|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Jim Bergmann wrote: - quote - > Required to take 401K as required by law. (70 1/2 deadline
Your 401k plan is a separate thing altogether, and all> NOVEMBER, 2007.) > Question: Can stock losses L/T or S/T be used vs. the gains > in the 401K upon mandatory distribution? > Have some sizable losses to partially offset the lump sum > distribution. distributions from it are taxed at ordinary (regular) rates. Capital gains/losses are reported separately and fall where they lay. However.... I don't see why you need to take the entire amount from your 401k in toto. Indeed, your magic age only decrees when minimum distributions must start. Talk to your 401k custodian and set up a gradual withdrawal plan. ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| "Jim Bergmann" <jbergmann13[at]wi.rr.com> wrote: - quote - > Required to take 401K as required by law. (70 1/2 deadline
No, other than the standard $3,000 of net capital loss that> NOVEMBER, 2007.) > Question: Can stock losses L/T or S/T be used vs. the gains > in the 401K upon mandatory distribution? can be applied against ordinary income. -- Phil Marti Clarksburg, MD << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| | |||
| |||
| Jim Bergmann wrote: - quote - > Required to take 401K as required by law. (70 1/2 deadline
Your 401k plan is a separate thing altogether, and all> NOVEMBER, 2007.) > Question: Can stock losses L/T or S/T be used vs. the gains > in the 401K upon mandatory distribution? > Have some sizable losses to partially offset the lump sum > distribution. distributions from it are taxed at ordinary (regular) rates. Capital gains/losses are reported separately and fall where they lay. However.... I don't see why you need to take the entire amount from your 401k in toto. Indeed, your magic age only decress when minimum distributions must start. Talk to your 401k custodian and set up a gradual withdrawal plan. ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Moderator: This was sent as a multi-part message in MIME format and is the last multi-part message in MIME format to be accepted here. This is an ASCII only nwesgroup. Required to take 401K as required by law. (70 1/2 deadline NOVEMBER, 2007.) Question: Can stock losses L/T or S/T be used vs. the gains in the 401K upon mandatory distribution? Have some sizable losses to partially offset the lump sum distribution. Thank you, Jim Bergmann Franklin, WI 53132 << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| Tags |
| 401, payout |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Annuity vs Managed Payout Chip: Have about $400K in 401k, diversified, but just sitting there since retirement 2 yrs ago. A broker/advisor is pushing me toward AVIVA "IncomePlus"... | Financial Planning | 7 | 06-11-2008 09:11 AM | |
| Managed Payout Mutual Funds Lon: Though these new funds by "Vanguard" & "Fidelity" have the element of risk as do all investments, they could work much better for many than... | Financial Planning | 4 | 05-20-2008 06:43 PM | |
| home insurance payout ratio Beliavsky: The September 2007 issue of Bloomberg Markets magazine has an article "Insurance Hoax" by David Dietz and Darrell Preston critical of home... | Financial Planning | 9 | 09-05-2007 12:17 AM | |
| another rollover Q re. payout as stock Dick Watson: I can take part of my rollover in "equivalent whole shares" of my previous employer's company stock in which my basis is about 50% of the current... | Taxes | 1 | 01-15-2007 06:07 AM | |
| New Tax Law induces increased dividend payout Frederick Jorden: http://home.hamptonroads.com/stories/story.cfm?story=58638&ran=174267 The above article reports increased dividend pay outs induced by the new... | Taxes | 5 | 09-01-2003 11:16 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |