|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Katie <katiej_1...[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > "nomail1...[at]hotmail.com" <nomail1...[at]hotmail.com> wrote:
Thanks, but that does not address my question.> > Does the Calif estimated tax penalty apply even if you are > > due a refund, as does the federal estimated tax penalty? > [....] > Look at the bottom right-hand corner of page 18 of the Form > 540 instructions. There is no penalty for underpayment of > estimated taxes if the total of your payments and credits > equals at least 90% of your current year liability, or 100% > (or 110% if high income) of your prior year tax liability, > or is less than $200. For federal taxes, you might still be subject to the underpayment penalty if you did not meet the proper conditions on each of the due dates for estimated tax payments ("quarterly"). For example, if you make no tax payments during the year, but pay more than 100% of your total tax liability in December, resulting in a refund, you are likely subject to an underpayment penalty -- unless all of your income were in the last quarter, or you made that more-than-100% tax payment by withholding from earned income, ya-da-ya-da-ya-da. But according to Calif income tax instructions, it would appear that is not the case. The instructions clearly state that if the "tax due" line is zero: "Stop. You are not subject to an estimated payment penalty". I now know that those instructions are wrong! Even though I got a refund, I got a notice from the FTB stating that the refund was reduced by an underpayment penalty (amount stated). (And no, I did not make just one tax payment in December. That was just an extreme hypothetical to make the point.) << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| "nomail1...[at]hotmail.com" <nomail1...[at]hotmail.com> wrote: - quote - > Does the Calif estimated tax penalty apply even if you are
Look at the bottom right-hand corner of page 18 of the Form> due a refund, as does the federal estimated tax penalty? > Instructions for line 67 of 2006 Form 540 does not state > that explicitly, as do the instructions for line 77 of 2006 > Form 1040. > On the contrary, the instructions for line 67 state that if > line 48 is less than $200 or less than 10% of line 30, > "Stop. You are not subject to an estimated payment > penalty". > Line 48 is non-zero only if you owe taxes. > I also looked at Form 5805 and it instructions, to no avail. > But I might have overlooked something. > If the Calif estimated tax penalty does apply even if you > are due a refund, I would appreciate it if you would point > me to the explanation of that fact. 540 instructions. There is no penalty for underpayment of estimated taxes if the total of your payments and credits equals at least 90% of your current year liability, or 100% (or 110% if high income) of your prior year tax liability, or is less than $200. These are the same as the federal rules except for the $200 exception. California generally conforms to IRC Sec. 6654, but IRC Sec 6654(e)(1) does not apply (Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code Sec. 19136(c) (1)). Instead, CRTC Sec. 19136(c)(2) provides that no penalty is assessed if the total tax liability, less payments and credits, is less than $200 ($100 for married filing separately). So if no tax is due with the return, or the tax due is less than $200, there is no penalty for underpayment of estimated taxes. Katie in San Diego << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| | |||
| |||
| "nomail1...[at]hotmail.com" <nomail1...[at]hotmail.com> wrote: - quote - > Does the Calif estimated tax penalty apply even if you are
Look at the bottom right-hand corner of page 18 of the Form> due a refund, as does the federal estimated tax penalty? > Instructions for line 67 of 2006 Form 540 does not state > that explicitly, as do the instructions for line 77 of 2006 > Form 1040. > On the contrary, the instructions for line 67 state that if > line 48 is less than $200 or less than 10% of line 30, > "Stop. You are not subject to an estimated payment > penalty". > Line 48 is non-zero only if you owe taxes. > I also looked at Form 5805 and it instructions, to no avail. > But I might have overlooked something. > If the Calif estimated tax penalty does apply even if you > are due a refund, I would appreciate it if you would point > me to the explanation of that fact. 540 instructions. There is no penalty for underpayment of estimated taxes if the total of your payments and credits equals at least 90% of your current year liability, or 100% (or 110% if high income) of your prior year tax liability, or is less than $200. These are the same as the federal rules except for the $200 exception. California generally conforms to IRC Sec. 6654, but IRC Sec 6654(e)(1) does not apply (Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code Sec. 19136(c) (1)). Instead, CRTC Sec. 19136(c)(2) provides that no penalty is assessed if the total tax liability, less payments and credits, is less than $200 ($100 for married filing separately). So if no tax is due with the return, or the tax due is less than $200, there is no penalty for underpayment of estimated taxes. Katie in San Diego << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Does the Calif estimated tax penalty apply even if you are due a refund, as does the federal estimated tax penalty? Instructions for line 67 of 2006 Form 540 does not state that explicitly, as do the instructions for line 77 of 2006 Form 1040. On the contrary, the instructions for line 67 state that if line 48 is less than $200 or less than 10% of line 30, "Stop. You are not subject to an estimated payment penalty". Line 48 is non-zero only if you owe taxes. I also looked at Form 5805 and it instructions, to no avail. But I might have overlooked something. If the Calif estimated tax penalty does apply even if you are due a refund, I would appreciate it if you would point me to the explanation of that fact. << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| Tags |
| 2006, calif, confused, est, penalty, tax |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Underpayment penalty vs. early withdrawal penalty Dave Rudisill: Since nobody responded when I asked this question three weeks ago, I'll try again: We retired early and are living off our IRAs. Since we are... | Taxes | 3 | 03-09-2006 02:21 AM | |
| Calif. LLC; domestic or foreign The Rainmaker: My partner and I have settled on an LLC (vs. S Corp.) to buy and sell income property in several states, including California. We both live in... | Taxes | 3 | 04-27-2004 06:11 PM | |
| Property Ins. in Calif-- how best 2 specify/research/buy Howard J: We are wanting to evaluate and perhaps solicit additional quotes for insuring our property. On the several quotes we've received, we received very... | Financial Planning | 2 | 11-04-2003 08:59 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |