| | |||
| |||
| bnelson[at]sptaxlaw.com (Bruce) writes: - quote - > I have been told that the capital gain income from certain
Occasionally I get a Massachusetts municipal bond whose> California bonds is exempt from California state income tax. > (Generally, it is just the interest income that is exempt.) prospectus claims (explicitly--not as "all taxes") that profit on the sale or other disposition is exempt from state capital gain tax. Also, each year my muni bond fund reports a fraction of its capital gain distributions as (they added "possibly" in recent years) exempt from state tax. I haven't been able to identify a characteristic of the bond that correlates with the statement in the prospectus and the fund folks can't tell me where they get the number (though I never pushed too hard). The thing that bothers be is that I typically get a prospectus only when I purchase the bond at or near issue, so I'm likely missing out on any exemption from secondary market purchases. It would be nice to understand what is going on. Dan Lanciani ddl[at]danlan.*com << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I have been told that the capital gain income from certain California bonds is exempt from California state income tax. (Generally, it is just the interest income that is exempt.) They cite Cal. Gov. Code Sec. 99016 that provides that bonds issued pursuant to the California Fiscal Recovery Financing Act are exempt. That code section says that "Any and all bonds issued by the Authority, their transfer, and the income therefrom, shall at all times be free from taxation of every kind by the state." Is this true? Does anyone have any rulings or decisions or other documentation that supports this position? Thanks. --Bruce << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| Tags |
| bond, california, income |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| S-Corp income from another state for California resident DavidAndrotti@gmail.com: I am part owner of an S-Corp based in Ohio. I am currently a resident of California. I have suspended at-risk limited losses on this corporation... | Taxes | 1 | 04-09-2007 07:29 AM | |
| Amending California income tax filing for 2004 deja_bhoot2000@yahoo.com: On April 22nd, I filed paper version of Federal and California tax returns. Previously, I had filed timely extension requests. The federal tax... | Taxes | 13 | 07-01-2005 03:16 AM | |
| California income tax & out-of-state income Jim Bancroft: My sister worked in San Diego this year, for about six months. She then moved to and now works in Chicago, and is an Illinois resident currently.... | Taxes | 5 | 04-18-2004 05:53 PM | |
| Use Tax & California Income ax Returns A.G. Kalman: I saw a peek at the 2003 CA income tax forms. CA has now joined other states by adding a line to all of their income tax returns for payment of Use... | Taxes | 5 | 12-26-2003 02:50 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |