Go Back   CDN Business Directory > Main Category > Taxes

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-11-2007, 08:41 PM
Stuart Bronstein
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: For Harlan, slightly OT

- quote -

> Moderator:
> Even if others do not believe you, I do beacause I read
> Playboy for the qualility of its prose.


I'd read Playboy for the quality of the prose, too, except I
go blind before I get that far.

Stu

<< ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- >
 
Old 09-10-2007, 10:58 PM
Harlan Lunsford
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: For Harlan, slightly OT

Stuart Bronstein wrote:

- quote -

> I know how Harlan feels about the NY Times. They do think
> they are being fair and balanced, however. One article from
> today's paper begins with these paragraphs:


(snipped.....)

- quote -

> Moderator:
> It seems to me that Harlan does not trust the privacy
> policies of damnyankees, expecially not damnyankee
> liberals. There was recently an article on AOL about
> a man suing 1-800-Flowers for sending his estranged wife
> a copy of the invoice for flowers he sent his lover. Of
> course, the message to his lover was on the invoice. His
> wife then upped the ante in the proposed property
> settlement of their divorce.
> I knew better. I paid cash for the flowers to Susan.


For the record: Just back from first ten days in Italy and
then ten days aboard ship in Aegean sea among the Greek
isles. Just as on last year's cruise, the ship had internet
cafe sponsored BY... uh huh, Noo Yawk times. And each day
in our suite was delivered an abbreviated international
edition of the International version of said paper. And I
did sneak a peak at least of baseball scores. Honestly,
that's all, though.

Good to be back.

ChEAr$,
Harlan

Moderator:
Even if others do not believe you, I do beacause I read
Playboy for the qualility of its prose.

<< ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- >
  #-1  
Old 08-14-2007, 02:23 AM
Stuart Bronstein
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default For Harlan, slightly OT

I know how Harlan feels about the NY Times. They do think
they are being fair and balanced, however. One article from
today's paper begins with these paragraphs:

WASHINGTON, Aug. 11: Despite promises by Congress to end the
secrecy of earmarks and other pet projects, the House of
Representatives has quietly funneled hundreds of millions of
dollars to specific hospitals and health care providers
under a bill passed this month to help low- income children.

Instead of naming the hospitals, the bill describes them in
cryptic terms, so that identifying a beneficiary is like
solving a riddle. Most of the provisions were added to the
bill at the request of Democratic lawmakers.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/12/wa...health.html?hp

Stu

Moderator:
It seems to me that Harlan does not trust the privacy
policies of damnyankees, expecially not damnyankee
liberals. There was recently an article on AOL about
a man suing 1-800-Flowers for sending his estranged wife
a copy of the invoice for flowers he sent his lover. Of
course, the message to his lover was on the invoice. His
wife then upped the ante in the proposed property
settlement of their divorce.

I knew better. I paid cash for the flowers to Susan.

<< ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- >
 

Tags
harlan, slightly
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
slightly OT: identity verification
Mark Bole: So, recently I deposited a modest sum in a CD at a well-known financial institution. When I registered at their on-line site, they verified my...
Financial Planning 2 04-13-2008 03:04 PM



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:29 PM.