| | |||
| |||
| John L <johnl[at]iecc.com> wrote: - quote - > An inventor has a patent that he wishes to sell to a
It seems to me that if the licensing back is part of the> company. So far so good, IRC sec 1235 says that if an > inventor sells "all substantial rights", it's treated as a > capital asset and capital gains rates apply. > He'd like to keep making his patented widgets, which > presumably can be handled by the company granting back a > license. The question is whether that disqualifies the sale > for capital gains treatment. transaction, he didn't really sell all the rights. If the licensing back is a separate arms-length transaction (e.g. if he gets the same terms as someone unrelated who wanted to license would get, or better, did get) then he did sell all the rights. My opinion is worth twice what you paid for it. Seth << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| An inventor has a patent that he wishes to sell to a company. So far so good, IRC sec 1235 says that if an inventor sells "all substantial rights", it's treated as a capital asset and capital gains rates apply. He'd like to keep making his patented widgets, which presumably can be handled by the company granting back a license. The question is whether that disqualifies the sale for capital gains treatment. The usual advice would be to consult a Knowledgable Tax Professional. Well, he did, several in fact, and their combined advice can be summarized as "I dunno". Inventors sell their patent rights all the time, and he's surely not the first one to want such a grant back. So where's the IRS rulings, case law, etc? << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| Tags |
| patent, selling, tax, treatment |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Patent Expenses G Burton: I have a patent, for which I have been taking business deductions for some time. I have not sold the rights to the invention, although that is... | Taxes | 1 | 02-25-2007 09:00 AM | |
| Patent exchange for stock Doug: I'm a taxation student and I need your help to clarify an issue in a case I'm doing now: What's the tax treatment of a taxpayer's acquisition of... | Taxes | 17 | 05-05-2006 03:07 AM | |
| Patent exchange for stock Doug: A taxpayer sold her patent to a company for 40,000 shares of common stock (has a fmv of $2m and represents 3% ownership). >Question: what's the... | Taxes | 1 | 05-04-2006 02:45 AM | |
| Sale of Patent Elizabeth McBay: I have a buyer for a patent that I own. The buyer is a startup bio-tech firm and is offering $500K spread over 10 years. My concern is their... | Taxes | 4 | 02-19-2004 02:15 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |