.> some sets of shares, and "first-in, first-out" for others? - quote - > I would of course be consistent for shares in one
You don't even have to do that. You can use specific> particular company. identification for some sales, and first-in, first-out for other sales of the same company. Of course you can't sell the same shares twice, so you have to keep careful records of what you sold when. - quote - > I know that Turbo Tax and the like default to "first-in,
The software works that way because that's how the IRS> first-out", and it is up to me to use a different method. regulations work. The default is first-in, first-out unless you took active steps to use specific identification. One other comment: You refer to this as a method of determining your holding period. It's not clear whether you realize that it also determines the cost of the shares that you sold. The cost that you report for each sale is the cost of the particular shares that you sold, no matter which method you used to determine which shares you sold. So using one method or the other will affect the amount of gain or loss on each sale, as well as whether it is short-term or long-term. Bob Sandler << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| <kevincostello[at]cox.net> wrote: - quote - > I have bought and sold a number of shares of two particular
I have no idea how turbotax handls this, but LIFO is simply> companies over the last two years. When I prepared my taxes > last year, I calculated the sales as "last-in, first-out", > maintaining the first shares I had purchased in my account > in case I ended up holding them more than a year. I have now > sold all of the shares of these two companies, and by a > careful tracking of last-in, first-out, I indeed have a > number of shares that I have held for more than a year, and > this will save me about $500 on my tax bill. > 1) There is nothing wrong with this method, is there? I have > been consistent and careful in my accounting for these > shares over two years, and the numbers work out correctly. I > have also been consistent in using this method for all > shares of individual stocks that I own. > 2) Am I required to use the same holding time accounting > method for shares of every company I own? Would I be able to > calculate by "last- in, first-out" for some sets of shares, > and "first-in, first-out" for others? I would of course be > consistent for shares in one particular company. > I know that Turbo Tax and the like default to "first-in, > first-out", and it is up to me to use a different method. I > just want to be sure I know the correct options as I > consider buying and selling stocks at the end of the year to > minimize my tax burden. one of many possible ways to specifically identify, at time of sale, the shares you sell. You have to make this specific identification at time of sale and have the broker confirm it. Oherwise FIFO is deemed to be the way to account for which shares were sold. -- ArtKamlet at a o l dot c o m Columbus OH K2PZH << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > I have bought and sold a number of shares of two particular
According to IRS publication 550, chapter 4,> companies over the last two years. When I prepared my taxes > last year, I calculated the sales as "last-in, first-out", > maintaining the first shares I had purchased in my account > in case I ended up holding them more than a year. I have now > sold all of the shares of these two companies, and by a > careful tracking of last-in, first-out, I indeed have a > number of shares that I have held for more than a year, and > this will save me about $500 on my tax bill. > 1) There is nothing wrong with this method, is there? I have > been consistent and careful in my accounting for these > shares over two years, and the numbers work out correctly. I > have also been consistent in using this method for all > shares of individual stocks that I own. "If you buy and sell securities at various times in varying quantities and you cannot adequately identify the shares you sell, the basis of the securities you sell is the basis of the securities you acquired first." [That is, first-in, first-out is the default unless ... ] "If you have left the stock certificates with your broker or other agent, you will make an adequate identification if you: - Tell your broker or other agent the particular stock to be sold or transferred at the time of the sale or transfer, and - Receive a written confirmation of this from your broker or other agent within a reasonable time" [That's how to deviate from first-in-first-out.] - quote - > 2) Am I required to use the same holding time accounting
Each security can be handled differently, as long as you> method for shares of every company I own? Would I be able to > calculate by "last- in, first-out" for some sets of shares, > and "first-in, first-out" for others? I would of course be > consistent for shares in one particular company. follow the two steps above for each non-FIFO sale. That is, (a) identify which shares to sell when placing the sell order and (b) get the written confirmation. - quote - > I know that Turbo Tax and the like default to "first-in,
I use Turbo Tax, and my recollection is that the user enters> first-out", and it is up to me to use a different method. the sale date and purchase date of each lot sold. Tax software can't default to anything because it doesn't know about shares you haven't sold. (Maybe Quicken and similar products have the default you mention.) Disclaimer: I'm not a tax pro, just a taxpayer. << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| <kevincostello[at]cox.net> wrote: - quote - > I have bought and sold a number of shares of two particular
There is something very wrong with it, based solely on what> companies over the last two years. When I prepared my taxes > last year, I calculated the sales as "last-in, first-out", > maintaining the first shares I had purchased in my account > in case I ended up holding them more than a year. I have now > sold all of the shares of these two companies, and by a > careful tracking of last-in, first-out, I indeed have a > number of shares that I have held for more than a year, and > this will save me about $500 on my tax bill. > 1) There is nothing wrong with this method, is there? you've written. The default is FIFO unless you specify the shares you're selling AT THE TIME OF SALE and get WRITTEN confirmation from the broker. - quote - > I have
You get an A for planning and an F for execution unless you> been consistent and careful in my accounting for these > shares over two years, and the numbers work out correctly. I > have also been consistent in using this method for all > shares of individual stocks that I own. got the necessary broker confirmations. BTW, if any of the sales was for a loss you may also have wash sale issues. - quote - > 2) Am I required to use the same holding time accounting
No> method for shares of every company I own? - quote - > Would I be able to
Consistency doesn't matter, and it's not dealer's choice.> calculate by "last- in, first-out" for some sets of shares, > and "first-in, first-out" for others? I would of course be > consistent for shares in one particular company. It's either FIFO or specific identification for each sale. - quote - > I know that Turbo Tax and the like default to "first-in,
And now you know why.> first-out" See IRS Publication 550. -- Phil Marti Clarksburg, MD << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| | |||
| |||
| <kevincostello[at]cox.net> wrote: - quote - > I have bought and sold a number of shares of two particular
If you didn't instruct your broker to sell the more recent> companies over the last two years. When I prepared my taxes > last year, I calculated the sales as "last-in, first-out", > maintaining the first shares I had purchased in my account > in case I ended up holding them more than a year. I have now > sold all of the shares of these two companies, and by a > careful tracking of last-in, first-out, I indeed have a > number of shares that I have held for more than a year, and > this will save me about $500 on my tax bill. > 1) There is nothing wrong with this method, is there? I have > been consistent and careful in my accounting for these > shares over two years, and the numbers work out correctly. I > have also been consistent in using this method for all > shares of individual stocks that I own. shares and if the broker didn't confirm receiving your instructions in writing, then you are forced to use the first-in, first-out method. You can't choose "after the fact" which shares to sell. - quote - > 2) Am I required to use the same holding time accounting
You can choose to sell shares in any order you want...> method for shares of every company I own? Would I be able to > calculate by "last- in, first-out" for some sets of shares, > and "first-in, first-out" for others? I would of course be > consistent for shares in one particular company. provided you instruct your broker at the time of sale and he confirms in writing that he received your instructions. If you fail to do that, you must use the first in, first out method. Each sale stands alone. - quote - > I know that Turbo Tax and the like default to "first-in,
They default to first-in, first-out because that is the> first-out", and it is up to me to use a different method. I > just want to be sure I know the correct options as I > consider buying and selling stocks at the end of the year to > minimize my tax burden. method you are required to use unless you take the steps mentioned above. Ira Smilovitz << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I have bought and sold a number of shares of two particular companies over the last two years. When I prepared my taxes last year, I calculated the sales as "last-in, first-out", maintaining the first shares I had purchased in my account in case I ended up holding them more than a year. I have now sold all of the shares of these two companies, and by a careful tracking of last-in, first-out, I indeed have a number of shares that I have held for more than a year, and this will save me about $500 on my tax bill. 1) There is nothing wrong with this method, is there? I have been consistent and careful in my accounting for these shares over two years, and the numbers work out correctly. I have also been consistent in using this method for all shares of individual stocks that I own. 2) Am I required to use the same holding time accounting method for shares of every company I own? Would I be able to calculate by "last- in, first-out" for some sets of shares, and "first-in, first-out" for others? I would of course be consistent for shares in one particular company. I know that Turbo Tax and the like default to "first-in, first-out", and it is up to me to use a different method. I just want to be sure I know the correct options as I consider buying and selling stocks at the end of the year to minimize my tax burden. Thank you very much. << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| Tags |
| accounting, firstout, holding, lastin, periods |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Querry regarding statement periods LPS-AU: When balancing my accounts, the default period is always monthly. (In Ver. 14.0) Is there any way to change this to quarterly half yearly? for... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 06-23-2008 04:00 PM | |
| IRS Recovery Periods Chas: What is the recovery period and property type of a restaurant ventilation system? Chas <<... | Taxes | 1 | 08-29-2005 02:26 PM | |
| meaningful monthly time periods kendisorder: Hi: I wonder if there is a way within money to change your time periods to reflect meaningful dates. For me, a month never starts at the... | Microsoft Money | 3 | 01-05-2005 12:22 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |