|
#14
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > There are a couple of nuances here. First the deadline for
IRC 6513 sets the date as the original due date for early> > 2003 amended returns is 4/15/2007 or 3 years from the date > > the 2003 original return was filed, whichever is later. > > Second, assuming a timely 2003 return, since the 3 year > > statute expired on a Sunday and the following Monday was a > > DC holiday, IRC 7503 treats a claim filed 4/17/2007 as > > timely. > Actually the instructions to the form 1040x say "must be > received within three years after the date you filed your > original return or within two years after the date you paid > the tax, whichever is later." > I take that to mean that if one filed a 2003 return on March > 2nd, 2004, then they have until March 2nd 2007 to properly > amend. returns. -- Phil Marti Clarksburg, MD << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#13
| |||
| |||
| Harlan Lunsford wrote: - quote - > Phil Marti wrote:
You missed the last sentence of the paragraph in the> > "Helpful One" <tryingtohelp[at]voyager.net> wrote: > > > The statute of limitiations is three years from the original > > > filing deadline date in 2003, and therefore has nothing to > > > do with 2007 filing deadlines or extensions. > > There are a couple of nuances here. First the deadline for > > 2003 amended returns is 4/15/2007 or 3 years from the date > > the 2003 original return was filed, whichever is later. > > Second, assuming a timely 2003 return, since the 3 year > > statute expired on a Sunday and the following Monday was a > > DC holiday, IRC 7503 treats a claim filed 4/17/2007 as > > timely. > Actually the instructions to the form 1040x say "must be > received within three years after the date you filed your > original return or within two years after the date you paid > the tax, whichever is later." > I take that to mean that if one filed a 2003 return on March > 2nd, 2004, then they have until March 2nd 2007 to properly > amend. instructions: File Form 1040X only after you have filed your original return. Generally, for a credit or refund, Form 1040X must be filed within 3 years after the date you filed the original return or within 2 years after the date you paid the tax, whichever is later. A return filed early is considered filed on the due date. << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| Harlan Lunsford <hnslunsford[at]bellsouth.net> wrote: - quote - > Phil Marti wrote:
My understanding was that the statute of limitations ran> > There are a couple of nuances here. First the deadline for > > 2003 amended returns is 4/15/2007 or 3 years from the date > > the 2003 original return was filed, whichever is later. > > Second, assuming a timely 2003 return, since the 3 year > > statute expired on a Sunday and the following Monday was a > > DC holiday, IRC 7503 treats a claim filed 4/17/2007 as > > timely. > Actually the instructions to the form 1040x say "must be > received within three years after the date you filed your > original return or within two years after the date you paid > the tax, whichever is later." three years from the date filed or the date "due," whichever was later. But that's a mistake. The time for the IRS to assess additional tax is three years from the date a return is filed or the date due, whichever is later. See IRS § 6501. But the time for claiming a refund by the taxpayer is different. Under §6511, as Harlan noted, the claim must be made within three years of when the return was filed (irrespective of when it was due) or two years from when the tax was paid. Stu << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| Phil Marti wrote: - quote - > "Helpful One" <tryingtohelp[at]voyager.net> wrote:
Actually the instructions to the form 1040x say "must be> > The statute of limitiations is three years from the original > > filing deadline date in 2003, and therefore has nothing to > > do with 2007 filing deadlines or extensions. > There are a couple of nuances here. First the deadline for > 2003 amended returns is 4/15/2007 or 3 years from the date > the 2003 original return was filed, whichever is later. > Second, assuming a timely 2003 return, since the 3 year > statute expired on a Sunday and the following Monday was a > DC holiday, IRC 7503 treats a claim filed 4/17/2007 as > timely. received within three years after the date you filed your original return or within two years after the date you paid the tax, whichever is later." I take that to mean that if one filed a 2003 return on March 2nd, 2004, then they have until March 2nd 2007 to properly amend. ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| "Ira Smilovitz" <i...[at]aol.com> wrote: - quote - > <<SNIP> > Personally, I think that anyone who arranges their affairs
Taxpayers with a balance due have, in my opinion, arranged> so poorly that they are up against a hard deadline deserves > whatever befalls them, but I'm curious just the same. their affairs well if that arrangement includes filing and paying at the last minute. Moderator: Our colleague Dr. Brown was referring to taxpayers who have refunds coming and find themselves up against the three year refund statute. << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| mattisy...[at]gmail.com wrote: - quote - > "Ira Smilovitz" <i...[at]aol.com> wrote:
In the case of fraud, the IRS can audit at will without> > Yesterday (it's now 4/17 here) the IRS announced a 48 hour > > extension of the filing/payment deadline for taxpayers > > affected by the storms of the past weekend. > > > My purely hypothetical question is... would this extend the > > deadline for 2003 amendments/refund claims which would have > > reached the statute of limitations on 4/15 (4/17)? > > > Personally, I think that anyone who arranges their affairs > > so poorly that they are up against a hard deadline deserves > > whatever befalls them, but I'm curious just the same. > IRS cannot extend statutory deadlines or else there > effectively would never be a statute of limitations (i.e. > the IRS could extend the period indefinitely and audit > someone after 3 years at will). regard to the timeframe. << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| "Ira Smilovitz" <iras1[at]aol.com> wrote: - quote - > Yesterday (it's now 4/17 here) the IRS announced a 48 hour
The IRS website stated that 4/17 is the deadline for 2003> extension of the filing/payment deadline for taxpayers > affected by the storms of the past weekend. > My purely hypothetical question is... would this extend the > deadline for 2003 amendments/refund claims which would have > reached the statute of limitations on 4/15 (4/17)? returns....not sure about the storms though << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| "Helpful One" <tryingtohelp[at]voyager.net> wrote: - quote - > The statute of limitiations is three years from the original
There are a couple of nuances here. First the deadline for> filing deadline date in 2003, and therefore has nothing to > do with 2007 filing deadlines or extensions. 2003 amended returns is 4/15/2007 or 3 years from the date the 2003 original return was filed, whichever is later. Second, assuming a timely 2003 return, since the 3 year statute expired on a Sunday and the following Monday was a DC holiday, IRC 7503 treats a claim filed 4/17/2007 as timely. -- Phil Marti Clarksburg, MD << ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- > |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > Yesterday (it's now 4/17 here) the IRS announced a 48 hour
No.> extension of the filing/payment deadline for taxpayers > affected by the storms of the past weekend. > My purely hypothetical question is... would this extend the > deadline for 2003 amendments/refund claims which would have > reached the statute of limitations on 4/15 (4/17)? http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/...169543,00.html. Frequently Asked Questions about the April 16, 2007, Storm Relief Q: Does the storm relief apply to the individual tax refund claims for tax year 2003 where the regular three-year statute of limitations is expiring? A: No. We do not have the authority to extend the statute of limitations for the filing of the refund claims or any other time sensitive acts unless there is a Presidential disaster declaration. Bob Sandler << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| "Ira Smilovitz" <i...[at]aol.com> wrote: - quote - > Yesterday (it's now 4/17 here) the IRS announced a 48 hour
IRS cannot extend statutory deadlines or else there> extension of the filing/payment deadline for taxpayers > affected by the storms of the past weekend. > My purely hypothetical question is... would this extend the > deadline for 2003 amendments/refund claims which would have > reached the statute of limitations on 4/15 (4/17)? > Personally, I think that anyone who arranges their affairs > so poorly that they are up against a hard deadline deserves > whatever befalls them, but I'm curious just the same. effectively would never be a statute of limitations (i.e. the IRS could extend the period indefinitely and audit someone after 3 years at will). << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Ira Smilovitz wrote: - quote - > Yesterday (it's now 4/17 here) the IRS announced a 48 hour
Nope. Tax year closed out April 15th.> extension of the filing/payment deadline for taxpayers > affected by the storms of the past weekend. > My purely hypothetical question is... would this extend the > deadline for 2003 amendments/refund claims which would have > reached the statute of limitations on 4/15 (4/17)? > Personally, I think that anyone who arranges their affairs > so poorly that they are up against a hard deadline deserves > whatever befalls them, but I'm curious just the same. ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| "Ira Smilovitz" <iras1[at]aol.com> wrote: - quote - > Yesterday (it's now 4/17 here) the IRS announced a 48 hour
The statute of limitiations is three years from the original> extension of the filing/payment deadline for taxpayers > affected by the storms of the past weekend. > My purely hypothetical question is... would this extend > the > deadline for 2003 amendments/refund claims which would > have > reached the statute of limitations on 4/15 (4/17)? filing deadline date in 2003, and therefore has nothing to do with 2007 filing deadlines or extensions. - quote - > Personally, I think that anyone who arranges their affairs
I agree.> so poorly that they are up against a hard deadline > deserves whatever befalls them, but I'm curious just the > same. << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > My purely hypothetical question is... would this extend the
Q: Does the storm relief apply to the individual tax refund> deadline for 2003 amendments/refund claims which would have > reached the statute of limitations on 4/15 (4/17)? claims for tax year 2003 where the regular three-year statute of limitations is expiring? A: No. We do not have the authority to extend the statute of limitations for the filing of the refund claims or any other time sensitive acts unless there is a Presidential disaster declaration. http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/...169543,00.html -- Don EA in Upstate NY << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| "Ira Smilovitz" <iras1[at]aol.com> wrote: - quote - > Yesterday (it's now 4/17 here) the IRS announced a 48 hour
I vote "no."> extension of the filing/payment deadline for taxpayers > affected by the storms of the past weekend. > My purely hypothetical question is... would this extend the > deadline for 2003 amendments/refund claims which would have > reached the statute of limitations on 4/15 (4/17)? Unlike the 4/17 due date, which is grounded in law (IRC 7503), this seems to be general noblesse oblige on the part of the IRS, using the administrative discretion that they have. I wouldn't rely on it for anything other than what they specifically cite. -- Phil Marti Clarksburg, MD << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| | |||
| |||
| "Ira Smilovitz" <iras1[at]aol.com> wrote: - quote - > Yesterday (it's now 4/17 here) the IRS announced a 48 hour
No.> extension of the filing/payment deadline for taxpayers > affected by the storms of the past weekend. > My purely hypothetical question is... would this extend the > deadline for 2003 amendments/refund claims which would have > reached the statute of limitations on 4/15 (4/17)? http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/...169543,00.html Frequently Asked Questions about the April 16, 2007, Storm Relief Q: Does the storm relief apply to the individual tax refund claims for tax year 2003 where the regular three-year statute of limitations is expiring? A: No. We do not have the authority to extend the statute of limitations for the filing of the refund claims or any other time sensitive acts unless there is a Presidential disaster declaration. << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Yesterday (it's now 4/17 here) the IRS announced a 48 hour extension of the filing/payment deadline for taxpayers affected by the storms of the past weekend. My purely hypothetical question is... would this extend the deadline for 2003 amendments/refund claims which would have reached the statute of limitations on 4/15 (4/17)? Personally, I think that anyone who arranges their affairs so poorly that they are up against a hard deadline deserves whatever befalls them, but I'm curious just the same. Ira Smilovitz << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| Tags |
| deadline, effect, extension, filing, irs, side |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Inheritance poses problems estimating tax due for extension filing Simon Baldwin: In 2005, I received distributions from an inheritance that seem to have triggered the need for me to be sent two Schedule K-1's and a Form 3520,... | Taxes | 3 | 06-29-2006 04:35 AM | |
| when is the deadline after filing 4868 David: Scoured through the IRS website to find out when the next deadline is for me. I filed for an extension using the 4868. This is a very simple... | Taxes | 12 | 05-26-2006 05:01 AM | |
| Filing Extension and Chances of Audit Todd Cool: Does filing for an extension increase or decrease the chances of an audit? I read somewhere that filing an extension actually deceases the chances.... | Taxes | 2 | 02-15-2006 02:37 AM | |
| Married filing jointly but requesting an extension - spouse is almost a resident alien ltbraswell@yahoo.com: I searched through the archives and couldn't find an answer so here goes: I am a US citizen. My wife (Belgian) and I were married in 2004. She... | Taxes | 1 | 04-15-2005 11:43 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |