|
#1
| |||
| |||
| "Howard Beale" <usenet[at]grasslake.net> wrote: - quote - > I work for a small (<25 people) computer consulting company
I think the key question here is what, exactly, is the> doing technical consulting on-site at customer locations all > over the metropolitan area. We have an office in an > out-of-the-way Northwestern suburb of the Twin Cities that > neither I nor any of the other engineers have an office > presence at, other than a plastic mail slot which is usually > empty since expense checks and paystubs are mailed to my > home. > I make about 8-10 trips per year to the office for meetings, > paperwork or to pick up a package that wasn't shipped > properly to the client location, but other than that do not > travel to this office since there's quite literally nowhere > for me to work, it's 25 miles from my house and its not "on > the way" to anywhere. > Our management recently said that trips "passing by" the > office need to be logged as if they went to/from the office > "as per IRS regulations" (their claim, not mine). > I have a 2-3 clients that are 10-15 miles past the office > (making them 40 miles from my house) and I questioned the > fairness of asking me to eat 70% of the mileage of visiting > these clients as well as the logic of "passing by", since I > would have to leave the freeway and travel 2-3 miles to > actually drive "past" our office. > I was told that this "was the IRS rule per the accountant" > but I can't find any clear, layman's description of how > mileage is supposed to be accounted for per the IRS. I know > that regular commutes are not considered business expenses, > but is there something so vague that "driving past" counts > as a commute? > I know that paying mileage has both a tax component as well > as a "what an employer wants to pay" component, and I > suspect that I am being snowed and that this is really about > them shaving money off the $3k+ or so per month they have to > pay in mileage. location of your "regular or main job". It sounds like it may be your home rather than the head office. The IRS has a summary of the rules regarding employees' deductible transportation expenses at http://www.irs.gov/publications/p463...292619966.html that may be helpful to you. The same information can be found in Publication 17. Based on the facts and circumstances as you present them, it seems like travel from your home office to a client location would be entirely deductible. To the extent your employer does not reimburse these expenses, you may want to consider deducting them as unreimbursed employee expenses on Schedule A of your Form 1040 as a miscellaneous expense. -Crystal << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| | |||
| |||
| Howard Beale" <usenet[at]grasslake.net> wrote: - quote - > I work for a small (<25 people) computer consulting company
I think the key question here is what, exactly, is the> doing technical consulting on-site at customer locations all > over the metropolitan area. We have an office in an > out-of-the-way Northwestern suburb of the Twin Cities that > neither I nor any of the other engineers have an office > presence at, other than a plastic mail slot which is usually > empty since expense checks and paystubs are mailed to my > home. > I make about 8-10 trips per year to the office for meetings, > paperwork or to pick up a package that wasn't shipped > properly to the client location, but other than that do not > travel to this office since there's quite literally nowhere > for me to work, it's 25 miles from my house and its not "on > the way" to anywhere. > Our management recently said that trips "passing by" the > office need to be logged as if they went to/from the office > "as per IRS regulations" (their claim, not mine). > I have a 2-3 clients that are 10-15 miles past the office > (making them 40 miles from my house) and I questioned the > fairness of asking me to eat 70% of the mileage of visiting > these clients as well as the logic of "passing by", since I > would have to leave the freeway and travel 2-3 miles to > actually drive "past" our office. > I was told that this "was the IRS rule per the accountant" > but I can't find any clear, layman's description of how > mileage is supposed to be accounted for per the IRS. I know > that regular commutes are not considered business expenses, > but is there something so vague that "driving past" counts > as a commute? > I know that paying mileage has both a tax component as well > as a "what an employer wants to pay" component, and I > suspect that I am being snowed and that this is really about > them shaving money off the $3k+ or so per month they have to > pay in mileage. location of your "regular or main job". It sounds like it may be your home rather than the head office. The IRS has a summary of the rules regarding employees' deductible transportation expenses at http://www.irs.gov/publications/p463...292619966.html that may be helpful to you. The same information can be found in Publication 17. Based on the facts and circumstances as you present them, it seems like travel from your home office to a client location would be entirely deductible. To the extent your employer does not reimburse these expenses, you may want to consider deducting them as unreimbursed employee expenses on Schedule A of your Form 1040 as a miscellaneous expense. -Crystal << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I work for a small (<25 people) computer consulting company doing technical consulting on-site at customer locations all over the metropolitan area. We have an office in an out-of-the-way Northwestern suburb of the Twin Cities that neither I nor any of the other engineers have an office presence at, other than a plastic mail slot which is usually empty since expense checks and paystubs are mailed to my home. I make about 8-10 trips per year to the office for meetings, paperwork or to pick up a package that wasn't shipped properly to the client location, but other than that do not travel to this office since there's quite literally nowhere for me to work, it's 25 miles from my house and its not "on the way" to anywhere. Our management recently said that trips "passing by" the office need to be logged as if they went to/from the office "as per IRS regulations" (their claim, not mine). I have a 2-3 clients that are 10-15 miles past the office (making them 40 miles from my house) and I questioned the fairness of asking me to eat 70% of the mileage of visiting these clients as well as the logic of "passing by", since I would have to leave the freeway and travel 2-3 miles to actually drive "past" our office. I was told that this "was the IRS rule per the accountant" but I can't find any clear, layman's description of how mileage is supposed to be accounted for per the IRS. I know that regular commutes are not considered business expenses, but is there something so vague that "driving past" counts as a commute? I know that paying mileage has both a tax component as well as a "what an employer wants to pay" component, and I suspect that I am being snowed and that this is really about them shaving money off the $3k+ or so per month they have to pay in mileage. << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| Tags |
| irs, mileage, reimbursements, rules |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| "news" and "fyi" links on the "Track My Portfolio" page tom: no longer work in my Money 2000. When I click them, I get "MSN Money-Page Not Found" and "The page you requested could not be found." But there is a... | Microsoft Money | 7 | 10-25-2007 11:34 PM | |
| Schedule "D" Clarification of Reporting Rules D.D. Pallmer: I see that the IRS has stated in the instructions that every trade must now be reported. I've been doing this for years (attaching a spreadsheet of... | Taxes | 1 | 01-15-2006 05:56 PM | |
| Advice/Taxes "constructive receipt rules" Dick Adams: JD N <ejojo13@yahoo.com> wrote: > I'm hoping you could help clarify this "constructive > receipt rules" issue. You certainly came to the right... | Taxes | 35 | 09-20-2005 02:32 PM | |
| Money 2002 transaction status flags ("E", "C", "R") have all disappeared Nick Tonkin: Hi, After many months of using Money 2002, yesterday I suddenly noticed that the column in my resgister that shows the cleared status of each... | Microsoft Money | 4 | 02-28-2004 04:39 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |