|
#4
| |||
| |||
| It's a great way to increase Taxes with out passing legislation. As Salaries and deductible expenses go up the deductibility of the expenses phase out and the Taxpayer pays more. The "Tax and spend" lovers (aren't they all?) could not have thought of a better system. Think of the Bonus Taxes the Gov gets from all the IRA etc deferments taken at 15% then taxed at 28% when with drawn at retirement etc.. CBS Nichols << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| "Kurt Ullman" <kurtullman[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > joetaxpayer <joetaxpayer[at]nospam.com> wrote:
I don't think that indexing will really only tax those> > I understand the desire to close tax loopholes and to pay > > one's fair share. At the risk of sounding like "as long as > > you don't tax me" I think there should be some basic sacred > > cows, mortgage interest, property tax, state tax, which the > > AMT should not negate. Living in a state (yes, I live here > > by choice, no one twisted my arm) that has high income and > > property tax, and now I find that my property tax and much > > of our state income tax is canceled by the effect of the > > AMT. Long term cap gains also are not 15%, more like 22.5%. > > > Funny, mortgage interest, which I've done my best to > > minimize, is allowed, right up to my gross income, but the > > other two, out of my control, are not. > Most of the real problems with the AMT could have been > avoided if they had merely indexed AMT to inflation like > they did most of the rest of the tax code. Although it is > probably a good idea to have the concept of bracket creep > reintroduced on occasion. really wealthy taxpayers that it originally intended to. ___________________________________ <<< Benjamin Yazersky, CPA [NJ & NY] > > -----> real address on hobokeni or hobokenx <----- << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| joetaxpayer <joetaxpayer[at]nospam.com> wrote: - quote - > I understand the desire to close tax loopholes and to pay
Most of the real problems with the AMT could have been> one's fair share. At the risk of sounding like "as long as > you don't tax me" I think there should be some basic sacred > cows, mortgage interest, property tax, state tax, which the > AMT should not negate. Living in a state (yes, I live here > by choice, no one twisted my arm) that has high income and > property tax, and now I find that my property tax and much > of our state income tax is canceled by the effect of the > AMT. Long term cap gains also are not 15%, more like 22.5%. > Funny, mortgage interest, which I've done my best to > minimize, is allowed, right up to my gross income, but the > other two, out of my control, are not. avoided if they had merely indexed AMT to inflation like they did most of the rest of the tax code. Although it is probably a good idea to have the concept of bracket creep reintroduced on occasion. << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| William Brenner <wbren...[at]nospamplease.net> wrote: - quote - > Here is some food for thought and a potential
Next, they will be coming out for slower depreciation,> source for lively discussion. > (Please note that the contents do not necessarily > reflect the views of the contributor. So please, > as the said in the old west, don't shoot the > piano player.) > http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...07/10/19/AR200... > Or:http://snipurl.com/1sf7yhttp://tinyurl.com/2wujge > Moderator: > Defending the AMT must be Tax Humor! elimination of the mortgage interest deduction and for jock itch. << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| | |||
| |||
| William Brenner wrote: - quote - > Here is some food for thought and a potential
I understand the desire to close tax loopholes and to pay> source for lively discussion. > (Please note that the contents do not necessarily > reflect the views of the contributor. So please, > as the said in the old west, don't shoot the > piano player.) > http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...901577_pf.html one's fair share. At the risk of sounding like "as long as you don't tax me" I think there should be some basic sacred cows, mortgage interest, property tax, state tax, which the AMT should not negate. Living in a state (yes, I live here by choice, no one twisted my arm) that has high income and property tax, and now I find that my property tax and much of our state income tax is canceled by the effect of the AMT. Long term cap gains also are not 15%, more like 22.5%. Funny, mortgage interest, which I've done my best to minimize, is allowed, right up to my gross income, but the other two, out of my control, are not. JOE << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Here is some food for thought and a potential source for lively discussion. (Please note that the contents do not necessarily reflect the views of the contributor. So please, as the said in the old west, don't shoot the piano player.) http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...901577_pf.html Or: http://snipurl.com/1sf7y http://tinyurl.com/2wujge Moderator: Defending the AMT must be Tax Humor! << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| Tags |
| amt, defense |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| In Defense of Commissions Lon: Commissions vs. Fees. Much has been written about those who earn a living selling financial products and services on a commission basis. Pushy,... | Financial Planning | 1 | 04-10-2007 02:28 AM | |
| A defense for the dollar? Bill Ragsdale: A client of mine asked how to cope with a (possible) dollar decline: "George Soros predicts a 20% dollar decline ahead. Is there a strategy for... | Financial Planning | 9 | 04-20-2005 10:02 AM | |
| Defense Dept. to use IRS data to contact reservists? Bill Brock: Normally, I don't think it's appropriate to post political stories to this board, but I think the following story could encourage noncompliance and... | Taxes | 8 | 06-02-2004 06:11 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |