|
#4
| |||
| |||
| "MyVeryOwnSelf" <self[at]emailNot.nul> wrote: - quote - > It was puzzling until I noticed that the penalty applies to
This is a recent change. It was done to address the problem> somebody eligible for only the last part of 2007 who > contributes for all of 2007. I didn't know that was allowed. that if a plan began in the middle of the year (say July), they wouldn't participate. Without this rule change, people who began a plan in July 2007 would have lots of out-of-pocket expenses July - December, but could only contribute half their HSA amount in 2007. With the new rule, they get to contribute a full year's worth up front (same as if you'd begun the plan Jan 1). But the change doesn't come for free. If you start a plan in the middle of the 2007, and contribute a full amount for 2007, you have to stick with the plan until the end of 2008 to avoid penalties for 2007. - quote - > Since I'm eligible for all of 2007 but will become
That's my understanding. You can also contribute in 2008> ineligible during 2008, I'm safe contributing the max for > 2007, right? for whatever months you are eligible. (Eligibility is determined by whether you qualify on the first of each month.) Mark Freeland BnetOnewsX[at]sbcglobal.net << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| "Mark Freeland" <BnetOnewsX[at]sbcglobal.net> wrote: - quote - > Like Will Rogers, all I know is what I read in the papers,
Thanks for confirming my interpretation.> but the IRS papers (Pub 553) are pretty clear (and confirm > your interpretation): - quote - > > > I'd like to contribute the maximum for 2007 but the nature
I'm already enrolled and I definitely plan to contribute for> > > of my job is such that the odds are fairly good that I'll > > > have a different employer before the end of 2008, which in > > > turn could mean that an HDHP might not be an option for me. > The HDHP could still be a good option, if you only > contribute 7 months worth (since you started on June 1). > Then there would be no penalty (assuming you're under the > plan through Dec 1 of this year). at least the the months of this year for which I'm enrolled. - quote - > And as noted below, you've got until April to
Yep, that's my plan -- I'm definitely not going to make the> make your decision on those extra 5 months. full contribution for 2007 before next April and at that time I'll have a better idea of whether or not I'm likely to remain in my current job. Thanks again. << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > "[i]f you are not an eligible individual, for any reason other
Thanks for the clarification. It took a while to decipher> than death or becoming disabled, for the 12 months following > the end of your tax year, any contribution attributable to these months > [the months in which you were not eligible] is included in > your income and is subject to an additional 10% tax. The > income and additional 10% tax are reported for the tax year > in which you cease to be an eligible individual." > http://www.irs.gov/publications/p553/ch01.html#d0e1626 which months were "these months" in the quote. It was puzzling until I noticed that the penalty applies to somebody eligible for only the last part of 2007 who contributes for all of 2007. I didn't know that was allowed. Since I'm eligible for all of 2007 but will become ineligible during 2008, I'm safe contributing the max for 2007, right? << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| "MyVeryOwnSelf" <self[at]emailNot.nul> wrote: - quote - > "Fred Johnson" <fredson[at]verizon.net> wrote:
Like Will Rogers, all I know is what I read in the papers,> > I started participating in a qualified High Deductible > > Health Plan (HDHP) [June 1] ... > > > Am I correct in my understanding that I can contribute up to > > $5650 (given that I have a family policy) for 2007 but if I > > do contribute the maximum and then don't remain enrolled in > > an HDHP through December 31 of 2008 that I would have to pay > > taxes and a 10% penalty on the "extra" portion that > > corresponds to the number of months in 2007 that I wasn't > > enrolled? > > [...] > > That's my interpretation based on the material I've read, > > but can someone more knowledgeable than me confirm this? but the IRS papers (Pub 553) are pretty clear (and confirm your interpretation): "[i]f you are not an eligible individual, for any reason other than death or becoming disabled, for the 12 months following the end of your tax year, any contribution attributable to [the months in which you were not eligible] is included in your income and is subject to an additional 10% tax. The income and additional 10% tax are reported for the tax year in which you cease to be an eligible individual." http://www.irs.gov/publications/p553/ch01.html#d0e1626 - quote - > > I'd like to contribute the maximum for 2007 but the nature
The HDHP could still be a good option, if you only> > of my job is such that the odds are fairly good that I'll > > have a different employer before the end of 2008, which in > > turn could mean that an HDHP might not be an option for me. contribute 7 months worth (since you started on June 1). Then there would be no penalty (assuming you're under the plan through Dec 1 of this year). I also started an HDHP in the middle of this year, am in the same situation, and am considering paying in the max anyway, but for me, the ability to shift income from 2007 to 2008 may be worth the penalty. Worst case for you is that you contribute $5650 * 5/12 = $2354 extra this year, you get the reduction of AGI in 2007, it shows up as additional AGI in 2008, plus you pay a $235.42 penalty. Assuming same tax brackets in 2007 and 2008, you are putting only the $235 penalty at risk. Your possible savings (say, in a 25% bracket) are 25% * $2354 = $588.54. And as noted below, you've got until April to make your decision on those extra 5 months. - quote - > Maybe I'm missing something, but I think each tax year
See above.> stands on its own. [...] - quote - > What's sometimes confusing is that we have until April,
Mark Freeland> 2008, to contribute for tax year 2007. BnetOnewsX[at]sbcglobal.net << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| | |||
| |||
| - quote - > I started participating in a qualified High Deductible
Maybe I'm missing something, but I think each tax year> Health Plan (HDHP) on June 1st of this year and opened a > Health Savings Account (HSA) that same day but I have a > question that I'm hoping someone on here can answer. > Am I correct in my understanding that I can contribute up to > $5650 (given that I have a family policy) for 2007 but if I > do contribute the maximum and then don't remain enrolled in > an HDHP through December 31 of 2008 that I would have to pay > taxes and a 10% penalty on the "extra" portion that > corresponds to the number of months in 2007 that I wasn't > enrolled? For example, if I remain enrolled through the end > of this year but am no longer in a qualified plan on > 12/31/08, then I'd have to pay taxes and a penalty on the > portion corresponding to the five months of this year > (January through May) when I wasn't enrolled in an HDHP? > That's my interpretation based on the material I've read, > but can someone more knowledgeable than me confirm this? > I'd like to contribute the maximum for 2007 but the nature > of my job is such that the odds are fairly good that I'll > have a different employer before the end of 2008, which in > turn could mean that an HDHP might not be an option for me. > Given that, it doesn't seem like a good idea to contribute > the full $5650 for this year because I'd risk paying more in > taxes and penalties than I can save by making the full > contribution. stands on its own. One's contribution limit for the 2007 tax year depends on eligibility in 2007. I haven't seen anywhere that says a contribution limit for one year depends on what will happen in future years. What's sometimes confusing is that we have until April, 2008, to contribute for tax year 2007. (Disclaimer: I'm not a tax pro, but I've had an HSAs they were available.) << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I started participating in a qualified High Deductible Health Plan (HDHP) on June 1st of this year and opened a Health Savings Account (HSA) that same day but I have a question that I'm hoping someone on here can answer. Am I correct in my understanding that I can contribute up to $5650 (given that I have a family policy) for 2007 but if I do contribute the maximum and then don't remain enrolled in an HDHP through December 31 of 2008 that I would have to pay taxes and a 10% penalty on the "extra" portion that corresponds to the number of months in 2007 that I wasn't enrolled? For example, if I remain enrolled through the end of this year but am no longer in a qualified plan on 12/31/08, then I'd have to pay taxes and a penalty on the portion corresponding to the five months of this year (January through May) when I wasn't enrolled in an HDHP? That's my interpretation based on the material I've read, but can someone more knowledgeable than me confirm this? I'd like to contribute the maximum for 2007 but the nature of my job is such that the odds are fairly good that I'll have a different employer before the end of 2008, which in turn could mean that an HDHP might not be an option for me. Given that, it doesn't seem like a good idea to contribute the full $5650 for this year because I'd risk paying more in taxes and penalties than I can save by making the full contribution. Thanks, Fred << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| Tags |
| account, contributions, health, savings |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Health Savings Account kade714@yahoo.com: I'm going to prepare my wife and my returns this year. One thing I have a question with. How do I handle HSA's? My wife received something titled... | Taxes | 1 | 02-26-2007 04:54 AM | |
| Anyone have HSA (health savings account) me@privacy.net: Went and talked to local insurance agent Friday afternoon abt private health insurance so I can quit work and go back to college He was pretty... | Financial Planning | 51 | 08-05-2006 12:39 AM | |
| Health Savings Account Max: I've got $1,000 sitting in my bank in a traditional IRA. I made a one time deposit into this account 2.5 years ago and it has sat there accruing... | Taxes | 2 | 06-27-2004 08:46 PM | |
| Health Savings Account eligibility Robert B.: Can someone translate the following eligibility Health Savings Account eligibility requirements for me (http://tinyurl.com/3ebtv): "Allowable... | Taxes | 2 | 01-27-2004 10:16 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |