"John H. Fisher" <TaxService[at]aol.com> wrote:

- quote -

That looks interesting. What are the implications of that?
That seems a lot different from the way things are handled
now.

Stu

<< ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- >

CCH TAX NEWS for August 16, 2007

FEDERAL NEWS

IRS Issues Final Regulations Treating QSubs as Separate Entities for
Federal Employment and Excise Tax Purposes. (T.D. 9356)
http://tax.cchgroup.com/news/headlin...nws81607.htm#1

Difference Between Adjusted AMT Basis and Regular Tax Basis of Stock
Received by ISO Is Not an Adjustment in Calculating an ATNOL (Marcus,
TC)
http://tax.cchgroup.com/news/headlin...nws81607.htm#2

STATE NEWS

All States --Sales and Use Tax: SST Sourcing Group Reports; Nevada to
Petition for Full Membership
http://tax.cchgroup.com/news/headlin...nws81607.htm#3

Missed a headline? Click here to review last week's tax news
http://tax.cchgroup.com/news/default.asp?PageID=4

<< ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- >