|
#1
| |||
| |||
| "questioner" <mnquestio...[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > In 2006, three of us started and are equal shareholders in
The S-corp does not have to pay salaries to its> an s-corp. There are no other employees and we all worked > for the corp. We lost money in 2006. The loss does not > count any wages paid to the three of us - because there were > no wages paid. I now know that we were supposed to pay > ourselves and issue W-2s. I did not know that at the time. > Since we lost money and there was no money to pay ourselves, > do we need to correct the no-wage problem? We can't say we > paid ourselves when we didn't, can we? All the information > I can find is related to reclassifying pass-thru profits as > wages and we had no profit. > We may shut down in 2007. If we continue, we'll figure out > how to pay ourselves. We DID file an extension before March > 15. employee-shareholders in the specific circumstances you describe. << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| | |||
| |||
| "questioner" <mnquestioner[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > In 2006, three of us started and are equal shareholders in
You are not reqired to pay yourselves.> an s-corp. There are no other employees and we all worked > for the corp. We lost money in 2006. The loss does not > count any wages paid to the three of us - because there were > no wages paid. I now know that we were supposed to pay > ourselves and issue W-2s. I did not know that at the time. > Since we lost money and there was no money to pay ourselves, > do we need to correct the no-wage problem? We can't say we > paid ourselves when we didn't, can we? All the information > I can find is related to reclassifying pass-thru profits as > wages and we had no profit. > We may shut down in 2007. If we continue, we'll figure out > how to pay ourselves. We DID file an extension before March > 15. << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| In 2006, three of us started and are equal shareholders in an s-corp. There are no other employees and we all worked for the corp. We lost money in 2006. The loss does not count any wages paid to the three of us - because there were no wages paid. I now know that we were supposed to pay ourselves and issue W-2s. I did not know that at the time. Since we lost money and there was no money to pay ourselves, do we need to correct the no-wage problem? We can't say we paid ourselves when we didn't, can we? All the information I can find is related to reclassifying pass-thru profits as wages and we had no profit. We may shut down in 2007. If we continue, we'll figure out how to pay ourselves. We DID file an extension before March 15. << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| Tags |
| losing, money, scorp, wages |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Re: Small % of S corp profit paid as wages - problematic? Katie: Lance Mannion wrote: > I noticed on a past return that I only paid 15k as a W2 > wage, and 90k on Schedule E for my S corp. I know this > does... | Taxes | 7 | 05-06-2005 06:15 PM | |
| Re: Small % of S corp profit paid as wages - problematic? Lance Mannion: I noticed on a past return that I only paid 15k as a W2 wage, and 90k on Schedule E for my S corp. I know this does not meet the "reasonableness"... | Taxes | 6 | 05-06-2005 05:37 PM | |
| Re: Small % of S corp profit paid as wages - problematic? Bill Brown: Lance Mannion wrote: > I noticed on a past return that I only paid 15k as a W2 > wage, and 90k on Schedule E for my S corp. I know this > does... | Taxes | 1 | 05-02-2005 05:15 AM | |
| S-corp wages MTW: Can anyone cite something AUTHORITATIVE within the meaning of Circular 230, Section 10.34(d)(1) to support the theory that an S-corp shareholder... | Taxes | 28 | 11-01-2004 06:36 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |