|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Tks all, appreciate the details a lot. bill << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| "bill" <bw1...[at]nospam.com> wrote: - quote - > In some instances, Un married couples can have their
If the reimbursement is for a non-employee's medical> employer paid medical benefits cover their significant other > but the employer paid amount is now taxable income. > My question is who mandates this practice? A pres. Senator? > IRS? Wehn and how did the taxation start? expenses and that non-employee is not a family member of the employee (as defined in the IRC) then the reimbursement doesn't qualify for exclusion from the employee's taxable income. This practice is mandated in the Internal Revenue Code. << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| "bill" <bw1945[at]nospam.com> wrote: - quote - > In some instances, Un married couples can have their
It's taxable because everything your employer provides you is taxable unless> employer paid medical benefits cover their significant other > but the employer paid amount is now taxable income. > My question is who mandates this practice? it's specifically excluded by law, and this one has never been exempted by Congress. Bills have been introduced to change this, but none has passed. States are free to do as they like, and I think most if not all of the states with formal civil unions have exempted this income from state taxation. -- Phil Marti Clarksburg, MD << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| | |||
| |||
| bill wrote: - quote - > In some instances, Un married couples can have their
Title 26 of U.S. Code sets the definition of what is an> employer paid medical benefits cover their significant other > but the employer paid amount is now taxable income. > My question is who mandates this practice? A pres. Senator? > IRS? When and how did the taxation start? employer tax-free benefit and who may partake in such a benefit for purposes of federal income taxation. At the current time, the benefit in question (tax-free employer medical benefits) is only available to the taxpayer, taxpayer's spouse and taxpayer's dependents. It would take an Act of Congress and the President's approval to change the definition of a spouse. Each State of the Union, may pass laws that treat the taxability of such fringe benefits in any manner they so desire. That would require an Act of the State Legislature and the Governor's approval. << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| In some instances, Un married couples can have their employer paid medical benefits cover their significant other but the employer paid amount is now taxable income. My question is who mandates this practice? A pres. Senator? IRS? Wehn and how did the taxation start? tks all bw << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
| Tags |
| benefits, medical, taxation |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Taxable benefits for evacuees Andy: Andy asks: I was wondering if the people from New Orleans, and other places, who are receiving monetary , and other benefits from the various... | Taxes | 1 | 10-01-2005 05:59 AM | |
| Money2005 benefits Hans: Hi I am currently using Mny2004. What would be the benefit of 2005 vs 2004? I couldn't find any spec info on 2005. Thanks Hans | Microsoft Money | 2 | 08-10-2004 12:25 PM | |
| Tax Benefits Of Microsoft $32B Dividend William Brenner: A fascinating article from the favorite newspaper of certain contributors who shall remain unidentified. ... | Taxes | 3 | 08-04-2004 05:35 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |