Go Back   CDN Business Directory > Main Category > Taxes

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #4  
Old 10-29-2007, 06:32 PM
ChenangoBusinessServices@hotmail.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: In Defense Of The AMT

It's a great way to increase Taxes with out passing
legislation.

As Salaries and deductible expenses go up the deductibility
of the expenses phase out and the Taxpayer pays more. The
"Tax and spend" lovers (aren't they all?) could not have
thought of a better system.

Think of the Bonus Taxes the Gov gets from all the IRA etc
deferments taken at 15% then taxed at 28% when with drawn at
retirement etc..

CBS
Nichols

<< ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- >
  #3  
Old 10-24-2007, 11:16 AM
Benjamin Yazersky CPA
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: In Defense Of The AMT

"Kurt Ullman" <kurtullman[at]yahoo.com> wrote:
- quote -

> joetaxpayer <joetaxpayer[at]nospam.com> wrote:

> > I understand the desire to close tax loopholes and to pay
> > one's fair share. At the risk of sounding like "as long as
> > you don't tax me" I think there should be some basic sacred
> > cows, mortgage interest, property tax, state tax, which the
> > AMT should not negate. Living in a state (yes, I live here
> > by choice, no one twisted my arm) that has high income and
> > property tax, and now I find that my property tax and much
> > of our state income tax is canceled by the effect of the
> > AMT. Long term cap gains also are not 15%, more like 22.5%.
> > > Funny, mortgage interest, which I've done my best to

> > minimize, is allowed, right up to my gross income, but the
> > other two, out of my control, are not.


> Most of the real problems with the AMT could have been
> avoided if they had merely indexed AMT to inflation like
> they did most of the rest of the tax code. Although it is
> probably a good idea to have the concept of bracket creep
> reintroduced on occasion.


I don't think that indexing will really only tax those
really wealthy taxpayers that it originally intended to.

___________________________________
<<< Benjamin Yazersky, CPA [NJ & NY] > > -----> real address on hobokeni or hobokenx <-----

<< ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- >
  #2  
Old 10-23-2007, 10:14 PM
Kurt Ullman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: In Defense Of The AMT

joetaxpayer <joetaxpayer[at]nospam.com> wrote:

- quote -

> I understand the desire to close tax loopholes and to pay
> one's fair share. At the risk of sounding like "as long as
> you don't tax me" I think there should be some basic sacred
> cows, mortgage interest, property tax, state tax, which the
> AMT should not negate. Living in a state (yes, I live here
> by choice, no one twisted my arm) that has high income and
> property tax, and now I find that my property tax and much
> of our state income tax is canceled by the effect of the
> AMT. Long term cap gains also are not 15%, more like 22.5%.
> Funny, mortgage interest, which I've done my best to
> minimize, is allowed, right up to my gross income, but the
> other two, out of my control, are not.


Most of the real problems with the AMT could have been
avoided if they had merely indexed AMT to inflation like
they did most of the rest of the tax code. Although it is
probably a good idea to have the concept of bracket creep
reintroduced on occasion.

<< ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- >
  #1  
Old 10-23-2007, 07:08 AM
Mike Wellman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: In Defense Of The AMT

William Brenner <wbren...[at]nospamplease.net> wrote:

- quote -

> Here is some food for thought and a potential
> source for lively discussion.
> (Please note that the contents do not necessarily
> reflect the views of the contributor. So please,
> as the said in the old west, don't shoot the
> piano player.)
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...07/10/19/AR200...
> Or:http://snipurl.com/1sf7yhttp://tinyurl.com/2wujge
> Moderator:
> Defending the AMT must be Tax Humor!


Next, they will be coming out for slower depreciation,
elimination of the mortgage interest deduction and for jock
itch.

<< ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- >
 
Old 10-23-2007, 07:07 AM
joetaxpayer
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: In Defense Of The AMT

William Brenner wrote:

- quote -

> Here is some food for thought and a potential
> source for lively discussion.
> (Please note that the contents do not necessarily
> reflect the views of the contributor. So please,
> as the said in the old west, don't shoot the
> piano player.)
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...901577_pf.html


I understand the desire to close tax loopholes and to pay
one's fair share. At the risk of sounding like "as long as
you don't tax me" I think there should be some basic sacred
cows, mortgage interest, property tax, state tax, which the
AMT should not negate. Living in a state (yes, I live here
by choice, no one twisted my arm) that has high income and
property tax, and now I find that my property tax and much
of our state income tax is canceled by the effect of the
AMT. Long term cap gains also are not 15%, more like 22.5%.

Funny, mortgage interest, which I've done my best to
minimize, is allowed, right up to my gross income, but the
other two, out of my control, are not.

JOE

<< ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- >
  #-1  
Old 10-21-2007, 11:47 PM
William Brenner
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default In Defense Of The AMT

Here is some food for thought and a potential
source for lively discussion.

(Please note that the contents do not necessarily
reflect the views of the contributor. So please,
as the said in the old west, don't shoot the
piano player.)

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...901577_pf.html
Or:
http://snipurl.com/1sf7y
http://tinyurl.com/2wujge

Moderator:
Defending the AMT must be Tax Humor!

<< ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- >
 

Tags
amt, defense
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
In Defense of Commissions
Lon: Commissions vs. Fees. Much has been written about those who earn a living selling financial products and services on a commission basis. Pushy,...
Financial Planning 1 04-10-2007 02:28 AM
A defense for the dollar?
Bill Ragsdale: A client of mine asked how to cope with a (possible) dollar decline: "George Soros predicts a 20% dollar decline ahead. Is there a strategy for...
Financial Planning 9 04-20-2005 10:02 AM
Defense Dept. to use IRS data to contact reservists?
Bill Brock: Normally, I don't think it's appropriate to post political stories to this board, but I think the following story could encourage noncompliance and...
Taxes 8 06-02-2004 06:11 PM



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:36 PM.