|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Harlan Lunsford <hnslunsford[at]bellsouth.net> wrote: - quote - > We're all familiar with the reporting requirements of
I'm not near my software, but I recall the kiddie tax> interest and dividends for dependent children under the age > of 18 these days. However the requirement to use parents' > rates etc does not extend to capital gains. instructions http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/i8615.pdf contains Line 5 worksheets that, when filled out as requested, do combine parents and child's capital gains income to tax child's capital gains income at the parent's rates. That being the case, I would assume the kiddie tax does apply parent's rates for capital gains and qualified dividends. - quote - > As a result
I would not recommend a minor gift or give anything to> two of the three sons of a client had to pay tax on > dividends at parents rates and pay tax on capital gains on > sale of stock. For the record, these stocks were inherited > from a grandparent maybe ten years ago. > Parents file jointly, and in the past when father inherited > boocoos (a word formed from the french word "beaucoup") of > money, he went whole hog in the market, and after finally > realizing he was NOT cut out to be a market maven > (strangely, back in 2002!), wound up with one humongous > capital loss carryover. I mean this is one BIG loss > carryfoward which he may never use up. > So then, these three boys are teens and going to college > eventually, and their stock will be sold piecemeal as > needed. > What IF, the boys gave (not "gifted"; I don't like that old > Scottish term) the stock to their mother? Anything wrong > with this idea? You can see where I'm going with this, I'm > sure. anyone. But starting in 2008, the kiddie tax will apply to kiddies who have outgrown their minor status buyt still pay kiddie tax. So maybe this could work for them. And as we now know, the writers of the new kiddie tax legislation were farsighted enough to add a clause that changes all instances of "minor" to "child" when applied to kiddie tax. -- ArtKamlet at a o l dot c o m Columbus OH K2PZH << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Harlan Lunsford <hnslunsford[at]bellsouth.net> wrote: - quote - > So then, these three boys are teens and going to college
Since these boys are all minors, the stock cannot be held in> eventually, and their stock will be sold piecemeal as > needed. > What IF, the boys gave (not "gifted"; I don't like that old > Scottish term) the stock to their mother? Anything wrong > with this idea? You can see where I'm going with this, I'm > sure. their names alone -- someone must be named as "trustee" -- if I understand the Uniform Gifts to Minors Act correctly. Probably the mother or father is such trustee. Regardless, the trustee must act in the best interest of the child, not the parents and the money cannot be used to meet parental obligations. It seems to me that a gift to either parent is not in the best interest of the child. I don't know the remedies for prohibited transactions, so I can't tell the full consequences. However, it does seem to me that IRS is likely to ignore such a gift. I also wonder if a broker or transfer agent would make the necessary changes. I wouldn't try this with one of my clients, I don't think. Lanny K. Williams, CPA Nawarat, Williams & Co., Ltd. Income Tax Services for Expatriate Americans << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| | |||
| |||
| Harlan Lunsford wrote: - quote - > What IF, the boys gave (not "gifted"; I don't like that old
Aside from the issue of how this impacts student aid, it> Scottish term) the stock to their mother? Anything wrong > with this idea? You can see where I'm going with this, I'm > sure. looks fine to me. You can't gift a loss, but you can gift appreciated stock and the recipient can use his own losses to offset that gain. JOE << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| We're all familiar with the reporting requirements of interest and dividends for dependent children under the age of 18 these days. However the requirement to use parents' rates etc does not extend to capital gains. As a result two of the three sons of a client had to pay tax on dividends at parents rates and pay tax on capital gains on sale of stock. For the record, these stocks were inherited from a grandparent maybe ten years ago. Parents file jointly, and in the past when father inherited boocoos (a word formed from the french word "beaucoup") of money, he went whole hog in the market, and after finally realizing he was NOT cut out to be a market maven (strangely, back in 2002!), wound up with one humongous capital loss carryover. I mean this is one BIG loss carryfoward which he may never use up. So then, these three boys are teens and going to college eventually, and their stock will be sold piecemeal as needed. What IF, the boys gave (not "gifted"; I don't like that old Scottish term) the stock to their mother? Anything wrong with this idea? You can see where I'm going with this, I'm sure. ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| Tags |
| capital, child, gains |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| How best to enter paper Capital gains and return of capital PTH: I hold mutual funds that report both capital gains and return of capital at the end of year for tax purposes. Neither of these are actually paid... | Microsoft Money | 5 | 03-19-2008 10:08 PM | |
| Short Term Capital Gains and Long Term Capital Losses PeterOut: (Under US tax law) can you offset short term capital gains with long term capital losses. Thanks, Peter. <<... | Taxes | 4 | 01-15-2007 06:07 AM | |
| Capital gains vs short term gains malibu.ron@verizon.net: Can stock losses from short term gains be used to offset long term gains. << -------------------------------------------------><< The Charter and... | Taxes | 1 | 06-11-2005 09:54 AM | |
| Child Capital Losses Bud Lacher: In 2000, my 2 children, ages 8 and 11 (now), had capital gains and income that required me to have them file separately. In 2001, they had capital... | Taxes | 11 | 10-22-2004 06:45 AM | |
| Capital Gains???????/ Fahey: 23 years ago my brother and I inherted our family house. Neither one of us has lived there. The value was not enough to involve Inheritance Tax.... | Taxes | 5 | 01-07-2004 02:36 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |